The DOI matches its Crossref record; 30 of the 44 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
FinQA: A Dataset of Numerical Reasoning over Financial Data
Open accessAbstract
Zhiyu Chen, Wenhu Chen, Charese Smiley, Sameena Shah, Iana Borova, Dylan Langdon, Reema Moussa, Matt Beane, Ting-Hao Huang, Bryan Routledge, William Yang Wang. Proceedings of the 2021 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. 2021.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Most existing financial benchmarks focus on static question-answering, failing to capture the dynamics of real-market trading.”
From StockBench: Can LLM Agents Trade Stocks Profitably In Real-world Markets? (2025) · cites this paper as Chen et al., 2021
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“However, most existing benchmarks focus on static question-answering, such as FinQA, TAT-QA, and FinBench (Chen et al., 2021; Zhu et al., 2021; Yin et al., 2023).”
From StockBench: Can LLM Agents Trade Stocks Profitably In Real-world Markets? (2025) · cites this paper as Chen et al., 2021
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization
Kingma, D. P., & Ba, J. (2014) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1412.6980 · Cited by 98,946 · cited 1×
“For all models, we use the Adam optimizer (Kingma and Ba, 2015).”
MethodBERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding
Devlin, J., Chang, M.-W., Lee, K., & Toutanova, K. (2019) · Proceedings of the 2019 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Volume 1 (Long and Short Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/n19-1423 · Cited by 54,325 · cited 6×
“Retriever The full page of the financial report can go beyond 2,000 tokens, which cannot be coped with the current popular QA models (Devlin et al., 2019).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialRoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approach
Liu, Y., Ott, M., Goyal, N., Du, J., Joshi, M., Chen, D., Levy, O., Lewis, M., Zettlemoyer, L., & Stoyanov, V. (2019) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1907.11692 · Cited by 16,515 · cited 4×
“, 2019) and RoBERTa (Liu et al., 2019), our proposed approach outperforms all other baselines and achieves an execution accuracy of 65.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialLongformer: The Long-Document Transformer
Beltagy, I., Peters, M. E., & Cohan, A. (2020) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2004.05150 · Cited by 2,281 · cited 6×
“3703 scales linearly with sequence length, like the Longformer (Beltagy et al., 2020).”
BackgroundInfluentialKnow What You Don’t Know: Unanswerable Questions for SQuAD
Rajpurkar, P., Jia, R., & Liang, P. (2018) · Proceedings of the 56th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 2: Short Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/p18-2124 · Cited by 2,240 · cited 1×
“Financial QA is more challenging than classic QA (Rajpurkar et al., 2018; Yang et al., 2018) because it requires the system to spot relevant information across heterogeneous sources, such as tables and unstructured texts, and then create a numerical reasoning path to connect all the information.”
BackgroundHotpotQA: A Dataset for Diverse, Explainable Multi-hop Question Answering
Yang, Z., Qi, P., Zhang, S., Bengio, Y., Cohen, W., Salakhutdinov, R., & Manning, C. D. (2018) · Proceedings of the 2018 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.18653/v1/d18-1259 · Cited by 1,804 · cited 2×
“Financial QA is more challenging than classic QA (Rajpurkar et al., 2018; Yang et al., 2018) because it requires the system to spot relevant information across heterogeneous sources, such as tables and unstructured texts, and then create a numerical reasoning path to connect all the information.”
BackgroundYu, T., Zhang, R., Yang, K., Yasunaga, M., Wang, D., Li, Z., Ma, J., Li, I., Yao, Q., Roman, S., et al. (2018) · Proceedings of the 2018 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.18653/v1/d18-1425 · Cited by 1,034
MathQA: Towards Interpretable Math Word Problem Solving with Operation-Based Formalisms
Amini, A., Gabriel, S., Lin, S., Koncel-Kedziorski, R., Choi, Y., & Hajishirzi, H. (2019) · North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.18653/v1/n19-1245 · Cited by 956 · cited 6×
“This way the model is able to learn the program structures as patterns from very large-scale data (~40k for MathQA), but may fail on learning the reasoning paths.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialFinBERT: Financial Sentiment Analysis with Pre-trained Language Models
Araci, D. (2019) · arXiv · Cited by 602 · cited 5×
“The performance of using FinBert is no better than BERT-large, mostly because its pre-training corpus is limited (~30M words from news articles).”
BackgroundInfluentialMAWPS: A Math Word Problem Repository
Koncel-Kedziorski, R., Roy, S., Amini, A., Kushman, N., & Hajishirzi, H. (2016) · North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.18653/v1/n16-1136 · Cited by 551 · cited 2×
“Another kind of QA datasets related to ours is the math word problem datasets, like MaWPS (Koncel-Kedziorski et al., 2016), MathQA (Amini et al.”
Background
Research works printed but not linked: 7
- additionally , we have other committed and uncommitted credit lines of $ 746 million with major international banks and financial institutions to support our general global funding needs , including with respect to bank supported letters of credit, performance bonds and guarantees .
- Kezhen Chen, Qiuyuan Huang, Hamid Palangi, Paul Smolensky, Kenneth D. Forbus, and Jianfeng Gao. 2020a. Mapping natural-language problems to formal-language solutions using structured neural representations. In Proceedings of the 37th Inter- national Conference on Machine Learning, ICML 2020, 13-18 July 2020, Virtual Event, volume 119 of Proceedings of Machine Learning Research, pages 1566-1575. PMLR.
- Xinyun Chen, Chen Liang, Adams Wei Yu, Denny Zhou, Dawn Song, and Quoc V. Le. 2020d. Neu- ral symbolic reader: Scalable integration of dis- tributed and symbolic representations for reading comprehension. In 8th International Conference on Learning Representations, ICLR 2020, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, April 26-30, 2020. OpenReview.net.
- Zhuang Liu, Degen Huang, Kaiyu Huang, Zhuang Li, and Jun Zhao. 2020. Finbert: A pre-trained finan- cial language representation model for financial text mining. In Proceedings of the Twenty-Ninth Inter- national Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, IJCAI 2020, pages 4513-4519. ijcai.org. · DOI
- Donald MacKenzie. 2008. An engine, not a camera: How financial models shape markets. Mit Press.
