The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Assessing Elementary School Students' Conceptions Of Engineering And Technology
Open accessAbstract
Abstract As our society becomes increasingly dependent on engineering and technology, it is more important than ever that our citizens are technologically literate [1]. There are many possible ways to develop technological literacy—one of the most wide-reaching is through K-12 schools. The Museum of Science, Boston is working to create curricular materials and professional development for K-12 students and teachers. However, previous research in science has evinced that responsible curriculum development draws upon and is shaped by students’ conceptions and misconceptions [2]. While the field of science education research has generated (and continues to develop) a strong base of research about students’ conceptions for educators, developers, and scholars to reference, similar efforts in technology and engineering education research are nascent. A literature review surfaced only a handful of relevant studies. There have been few studies that probe students’ understanding of design [3], and students’ conceptions of strength of materials and stability [4]. The International Technology Education Association (ITEA) has conducted one study of adults’ thinking about technology and engineering [5]. Clearly, much more research is needed in this area to guide the field [4-6]. One of stumbling blocks that has been identified is that scholars have not yet come to consensus on the specific concepts and process understandings that comprise technological literacy [7]. More clarification at the national, state, district, or project level could provide some guidelines. However, we have chosen to begin to investigate conceptions at a much more basic level; specifically, what do students think engineering and technology are? One could argue that for any person to be technologically literate, s/he must first have some idea of what engineering and technology are. Though they are surrounded by the products of engineering in our everyday lives, students and the general public generally don’t understand what engineers do [8-10]. A dearth of information currently exists that probes students’ understandings of these fundamental concepts. This paper reports the creation of one instrument developed to assess these concepts in students. It presents some statistical data from 504 students who have completed the survey and draws some preliminary conclusions about what the average child thinks engineering and technology are. It concludes with some further uses for the instrument and next steps for the research agenda.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Accommodation of a scientific conception: Toward a theory of conceptual change
Posner, G. J., Strike, K. A., Hewson, P. W., & Gertzog, W. A. (1982) · Science Education · doi:10.1002/sce.3730660207 · Cited by 5,187
Cited by
Advancing engineering education in P–12 classrooms
Brophy, S., Klein, S., Portsmore, M., & Rogers, C. (2008) · Journal of Engineering Education · doi:10.1002/j.2168-9830.2008.tb00985.x · Cited by 910
Engineering in K–12 Education: Understanding the Status and Improving the Prospects
(2010) · INSIGHT · doi:10.1002/inst.20101338 · Cited by 816
Boucher, K. L., Fuesting, M. A., Diekman, A. B., & Murphy, M. C. (2017) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00901 · Cited by 140
“Students do not often see the links to communal goals evident in STEM work (e.g., sustainability, food availability, medical innovations; Cunningham et al., 2005; National Academy of Engineering, 2008; Klotz et al., 2014).”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Cunningham, C., Lachapelle, C., & Lindgren-Streicher, A.
- Venue
- 2005 Annual Conference Proceedings
- Publisher
- ASEE Conferences
- Published
- 2020-09-03
- Pages
- 10.227.1-10.227.10
- OpenAlex
- W138483784
- Cited by
- 180
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 55.04
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Assessing Elementary School Students' Conceptions Of Engineering And Technology. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.18260/1-2--14836
- The paper
- Cunningham, C., Lachapelle, C., & Lindgren-Streicher, A. (2020). Assessing Elementary School Students' Conceptions Of Engineering And Technology. 2005 Annual Conference Proceedings. https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2--14836
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.