The DOI matches its Crossref record; 30 of the 44 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
FinQA: A Dataset of Numerical Reasoning over Financial Data
Open accessAbstract
Zhiyu Chen, Wenhu Chen, Charese Smiley, Sameena Shah, Iana Borova, Dylan Langdon, Reema Moussa, Matt Beane, Ting-Hao Huang, Bryan Routledge, William Yang Wang. Proceedings of the 2021 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. 2021.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Most existing financial benchmarks focus on static question-answering, failing to capture the dynamics of real-market trading.”
From StockBench: Can LLM Agents Trade Stocks Profitably In Real-world Markets? (2025) · cites this paper as Chen et al., 2021
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“However, most existing benchmarks focus on static question-answering, such as FinQA, TAT-QA, and FinBench (Chen et al., 2021; Zhu et al., 2021; Yin et al., 2023).”
From StockBench: Can LLM Agents Trade Stocks Profitably In Real-world Markets? (2025) · cites this paper as Chen et al., 2021
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization
Kingma, D. P., & Ba, J. (2014) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1412.6980 · Cited by 98,946 · cited 1×
“For all models, we use the Adam optimizer (Kingma and Ba, 2015).”
MethodBERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding
Devlin, J., Chang, M.-W., Lee, K., & Toutanova, K. (2019) · Proceedings of the 2019 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Volume 1 (Long and Short Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/n19-1423 · Cited by 54,325 · cited 6×
“Retriever The full page of the financial report can go beyond 2,000 tokens, which cannot be coped with the current popular QA models (Devlin et al., 2019).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialRoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approach
Liu, Y., Ott, M., Goyal, N., Du, J., Joshi, M., Chen, D., Levy, O., Lewis, M., Zettlemoyer, L., & Stoyanov, V. (2019) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1907.11692 · Cited by 16,515 · cited 4×
“, 2019) and RoBERTa (Liu et al., 2019), our proposed approach outperforms all other baselines and achieves an execution accuracy of 65.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialLongformer: The Long-Document Transformer
Beltagy, I., Peters, M. E., & Cohan, A. (2020) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2004.05150 · Cited by 2,281 · cited 6×
“3703 scales linearly with sequence length, like the Longformer (Beltagy et al., 2020).”
BackgroundInfluentialKnow What You Don’t Know: Unanswerable Questions for SQuAD
Rajpurkar, P., Jia, R., & Liang, P. (2018) · Proceedings of the 56th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 2: Short Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/p18-2124 · Cited by 2,240 · cited 1×
“Financial QA is more challenging than classic QA (Rajpurkar et al., 2018; Yang et al., 2018) because it requires the system to spot relevant information across heterogeneous sources, such as tables and unstructured texts, and then create a numerical reasoning path to connect all the information.”
BackgroundHotpotQA: A Dataset for Diverse, Explainable Multi-hop Question Answering
Yang, Z., Qi, P., Zhang, S., Bengio, Y., Cohen, W., Salakhutdinov, R., & Manning, C. D. (2018) · Proceedings of the 2018 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.18653/v1/d18-1259 · Cited by 1,804 · cited 2×
“Financial QA is more challenging than classic QA (Rajpurkar et al., 2018; Yang et al., 2018) because it requires the system to spot relevant information across heterogeneous sources, such as tables and unstructured texts, and then create a numerical reasoning path to connect all the information.”
BackgroundYu, T., Zhang, R., Yang, K., Yasunaga, M., Wang, D., Li, Z., Ma, J., Li, I., Yao, Q., Roman, S., et al. (2018) · Proceedings of the 2018 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.18653/v1/d18-1425 · Cited by 1,034
MathQA: Towards Interpretable Math Word Problem Solving with Operation-Based Formalisms
Amini, A., Gabriel, S., Lin, S., Koncel-Kedziorski, R., Choi, Y., & Hajishirzi, H. (2019) · North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.18653/v1/n19-1245 · Cited by 956 · cited 6×
“This way the model is able to learn the program structures as patterns from very large-scale data (~40k for MathQA), but may fail on learning the reasoning paths.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialFinBERT: Financial Sentiment Analysis with Pre-trained Language Models
Araci, D. (2019) · arXiv · Cited by 602 · cited 5×
“The performance of using FinBert is no better than BERT-large, mostly because its pre-training corpus is limited (~30M words from news articles).”
BackgroundInfluentialMAWPS: A Math Word Problem Repository
Koncel-Kedziorski, R., Roy, S., Amini, A., Kushman, N., & Hajishirzi, H. (2016) · North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.18653/v1/n16-1136 · Cited by 551 · cited 2×
“Another kind of QA datasets related to ours is the math word problem datasets, like MaWPS (Koncel-Kedziorski et al., 2016), MathQA (Amini et al.”
Background
Research works printed but not linked: 7
- additionally , we have other committed and uncommitted credit lines of $ 746 million with major international banks and financial institutions to support our general global funding needs , including with respect to bank supported letters of credit, performance bonds and guarantees .
- Kezhen Chen, Qiuyuan Huang, Hamid Palangi, Paul Smolensky, Kenneth D. Forbus, and Jianfeng Gao. 2020a. Mapping natural-language problems to formal-language solutions using structured neural representations. In Proceedings of the 37th Inter- national Conference on Machine Learning, ICML 2020, 13-18 July 2020, Virtual Event, volume 119 of Proceedings of Machine Learning Research, pages 1566-1575. PMLR.
- Xinyun Chen, Chen Liang, Adams Wei Yu, Denny Zhou, Dawn Song, and Quoc V. Le. 2020d. Neu- ral symbolic reader: Scalable integration of dis- tributed and symbolic representations for reading comprehension. In 8th International Conference on Learning Representations, ICLR 2020, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, April 26-30, 2020. OpenReview.net.
- Zhuang Liu, Degen Huang, Kaiyu Huang, Zhuang Li, and Jun Zhao. 2020. Finbert: A pre-trained finan- cial language representation model for financial text mining. In Proceedings of the Twenty-Ninth Inter- national Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, IJCAI 2020, pages 4513-4519. ijcai.org. · DOI
- Donald MacKenzie. 2008. An engine, not a camera: How financial models shape markets. Mit Press.
- Donald MacKenzie, Daniel Beunza, Yuval Millo, and Juan Pablo Pardo-Guerra. 2012. Drilling through the allegheny mountains: Liquidity, materiality and high-frequency trading. Journal of cultural econ- omy, 5(3):279-296.
