Cited by 140Career Development and DiversityScience Education and PerceptionsGender and Technology in Education

Can I Work with and Help Others in This Field? How Communal Goals Influence Interest and Participation in STEM Fields

Open access
Boucher, Kathryn L., Fuesting, Melissa A., Diekman, Amanda B., Murphy, Mary C.·2017·Frontiers in Psychology

Abstract

Although science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) disciplines as a whole have made advances in gender parity and greater inclusion for women, these increases have been smaller or nonexistent in computing and engineering compared to other fields. In this focused review, we discuss how stereotypic perceptions of computing and engineering influence who enters, stays, and excels in these fields. We focus on communal goal incongruity--the idea that some STEM disciplines like engineering and computing are perceived as less aligned with people’s communal goals of collaboration and helping others. In Part 1, we review the empirical literature that demonstrates how perceptions that these disciplines are incongruent with communal goals can especially deter women and girls, who highly endorse communal goals. In Part 2, we extend this perspective by reviewing accumulating evidence that perceived communal goal incongruity can deter any individual who values communal goals. Communal opportunities within computing and engineering have the potential to benefit first generation college students, underrepresented minority students, and communally-oriented men (as well as communally-oriented women). We describe the implications of this body of literature: describing how opting out of STEM in order to pursue fields perceived to encourage the pursuit of communal goals leave the stereotypic (mis)perceptions of computing and engineering unchanged and exacerbate female underrepresentation. In Part 3, we close with recommendations for how communal opportunities in computing and engineering can be highlighted to increase interest and motivation. By better integrating and publically acknowledging communal opportunities, the stereotypic perceptions of these fields could gradually change, making computing and engineering more inclusive and welcoming to all.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00901

Cites

76 of 76 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Utility value interventions help students see the relevance of education to their lives by encouraging them to identify the value of the content of a given field of study to them and their lives.

    “Utility value interventions help students see the relevance of education to their lives by encouraging them to identify the value of the content of a given field of study to them and their lives”

    From Tackling Educational Inequalities with Social Psychology: Identities, Contexts, and Interventions (2021) · cites this paper as Boucher, Fuesting, Diekman, & Murphy, 2017

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 79 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Alvarado C. Dodds Z. (2010). Women in CS: An evaluation of three promising practices, in Proceedings of the 41st SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, New York, NY; Milwaukee, WI: ACM Press 10– 13; 57–61.
  2. Boucher K. L. Murphy M. C. (2017). Why So few?: The Role of Social Identity and Situational Cues in Understanding the Underrepresentation of Women in STEM Fields. Self and Social Identity in Educational Contexts. New York, NY: Routledge.
  3. Fiske S. T. (2004). Social Beings: A Core Motives Approach to Social Psychology. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
  4. Hamilton D. L. Sherman J. W. (1994). Stereotypes, in Handbook of Social Cognition, Vol. 2, Applications, eds Wyer R. S. Srull a T. K. (Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum), 1– 68.
  5. National Academy of Engineering (2008). Changing the Conversation: Messages for Improving Public Understanding of Engineering. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
  6. National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, Institute of Medicine, Rising above the Gathering Storm Committee (2010). Rising Above the Gathering Storm, Revisited: Rapidly Approaching Category 5. Washington, DC: National Academies Press. 25506949

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Boucher, K. L., Fuesting, M. A., Diekman, A. B., & Murphy, M. C.
Affiliations
  • University of Indianapolis (US)
  • Miami University (US)
  • Indiana University Bloomington (US)
Corresponding author
Boucher, Kathryn L.
Venue
Frontiers in Psychology
Published
2017-05-31
Volume
8
Pages
901-901
ISSN
1664-1078 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2618805775
Cited by
140
References
79
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 28 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1
FWCI
2.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Frontiers in Psychology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
National Science Foundation (1232364, 1450755)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Career Development and Diversity
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Science Education and Perceptions
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender and Technology in Education
Keywords
communal goals, STEM interest, computing, gender stereotypes, women in STEM, underrepresentation of women, first-generation college students, underrepresented minorities, career choice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review