Cited by 590Early Childhood Education and DevelopmentEducation Systems and PoliciesGlobal Educational Policies and Reforms

Starting Strong II: Early Childhood Education and Care

OECD·2006·Starting Strong

Abstract

This review of early childhood education and care (ECEC) in twenty OECD countries describes the social, economic, conceptual and research factors that influence early childhood policy. These include increasing women’s labour market participation; reconciling work and family responsibilities on a more equitable basis for women; confronting the demographic challenges faced by OECD countries; and in particular, addressing issues of access, quality, diversity, child poverty and educational disadvantage. Starting Strong II outlines the progress made by the participating countries in responding to the key aspects of successful ECEC policy outlined in the previous volume, Starting Strong (OECD, 2001). It offers many examples of new policy initiatives adopted in the ECEC field. In their conclusion, the authors identify ten policy areas for further critical attention from governments. The book also presents country profiles, which give an overview of ECEC systems in all 20 participating countries.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1787/9789264035461-en

Cites

116 of 116 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • General quality assessments and parent surveys indicate that the quality of Swedish childcare is still high and that parents are generally very satisfied with the service.

    “General quality assessments, together with parent surveys, indicate, however, that the quality of the care is still high and that parents are generally very satisfied with the service (OECD, 2006; Swedish National Agency of Education 2018).”

    From Universalism in Welfare Policy: The Swedish Case beyond 1990 (2020) · cites this paper as OECD, 2006

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

6 of the 122 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
OECD
Corresponding author
OECD
Venue
Starting Strong
Publisher
OECD
Published
2006-09-14
ISSN
  • 2521-6023 (ISSN-L)
  • 2521-6031
OpenAlex
W4229741615
Cited by
582
References
122
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 37 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 33 · 2019: 29 · 2018: 42 · 2017: 48 · 2016: 48 · 2015: 44 · 2014: 40 · 2013: 39 · 2012: 39
FWCI
21.40
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Starting strong (publishedVersion)
  • DIAL (Catholic University of Leuven) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Early Childhood Education and Development
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management of Technology and Innovation › Education Systems and Policies
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Global Educational Policies and Reforms
Keywords
early childhood education and care, early childhood education policy, women's labour market participation, work-family balance, population problems, early childhood care quality, child poverty, educational disadvantage, OECD countries

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review