The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Multivariate Dose-Response Meta-Analysis: The dosresmetaR Package
Open accessAbstract
An increasing number of quantitative reviews of epidemiological data includes a doseresponse analysis. Aims of this paper are to describe the main aspects of the methodology and to illustrate the novel R package dosresmeta developed for multivariate dose-response meta-analysis of summarized data. Specific topics covered are reconstructing covariances of correlated outcomes; pooling of study-specific trends; flexible modeling of the exposure; testing hypothesis; assessing statistical heterogeneity; and presenting in either a graphical or tabular way the overall dose-response association.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Maximum Likelihood Approaches to Variance Component Estimation and to Related Problems
Harville, D. A. (1977) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1977.10480998 · Cited by 2,667
Methods for Trend Estimation from Summarized Dose-Response Data, with Applications to Meta-Analysis
Greenland, S., & Longnecker, M. P. (1992) · American Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a116237 · Cited by 2,353
Multivariate meta-analysis for non-linear and other multi-parameter associations
Gasparrini, A., Armstrong, B., & Kenward, M. G. (2012) · Statistics in Medicine · doi:10.1002/sim.5471 · Cited by 772
Cited by
Association Between Physical Activity and Risk of Depression: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
Pearce, M., Garcia, L., Abbas, A., Strain, T., Schuch, F. B., Golubic, R., Kelly, P., Khan, S., Utukuri, M., Laird, Y., et al. (2022) · JAMA Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2022.0609 · Cited by 1,332
Wang, D. D., Li, Y., Bhupathiraju, S. N., Rosner, B. A., Sun, Q., Giovannucci, E. L., Rimm, E. B., Manson, J. E., Willett, W. C., Stampfer, M. J., et al. (2021) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/circulationaha.120.048996 · Cited by 435
Iso-Markku, P., Kujala, U. M., Knittle, K., Polet, J., Vuoksimaa, E., & Waller, K. (2022) · British Journal of Sports Medicine · doi:10.1136/bjsports-2021-104981 · Cited by 423
One-stage dose–response meta-analysis for aggregated data
Crippa, A., Discacciati, A., Bottai, M., Spiegelman, D., & Orsini, N. (2019) · Statistical Methods in Medical Research · doi:10.1177/0962280218773122 · Cited by 365
Self-citationAn extended mixed‐effects framework for meta‐analysis
Sera, F., Armstrong, B., Blangiardo, M., & Gasparrini, A. (2019) · Statistics in Medicine · doi:10.1002/sim.8362 · Cited by 323
Metadata
- Authors
- Crippa, A., & Orsini, N.
- Venue
- Journal of Statistical Software
- Publisher
- Foundation for Open Access Statistic
- Published
- 2016
- Volume
- 72
- Issue
- Code Snippet 1
- ISSN
- 1548-7660 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2524723291
- Cited by
- 204
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 8.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Multivariate Dose-Response Meta-Analysis: The dosresmetaR Package. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.18637/jss.v072.c01
- The paper
- Crippa, A., & Orsini, N. (2016). Multivariate Dose-Response Meta-Analysis: The dosresmetaR Package. Journal of Statistical Software. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v072.c01
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