- Chuan-Ju Wang, Ming-Feng Tsai, Tse Liu, and Chin- Ting Chang. 2013. Financial sentiment analysis for risk prediction. In Sixth International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing, IJC- NLP 2013, Nagoya, Japan, October 14-18, 2013, pages 802-808. Asian Federation of Natural Lan- guage Processing / ACL.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 301–400 of 888
Ali, M., Abdallah, A., & Jatowt, A. (2025) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2508.03000 · Cited by 7
FinWorld: An All-in-One Open-Source Platform for End-to-End Financial AI Research and Deployment
Zhang, W., Zhao, Y., Zong, C., Wang, X., & An, B. (2026) · ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD) · doi:10.1145/3770854.3785689 · Cited by 2
“Recent progress includes FinGPT [25], BloombergGPT [57] with domain-adapted tokenization, and FinQA [5] featuring numerical reasoning.”
FRED: Financial Retrieval-Enhanced Detection and Editing of Hallucinations in Language Models
Tan, L., Huang, K.-W., & Wu, K. (2025) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2507.20930 · Cited by 7
“…incorrect entity references, temporal inconsistencies, and relation mismatches. onomy, we introduce tagged hallucinations into answers from FinQA (Chen et al., 2021) and TAT-QA (Zhu et al., 2021) - two benchmark datasets requiring multi-step numerical reasoning over financial tables and text.”
Improved LLM Agents for Financial Document Question Answering
Tan, N., Seng, Z., Zhang, L., Shih, Y.-C., Yang, D., & Salunkhe, A. (2025) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2506.08726 · Cited by 7
“This involves using the analyst agent and the calculator agent to get the final answer (see Section 3.3 for Table 1: Accuracy of different approaches for TATQA and FinQA.”
InfluentialExploring Trust and Transparency in Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Domain Experts
Ravi, D., & Sindhgatta, R. (2025) · CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA) · doi:10.1145/3706599.3719985 · Cited by 10
“RAG and Applications: RAG systems combine LLMs with ex-ternal retrieval to improve factual accuracy by leveraging domain-specific information [15, 17], particularly useful in high-stakes domains like finance [6, 31].”
FinNLI: Novel Dataset for Multi-Genre Financial Natural Language Inference Benchmarking
Magomere, J., Kochkina, E., Mensah, S., Kaur, S., & Smiley, C. H. (2025) · North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2504.16188 · Cited by 7
“Financial NLP Financial NLP is a rapidly evolving research area, with a number of advances achieved in a number of tasks such as sentiment analysis (Shah et al., 2023; Malo et al., 2014), question answering (Chen et al., 2021b, 2022), and financial text summarization (Mukherjee et al., 2022).”
Self-citationWu, X., Liu, J., Su, H. C., Lin, Z., Qi, Y., Xu, C., Su, J., Zhong, J., Wang, F., Wang, S., et al. (2025) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP (Findings of EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2025.findings-emnlp.1227 · Cited by 12
“Fin-22549”
GRI-QA: a Comprehensive Benchmark for Table Question Answering over Environmental Data
Contalbo, M., Pederzoli, S., del Buono, F., Valeria, V., Guerra, F., & Paganelli, M. (2025) · Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.18653/v1/2025.findings-acl.814 · Cited by 7
Towards a new research agenda for multimodal enterprise document understanding: What are we missing?
Nourbakhsh, A., Shah, S., & Rosé, C. P. (2024) · Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.18653/v1/2024.findings-acl.870 · Cited by 7
“While grounded reasoning datasets exist in the unimodal literature (Chen et al., 2021; Zhang et al., 2021) and in open-domain VQA (Zhu et al., 2016; Pont-Tuset et al., 2020), such datasets are yet to be popularized in multi-modal document understanding.”
BackgroundSelf-citationOpenRT: An Open-source Framework for Reasoning Over Tabular Data
Zhao, Y., Mi, B., Qi, Z., Nan, L., Guo, M., Cohan, A., & Radev, D. (2023) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.acl-demo.32 · Cited by 5
“Efficient Supporting Fact Annotation Previous work (Chen et al., 2020a, 2021) required annotators to manually write down the column and row indices of all relevant table cells (i.e., supporting fact), which is time-consuming and might introduce typos.”
MethodKnowledgeMath: Knowledge-Intensive Math Word Problem Solving in Finance Domains
Zhao, Y., Liu, H.-J., Long, Y.-T., Zhang, R., Zhao, C., & Cohan, A. (2023) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2311.09797 · Cited by 6
“Additionally, the finance domain frequently employs tables to represent data (Zhu et al., 2021; Chen et al., 2021; Zhao et al., 2022; Li et al., 2022b,a; Zhao et al., 2023b,d), which adds another layer of complexity to the knowledge-intensive problem-solving.”
MethodXu, Y., Chakraborty, T., Sharma, S., Nunes, L. S., Sharma, S., Demopulos, K. D., Kıcıman, E., Lu, S., & Chandra, R. (2025) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2506.13351 · Cited by 24
“FinQA [Chen et al., 2021] comprises 8K+ finance QA instances; the task is numerical reasoning over financial context, and we score answer correctness with math-verify [Kydlíˇcek et al., 2025] under a 0.001 tolerance.”
InfluentialTransferability for General Reasoning: An Automated Curriculum for Multi-Domain RLVR
Yang, Y.-J., Liu, J.-R., He, Y.-H., Zhang, L., Schölkopf, B., & Jin, Z.-J. (2026) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2606.25178 · Cited by 6
“…we use held-out benchmarks spanning all six domains: MATH-500 [19], AIME [2] (math); HumanEval [7], MBPP [4] (codegen); zebra puzzles [32], ARC-AGI [12, 13] (logic); CodeI/O [27], CruxEval [16] (simulation); HiTab [10], MultiHierTT [63], FinQA [9] (table); GPQA-Diamond [46], SuperGPQA [14] Models.”
