CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 129Student Assessment and FeedbackEducational and Psychological AssessmentsEducational Assessment and Improvement

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 62 of the 63 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Formative Assessment: Improving Learning in Secondary Classrooms

OECD·2005·OECD eBooks
DOI 10.1787/9789264007413-en
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

This study features a collection of eight case studies of exemplary cases from secondary schools as well as international literature reviews and policy analysis related to formative assessment – the frequent assessments of student progress to identify learning needs and shape teaching. It examines such issues as benefits and barriers for using formative assessment, policy frameworks and implications, and formative assessment in practice. Achievement gains attributed to formative assessment are reported as being quite high, but it is not yet practiced systematically. This book makes the case for use of formative assessment and shows how it can be put into practice.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1787/9789264007413-en

Cites

62 of 62 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 63 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–129 of 129

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
OECD
Corresponding author
OECD
Venue
OECD eBooks
Publisher
OECD
Published
2005-01-25
DOI
10.1787/9789264007413-en
OpenAlex
W4247589335
Cited by
123
References
63
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 52 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 2
FWCI
2.00
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • OECD eBooks (publishedVersion)
  • Digital Access to Libraries (Université catholique de Louvain (UCL), l'Université de Namur (UNamur) and the Université Saint-Louis (USL-B)) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Student Assessment and Feedback
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Educational and Psychological Assessments
  • Social Sciences › Education › Educational Assessment and Improvement
Keywords
formative assessment, student progress monitoring, learning needs, teaching practice, secondary schools, achievement gains

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review