- Donald MacKenzie, Daniel Beunza, Yuval Millo, and Juan Pablo Pardo-Guerra. 2012. Drilling through the allegheny mountains: Liquidity, materiality and high-frequency trading. Journal of cultural econ- omy, 5(3):279-296.
- Chuan-Ju Wang, Ming-Feng Tsai, Tse Liu, and Chin- Ting Chang. 2013. Financial sentiment analysis for risk prediction. In Sixth International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing, IJC- NLP 2013, Nagoya, Japan, October 14-18, 2013, pages 802-808. Asian Federation of Natural Lan- guage Processing / ACL.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 401–500 of 888
FinRCA-Bench: Benchmarking Evidence Retrieval and Reasoning for Financial AI SystemsPreprint
Ghawate, P. (2026) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2608.18534 · Cited by 3
“FinQA and TAT-QA focus on numerical reasoning over financial reports and tables [2], [3]; FinanceBench evaluates open-book question answering over public-company filings [4]; FinAgentBench and FinRetrieval examine retrieval over financial documents or structured data [5], [16]; Finch evaluates…”
FinEvo-Bench: A Longitudinal Benchmark for Self-Evolving Agents in Professional Financial WorkflowsPreprint
Deng, B., Zhou, K., Guo, L., Tao, C., Chen, X., Xie, C., Liang, R., Chen, F., & Zhang, C. (2026) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2608.06144 · Cited by 5
“Financial benchmarks cover numerical and document reasoning (Chen et al. 2021; Zhu et al. 2021; Chen et al. 2022; Islam et al. 2023), broad capability suites (Xie et al. 2023, 2024a), and professional analysis, research, tool-use, or spreadsheet tasks (BenYoash et al. 2025; Bigeard et al. 2025;…”
When Knowledge Changes: Metamorphic Testing of RAG Systems with Mutations
Kim, J., Pasini, S., & Tonella, P. (2026) · Proceedings of the 41st IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automated Software Engineering · doi:10.1145/3832783.3837543 · Cited by 3
“T2-RAGBench includes four datasets: ConvFinQA [1], FinQA [1], TAT-DQA [23], and VQAonBD [11] that cover heterogeneous financial sources such as annual reports, regulatory filings, and financial statements.”
GDP.pdf: Benchmarking Grounded Multimodal Reasoning over Professional PDF Documents
Garre, S., Ritchie, E., Mehta, S., & Chen, E. (2026) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2607.11192 · Cited by 3
“Charts have dedicated benchmarks (ChartQA [18], PlotQA [22], CharXiv [32], ChartQAPro [19]), as do tables and numerical reasoning (HybridQA [3], TAT-QA [37], FinQA [5]).”
Zhu, Z., Thai, L., Yu, S., Liu, Y., Qiao, Y.-F., Wang, C.-X., Xu, H., & Shu, J.-Y. (2026) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2606.21023 · Cited by 3
“The finance subset is constructed from Financial Sentiment Analysis [25], FinQA [7], and FinClaim [34].”
Let Them Steal: Trapping Large Language Model Extraction Attacks with Knowledge Honeypot
Dai, Y.-Y., & Dong, Y.-S. (2026) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2606.15810 · Cited by 3
“Output Perturbation increases Agreement on FinQA relative to No Defense, suggesting that noisy responses can provide exploitable training signals.”
Knowing When to Ask: Segment-Level Credit Assignment for LLM Tool Use
Kumar, A., Wu, Z., & Suley, M. (2026) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2605.27788 · Cited by 3
“FinQA (19) is held out from training and tests generalization to heterogeneous tool routing (search followed by computation).”
WildTableBench: Benchmarking Multimodal Foundation Models on Table Understanding In the Wild
Huang, J.-Z., Sun, X., Yang, Y., Hou, Y., Zhang, R.-T., Li, S., Fan, H.-H., Yeung-Levy, S., & Yu, X. (2026) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2605.01018 · Cited by 3
“TableBench (Wu et al., 2025b) consolidates tables from WTQ (Pasupat & Liang, 2015), SQA (Iyyer et al., 2017), FinQA (Chen et al., 2021), and related datasets to evaluate LLMs across 18 task subtypes.”
Taming Actor-Observer Asymmetry in Agents via Dialectical Alignment
Li, B.-B., Wu, R., Ji, Z., Zhang, M.-S., Fei, H., Zhang, M., Lee, M. L., & Hsu, W. (2026) · Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2604.19548 · Cited by 3
“We construct two failure attribution datasets as described in Section 4.2: (a) FinQA-TAS is based on the hybrid reasoning FinQA dataset (Chen et al., 2021) and (b) Spider-TAS is based on the Spider dataset comprising structured text-to-SQL tasks (Yu et al., 2018).”
InfluentialAgand, P. (2026) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2603.04663 · Cited by 3
“However, benchmarks like FinQA Chen et al. [2021] and TAT-QA Zhu et al. [2021] reveal that even code-generating models struggle with grounding ; frequently executing correct logic on hallucinated input variables.”
BankMathBench: A Benchmark for Numerical Reasoning in Banking Scenarios
Lee, Y., Kim, S., Kwak, Y., & Choo, J. (2026) · International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2602.17072 · Cited by 3
“FinQA (Chen et al., 2021a), and TAT-QA (Zhu et al., 2021) primarily focus on interpreting financial reports and statements, while FinanceMath (Zhao et al., 2024a) evaluates financial reasoning using college-level finance and economics problems.”