GoLongRL: Capability-Oriented Long Context Reinforcement Learning with Multitask Alignment
Lv, M.-X., Mei, T., Du, T., Chen, J.-M., Su, Z., Chen, Z.-Y., Wang, Z.-Q., Wu, Z., Pan, R.-T., Liang, J., et al. (2026) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2605.19577 · Cited by 6
Self-citationHerculean: An Agentic Benchmark for Financial IntelligencePreprint
Peng, X., Xie, Z., Cao, Y., Li, H., Qian, L., Wang, Y., Zhang, V. J., He, H., Ai, X., Ma, L., et al. (2026) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2605.14355 · Cited by 13
“FinQA [31] evaluates numerical reasoning over financial reports, while DocFinQA [32] studies long-context reasoning over document-level financial data.”
Choi, Y.-H., Lim, J., Ahn, W., Oh, M., Shim, J., & Jo, Y. (2026) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2605.07579 · Cited by 6
“This shows that the policy model’s own activations encode a compact signal about prompt difficulty and policy-specific uncertainty, which can be leveraged for value estimation at negligible cost.”
The Avengers: A Routing Recipe for Collective Intelligence in Language Models
Zhang, Y., Li, H., Wang, C., Chen, L., Zhang, Q., Ye, P., Feng, S., Wang, X., Xu, J., Bai, L., et al. (2026) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v40i41.40790 · Cited by 1
The CLEF-2026 FinMMEval Lab: Multilingual and Multimodal Evaluation of Financial AI Systems
Xie, Z.-H., Elbadry, R., Zhang, F., Georgiev, G., Peng, X.-Q., Qian, L.-F., Huang, J.-M., Dimitrov, D., Jani, V., Dai, Y.-Y., et al. (2026) · European Conference on Information Retrieval · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2602.10886 · Cited by 6
“Concurrently, English financial NLP benchmarks such as FiQA [13], TAT-QA [37], FinQA [1], ConvFinQA [2], FinanceMath [35], and FinChain [31] have supported progress in sentiment analysis, text–table reasoning, numerical computation, and verifiable reasoning.”
Streaming Hallucination Detection in Long Chain-of-Thought Reasoning
Lu, H.-L., Pan, M., Li, R., Nan, G.-S., Zhuang, J., Zhao, Z.-J., Sun, Z.-X., Wang, K., & Liu, Y. (2026) · Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2601.02170 · Cited by 6
“The core contribution of SAPLMA(Azaria and Mitchell, 2023) posits that LLMs often possess a form of self-awareness , in the sense that even when generating hallucinated or incorrect outputs, their hidden states typically retain information about answer correctness.”
FinRetrieval: A Benchmark for Financial Data Retrieval by AI Agents
Kim, E. Y., & Huang, J. (2026) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2603.04403 · Cited by 6
“FinQA [1] tests arithmetic calculations given table excerpts.”
Mixture-of-Minds: Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning for Table Understanding
Zhou, Y.-H., Zhang, M.-R., Li, K., Wang, M.-Y., Liu, Q., Wang, Q.-F., Liu, J., Liu, F., Li, S., Li, W.-W., et al. (2025) · Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2510.20176 · Cited by 6
“…(Pasupat and Liang, 2015; Iyyer et al., 2017; Chen et al., 2019); later efforts incorporated tasks requiring complex mathematical reasoning (Chen et al., 2021; Kat-sis et al., 2021); and recent benchmarks extend to multimodal settings that integrate tables with other modalities (Talmor et…”
FinMR: A Knowledge-Intensive Multimodal Benchmark for Advanced Financial Reasoning
Deng, S., Peng, H., Xu, J.-C., Mao, R., Giurcăneanu, C., & Liu, J. (2025) · International Conference on AI in Finance · doi:10.1145/3768292.3770365 · Cited by 6
“In the financial domain, analysts leverage expert knowledge to extract meaningful insights from diverse financial data, facilitating logical and informed decision-making, like reasoning process [4, 10, 15].”
Same Content, Different Representations: A Controlled Study for Table QAPreprint
Zhang, Y., Maekawa, S., & Bhutani, N. (2025) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2509.22983 · Cited by 5
“In practice, tables appear in both structured formats with rigid schemas and executable SQL queries (Zhong et al., 2017; Li et al., 2023; Wu et al., 2025a), and semi-structured formats where columns are irregular and cells contain free text (Chen et al., 2021; 2020; Singh et al., 2025).”
Open-ViTabQA: A novel benchmark for Vietnamese question answering on open domain wikipedia table
Dao, D. H., Huynh, N. T.-K., Khanh, T. Q., & Nguyen, K. V. (2025) · Knowledge-Based Systems · doi:10.1016/j.knosys.2025.114391 · Cited by 6
CFBenchmark-MM: Chinese Financial Assistant Benchmark for Multimodal Large Language ModelPreprint
Li, J., Zhu, Y., Cheng, D., Ding, Z., & Jiang, C. (2025) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2506.13055 · Cited by 8
“In financial domain, benchmarks like FLUE [37], CFLEB [30], and DISC-FinLLM [9] evaluate NLP capabilities, while FinEval [53] ,investorbench [21] and FinQA [10] focus on financial analysis and knowledge.”
TabXEval: Why this is a Bad Table? An eXhaustive Rubric for Table Evaluation
Pancholi, V., Bafna, J., Anvekar, T., Shrivastava, M., & Gupta, V. (2025) · Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2505.22176 · Cited by 6
Yu, J., Tang, Y., Feng, K., Liang, L., Zhang, Q., Ding, K., & Chen, H. (2026) · Scientific Data · doi:10.1038/s41597-026-06594-9 · Cited by 6
“Context Understanding Benchmarks The development of robust and comprehensive benchmarks for evaluating long context understanding has gained increasing attention in recent research (Li et al., 2024; Liu et al., 2024; Bai et al., 2023b; Zhang et al., 2024c; Wu et al., 2025; Chen et al., 2020, 2021).”
Language Modeling for the Future of Finance: A Survey into Metrics, Tasks, and Data Opportunities
Tatarinov, N., Sukhani, S., Shah, A., & Chava, S. (2025) · IEEE Games Entertainment Media Conference · doi:10.18653/v1/2026.gem-main.65 · Cited by 6
“While these datasets are not finance-specific, they have potential applications in finance.”
Rocha, J. L. A., Martínez-Rojas, A., Enríquez, J. G., & Sánchez-Oliva, J. M. (2025) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2025.127958 · Cited by 6
Bridging Language Models and Financial AnalysisPreprint
Lopez-Lira, A., Kwon, J., Yoon, S., Sohn, J.-Y., & Choi, C. (2025) · RePEc: Research Papers in Economics · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2503.22693 · Cited by 17
“Recently, tasks combined with tabular data and unstructured text have gained traction (Chen et al., 2021; Watson et al., 2024; Chen et al., 2022; Zhu et al., 2021; Chen et al., 2024a; Zhao et al., 2022; Liu et al., 2023a; Deng et al., 2022).”
