Cited by 22Speech and dialogue systemsTopic ModelingAI in Service Interactions

Large scale multi-actor generative dialog modeling,

Open access
Boyd, Alex, Puri, Raul, Shoeybi, Mohammad, Patwary, Mostofa, Catanzaro, Bryan·2020·Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics

Abstract

Non-goal oriented dialog agents (i.e. chatbots) aim to produce varying and engaging conversations with a user; however, they typically exhibit either inconsistent personality across conversations or the average personality of all users. This paper addresses these issues by controlling an agent's persona upon generation via conditioning on prior conversations of a target actor. In doing so, we are able to utilize more abstract patterns within a person's speech and better emulate them in generated responses. This work introduces the Generative Conversation Control model, an augmented and fine-tuned GPT-2 language model that conditions on past reference conversations to probabilistically model multi-turn conversations in the actor's persona. We introduce an accompanying data collection procedure to obtain 10.3M conversations from 6 months worth of Reddit comments. We demonstrate that scaling model sizes from 117M to 8.3B parameters yields an improvement from 23.14 to 13.14 perplexity on 1.7M held out Reddit conversations. Increasing model scale yielded similar improvements in human evaluations that measure preference of model samples to the held out target distribution in terms of realism (31% increased to 37% preference), style matching (37% to 42%), grammar and content quality (29% to 42%), and conversation coherency (32% to 40%). We find that conditionally modeling past conversations improves perplexity by 0.47 in automatic evaluations. Through human trials we identify positive trends between conditional modeling and style matching and outline steps to further improve persona control.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.18653/v1/2020.acl-main.8

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • End-to-end models can be trained to contain internal states keeping track of the user model, learning these states from large amounts of dialogue examples.

    “End-to-end models can be trained to contain internal states keeping track of the user model, learning these states simply from large amounts of dialogue examples (Crook and Marin, 2017; Boyd et al., 2020; Li et al., 2020).”

    From Modeling Feedback in Interaction With Conversational Agents—A Review (2022) · cites this paper as Boyd et al., 2020

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 27 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Boyd, A., Puri, R., Shoeybi, M., Patwary, M., & Catanzaro, B.
Affiliations
  • University of California, Irvine (US)
  • Nvidia (United Kingdom) (GB)
Venue
Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics
Published
2020
Pages
66-84
ISSN
0736-587X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3025249494
Cited by
22
References
27
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 5
FWCI
2.01
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Speech and dialogue systems
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI in Service Interactions
Keywords
chatbots, GPT-2, model scaling, perplexity, human evaluation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review