Cited by 4Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPsychotherapy Techniques and ApplicationsPsychological Treatments and Assessments

Comparing skill enhanced and standard cognitive behavioral therapy for depression: A protocol for a randomized trial

Open access
Murphy, Samuel T., Strunk, Daniel R., Bailey, Brooklynn, Bartels, Graham C., Vittorio, Lisa N., Whelen, Megan L., Zhou, Robert J.·2021·International Journal of Clinical Trials

Abstract

Background: Cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) features prominently among the first-line treatments for depression. The development of CBT skills is associated with both symptom reductions and reduced risk for relapse, suggesting that improvements in CBT skills might be important to the benefits of CBT. Nonetheless, standard CBT places modest emphasis on the development of these skills. Methods: In this paper, we describe a randomized clinical trial testing the benefits of a variation of CBT that places greater emphasis on teaching patients CBT skills and makes patients' independent use of these skills a central therapeutic goal. Patients in this study (75 per condition) are being randomized to 12 weeks of standard or skill enhanced CBT for depression. The primary outcomes are change in symptoms and change in CBT skills. We will also evaluate the process of change in the treatments. Conclusions: This study has the potential to suggest an approach to enhancing CBT outcomes through greater focus on patients developing and independently using CBT skills. It will also provide an important context for understanding the role that CBT skills play in the therapeutic outcomes of CBT. Trial registration: The trial has been registered in ClinicalTrials.gov. Registration number: NCT04673513; registered on 17 December 2020.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.18203/2349-3259.ijct20214107

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so the self-check wasn’t run.

Cites

The publisher hasn’t deposited this paper’s reference list.