DEXTER: A Benchmark for open-domain Complex Question Answering using LLMs
Venktesh, V., Prabhu, D., & Anand, A. (2024) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2406.17158 · Cited by 6
“…[16]) (iii) Complexity due to ambiguity in questions (AmbigQA [36]) and (iv) complexity due to reasoning over different modalities / heterogeneous sources such as table and text (TAT-QA [67], OTT-QA [32]) and (v) complexity due to numerical reasoning over heterogeneous sources (FinQA [6]).”
BackgroundInfluentialIndicFinNLP: Financial Natural Language Processing for Indian Languages
Ghosh, S., Maji, A., Narayana, A., & Naskar, S. (2024) · International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation · doi:10.63317/39y6gdxpidex · Cited by 6
“Researchers have applied FinNLP on various languages, extending beyond English (Chen et al., 2021, 2020a) to encompass Japanese (Kannan and Seki, 2023), Chinese (Tseng et al., 2023) and multiple European languages like Danish, Spanish, Turkish, etc. (Jør-gensen et al., 2023).”
MethodHow Robust Are the QA Models for Hybrid Scientific Tabular Data? A Study Using Customized Dataset
Ghosh, A., Sahith, B. V., Ganguly, N., Goyal, P., & Singh, M. (2024) · International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2404.00401 · Cited by 6
“Among the hybrid question-answering datasets, HybridQA (Chen et al., 2020) and OT-TQA (Chen et al., 2021a) are based on Wikipedia data, and TATQA (Zhu et al., 2021), FinQA (Chen et al., 2021b) and MultiHiertt (Zhao et al., 2022) on financial data.”
MethodIn-Context Ability Transfer for Question Decomposition in Complex QAPreprint
Venktesh, V., Bhattacharya, S., & Anand, A. (2023) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2310.18371 · Cited by 8
“The source of complexity in complex QA tasks can be due to a complex question structure [27, 49], the need to perform comparisons or aggregations [19, 29], mathematical operations [42], or having to extract from complex objects like tables and text [7].”
BackgroundReTAG: Reasoning Aware Table to Analytic Text Generation
Ghosal, D., Nema, P., & Raghuveer, A. (2023) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.emnlp-main.389 · Cited by 4
“…(Chen et al., 2020c): consists of diversified sentences across symbolic operations (such as max, min, etc.); (Chen et al., 2020d; Zhu et al., 2021; Chen et al., 2021; Zhao et al., 2022a) introduce table and text based QA tasks that primarily involve numerical and table reasoning along with…”
BackgroundXia, Y., Li, F., Liu, Q., Jin, L., Zhang, Z., Sun, X., & Shao, L. (2022) · Neurocomputing · doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2022.09.046 · Cited by 5
A Novel DeBERTa-based Model for Financial Question Answering TaskPreprint
Wang, Y. J., Li, Y., Qin, H., Guan, Y., & Chen, S. (2022) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2207.05875 · Cited by 8
“In this paper, we propose a DeBERTa v3 large-based (He et al., 2020) model for financial question and answer task in FinQA dataset (Chen et al., 2021).”
MethodFinTagging: Benchmarking LLMs for Extracting and Structuring Financial Information
Wang, Y., Qian, L.-F., Peng, X.-Q., Ren, Y., Wang, K.-Y., Han, Y., Feng, D., Mo, F., Lin, S., Zhang, Q., et al. (2025) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2505.20650 · Cited by 5
“As shown in Table 1, unlike prior work [14, 23, 24] that frames tagging as flat multi-class classification and focuses solely on narrative text, FinTagging requires models to jointly extract financial facts and align them with the US-GAAP taxonomy across both unstructured text and structured tables.”
CODA-BENCH: Can Code Agents Handle Data-Intensive Tasks?Preprint
Zhang, Y., Fan, J., Fan, M., Zhang, S., & Du, X. (2026) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2606.15300 · Cited by 3
Panda, S. (2026) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2605.29586 · Cited by 6
“Bench-marks such as FinQA [Chen et al., 2021], TAT-QA [Zhu et al., 2021], and FinanceBench [Islam The most comprehensive effort to date is FinBen [Xie et al., 2024], which aggregates 42 datasets across 24 financial NLP tasks organized into seven categories.”
MemPoison: Bypassing Selective Memory Mechanisms to Plant Backdoors in LLM AgentsPreprint
Wang, H., Yang, S., Chen, Y., & Liu, P. (2026) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2605.29960 · Cited by 6
“We employ the FinQA dataset [6], which requires the agent to retrieve and process complex financial reports to answer expert-level queries.”
PortBench: A Correlation-Aware, Full-Pipeline Benchmark for LLM-Driven Portfolio Management
Zhao, Y., Chen, S.-J., & Su, N.-X. (2026) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2605.27887 · Cited by 5
“Short gaps of up to five consecutive trading days are forward-filled using the most recent available observation.”
InfluentialStanishevskii, D., Kamkia, N., Khoroshilov, A., Zmitrovich, D., Kokosinskii, D. V., Hayrapetyan, Z., & Kalmykov, A. (2026) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2605.15482
Fin-Bias: Comprehensive Evaluation for LLM Decision-Making under human bias in Finance Domain
Hu, X., & Zhao, J. (2026) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL (Findings of ACL) · doi:10.18653/v1/2026.findings-acl.279 · Cited by 3
“FinQA (Chen et al., 2021) × × × ✓ × ConvFinQA (Chen et al., 2022) ✓ × × ✓ × FiQA-SA (Maia et al., 2018) × × ✓ ✓ × FPB Malo et al. (2014) × × ✓ ✓ × ACL18 (Xu and Cohen, 2018) (Li et al., 2025) ✓ ✓ × × ✓ Fintrade (Xie et al., 2024) Table 1: Comparison with existing Financial Benchmarks.”
From BM25 to Corrective RAG: Benchmarking Retrieval Strategies for Text-and-Table DocumentsPreprint
Akarsu, M., Karaman, R. K., & Mierbach, C. (2026) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2604.01733 · Cited by 3
“In the financial domain, FinQA [29] provides expert-annotated question-program pairs over earnings reports, TAT-QA [30] focuses on numerical operations over hybrid tabular-textual contexts, and ConvFinQA [31] extends FinQA to multi-turn reasoning.”
