Cited by 9Political Dynamics in Latin AmericaPolitics and Society in Latin AmericaElectoral Systems and Political Participation

El sistema de partidos en México: fragmentación y consolidación

Open access
Méndez de Hoyos, Irma·2007·Perfiles Latinoamericanos

Abstract

En este artículo se analizan algunas de las características del actual sistema de partidos en México, en particular su grado de fragmentación y el funcionamiento de sus partidos. Se argumenta que la creciente fragmentación de dicho sistema podría vincularse con el deterioro de las funciones de representación e institucionales de los partidos. En este sentido se explora la relación del número de partidos con una serie de indicadores de las funciones sistémicas de los partidos como la competitividad electoral, la participación política y la estabilidad gubernamental, así como la confianza en los partidos políticos y la satisfacción ciudadana con la democracia. El propósito es discutir algunas de las características del nuevo sistema de partidos mexicano en el marco de la consolidación democrática, y al mismo tiempo explorar la relación de su funcionamiento con el crecimiento del número de partidos en el periodo 1979-2003.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.18504/pl1429-007-2007

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • México tiene un sistema político multipartidista que puede sugerir diferentes patrones de polarización dada la multiplicidad de actores políticos que estructuran la dinámica de las interacciones en redes socio-digitales, particularmente en Twitter.

    “México tiene un sistema político multipartidista que puede sugerir diferentes patrones de polarización dada la multiplicidad de actores políticos que estructuran la dinámica de las interacciones en redes socio-digitales, particularmente en Twitter donde tienden a concentrarse (Méndez de Hoyos, 2007).”

    From Polarización, heterogeneidad política y redes sociales en México: un análisis comparativo de #PresidenteRompaElPacto, #FRENA y #RevocacionDeMandato en Twitter (2023) · cites this paper as Méndez de Hoyos, 2007

    Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 17

  1. Diamond, Larry y Richard Gunther, (eds.), 2001, Political Parties and Democracy, usa, The Johns Hopkins University Press.
  2. Dunleavy, Patrick and Fancois Boucek, 2003, "Constructing the Number of Parties", en Party Politics, vol. 9, núm. 3, Reino Unido.
  3. Gunther, Richard y Larry Diamond, 2001, "Types and Functions of Parties", en Political Par- ties and Democracy, Larry Diamond y Richard Gunther, (eds.), usa, The Johns Hopkins University Press.
  4. Huntington, Samuel P., 1968, Political Order in Changing Societies, usa, Yale University Press.
  5. Lijphart, Arend, 1994, Electoral Systems and Party Systems. A Study of 27 Democracies, 1945- 1990, usa, Oxford Press.
  6. Mainwaring, Scott y Timothy Scully, 1995, 1995, Building Democratic Institution, usa, Stanford University Press.
  7. -----y Matthew Soberg Shugart, (eds.), 2002, Presidencialismo y democracia en América Latina, Argentina, Paidós.
  8. -----y Torcal Mariano, 2005, "La institucionalización de los sistemas de partidos y la teoría del sistema partidista después de la tercera ola democratizadora", en América Latina Hoy. Revista de Ciencias Sociales, vol. 41, diciembre, Salamanca, Ediciones Universidad Sala- manca.
  9. Molinar Horcasitas, Juan, 1991, "Counting the Number of Parties: An Alternative Index", en American Political Science Review, núm. 85, usa.
  10. Rae, Douglas, 1967, The Political Consequences of Electoral Laws, usa, Yale University Press.
  11. -----, 1976, Parties and Party Systems, usa, Cambridge University Press.
  12. Schmitter, Philippe C., 2001, "Parties are not What they Once Were", en Political Parties and Democracy, Larry Diamond y Richard Gunther, (eds.), usa, The Johns Hopkins University Press.
  13. Taagepera, Rein, 1999, "Supmementing the Effective Number of Parties", en Electoral Stud- ies, vol. 18, núm. 4, Reino Unido.
  14. -----, 1997, "Effective Number of Parties for Incomplete Data", Electoral Studies, vol. 16, núm. 2, Reino Unido.
  15. -----, y Matthew Soberg Shugart, 1989, Seats and Votes The Effects and Determinants of Elec- toral Systems, usa, Yale University Press.
  16. Taylor, Michael, y V.M. Herman, 1971, "Party Systems and Government Stability", en The American Political Science Review, vol. 65, núm. 1, usa.
  17. Ware, Alan, 1996, Political Parties and Party Systems, usa, Oxford University Press.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Méndez de Hoyos, I.
Venue
Perfiles Latinoamericanos
Published
2007-01-01
Volume
14
Issue
29
Pages
7-45
ISSN
  • 0188-7653 (ISSN-L)
  • 2309-4982
OpenAlex
W2106433342
Cited by
9
References
1
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
es
Open access
Locations
  • Perfiles Latinoamericanos (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Redalyc (Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Americanae (AECID Library) (submittedVersion)
  • Dialnet (Universidad de la Rioja) (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Redalyc (Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Political Dynamics in Latin America
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Politics and Society in Latin America
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Electoral Systems and Political Participation
Keywords
party system, party fragmentation, party consolidation, Mexican party system, number of political parties, electoral competitiveness, political participation, government stability, trust in political parties, democratic consolidation, party functions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review