HierFinRAG—Hierarchical Multimodal RAG for Financial Document Understanding
Dang, Q.-V., Nguyen, N.-S.-A., & Vo, T.-B.-D. (2026) · Informatics · doi:10.3390/informatics13020030 · Cited by 3
Ebisu: Benchmarking Large Language Models in Japanese Finance
Peng, X.-Q., Xiang, R.-Y., Zhang, F., Song, M., Jiang, M.-Y., Wang, Y., Qian, L.-F., Hara, T., Guo, Y., Huang, J.-M., et al. (2026) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2602.01479 · Cited by 3
“Existing evaluations span general Japanese linguistic benchmarks (Kurihara et al., 2022; Someya and Oseki, 2023) and global financial benchmarks (Xie et al., 2024; Chen et al., 2022), but the former lacks finance coverage and the latter is largely English-centric.”
A benchmark and method for photographed table reasoning
Kang, X., Wang, Z.-M., Zi, X., Jin, X.-B., Huang, K.-Z., Yin, F., & Wang, Q.-F. (2026) · Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1016/j.patcog.2026.113355 · Cited by 3
Utilizing Metadata for Better Retrieval-Augmented Generation
Yousuf, R. B., Xu, S.-Z., Sharma, M., Neeser, A., Latimer, C., & Ramakrishnan, N. (2026) · European Conference on Information Retrieval · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2601.11863 · Cited by 3
“SEC filings have therefore become a common testbed for financial QA with LLMs [19, 20, 7], alongside broader benchmarks in finance [31, 10].”
MuISQA: Multi-Intent Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Scientific Question AnsweringPreprint
Li, Z., Yu, H., Guo, G., Zhou, N., & Zhang, J. (2025) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2511.16283 · Cited by 2
“RAG benchmarks (Yu et al., 2024; Fan et al., 2024) have been central to evaluating systems across question answering (Talmor et al., 2019; Chen et al., 2021), document retrieval (Wang et al., 2024; Wasserman et al., 2025), and summarization (Wang et al., 2020; Petroni et al., 2021).”
EncouRAGe: Evaluating RAG Local, Fast, and ReliablePreprint
Strich, J., Scharfenberg, A., Biemann, C., & Semmann, M. (2025) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2511.04696 · Cited by 4
“We observe consistent performance gains in the retriever metrics (except for FinQA + Marco), but only meaningful gains in HotPotQA and FinQA.”
InfluentialEduDial: Constructing a Large-scale Multi-turn Teacher-Student Dialogue Corpus
Wei, S., Zhang, M., Lin, X., Jiang, B., Dai, Z.-X., & Kuang, K. (2025) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2510.12899 · Cited by 3
“However, single-turn dialogues cannot capture dialogue history understanding and adaptive response strategies, re-stricting LLM deployment.”
Learning to Route: A Rule-Driven Agent Framework for Hybrid-Source Retrieval-Augmented Generation
Bai, H., Wang, H.-Y., Chen, S.-Y., Chen, Z.-Z., Tang, L.-A., Cheng, W., Fu, Y.-J., & Chen, H.-F. (2025) · The Web Conference · doi:10.1145/3774904.3792676 · Cited by 3
“TATQA [39] and FINQA [5] are financial report datasets.”
Self-citationAuditAgent: Expert-Guided Multi-Agent Reasoning for Cross-Document Fraudulent Evidence Discovery
Bai, S., Wu, B., Zhang, Y., Chengke, W., Zheng, X., Yuan, Y., Wu, K., & Li, J. (2025) · ACM International Conference on AI in Finance (ICAIF) · doi:10.1145/3768292.3770383 · Cited by 4
“For example, FinQA [10] and TAT-QA [49] focus on hybrid question answering over financial reports, requiring multi-step reasoning with textual and tabular data.”
Das, S., Mathur, P., Sharma, I., Saha, S., Pasupa, K., & Maurya, A. (2025) · European Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2509.24342 · Cited by 3
MindVL: Towards Efficient and Effective Training of Multimodal Large Language Models on Ascend NPUs
Chen, F.-L., Liu, Y.-J., Huang, Y., Wang, H., Tian, M., Yu, Y.-Q., Liao, M.-H., & Wu, J.-H. (2025) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2509.11662 · Cited by 3
“…OCRVQA [76], POIE [46], Sroie [35], CIDP [52] Infographic Cauldron [49], InfoVQA [71], InfographicGPT4v [71], Docs-diagrams [26], Slide [93], Finqa [19], Hitab [20], MultiHiertt [128], Robut-SQA [129], Robut-Wikisql [129], Robut-WTQ [129], Table Tabmwp [66], TAT-QA [131], Pubtables [91],…”
INSEva: A Comprehensive Chinese Benchmark for Large Language Models in Insurance
Chen, S.-S., Zhu, Q., Yang, W., Yang, C., Wang, Z., Wang, P., Lin, X., Xu, B., Li, D.-Q., Yuan, C., et al. (2025) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2509.04455 · Cited by 3
“FinQA (Chen et al., 2021) advances numerical reasoning evaluation by constructing a dataset requiring multi-step calculations and inference from financial reports.”
Quantifying Conversation Drift in MCP via Latent Polytope
Shi, H., Yao, H., Shao, S., Jiao, S., Peng, Z., Qin, Z., & Wang, C. (2025) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2508.06418 · Cited by 3
“Datasets To capture the diversity in our experimental evaluations, we conducted experiments on multiple benchmark datasets: FinQA(Chen et al. 2021), HotpotQA(Yang et al. 2018) and Ms Marco(Nguyen et al. 2017).”
PrismRAG: Boosting RAG Factuality with Distractor Resilience and Strategized Reasoning
Kachuee, M., Gollapudi, T., Kim, M., Huang, Y., Sun, K., Yang, X., Wang, J., Shah, N., Liu, Y., Colak, A., et al. (2025) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2507.18857 · Cited by 3
“These benchmarks cover relevant real-world application areas, including health (Jin et al., 2019; Möller et al., 2020), finance (Chen et al., 2021; Zhu et al., 2021), customer support (Sadat et al., 2023; Nandy et al., 2021; Malaviya et al., 2023), legal (Hendrycks et al., 2021), and general…”
SKA-Bench: A Fine-Grained Benchmark for Evaluating Structured Knowledge Understanding of LLMs
Liu, Z., Niu, E., Hua, Y., Sun, M.-S., Liang, L., Chen, H.-J., & Zhang, W. (2025) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2507.17178 · Cited by 3
“Four Abilities in SK Understanding real-world scenarios (e.g., financial reports with numerous tables (Chen et al., 2021) and product knowledge graphs (Wu et al., 2024)), thus serving as a significant knowledge base for existing LLM systems (Liang et al., 2024; Wang et al., 2025).”
