The DOI matches its Crossref record; 58 of the 58 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Dosing Frequency and Medication Adherence in Chronic Disease
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Prior research has shown a decrease in medication adherence as dosing frequency increases; however, meta-analyses have not been able to demonstrate a significant inverse relationship between dosing frequency and adherence when comparing twice-daily versus once-daily dosing. OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect of scheduled dosing frequency on medication adherence in patients with chronic diseases. METHODS: A systematic literature search of Medline and Embase from January 1986 to December 2011 and a hand search of references were performed to identify eligible studies. Randomized and observational studies were included if they utilized a prospective design, assessed adult patients with chronic diseases, evaluated scheduled oral medications taken 1 to 4 times daily, and measured medication adherence for at least 1 month using an electronic monitoring device. Manual searches of reference sections of identified studies and systematic reviews were also performed to find other potentially relevant articles. Standard definitions for medication taking, regimen, and timing adherence were used and evaluated. Studies were pooled using a multivariate linear mixed-model method to conduct meta-regression accounting for both random and fixed effects, weighted by the inverse of the variance of medication adherence. RESULTS: Fifty-one studies, comprising 65, 76, and 47 dosing frequency arms for the taking, regimen, and timing adherence endpoints were included. Unadjusted adherence estimates were highest when the least stringent definition, taking adherence, was used (range for dosing frequencies: 80.1%-93.0%) and lowest when the most stringent definition, timing adherence, was used (range for dosing frequencies: 18.8%-76.9%). In multivariate meta-regression analyses, the adjusted weighted mean percentage adherence rates for all regimens dosed more frequently than once per day were significantly lower compared with once-daily regimens (for 2-times, 3-times, and 4-times daily regimens, respectively: differences for taking adherence: -6.7%, -13.5%, and -19.2%; regimen adherence: -13.1%, -24.9%, and -23.1%; and timing adherence: -26.7%, -39.0%, and -54.2%). CONCLUSION: Patients with chronic diseases appear to be more adherent with once-daily compared with more frequently scheduled medication regimens. The use of more stringent definitions of adherence magnified these findings.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Osterberg, L., & Blaschke, T. (2005) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmra050100 · Cited by 7,974
A systematic review of the associations between dose regimens and medication compliance
Claxton, A. J., Cramer, J., & Pierce, C. (2001) · Clinical Therapeutics · doi:10.1016/s0149-2918(01)80109-0 · Cited by 2,388
Long-term persistence in use of statin therapy in elderly patients
Benner, J. S. (2002) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.288.4.455 · Cited by 1,232
Ho, P. M., Rumsfeld, J. S., Masoudi, F. A., McClure, D. L., Plomondon, M. E., Steiner, J. F., & Magid, D. J. (2006) · Archives of Internal Medicine · doi:10.1001/archinte.166.17.1836 · Cited by 1,135
How often is medication taken as prescribed? A novel assessment technique
Cramer, J. A. (1989) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.261.22.3273 · Cited by 1,021
The Effect of Prescribed Daily Dose Frequency on Patient Medication Compliance
Eisen, S. A. (1990) · Archives of Internal Medicine · doi:10.1001/archinte.150.9.1881 · Cited by 817
Brian Haynes, R., Ann McKibbon, K., & Kanani, R. (1996) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(96)01073-2 · Cited by 645
Persistence of Use of Lipid-Lowering Medications: A Cross-National Study
Avorn, J., Monette, J., Lacour, A., Bohn, R. L., Monane, M., Mogun, H., & LeLorier, J. (1998) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.279.18.1458 · Cited by 634
Hospital Admissions Resulting from Preventable Adverse Drug Reactions
McDonnell, P. J., & Jacobs, M. R. (2002) · The Annals of Pharmacotherapy · doi:10.1345/1542-6270(2002)036<1331:harfpa>2.0.co;2 · Cited by 587
Impact of Dosage Frequency on Patient Compliance
Paes, A. H. P., Bakker, A., & Soe-Agnie, C. J. (1997) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/diacare.20.10.1512 · Cited by 408
Cited by
Polonsky, W., & Henry, R. (2016) · Patient Preference and Adherence · doi:10.2147/ppa.s106821 · Cited by 784
“43,44 Beyond the influence of dosing schedules, recent data suggest that the overall complexity of the T2D medication regimen predicts adherence, with greater complexity contributing to poorer adherence.”
Covalent inhibitors: a rational approach to drug discovery
Sutanto, F., Konstantinidou, M., & Dömling, A. (2020) · RSC Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1039/d0md00154f · Cited by 389
Rethinking adherence: a health literacy—informed model of medication self-management
Bailey, S. C., Oramasionwu, C. U., & Wolf, M. S. (2013) · Journal of Health Communication · doi:10.1080/10810730.2013.825672 · Cited by 160
Medication nonadherence and psychiatry
Chapman, S. C. E., & Horne, R. (2013) · Current Opinion in Psychiatry · doi:10.1097/yco.0b013e3283642da4 · Cited by 142
Weeda, E. R., Muraoka, A. K., Brock, M. D., & Cannon, J. M. (2021) · International Journal of Clinical Practice · doi:10.1111/ijcp.14060 · Cited by 73
Metadata
- Authors
- Coleman, C. I., Limone, B., Sobieraj, D. M., Lee, S., Roberts, M. S., Kaur, R., & Alam, T.
- Venue
- Journal of Managed Care Pharmacy
- Publisher
- Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy
- Published
- 2012-09
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 527-539
- ISSN
- 1083-4087 (ISSN-L)
- 1944-706X
- OpenAlex
- W2235318197
- Cited by
- 432
- References
- 58
- FWCI
- 22.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Dosing Frequency and Medication Adherence in Chronic Disease. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.18553/jmcp.2012.18.7.527
- The paper
- Coleman, C. I., Limone, B., Sobieraj, D. M., Lee, S., Roberts, M. S., Kaur, R., & Alam, T. (2012). Dosing Frequency and Medication Adherence in Chronic Disease. Journal of Managed Care Pharmacy. https://doi.org/10.18553/jmcp.2012.18.7.527
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.