Cited by 65Topic ModelingNatural Language Processing TechniquesAdvanced Neural Network Applications

Improving Transformer Models by Reordering their Sublayers

Open access
Press, Ofir, Smith, Noah A., Levy, Omer·2020·Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics

Abstract

Multilayer transformer networks consist of interleaved self-attention and feedforward sublayers.Could ordering the sublayers in a different pattern lead to better performance?We generate randomly ordered transformers and train them with the language modeling objective.We observe that some of these models are able to achieve better performance than the interleaved baseline, and that those successful variants tend to have more self-attention at the bottom and more feedforward sublayers at the top.We propose a new transformer pattern that adheres to this property, the sandwich transformer, and show that it improves perplexity on multiple word-level and character-level language modeling benchmarks, at no cost in parameters, memory, or training time.However, the sandwich reordering pattern does not guarantee performance gains across every task, as we demonstrate on machine translation models.Instead, we suggest that further exploration of task-specific sublayer reorderings is needed in order to unlock additional gains. 1

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.18653/v1/2020.acl-main.270

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Cumulative noise effect increases response latency and accelerates nonlinear consumption of computational and storage resources, threatening scalability and stability in long-term multi-agent system operations.

    “In addition, the cumulative noise effect increases response latency and accelerates the nonlinear consumption of computational and storage resources [22], ultimately threatening both scalability and stability in long-term MAS operations [43].”

    From SEDM: Scalable Self-Evolving Distributed Memory for Agents (2025) · cites this paper as [43]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 24 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Press, O., Smith, N. A., & Levy, O.
Affiliations
University of Washington (US)
Venue
Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics
Published
2020
Pages
2996-3005
ISSN
0736-587X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2988945824
Cited by
64
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 8
FWCI
4.49
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Natural Language Processing Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
Keywords
transformer models, self-attention, language modeling, perplexity, machine translation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review