Efficient Multi-Expert Tabular Language Model for Banking
Guo, Y., Zhang, W., Zhang, X., Zheng, V. W., & Yang, Y. (2025) · ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD) · doi:10.1145/3690624.3709400 · Cited by 3
“Different from the previous works that focus on the solving general financial NLP tasks, such as financial sentiment analysis [32], text classification [38, 40] or question answering [3, 4], our work supports three applications for the banking services.”
InfluentialFinLMM-R1: Enhancing Financial Reasoning in LMM through Scalable Data and Reward Design
Lan, K., Zhu, J., Li, J.-T., Cheng, D., Chen, G., & Jiang, C. (2025) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2506.13066 · Cited by 3
“Existing financial benchmarks include FLUE [39], CFLEB [40], and DISC-FinLLM [35] for evaluating financial NLP capabilities, and FinEval [41], InvestorBench [42], and FinQA [43] for financial knowledge and analysis.”
FinS-Pilot: A Benchmark for Online Financial RAG System
Wang, F., Sun, Y., Mao, J., Wei, X., & Xu, D. (2025) · ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management (CIKM) · doi:10.1145/3746252.3761643 · Cited by 2
“Fi-nanceBench [8] and FinQA [4] focus narrowly on static financial statement analysis, without evaluation of real-time queries.”
Cao, L., Xu, J.-X., Liu, H.-B., Wang, J.-Y., Zhou, M., Dong, H.-Y., Han, S., & Zhang, D.-M. (2025) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2505.23667 · Cited by 3
“Pre-text and Post-text refer to optional unstructured context surrounding the table, such as the data description format used in FinQA (Chen et al., 2021b). formula operator instruction represents the textual representations and usage guidelines of the representative spreadsheet formula operators…”
OET: Optimization-based prompt injection Evaluation ToolkitPreprint
Pan, J., Liu, X., & Xiao, C. (2025) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2505.00843 · Cited by 5
“Lucia Zheng, Neel Guha, Brandon R. (Rajpurkar et al., 2016) Wikipedia 400 5 CaseHold (Zheng et al., 2021) Law 400 5 FinQA (Chen et al., 2021) Finance 400 5 SciQ (Johannes Welbl, 2017) Science 400 5 TriviaQA (Joshi et al., 2017) Open-domain 400 5 AQuA (Behrendt et al., 2024) Math 400 5 PubMedQA (Jin…”
InfluentialPoelitz, C., & McKenna, N. (2026) · Language Resources and Evaluation Conference (LREC) · doi:10.63317/2qropbkccqtp · Cited by 2
LLaSA: Large Language and Structured Data Assistant
Xu, Y., He, S.-Z., Zeng, X., Chen, J.-B., Liu, G., Wang, B.-N., Zhao, J., & Liu, K. (2024) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2411.14460 · Cited by 3
“To evaluate the generalization ability of our method, we use SQA(Iyyer et al., 2017), Wik-iTableText (Bao et al., 2018) and FinQA (Chen et al., 2021) as held-out datasets, where SQA belongs to table-based question, WikiTableText belongs to structured data to Text and FinQA requires generating python-executable math ex…”
Lefort, B., Benhamou, E., Ohana, J., Saltiel, D., & Guez, B. (2024) · PKDD/ECML Workshops · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2409.11408 · Cited by 3
“Moreover, the introduction of niche datasets such as FinQA or financial-phrasebank has played a major role in refining the proficiency of LLMs in processing financial texts interspersed with numerical information [4,17].”
Domain-Specific Few-Shot Table Prompt Question Answering via Contrastive Exemplar Selection
Mo, T., Xiao, Q., Zhang, H., Li, R., & Wu, Y. (2024) · Algorithms · doi:10.3390/a17070278 · Cited by 3
iTBLS: A Dataset of Interactive Conversations Over Tabular Information
Sundar, A. S., Richardson, C., Avsian, A., & Heck, L. (2024) · Proceedings of the 4th Table Representation Learning Workshop · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2404.12580 · Cited by 3
“Other tabular datasets are constructed from financial reports including TAT-QA (Zhu et al., 2021), F IN QA (Chen et al., 2021), M ULTI H IERTT (Zhao et al., 2022), or scientific reviews (Sundar et al., 2024).”
Wang, Y., Zhou, Y., Duan, C., Bao, J., & Zhao, T.-J. (2023) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2308.11257 · Cited by 3
“In recent years, question-answering tasks based on heterogeneous knowledge (HQA) have increasingly gained the attention of researchers (Chen et al., 2020b,a; Zhu et al., 2021; Talmor et al., 2021; Chen et al., 2021).”
BackgroundZhang, K., Meng, S., & Zhou, E. (2023) · Journal of Advanced Computing Systems · doi:10.69987/jacs.2023.30205 · Cited by 3
“Datasets such as FinQA show that finance questions require multi-step numerical reasoning over financial reports [9].”
Automated Text-to-Table for Reasoning-Intensive Table QA: Pipeline Design and Benchmarking Insights
Tian, S.-Y., Zhou, Z., Dong, W., Yang, M., Yu, K.-Y., Cheng, Z.-J., Guo, L.-Z., & Li, Y.-F. (2025) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2505.19563 · Cited by 3
“These gains further transfer to other tabular reasoning benchmarks (TAT-QA, FinQA, and TabMWP), with an average improvement of 4%(Table 12), particularly on complex tables, demonstrating the effectiveness of controllable data generation.”