Thinking with Tables: Enhancing Multi-Modal Tabular Understanding via Neuro-Symbolic Reasoning
Yu, K.-Y., Zhou, Z., Tian, S.-Y., Yang, X.-W., Jia, Z.-Y., Yang, M., Cheng, Z., Guo, L.-Z., & Li, Y.-F. (2026) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2603.24004 · Cited by 5
“For QA tasks, we adopt four benchmark datasets: WikiTQ (Pasupat & Liang, 2015), TabMWP (Lu et al., 2022), FinQA (Chen et al., 2021), and TAT-QA (Zhu et al., 2021).”
FinTradeBench: A Financial Reasoning Benchmark for LLMs
Agrawal, Y., Dutta, A., Hasan, M., Karmaker, S., & Dutta, A. (2026) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2603.19225 · Cited by 5
“Existing benchmarking datasets such as FinQA (Chen et al., 2022a), ConvFinQA (Chen et al., 2022b), and TAT-QA (Zhu et al., 2021) focus primarily on numerical reasoning over financial reports and tables.”
Unlocking Data Value in Finance: A Study on Distillation and Difficulty-Aware Training
Cao, C., Lin, H.-L., Zhong, Z., Gao, X., Cai, M.-Z., He, C., Han, S., & Wu, L.-J. (2026) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2603.07223 · Cited by 5
“(7) FinQA : a dataset requiring models to perform complex numerical reasoning and calculations over unstructured text and tables found in financial reports [3].”
AlphaForgeBench: Benchmarking End-to-End Trading Strategy Design with Large Language Models
Zhang, W., Zhao, M., Gao, J., You, J., Jia, H., Zhao, Y., An, B., & Sun, S. (2026) · ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD) · doi:10.1145/3770855.3817500
Zhu, Y.-J., Bai, X.-F., Chen, K.-H., Xiang, Y., Pan, Y.-C., Zhou, X., & Zhang, M. (2026) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2602.03491 · Cited by 5
“…into rows and columns, serving as a fundamental medium for conveying relational data across numerous domains such as financial reports, scientific articles, medical records and government documents (Chen et al., 2021; Akhtar et al., 2022; Cheng et al., 2022; Si et al., 2023; Li et al., 2024).”
MMFCTUB: Multi-Modal Financial Credit Table Understanding Benchmark
Cui, Y.-K., Zhang, Y., Lei, Z., Xie, J., Kou, Z.-Z., Du, H., Zhu, Z.-H., & Han, S.-R. (2026) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2601.04643 · Cited by 5
“FinQA (Chen et al., 2021) extracts tables from financial market reports and provides a dataset for numerical calculation (Su et al., 2024; Loukas et al., 2022; Khang et al., 2024) tasks.”
MIRAGE: Misleading Retrieval-Augmented Generation via Black-box and Query-agnostic Poisoning AttacksPreprint
Chen, T., He, Y., Wang, Y., Shao, S., Zheng, H., Liu, Z., Li, J., Qin, Z., Chen, Y., Chu, Z., et al. (2025) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2512.08289 · Cited by 5
“Finally, activating the Misleading Reward (MR) completes the MIRAGE pipeline (Row 6).”
InfluentialKhatuya, S., Naidu, S., Goyal, P., & Ganguly, N. (2025) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.18653/v1/2025.emnlp-main.1577 · Cited by 5
“A common approach to tackle numerical reasoning problem is the retriever-generator question-answering framework, initially proposed by Chen et al. (2021b).”
InfluentialVeritasFi : An Adaptable, Multi-tiered RAG Framework for Multi-modal Financial Question Answering
Tai, Z., Wu, H., Hu, Q., Chi, J., He, H., Ding, L., Kwok, T. S. T., Xiao, B., Hua, Y., Wang, S., et al. (2026) · International World Wide Web Conference (WWW) · doi:10.1145/3774904.3792795 · Cited by 6
“WeevaluateVeritasFiacross4financialQAdatasets: FinanceBench reference chunks from financial filings; FinQA [8], from which we use In-House Company Dataset with multi-entity (e.g., Lotus, Zeekr)”
FinCall-Surprise: A Large Scale Multi-modal Benchmark for Earning Surprise Prediction
Shu, D., Liu, Y.-G., Zhang, H.-P., & Du, M.-N. (2025) · Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2510.03965 · Cited by 5
“For instance, datasets such as (Chen et al., 2021, 2024; Zhu et al., 2021; Lai et al., 2024; Reddy et al., 2024; Yuan et al., 2024) focus on question answering over financial reports.”
FinGEAR: Financial Mapping-Guided Enhanced Answer Retrieval
Li, Y., Wang, M.-Y., de Carvalho, M., Sabanis, S., & Ma, T.-J. (2025) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2509.12042 · Cited by 5
“To evaluate our retrieval capabilities, we use the FinQA dataset (Chen et al., 2021), a benchmark designed for financial question answering.”
Large Language Models are Near-Optimal Decision-Makers with a Non-Human Learning BehaviorPreprint
Li, H., Zhang, G., Holme, P., Hu, S., & Wang, Z. (2025) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2506.16163
“Recent studies have reported strong performance for the decision-making of these systems in domains such as healthcare [15, 16], finance [17, 18], and strategic games [19–22].”
T2-RAGBench: Text-and-Table Benchmark for Evaluating Retrieval-Augmented GenerationPreprint
Strich, J., Isgorur, E. K., Trescher, M., Biemann, C., & Semmann, M. (2025) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2506.12071 · Cited by 5
“Our task (b) targets the unknown-context setting, requiring retrieval from mixed text-tables before answering. formance answering numerical and free-form question-answering (QA) tasks when appropriate documents are provided (Nan et al., 2021; Chen et al., 2021, 2022; Zhu et al., 2021, 2022).”
InfluentialGeoGrid-Bench: Can Foundation Models Understand Multimodal Gridded Geo-Spatial Data?
