Cited by 15Agricultural Economics and PolicyAgricultural economics and policiesAgricultural Economics and Practices

OECD Review of Agricultural Policies: South Africa 2006

OECD·2006·OECD Review of Agricultural Policies

Abstract

OECD's first comprehensive OECD review of agricultural policies in South Africa, this book presents an overview of South Africa's agricultural policies combined with an assessment of the level of support provided to South Africa's agriculture.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1787/9789264021907-en

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 14 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
OECD
Corresponding author
OECD
Venue
OECD Review of Agricultural Policies
Publisher
OECD
Published
2006-04-19
ISSN
1990-004X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4249689243
Cited by
15
References
14
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2012: 3
FWCI
1.37
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • OECD review of agricultural policies (publishedVersion)
  • DIAL (Catholic University of Leuven) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agricultural Economics and Policy
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Agricultural economics and policies
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agricultural Economics and Practices
Keywords
agricultural policy, agricultural support, agricultural subsidies, South Africa, policy evaluation, agricultural development

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review