InfluentialCunha, R., Chinonso, O., Campos, J. G. M., Timoney, B., Davis, B., Cozman, F., Pagano, A. S., & Ferreira, T. C. (2024) · First Workshop on Insights from Negative Results in NLP · doi:10.18653/v1/2024.insights-1.10 · Cited by 3
“…systems, despite having been addressed in other generation tasks such as text normalization (Zhang et al., 2019; Sproat, 2022), question-answering (Chen et al., 2021; Kim et al., 2022), and text-to-speech (Nikulásdóttir and Guðnason, 2019); tasks which also struggle to synthesize texts with…”
BackgroundImproving compositional generalization for multi-step quantitative reasoning in question answering
Nourbakhsh, A., Jiao, C., Shah, S., & Rosé, C. P. (2022) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.emnlp-main.125 · Cited by 3
“FinQA (Chen et al., 2021) is based on a collection of financial reports published by U.S. companies that were released as part of FinTabNet (Zheng et al., 2021).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialSelf-citationFact Checking Machine Generated Text with Dependency Trees
Estes, A., Vedula, N., Collins, M., Cecil, M., & Rokhlenko, O. (2022) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.emnlp-industry.46 · Cited by 4
“In conversational, high-consequence domains like health, finance, or e-commerce, we must be sure that any factual error introduced by an NLG system is detected (Chen et al., 2021; Di Sotto and Viviani, 2022; Khan et al., 2022).”
BackgroundInfluentialFinSphere, a Real-Time Stock Analysis Agent Powered by Instruction-Tuned LLMs and Domain Tools
Han, S.-J., Zhang, J., Shen, Y., Yan, K., & Li, H.-G. (2025) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2501.12399 · Cited by 2
“Financial Datasets and Evaluation Existing datasets such as FinQA [Chen et al. , 2021], TAT-QA [Zhu et al. , 2021], and FLARE [Xie et al. , 2023] focus on question answering or numerical reasoning, but lack support for comprehensive, real-time stock analysis.”
DecisionRobust: Benchmarking Robustness for JEV Style Decision Models Across Text and Vision
Lan, Y.-F., Liu, Z.-Y., Chang, Y.-R., Wang, H., Du, Y.-K., Lin, L., & Chen, J.-H. (2026) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2610.19118 · Cited by 2
“Apply counting, spatial, or conditional rules; answer table and geometry questions ImajevBench (mohit67890, 2026); FinQA (Chen et al., 2021); Geometry3K (Lu et al., 2021)”
InfluentialEnterpriseBench: Benchmarking LLM Agents on Enterprise-Level Strategic Reasoning and Decision-Making
Yang, M., Pan, Y.-C., Piao, J.-H., Song, D.-D., Gong, Y.-S., & Li, Y. (2026) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2609.37658 · Cited by 2
“Representative tasks include retrieving numerical facts from filings, identifying relevant spans in financial reports, and extracting values from tables or textual disclosures (Chen et al., 2021; Krumdick et al., 2024).”
USA: Update-aware SAM for Cross-domain On-Policy Disitllation of Language AgentsPreprint
Zhong, Q., Zheng, M., Song, M., 魏, 继., Jiang, H., Su, J., Zhang, L., Li, G., & Fang, J. (2026) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2609.34225 · Cited by 2
“FinQA is a financial numerical reasoning corpus containing roughly 8k expert-annotated question–answer pairs grounded in approximately 2.8k financial reports, where each problem requires reasoning jointly over textual and tabular evidence.”
Where Should a Document Live: Context, Representations, or Parameters?
Rakotonirina, N. C., Hardalov, M., Iglesias, G., & de Gispert, A. (2026) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2609.17346 · Cited by 2
“• T 2 -RAGBench/FinQA (Strich et al., 2026; Chen et al., 2021b): A decontextualized variant of FinQA designed for RAG evaluation, where questions about corporate earnings reports have been rewritten to be context-independent.”
FinRiskAtlas: Decision-Aligned Evaluation of Large Language Models for Financial Risk Review
Zhong, S.-Y., Zhu, J., Xu, Q., Sun, L.-Y., Wang, Y., Sun, Q.-Q., Chen, S., & Zhang, T.-Y. (2026) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2608.25325 · Cited by 2
“…financial LLM benchmarks have substantially expanded coverage of financial language understanding and numerical reasoning Shah et al. (2022), Chen et al. (2021, 2022), Zhu et al. (2021), broad financial knowledge, prediction, and professional applications Xie et al. (2023, 2024), Matlin et…”
Mansouri, S., Saad, D., Wahrenburg, M., Weissel, M., & Woebbeking, F. (2026) · arXiv
FinDeepIndicator: Benchmarking Deep Research Agents in End-to-End Financial Indicator ConstructionPreprint
Yang, C., Zhu, F., Lin, X., Bai, L., Liu, X., Huang, K., Zimmermann, R., & Chua, T.-S. (2026) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2608.00764 · Cited by 2
“FinQA[4],ConvFinQA[5],andTAT-QA[43]focuson arithmetic reasoning over financial tables and text.”
FinanceComplexQA: Benchmarking Agentic Reasoning on Industrial-grade Financial DocumentsPreprint
Cheng, X., Zhang, S., Zhao, J. M., Yang, J., Wang, X., Zhou, M., Zhou, W., Guan, X., Li, X., Wu, Z. Z., et al. (2026) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2607.19238 · Cited by 2
“FinQA (Chen et al., 2021) and ConvFinQA (Chen et al., 2022) focus on multi-step arithmetic over financial report excerpts, while TAT-QA (Zhu et al., 2021) combines tabular and textual evidence.”
Testing Retrieval-Augmented Generation Systems with Chunk Coverage
Kim, J., Pasini, S., & Tonella, P. (2026) · Proceedings of the ACM on software engineering. · doi:10.1145/3832208 · Cited by 1
Arabov, M. (2026) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2607.01388 · Cited by 2
“Chen et al. [2021] introduced FinQA, an expert-annotated dataset of numerical reasoning questions with executable reasoning programs.”
