Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 305

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 70 of the 70 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Proteomic profiling of NCI-60 extracellular vesicles uncovers common protein cargo and cancer type-specific biomarkers

Open access
Hurwitz, Stephanie N., Rider, Mark A., Bundy, Joseph L., Liu, Xia, Singh, Rakesh K., Meckes, David G.·2016·Oncotarget

Abstract

// Stephanie N. Hurwitz 1, * , Mark A. Rider 1, * , Joseph L. Bundy 1, * , Xia Liu 1 , Rakesh K. Singh 1 , David G. Meckes Jr. 1 1 Department of Biomedical Sciences, Florida State University College of Medicine, Tallahassee, FL, 32306, USA * These authors contributed equally to this work Correspondence to: David G. Meckes Jr., email: david.meckes@med.fsu.edu Keywords: exosomes, microvesicles, co-inertia, proteomics, biomarkers Received: September 28, 2016 Accepted: November 07, 2016 Published: November 24, 2016 ABSTRACT Packed with biological information, extracellular vesicles (EVs) offer exciting promise for biomarker discovery and applications in therapeutics and non-invasive diagnostics. Currently, our understanding of EV contents is confined by the limited cells from which vesicles have been characterized utilizing the same enrichment method. Using sixty cell lines from the National Cancer Institute (NCI-60), here we provide the largest proteomic profile of EVs in a single study, identifying 6,071 proteins with 213 common to all isolates. Proteins included established EV markers, and vesicular trafficking proteins such as Rab GTPases and tetraspanins. Differentially-expressed proteins offer potential for cancer diagnosis and prognosis. Network analysis of vesicle quantity and proteomes identified EV components associated with vesicle secretion, including CD81, CD63, syntenin-1, VAMP3, Rab GTPases, and integrins. Integration of vesicle proteomes with whole-cell molecular profiles revealed similarities, suggesting EVs provide a reliable reflection of their progenitor cell content, and are therefore excellent indicators of disease.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.18632/oncotarget.13569

Cites

70 of 70 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 70 references

Cited by

See all 305

Metadata

Authors
Hurwitz, S. N., Rider, M. A., Bundy, J. L., Liu, X., Singh, R. K., & Meckes, D. G.
Venue
Oncotarget
Published
2016-11-24
Volume
7
Issue
52
Pages
86999-87015
ISSN
1949-2553 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2556224708
Cited by
305
References
70
FWCI
10.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
diamond

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Proteomic profiling of NCI-60 extracellular vesicles uncovers common protein cargo and cancer type-specific biomarkers. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.18632/oncotarget.13569
The paper
Hurwitz, S. N., Rider, M. A., Bundy, J. L., Liu, X., Singh, R. K., & Meckes, D. G. (2016). Proteomic profiling of NCI-60 extracellular vesicles uncovers common protein cargo and cancer type-specific biomarkers. Oncotarget. https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.13569

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.