The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Improving Performance in Trigonometry and Pre-Calculus by Incorporating Adaptive Learning Technology into Blended Models on Campus
Open accessAbstract
Tonya Troka, with more than 10 years of experience
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Additionally, students who took courses with AL performed better in the following calculus courses”
From Using an adaptive learning tool to improve student performance and satisfaction in online and face-to-face education for a more personalized approach (2024) · cites this paper as Daines et al., 2016
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Similarly, the average pass rate in Precalculus increased from 66 to 94%, and average withdrawal rates decreased from 45 to 13%.”
From Using an adaptive learning tool to improve student performance and satisfaction in online and face-to-face education for a more personalized approach (2024) · cites this paper as Daines et al., 2016
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Colorado Technical University integrated its AL tool into its face-to-face Trigonometry and Pre-calculus courses, increasing the average pass rate from 76 to 94%, and average withdrawal rates decreased from 36 to 17% in Trigonometry.”
From Using an adaptive learning tool to improve student performance and satisfaction in online and face-to-face education for a more personalized approach (2024) · cites this paper as Daines et al., 2016
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Similar studies show positive effects in increase in average and decrease in dropout (Daines et al., 2016).”
From Using an adaptive learning tool to improve student performance and satisfaction in online and face-to-face education for a more personalized approach (2024) · cites this paper as Daines et al., 2016
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- Blair, R., Kirkman, E. E., & Maxwell, J. W. (2013). Statistical abstract of undergraduate programs in the mathematical sciences in the Unites States: Fall 2010 CBMS survey. Retrieved from http://www.ams.org/profession/data/cbms-survey/cbms2010-Report.pdf
- Brusilovsky, P., & Millán, E. (2007). User models for adaptive hypermedia and adaptive educational systems. In P. Brusilovsky, A. Kobsa, & W. Nejdl (Eds.), The adaptive web (pp. 3-53). New York: Springer.
- Small, D. (2002). An urgent call to improve traditional college algebra programs, MAA Focus, May/June 2002 issue. (Summary of the Conference to Improve College algebra held at the U.S. Military Academy, February 7-10, 2002.)
Cited by
Sorted by citations
El-Sabagh, H. A. (2021) · International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education · doi:10.1186/s41239-021-00289-4 · Cited by 566
Contrino, M. F., Reyes-Millán, M., Vázquez-Villegas, P., & Membrillo-Hernández, J. (2024) · Smart Learning Environments · doi:10.1186/s40561-024-00292-y · Cited by 158
“Similar studies show positive effects in increase in average and decrease in dropout (Daines et al., 2016).”
BackgroundResultInfluentialMirata, V., Hirt, F., Bergamin, P., & van der Westhuizen, C. (2020) · International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education · doi:10.1186/s41239-020-00209-y · Cited by 135
Metadata
- Authors
- Daines, J., Troka, T., & Santiago, J.
- Affiliations
- Colorado Technical University (US)
- Venue
- 2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings
- Publisher
- ASEE Conferences
- Published
- 2016-07-06
- OpenAlex
- W2613121707
- Cited by
- 17
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2018: 4
- FWCI
- 10.64
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Online and Blended Learning
- Social Sciences › Education › Mathematics Education and Programs
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning
- Keywords
- trigonometry, precalculus, adaptive learning systems, blended learning, mathematics achievement
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