When LLMs Read Tables Carelessly: Measuring and Reducing Data Referencing Errors
Yang, Y.-Q., Zhu, Q., Han, Z., Han, B., Shen, Z., Wang, S., Ioannidis, V. N., & Rangwala, H. (2026) · Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.18653/v1/2026.acl-long.762 · Cited by 2
“They are widely used across real-world domains such as finance (Chen et al., 2021), healthcare (Yan et al., 2025), and scientific reporting (Moosavi et al., 2021; Zhang et al., 2025b), making the ability to effectively perform tasks over tabular data essential.”
InfluentialRecognize Your Orchestrator: An Entropy Dynamics Perspective for LLM Multi-Agent Systems
Zhu, J.-Z., Chen, W.-H., Zhang, X.-W., Wu, Z., & Dai, X.-Y. (2026) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2606.01351 · Cited by 2
“A diverse agent task set of 679 instances from IWG was gathered, spanning domains such as complex data analysis (Chen et al., 2021), research report writing (Yang et al., 2018), omni task (Mishra et al., 2019).”
Self-citationAn Auditable LLM-RAG Architecture for Financial Document Intelligence and Decision Support
Cosentino, C., Squillace, S., & Marozzo, F. (2026) · Future Internet · doi:10.3390/fi18060284 · Cited by 1
MAGE: Multi-Agent Self-Evolution with Co-Evolutionary Knowledge GraphsPreprint
Yang, R., Li, Z., Xue, H., Razzak, I., & Salim, F. D. (2026) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2605.10064 · Cited by 2
“FinQA [6] tests table-grounded numerical reasoning over financial reports, and MedQA-USMLE [10] tests medical multiple-choice reasoning.”
Agentic Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Financial Document Question AnsweringPreprint
Shu, Y., Liu, Y., & Xie, Z. (2026) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2605.05409 · Cited by 2
“Several benchmarks have driven progress in financial QA: FinQA (Chen et al., 2021) introduced 8,281 question-answer pairs requiring numerical reasoning over S&P 500 reports; ConvFinQA (Chen et al., 2022) extended this to multi-turn conversations; TAT-QA (Zhu et al., 2021) mixed tabular and textual…”
InfluentialWang, M.-Y., Zhi, X.-Y., Li, Z., Schmucker, R., Cohen, S. B., Ma, T.-J., & Silavong, F. (2026) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2604.22939 · Cited by 2
“Adapting LLMs to specialized tasks typically requires extensive, high-quality annotated data D = ⟨ D x , D y ⟩ , whether derived from human (Chen et al., 2021) or model-assisted (Wu et al., 2025) sources.”
Self-Consistency from Only Two Samples: CoT-PoT Ensembling for Efficient LLM Reasoning
Saparkhan, R., Hawasly, M., Parvez, M. R., & Raza, M. (2026) · Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2604.17433 · Cited by 2
“For instance, CP DFA has the highest accuracy for the Mistral model (across all datasets) and on the FinQA dataset (finance domain questions across all models) while also providing better efficiency than CP FF .”
InfluentialEmpirical Evaluation of PDF Parsing and Chunking for Financial Question Answering with RAG
Bachyr, O. E., Song, Y.-W., Ezzini, S., Klein, J., Bissyandé, T. F., Zilali, A., Ble, U., & Goujon, A. (2026) · SEIP@ICSE · doi:10.1145/3786583.3786911 · Cited by 2
“Financial NLP is a fast-growing field, that applies NLP to financial data to solve complex challenges and has recently drawn attention for its diverse, impactful applications [6].”
BidDeepSC-1.58b: 1.58-Bit Bidirectional Slimmable Semantic Communication System
Do, T. S., Truong, T. P., Do, Q. T., Won, D., Noh, W., & Cho, S. (2025) · IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology · doi:10.1109/tvt.2025.3622754 · Cited by 1
Q-Mask: Query-driven Causal Masks for Text Anchoring in OCR-Oriented Vision-Language Models
Xu, L., Feng, F.-J., Zhang, S.-J., Chen, X., Li, H., Du, A.-A., Yu, H., Fu, P., Luo, Z.-B., & Luan, J. (2026) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2604.00161 · Cited by 2
From Natural Language to Executable Option Strategies via Large Language Models
Luo, H.-C., Lai, Z.-Z., Xu, J., Li, Y.-F., Hin, T.-P., Zhang, Y., & Liu, C. (2026) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2603.16434 · Cited by 2
LingDT-VL-OCR: Structure-Aware Document-Level Parsing with Fine-Grained Visual Reference
Qian, S.-Y., Bai, X., Fu, B.-T., Lu, Y.-C., Zhang, G.-Y., Yang, X., & Zhang, P. (2026) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2603.11044 · Cited by 2
“However, general VLMs are often criticized for their “hallucination” tendencies regarding numerical data [6, 19], which is a critical failure point for financial auditing.”
TableMind++: An Uncertainty-Aware Programmatic Agent for Tool-Augmented Table ReasoningPreprint
Cheng, M., Yu, S., Jiang, C., Tao, X., Mao, Q., Ouyang, J., Liu, Q., & Chen, E. (2026) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2603.07528 · Cited by 2
“To further evaluate the robustness and transferability of TableMind++, we extend our experiments to two out-of-domain datasets: HiTab [10] and FinQA [5].”
EcoGym: Evaluating LLMs for Long-Horizon Plan-and-Execute in Interactive EconomiesPreprint
Hu, X., Xia, J., Xu, S., Song, K., Yuan, Y., Zhang, G., Ren, J., Feng, B., Lu, L., Zeng, T., et al. (2026) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2602.09514 · Cited by 2
“We first aggregated authoritative cross-domain datasets, including software development (LiveCodeBench [14], SWE-bench [16]), financial (FinQA [7], BizFinBench [20]), STEM (GSM8K [8], SciQ [27]), and Legal/Admin (LEXam [9], Pile-of-law [12]).”
