Cited by 63Online Learning and AnalyticsDigital Education and SocietyEthics and Social Impacts of AI

Ethical Challenges for Learning Analytics

Open access
Ferguson, Rebecca·2019·Journal of Learning Analytics

Abstract

This response to Neil Selwyn’s paper, ‘What’s the problem with learning analytics?’, relates his work to the ethical challenges associated with learning analytics and proposes six ethical challenges for the field.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.18608/jla.2019.63.5

Cites

19 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Issues of fairness and equity in educational AI (AIEd) systems have received comparatively little attention.

    “issues of fairness and equity in educational AI (AIEd) systems have received comparatively little attention (Blikstein, 2018; Ferguson, 2019; Holmes, Bialik, & Fadel, 2019; Holstein & Doroudi, 2019; Shum & Luckin, 2019).”

    From Equity and Artificial Intelligence in Education: Will "AIEd" Amplify or Alleviate Inequities in Education? (2021) · cites this paper as Ferguson, 2019

    Section 2.4, “Equality and Justice” (page not provided), says these challenges have not yet been fully explored in learning analytics. That supports the claim of limited attention, but the paper does not establish it for educational AI systems generally. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Evrard, A. E., & Teplovs, C. (2017). Community building around a shared history: Rebooting academic reporting tools at the University of Michigan. Paper presented at the 7th International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge (LAK '17), 13-17 March 2017, Vancouver, BC, Canada (practitioner track).
  2. Ferguson, R., Hoel, T., Scheffel, M., & Drachsler, H. (2016). Ethics and privacy in learning analytics. Journal of Learning Analytics, 3(1), 5-15.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ferguson, R.
Affiliations
The Open University (GB)
Corresponding author
Ferguson, Rebecca
Venue
Journal of Learning Analytics
Published
2019-12-13
Volume
6
Issue
3
ISSN
1929-7750 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2995279764
Cited by
62
References
21
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2
FWCI
7.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-nd
Locations
  • Journal of Learning Analytics (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Open Research Online - ORO (The Open University) (acceptedVersion)
  • Cosmopolitan Civil Societies: An Interdisciplinary Journal (University of Technology Sydney) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Online Learning and Analytics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Digital Education and Society
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Keywords
learning analytics, ethics, ethical considerations, data privacy, school surveillance, student data

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review