Jiang, B.-W., Xie, Y., Wang, X.-M., He, J.-S., Bergerson, J., Hutchison, J. K., Branham, J., Taylor, C. J., & Mallick, T. (2025) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2505.10714 · Cited by 5
“Benchmarks like HybridQA, TabFact, ToTTo, WikiTQ, and others (Chen et al., 2020, 2019; Parikh et al., 2020; Aly et al., 2021; Chen et al., 2021; Pasupat & Liang, 2015) focus on simple fact extractions and He et al. (2024b); Sui et al. (2024) cover more advanced analysis that still rely heavily on…”
Hu, B., Yuan, H., Pandelea, V., Luo, W.-Q., Zhao, Y.-Z., & Ma, Z. (2025) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2503.16575 · Cited by 5
“First, we primarily evaluated the inference capabilities of LLMs on qualitative information of earning call transcripts and did not dive into the mathematical reasoning, which is crucial in financial NLP (Chen et al., 2021; 2022; Krumdick et al., 2024; Srivas-tava et al., 2024).”
InfluentialExtract Information from Hybrid Long Documents Leveraging LLMs: A Framework and Dataset
Yue, C., Xu, X., Ma, X., Du, L., Ding, Z., Han, S., Zhang, D., & Zhang, Q. (2025) · IEEE International Conference on Acoustics Speech and Signal Processing · doi:10.1109/icassp49660.2025.10889045 · Cited by 7
“However, QA-focused approaches like FinQA [20], TAT-QA [21], and MULTIHIERTT [22] only analyze specific sections within HLDs.”
Liu, R., Zhang, Y., Yang, B., Shi, Q., & Tian, L. (2024) · Information Processing & Management · doi:10.1016/j.ipm.2024.103853 · Cited by 4
Enhancing Numerical Reasoning with the Guidance of Reliable Reasoning Processes
Wang, D., Dou, L.-X., Zhang, X.-L., Zhu, Q.-F., & Che, W.-X. (2024) · Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2402.10654 · Cited by 5
“Datasets We apply E NCORE on five datasets with various settings: FinQA (Chen et al., 2021), ConvFinQA (Chen et al., 2022b), TAT-QA (Zhu et al., 2021a), MathQA (Amini et al., 2019) and DROP (Dua et al., 2019), which cover different types of evidence and answers.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialInfoSync: Information Synchronization across Multilingual Semi-structured Tables
Khincha, S., Jain, C., Gupta, V., Kataria, T., & Zhang, S. (2023) · Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2307.03313 · Cited by 5
“…2021; Pasupat and Liang, 2015a; Abbas et al., 2016; Sun et al., 2016; Chen et al., 2021a, 2020b; Lin et al., 2020; Zayats et al., 2021; Oguz et al., 2022, and others) and table-to-text generation (Zhang et al., 2020c; Parikh et al., 2020; Nan et al., 2021; Yoran et al., 2022; Chen et al., 2021b).”
BackgroundAdapting Knowledge for Few-Shot Table-to-Text Generation
Guo, Z., Yan, M., Qi, J., Zhou, J., He, Z., Zheng, G., Wang, X., & Zhou, C. (2024) · IEEE Transactions on Audio Speech and Language Processing · doi:10.1109/taslp.2024.3430480 · Cited by 5
“answering [2], [3], [4], dialog [5], report generation [6], [7], [8], [9], and biographical description [10], demonstrating the great potential of table-to-text generation for use in extensive real-world scenarios.”
Few-Shot Table-to-Text Generation with Prompt Planning and Knowledge Memorization
Guo, Z., Yan, M., Qi, J., Zhou, J., He, Z., Lin, Z., Zheng, G., & Wang, X. (2023) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2302.04415 · Cited by 5
“Some representative instances are question answering [2]–[4], dialog [5], report generation [6]–[8], and biographical description [9], demonstrating the great potential of table-to-text generation to use in extensive real-world scenarios.”
BackgroundWang, B., Ju, J., Mao, Y., Dai, X.-Y., Huang, S., & Chen, J.-J. (2022) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2206.08506 · Cited by 5
“The effectiveness of the generator of FinQANet has been verified in Chen et al. (2021) by many comparative experiments, and Unilm also has achieved superior performance on Natural language understanding and generation tasks.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialA Graph-Based Method for Unsupervised Knowledge Discovery from Financial Texts
Oksanen, J., Majumder, A., Saunack, K., Toni, F., & Dhondiyal, A. (2022) · International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation · doi:10.63317/4en2axss4d59 · Cited by 5
“Existing work includes question answering (Liu et al., 2020), numerical reasoning on financial reports (Chen et al., 2021) and port-folio selection (Liang et al., 2021), amongst others.”
BackgroundHypothetical Training for Robust Machine Reading Comprehension of Tabular Context
Li, M.-X., Wang, W.-J., Feng, F.-L., Zhang, H., Wang, Q.-F., & Chua, T.-S. (2023) · Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.findings-acl.79 · Cited by 5
“First, the tables cannot always be processed by relational databases since recent MRC datasets often utilize web-crawled semi-structured tables without clearly defined relations (Zhu et al., 2021; Zhao et al., 2022b; Chen et al., 2021).”
BackgroundSelf-citationShiJianBench: From Dialogue to Decision for Long-Horizon Evaluation of Investment Advisors
Gong, J., Jiang, M.-W., Liu, Z., Qiao, Y., Wu, W., Xiao, M.-X., Zhang, E.-Z., Kuang, Z.-Z., Chen, Y.-K., Huang, C.-S., et al. (2026) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2608.01204 · Cited by 4
“Response-level and financial QA benchmarks evaluate whether an advisor’s answer is accurate, helpful, or compliant, but they stop at the generated response and do not follow the user’s subsequent decision trajectory (Wu et al., 2023; Islam et al., 2023; Chen et al., 2021; Xie et al., 2024).”
Overview of FinMMEval 2026 Task 2: Multilingual Financial Short-Answer Question Answering
Xie, Z.-H., Peng, X.-Q., Georgiev, G., Dimitrov, D., Dai, Y.-Y., Elbadry, R., Jani, V., Qian, L.-F., Zhang, F., Huang, J.-M., et al. (2026) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2607.19867 · Cited by 4
“FinQA [7] and TAT-QA [8] focus on numerical and tabular reasoning over financial reports, while ConvFinQA adds a conversational setting in which systems must track evidence across turns [9].”
FinBalance: A Multi-Document Accounting Reconciliation Benchmark
Tumpati, S., Agarwal, D., Kedia, A., Neekhra, A., Mandal, M., Garg, K., Sinha, Y., Gupta, S., & Kumar, D. (2026) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2606.15949 · Cited by 4
“FinQA (Chen et al., 2021) and ConvFinQA (Chen et al., 2022) pose numerical questions over single financial reports and their tabular content, with the latter requiring conversational multi-turn reasoning.”