Self-citationExplainable visual question answering: A survey on methods, datasets and evaluation
Wang, Y., Lin, Q.-K., Shi, J.-B., An, Y.-S., Liu, J., Wei, B.-F., & Jiang, X. (2026) · Information Fusion · doi:10.1016/j.inffus.2026.104215 · Cited by 2
Astaraki, M., Saloot, M. A., Kasmaee, A. S., Mahyar, H., & Samiee, S. (2026) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2601.19827 · Cited by 4
“This is the focus of FinQA (Chen et al., 2021) and TAT-QA (Yu et al., 2021), the latter being larger in scale and intentionally rich in numerical reasoning challenges.”
Pan, C.-Z., Zhang, J., Wei, K., Pan, C.-S., Zhao, Y., Huang, J.-W., Yang, J., Wu, Z.-H., Zeng, H.-Y., Gu, X., et al. (2026) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2601.07280 · Cited by 2
“TableQA has evolved from foundational datasets like WTQ (Pasupat and Liang, 2015) and TabFact (Chen et al., 2019), which primarily utilize Wikipedia-sourced tables, to more specialized domains such as aviation (AIT-QA (Katsis et al., 2022)), finance (TAT-QA (Zhu et al., 2021b), FinQA (Chen et al., 2021)) and others (C…”
CSCBench: A PVC Diagnostic Benchmark for Commodity Supply Chain Reasoning
Cui, Y., Zeng, Y., Yan, J., Lin, K., Ji, K., Zeng, J., Zhang, S., Luo, X., Su, B., Shen, C., et al. (2026) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2601.01825 · Cited by 2
“Financial benchmarks such as FinEval (Guo et al., 2025), BizBench (Krumdick et al., 2024), and FinQA (Chen et al., 2022) probe financial knowledge and quantitative reasoning.”
GraphMind: Theorem Selection and Conclusion Generation Framework with Dynamic GNN for LLM ReasoningPreprint
Li, Y., Zhou, Y., Wang, X., GuoChen, & Qin, C. (2025) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2511.19078 · Cited by 2
“We conduct experiments on three question-answering (QA) datasets from distinct domains: GSM8K [6] (mathematics), FinQA [5] (finance), and LegalBench [9] (law).”
STaR: Towards Effective and Stable Table Reasoning via Slow-Thinking Large Language Models
Zhang, H., Cheng, M., Luo, Y., & Tao, X. (2026) · International World Wide Web Conference (WWW) · doi:10.1145/3774904.3792372 · Cited by 6
“The training data is sourced from WikiTableQuestions (WTQ) [34] for table QA, HiTab [11] for hierarchical table reasoning, and FinQA [7] for numerical reasoning over financial tables.”
A Role-Aware Multi-Agent Framework for Financial Education QA
Zhu, A., & Du, Y. (2025) · ACM International Conference on AI in Finance (ICAIF) · doi:10.1145/3768292.3770345 · Cited by 1
“Benchmarks like FinQA [5] and FinBen [26] focus on general applied reasoning skills useful for evaluating industry-capabilities but not always central to educational learning objectives.”
RUST-BENCH: Benchmarking LLM Reasoning on Unstructured Text within Structured Tables
Abhyankar, N., Chaurasia, P., Kabra, S., Srivastava, A., Gupta, V., & Reddy, C. K. (2025) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2511.04491 · Cited by 2
“Finally, domain specificity intro-a WikiTQ (Pasupat and Liang, 2015) Wikipedia (Wikipedia) ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ 6.3 1133.51 TabFact (Chen et al., 2019) Wikipedia ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ 6.2 586.51 Hybrid-QA (Chen et al., 2020b) Wikipedia ✓ ✗ ✗ ✓ ✗ 15.7 372.14 ∗ OTT-QA (Chen et al., 2020a) Wikipedia ✓ ✗ ✗ ✓ ✗ 15.7 372.14 ∗ CRT-QA (Zhang et al.…”
InfluentialZhang, X.-G., & Wang, M. (2025) · Mathematical Modeling and Algorithm Application · doi:10.54097/7am6vk38 · Cited by 2
“Evaluation on financial QA benchmarks demonstrates that domain-adapted models significantly outperform general-purpose models, highlighting the value of financial corpus exposure during training [33].”
LogiNumSynth: Synthesizing Joint Logical-Numerical Reasoning Problems for Language ModelsPreprint
Liu, Y., Li, Y., Li, X., & Cheng, G. (2025) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2510.11031 · Cited by 2
“…including MAWPS (Koncel-Kedziorski et al., 2016), DROP (Dua et al., 2019), MathQA (Amini et al., 2019), GSM8k (Cobbe et al., 2021), FinQA (Chen et al., 2021b), SVAMP (Patel et al., 2021), MATH (Hendrycks et al., 2021), AIME (Veeraboina, 2023), and Omni-MATH (Gao et al., 2025) require…”
FINCH: Financial Intelligence using Natural language for Contextualized SQL Handling
Singh, A., Sarmah, B., & Pasquali, S. (2025) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2510.01887 · Cited by 2
“In contrast, practitioners and researchers working with financial data face highly specialized challenges, such as interpreting banking records, analyzing card transactions, managing retail and sales data, or handling loan and insurance queries [1, 39].”
Han, S., Zhang, J., Shen, Y., Yan, K., & Li, H. (2025) · Frontiers of Information Technology & Electronic Engineering · doi:10.1631/fitee.2500414 · Cited by 6
Chen, J., Chen, Z., Hu, X., Zhou, P., Hua, Y., Fang, H., Choy, C. H. Y., Ke, X., Luo, J., & Yuan, Z. (2025) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2509.14507 · Cited by 1
“Early research focused on discrete reasoning (Jin et al., 2022), with works such as TAT-QA (Zhu et al., 2021), FinQA (Chen et al., 2021), and MVGE (Ma et al., 2017) exploring methods like fine-tuning, pre-training, and in-context learning.”
Self-citationA Role-Aware Multi-Agent Framework for Financial Education Question Answering with LLMs
Zhu, A., & Du, Y. (2025) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2509.09727 · Cited by 2
“Benchmarks like FinQA [4] and FinBen [24] focus on general applied reasoning skills useful for evaluating industry-capabilities but not always central to educational learning objectives.”
