Cited by 100Ethics and Social Impacts of AIArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare and EducationDiversity and Career in Medicine

Bias in Artificial Intelligence

Open access
Nelson, Gregory S.·2019·North Carolina Medical Journal

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.18043/ncm.80.4.220

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nelson, G. S.
Affiliations
Duke University (US)
Corresponding author
Nelson, Gregory S.
Venue
North Carolina Medical Journal
Published
2019-07
Volume
80
Issue
4
Pages
220-222
ISSN
0029-2559 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2954580163
Cited by
100
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 3
FWCI
19.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • North Carolina Medical Journal (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Diversity and Career in Medicine
Keywords
algorithmic bias, artificial intelligence, algorithmic fairness, health care AI
MeSH terms
Artificial Intelligence, Humans, Bias

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review