FrontierFinance: A Long-Horizon Computer-Use Benchmark of Real-World Financial TasksPreprint
Krumdick, M., Reddy, V., Chaudhary, S., Day, W., Ahmed, M., Haqqi, H., Fahim, M. A., Amjad, H., Orakzai, A., Gul, A., et al. (2026) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2604.05912 · Cited by 5
“Early efforts such as FinQA (Chen et al., 2021) and ConvFinQA (Chen et al., 2022) established standards for multi-step arithmetic reasoning over financial reports, while TAT-QA (Zhu et al., 2021) introduced challenges requiring reasoning across hybrid tabular and textual data.”
Agentic Tool Use in Large Language ModelsPreprint
Hu, J., Zhong, M., Chen, K., Bai, X., & Zhang, M. (2026) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2604.00835 · Cited by 11
“In more specialized settings, FinQA [24] targets numerical reasoning over financial documents, SheetBench [85] addresses spreadsheet manipulation, and InterCode [168] standardizes interactive coding with execution feedback, allowing agents to debug and refine scripts during task solving.”
FinSheet-Bench: From Simple Lookups to Complex Reasoning, Where LLMs Break on Financial Spreadsheets
Ravnik, J., Licen, M., Bührmann, F., Yuan, B., Stinson, F., & Singh, T. (2026) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2603.07316 · Cited by 4
“FinQA [Chen et al., 2021] and TAT-QA [Zhu et al., 2021] specifically address question answering over financial documents with tables, but focus primarily on public company filings rather than the complex spreadsheet models used in private markets.”
SPARTA: Scalable and Principled Benchmark of Tree-Structured Multi-hop QA over Text and Tables
Park, S., Kim, J., & Han, W.-S. (2026) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2602.23286 · Cited by 4
Data Science and Technology Towards AGI Part I: Tiered Data ManagementPreprint
Wang, Y., Fu, Z., Zhao, H., Zhao, C., Zhou, C., Lin, X., Lyu, H., Xue, S., Yi, Y., Wang, Y., et al. (2026) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2602.09003 · Cited by 9
“…2025), OpenMathInstruct-2 (Toshniwal et al., 2024), Ultrachat (Ding et al., 2023), DISC-Law-SFT (Yue et al., 2023), SynthLaw (Yue et al., 2025), FinQA (Chen et al., 2021), FinCoT (Qian et al., 2025), ConvFinQA (Chen et al., 2022), SMART’s Trajectory Dataset (Yue et al., 2024a), COIG (Zhang et…”
Training Data Selection with Gradient Orthogonality for Efficient Domain Adaptation
Zhang, X., Tian, Y., Wang, H., & Song, Y. (2026) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2602.06359 · Cited by 4
“• Finance: We employ F IN QA (Chen et al., 2021), which requires numerical reasoning over financial reports.”
Fine-Tuning and Explaining FinBERT for Sector-Specific Financial News: A Reproducible Workflow
Cristescu, M. P., Brândaș, C., Mara, D. A., & Petrea, I. (2025) · Electronics · doi:10.3390/electronics14234680 · Cited by 8
Lumer, E., Melich, M., Zino, O., Kim, E., Dieter, S., Basavaraju, P. H., Subbiah, V. K., Burke, J. A., & Hernandez, R. (2025) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2511.18177 · Cited by 4
“Their effectiveness relative to semantic vector search remains unclear for complex financial queries requiring multi-hop reasoning across lengthy regulatory filings (Islam et al., 2023; Chen et al., 2021; Zhu et al., 2021).”
PublicAgent: Multi-Agent Design Principles From an LLM-Based Open Data Analysis Framework
Montazeri, S., Feng, Y.-H., & Sha, K.-W. (2025) · Digital Engineering · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2511.03023 · Cited by 4
“Recent work on table-to-text generation includes TAPAS [41] for question answering over tables and GPT-3-based approaches for numerical reasoning [42].”
Zhou, W., Ma, B., Friedrich, A., & Mesgar, M. (2025) · Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2510.09671 · Cited by 4
“…setup involving only retrieval questions (Katsis et al., 2022; Liu et al., 2023a; Wang et al., 2025a) while the complex setup involves numerical (Chen et al., 2021; Zhu et al., 2021; Lu et al., 2022; Tian et al., 2025a), commonsense (Zhang et al., 2023), temporal (Gupta et al., 2023;…”
Bounds of Chain-of-Thought Robustness: Reasoning Steps, Embed Norms, and Beyond
Wang, D., Zhang, X.-L., Xu, K., Zhu, Q.-F., Che, W.-X., & Deng, Y. (2025) · International Conference on Learning Representations · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2509.21284 · Cited by 4
MetaGraph: A Large-Scale Meta-Analysis of GenAI in Financial NLP (2022–2025)
Pedinotti, P., Baumann, P., Jessurun, N., Barrett, L., & Santus, E. (2026) · Workshop on Generation, Evaluation and Metrics (GEM) · doi:10.18653/v1/2026.gem-main.71 · Cited by 2
Dai, Y., Ji, Z., Li, Z., Li, K., & Wang, S. (2025) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2508.20083 · Cited by 3
“A typical RAG system comprises two main components: a retriever [12, 32, 78] that searches an external knowledge base for relevant information, and an LLM that synthesizes this retrieved context with the user query to generate the final response.”
Yao, R., Chai, Q., Yao, J.-G., Li, S.-Y., Chen, J., Zhang, Q., & Wang, H. (2025) · AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2508.08001 · Cited by 4
“Existing financial evaluation benchmarks, such as FinQA (Chen et al. 2021), FinBen (Xie et al. 2024), FinTextQA (Chen et al. 2024a), and FinDER (Choi et al. 2025), are designed to assess the performance of LLMs on a diverse range of tasks.”
Zhao, X., Zhou, Z. P., Chen, L., Wang, L., Huang, Z., Zheng, K., Zheng, Y., Du, X., Liao, L., Liu, J., et al. (2025) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2507.12901 · Cited by 4
“For the open-source portion, extensive QA pairs were gathered from publicly available datasets, including FinCorpus [31], Finance-Instruct-500K [6], FinCUGE [17], FinQA [2], FinancialData [4] and Quant-Trading-Instruct [18].”