Research works printed but not linked: 38

  1. Strunk DR, Adler AD, Hollon SD. Cognitive therapy of depression. DeRubeis RJ, Strunk DR, Editors. The Oxford handbook of mood disorders. Oxford University. 2017;411-22.
  2. Cuijpers P, Karyotaki E, Weitz E, Andersson G, Hollon SD, van Straten A. The effects of psychotherapies for major depression in adults on remission, recovery and improvement: A meta-analysis. J Affect Disord. 2014;159:118-26
  3. Hollon SD, DeRubeis RJ, Shelton RC, Amsterdam JD, Salomon RM, O'Reardon JP, et al. Prevention of relapse following cognitive therapy vs medications in moderate to severe depression. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2005;62(4):417-22.
  4. Bruijniks SJ, DeRubeis RJ, Hollon SD, Huibers MJ. The potential role of learning capacity in cognitive behavior therapy for depression: A systematic review of the evidence and future directions for improving therapeutic learning. Clin Psychol Sci. 2019;7:668-92.
  5. Hundt NE, Mignogna J, Underhill C, Cully JA. The relationship between use of CBT skills and depression treatment outcome: a theoretical and methodological review of the literature. Behav Ther. 2013;44(1):12-26.
  6. Schmidt ID, Pfeifer BJ, Strunk DR. Putting the “cognitive” back in cognitive therapy: Sustained cognitive change as a mediator of in-session insights and depressive symptom improvement. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2019;87:446-56.
  7. Stone SJ, Strunk DR. Fostering Cognitive Change in Cognitive Therapy of Depression: An Investigation of Therapeutic Strategies. Cognitive Therap Res. 2020;44:21-7.
  8. Strunk DR, DeRubeis RJ, Chiu AW, Alvarez J. Patients' competence in and performance of cognitive therapy skills: Relation to the reduction of relapse risk following treatment for depression. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2007;75:523-30.
  9. Bruijniks SJ, Sijbrandij M, Schlinkert C, Huibers MJ. Isolating therapeutic procedures to investigate mechanisms of change in cognitive behavioral therapy for depression. J Exp Psychopathol. 2018;9:2043808718800893.
  10. Bruijniks SJ, Los SA, Huibers MJ. Direct effects of cognitive therapy skill acquisition on cognitive therapy skill use, idiosyncratic dysfunctional beliefs and emotions in distressed individuals: An experimental study. J Behav Therap Exp Psychiatr. 2020;67:101460.
  11. Salama I, Ivanova A, Qaqish B. Efficient generation of constrained block allocation sequences. Stat Med. 2008;27:1421-8.
  12. Moher D, Hopewell S, Schulz KF, Montori V, Gøtzsche PC, Devereaux PJ, et al. CONSORT 2010 explanation and elaboration: Updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. Int J Surg. 2012;10:28-55.
  13. Murphy ST, Cooper AA, Hollars SN, Strunk, DR. Who benefits from a cognitive vs. behavioral approach to treating depression? A pilot study of prescriptive predictors. Behav Therap. 2021;52(6):1433-48.
  14. Rush AJ, Trivedi MH, Ibrahim HM, Carmody TJ, Arnow B, Klein DN, et al. The 16-Item Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology (QIDS), clinician rating (QIDS-C), and self-report (QIDS-SR): a psychometric evaluation in patients with chronic major depression. Biol Psychiatry. 2003;54(5):573-83.
  15. Barber JP, DeRubeis RJ. The ways of responding: A scale to assess compensatory skills taught in cognitive therapy. Behavioral Assessment. 1992;14:93-115.
  16. Mundt JC, Marks IM, Shear MK, Greist JH. The Work and Social Adjustment Scale: a simple measure of impairment in functioning. Br J Psychiatry. 2002;180:461-4.
  17. Strunk DR, Hollars SN, Adler AD, Goldstein LA, Braun JD. Assessing patients’ cognitive therapy skills: Initial evaluation of the competencies of cognitive therapy scale. Cognitiv Ther Res. 2014;38:559-69.
  18. Kroenke K, Spitzer RL. The PHQ-9: A new depression diagnostic and severity measure. Psychiatr Ann. 2002;32:509515.
  19. Hatcher RL, Gillaspy JA. Development and validation of a revised short version of the Working Alliance Inventory. Psychotherap Res. 2006;16:12-25
  20. Harvey AG, Dong L, Lee JY, Gumport NB, Hollon SD, Rabe-Hesketh S, et al. Can integrating the Memory Support Intervention into cognitive therapy improve depression outcome? Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2017;18(1):539.
  21. Spitzer RL, Kroenke K, Williams JB, Löwe, B. A brief measure for assessing generalized anxiety disorder: the GAD-7. Arch Int Med. 2006;166:1092-7.
  22. Weissman AN. The Dysfunctional Attitude Scale: A validation study. Dissertation Abstracts International, 1979;40:1389-90.
  23. Nolen-Hoeksema S, Morrow J. A prospective study of depression and posttraumatic stress symptoms after a natural disaster: The 1989 Loma Prieta earthquake. J Personal Soc Psychol. 1991;61:115-21.
  24. Whitmer A, Gotlib, IH. Brooding and reflection reconsidered: A factor analytic examination of rumination in currently depressed, formerly depressed, and never depressed individuals. Cognitiv Therap Res. 2011;35:99-107.
  25. Krueger RF, Derringer J, Markon KE, Watson D, Skodol AE. Initial construction of a maladaptive personality trait model and inventory for DSM-5. Psychol Med. 2012;42(9):1879-90.
  26. Cohen S, Kamarck T, Mermelstein R. Perceived Stress Scale. Measuring Stress: A Guide for Health and Social Scientists. 1994;10:1-2.
  27. Dohrenwend BS, Krasnoff L, Askenasy AR, Dohrenwend BP. Exemplification of a method for scaling life events: The PERI Life Events Scale. J Health Soc Behav. 1978;19:205-29.
  28. Hofmann SG, Carpenter JK, Curtiss J. Interpersonal Emotion Regulation Questionnaire (IERQ): Scale Development and Psychometric Characteristics. Cognit Ther Res. 2016;40(3):341-56.
  29. Barkham M, Hardy GE, Startup M. The IIP-32: A short version of the Inventory of Interpersonal Problems. Br J Clin Psychol. 1996;35:21-35.
  30. DeRubeis RJ, Gelfand LA, German RE, Fournier JC, Forand NR. Understanding processes of change: How some patients reveal more than others—and some groups of therapists less—about what matters in psychotherapy. Psychother Res. 2014;24:419-28.
  31. Devilly GJ, Borkovec TD. Psychometric properties of the credibility/expectancy questionnaire. J Behav Therap Exp Psychiatr. 2000;31:73-86.
  32. Fitzpatrick OM, Whelen ML, Falkenström F, Strunk DR. Who benefits the most from cognitive change in cognitive therapy of depression? A study of interpersonal factors. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2020;88(2):128-36.
  33. Sasso KE, Strunk DR, Braun JD, DeRubeis RJ, Brotman MA. Identifying moderators of the adherence-outcome relation in cognitive therapy for depression. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2015;83:976-84.
  34. Huibers MJH, Lorenzo-Luaces L, Cuijpers P, Kazantzis N. On the Road to Personalized Psychotherapy: A Research Agenda Based on Cognitive Behavior Therapy for Depression. Front Psychiatry. 2021;11:607508.
  35. Cohen ZD, DeRubeis RJ. Treatment selection in depression. Ann Rev Clin Psychol. 2018;14:209-36.
  36. Murphy, S. T., Bailey, B., Bartels, G. C., Vittorio, L. N., Whelen, M. L., Zhou, R. J., & Strunk, D. R. (2021). Comparing skill enhanced and standard cognitive behavioral therapy for depression: a protocol for a randomized trial. International Journal of Clinical Trials, 8(4), 285–291. https://doi.org/10.18203/2349-3259.ijct20214107
  37. Vol. 8 No. 4 (2021): October-December 2021
  38. International Journal of Clinical Trials. Copyright © 2026.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Murphy, S. T., Strunk, D. R., Bailey, B., Bartels, G. C., Vittorio, L. N., Whelen, M. L., & Zhou, R. J.
Affiliations
The Ohio State University (US)
Venue
International Journal of Clinical Trials
Publisher
Medip Academy
Published
2021-10-22
Volume
8
Issue
4
Pages
285
ISSN
  • 2349-3240 (ISSN-L)
  • 2349-3259
OpenAlex
W3209958302
Cited by
4
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2023: 3
FWCI
0.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
International Journal of Clinical Trials (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychological Treatments and Assessments
Keywords
cognitive behavioral therapy, depression, change processes, relapse prevention, treatment outcomes

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review