Self-citationTian, J., Li, L., Ye, W., Wang, H., Wang, L., Yu, L., Ren, Z., Chen, G., & Zhao, J. (2026) · World Wide Web · doi:10.1007/s11280-025-01399-z · Cited by 3
TReB: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Evaluating Table Reasoning Capabilities of Large Language Models
Li, C., Liu, X., Song, Z., Chi, C., Shi, B., Zhao, C., Chang, G., Wang, Z., Yang, K., Wang, X., et al. (2026) · International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (SIGIR) · doi:10.1145/3805712.3808617 · Cited by 5
FinCoT: Grounding Chain-of-Thought in Expert Financial ReasoningPreprint
Nitarach, N., Sirichotedumrong, W., Pitchayarthorn, P., Taveekitworachai, P., Manakul, P., & Pipatanakul, K. (2025) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2506.16123 · Cited by 6
“Fine-tuning-based: Methods adapt models via supervised fine-tuning with curated QA/classification datasets (Ma et al., 2023; Harsha et al., 2025) or continued pretraining on domain-specific corpora (Yang et al., 2020; Lee et al., 2024; Bhatia et al., 2024; Ke et al., 2025; Liu et al., 2025).”
Finance Language Model Evaluation (FLaME)Preprint
Matlin, G. S., Okamoto, M., Pardawala, H., Yang, Y., & Chava, S. (2025) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2506.15846 · Cited by 4
“• FinQA (Chen et al., 2021) The Zero-Shot prompt used for FinQA is given in Figure 5.”
TabularMath: Understanding Math Reasoning over Tables with Large Language Models
Tian, S.-Y., Zhou, Z., Dong, W. G., Yu, K.-Y., Yang, M., Cheng, Z.-J., Guo, L.-Z., & Li, Y.-F. (2026) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL (Findings of ACL) · doi:10.18653/v1/2026.findings-acl.759
“These gains further transfer to other tabular reasoning benchmarks (TAT-QA, FinQA, and TabMWP), with an average improvement of 4%(Table 12), particularly on complex tables, demonstrating the effectiveness of controllable data generation.”
InfluentialExpertSteer: Intervening in LLMs through Expert Knowledge
Wang, W.-X., Wu, M.-H., Haddow, B., & Birch, A. (2025) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2505.12313 · Cited by 4
“Bio-Medical-Llama-3-8B [59] Financial FINQA [60] FPB [61], Flare-cfa [62], MMLU-Financial [58] Llama-3-8B-Instruct-Finance [63] Mathematical MetaMathQA [64] GSM8K [65], MATH500 [66], MMLU-Math [58] Qwen2.”
Self-citationGenerative AI Enhanced Financial Risk Management Information RetrievalPreprint
Haeri, A., Vitrano, J., & Ghelichi, M. (2025) · RePEc: Research Papers in Economics · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2504.06293 · Cited by 5
FinBloom: Knowledge-Grounding Large Language Model with Real-Time Financial Data
Sinha, A., Agarwal, C., & Malo, P. (2026) · Knowledge-Based Systems · doi:10.1016/j.knosys.2026.115559 · Cited by 5
KaPQA: Knowledge-Augmented Product Question-AnsweringPreprint
Eppalapally, S., Dangi, D., Bhat, C., Gupta, A., Zhang, R., Agarwal, S., Bagga, K., Yoon, S., Lipka, N., Rossi, R. A., et al. (2024) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2407.16073 · Cited by 3
“Notably, while efforts have been directed towards releasing datasets across prominent and expansive domains such as Medicine (Pal et al., 2022; Pampari et al., 2018), Finance (Chen et al., 2021; Zhu et al., 2021), and Legal (Zhong et al., 2019; Chen et al., 2023a), there remains an apparent scarcity of such datasets i…”
BackgroundSaqur, R. (2024) · RePEc: Research Papers in Economics · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2406.15508 · Cited by 3
KRX Bench: Automating Financial Benchmark Creation via Large Language Models
Son, G., Jeon, H., Hwang, C., & Jung, H. (2024) · Language Resources and Evaluation Conference (LREC) · doi:10.63317/3h43ax9b5w5q
“However, existing research has predominantly focused on assessing financial LLMs’ reasoning capabilities (Chen et al., 2021, 2022) or proficiency in singular tasks (Son et al., 2023b; Malo et al., 2014; Loukas et al., 2022), leaving a critical gap in understanding their comprehension of the…”
MethodDBQR-QA: A Question Answering Dataset on a Hybrid of Database Querying and Reasoning
Nararatwong, R., Chen, C.-C., Kertkeidkachorn, N., Takamura, H., & Ichise, R. (2024) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL (Findings of ACL) · doi:10.18653/v1/2024.findings-acl.900 · Cited by 1
“The TAT-QA dataset (Zhu et al., 2021) is designed for hybrid financial tabular and textual data, and the FinQA dataset (Chen et al., 2021b) targets numerical reasoning tasks in finance.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialLeveraging LLMs for KPIs Retrieval from Hybrid Long-Document: A Comprehensive Framework and Dataset
Yue, C., Xu, X., Ma, X., Du, L., Liu, H., Ding, Z.-M., Jiang, Y., Han, S., & Zhang, D.-M. (2023) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2305.16344 · Cited by 4
“The most relevant works to our research are FinQA (Chen et al., 2022), TAT-QA (Zhu et al.”
Influential
Metadata
- Authors
- Chen, Z., Chen, W., Smiley, C., Shah, S., Borova, I., Langdon, D., Moussa, R., Beane, M., Huang, T.-H., Routledge, B., & Wang, W. Y.
- Affiliations
- University of California, Santa Barbara (US)
- Thomson Reuters (United States) (US)
- Pennsylvania State University (US)
- Carnegie Mellon University (US)
- Stanford University (US)
- ORCID
- Venue
- Proceedings of the 2021 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing
- Published
- 2021
- Pages
- 3697-3711
- OpenAlex
- W3198243861
- Cited by
- 258
- References
- 44
- Citations by year
- 2026: 79 · 2025: 74 · 2024: 42 · 2023: 35 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 1
- FWCI
- 12.13
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Natural Language Processing Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Multimodal Machine Learning Applications
- Keywords
- numerical reasoning, financial data, question answering, financial question answering
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review