Type-Compliant Adaptation Cascades: Adapting Programmatic LM Workflows to DataPreprint
Lin, C., Peng, D., Lu, Y., Zhang, M., & Ie, E. (2025) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2508.18244 · Cited by 1
“• FinQA [39] is a dataset of QA pairs, where solving the problems require extracting relevant information from long financial reports.”
CF-RAG: A Dataset and Method for Carbon Footprint QA Using Retrieval-Augmented GenerationPreprint
Zhao, K., Balaji, B., & Lee, S. (2025) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2508.03489 · Cited by 4
“Notably, financial QA datasets such as FinQA [8] and FinLLMs [45] illustrate the challenges and opportunities of reasoning over domain-specific documents with embedded numerical content.”
Reddy, V., & Veeranjaneyulu, N. (2025) · Journal of Intelligent Information Systems · doi:10.1007/s10844-025-00959-z · Cited by 4
“2%accuracy and supports 100 concurrent queries, enhancing scalability, accuracy, compliance, and accessibility (Chen et al., 2021).”
On the Comprehensibility of Multi-structured Financial Documents using LLMs and Pre-processing ToolsPreprint
Upadhyay, S., Ataey, M., Murtaza, S. S., Nie, Y., & Lin, J. (2025) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2506.05182 · Cited by 2
“…datasets can be categorized into two types: those that use a raw table as direct input for model analysis (Pa-supat and Liang, 2015; Hwang et al., 2019), and those that use a table with additional annotated information (Zhu et al., 2021; Nguyen et al., 2023; Jauhar et al., 2016; Chen et al., 2021).”
Zhu, J., Li, J., Wen, Y., Li, X., Guo, L.-F., & Chen, F. (2025) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2506.02510 · Cited by 2
“In English, FINQA by Chen et al. (2021) contains 8,281 question-answering pairs, with their numerical reasoning, from the earnings reports of S&P 500 companies.”
Towards Competent AI for Fundamental Analysis in Finance: A Benchmark Dataset and Evaluation
Wu, Z.-H., Zou, C., Wang, J., Wang, C., Yang, H.-J., & Shao, Y. (2025) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2506.07315 · Cited by 2
“Existing finance-focused benchmarks primarily assess LLMs on their ability to answer expert-level questions, covering areas such as financial natural language understanding [5, 6, 7], numerical reasoning [8, 9], and professional certification tests [10, 11].”
SMARTFinRAG: Interactive Modularized Financial RAG Benchmark
Zha, Y. (2025) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2504.18024 · Cited by 2
“Current approaches fall into two principal categories: financial question-answering datasets like FiQA [5] and FinQA [2] that lack retrieval integration capabilities, or comprehensive financial benchmarks such as FinBen [10] and PIXIU [9] that primarily focus on static model capabilities rather…”
Understanding Financial Reasoning in AI: A Multimodal Benchmark and Error Learning ApproachPreprint
Deng, S., Peng, H., Xu, J., Liu, C., Giurcăneanu, C. D., & Liu, J. (2025) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2506.06282 · Cited by 2
“For instance, TAT-QA (Zhu et al., 2021) combines tables and text for numerical reasoning, while FinQA (Chen et al., 2022c) offers 8,281 expert-annotated QA pairs requiring math operations like addition and comparison.”
Collaborative LLM Numerical Reasoning with Local Data Protection
Zhang, M., Lu, Y.-Z., Zhou, Y., Xu, P.-P., Cheong, L. L., Lu, C.-T., & Wang, H. (2025) · AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2504.00299 · Cited by 2
“This is the imperfect model’s inherent error, note that the accuracy for remote-only method on MultiHiertt/FinQA dataset is 66.4% and 73.7%.”
InfluentialHCT-QA: A Benchmark for Question Answering on Human-Centric Tables
Ahmad, M. S., Naeem, Z. A., Aupetit, M. J. M., Elmagarmid, A. K., Eltabakh, M. Y., Ma, X., Ouzzani, M., Ruan, C., & Al-Sayeh, H. (2026) · IEEE International Conference on Data Engineering (ICDE) · doi:10.1109/icde65706.2026.00234 · Cited by 3
“FinQA [62] consist of tables from the finance domain but specifically exclude tables with complex nested structures.”
OkraLong: A Flexible Retrieval-Augmented Framework for Long-Text Query Processing
Hui, Y.-L., Liu, Y.-H., Lu, Y., & Zhang, H.-C. (2025) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2503.02603 · Cited by 2
“To evaluate the performance of OkraLong comprehensively, we conduct experiments on six long-text query-answering datasets, spanning various domains and multiple query types: (1) FINQA (Chen et al., 2021) is a finanicl numerical reasoning dataset, constructed from the public earnings reports of S&P 500 companies.”
InfluentialMULTITAT: Benchmarking Multilingual Table-and-Text Question Answering
Zhang, X.-L., Wang, D., Xu, K., Zhu, Q.-F., & Che, W.-X. (2025) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2502.17253 · Cited by 2
“To evaluate the model capabilities on the TATQA task, several datasets are proposed (Li et al., 2021; Chen et al., 2021; Zhao et al., 2024b).”
InfluentialHiFi-KPI: A Dataset for Hierarchical KPI Extraction from Earnings Filings
Aavang, R. T., Rizzi, G., Boggild, R., Iolov, A., Zhang, M., & Bjerva, J. (2025) · International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation · doi:10.63317/2nbsp7zzfb3g · Cited by 2
“We investigate this by contributing: • HiFi-KPI: An iXBRL-based dataset with 1.65M paragraphs and 4.5M entities, and a smaller HiFi-KPI-Lite with four expert-defined labels.”
What Really Matters for Table LLMs? A Meta-Evaluation of Model and Data Effects
Deng, N., Zhang, S., Zhu, H., Chang, S., Zhang, J., Li, A. H., Hang, C.-W., Kobayashi, H., Hu, Y., & Ng, P. (2026) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EACL · doi:10.18653/v1/2026.findings-eacl.195
“These proposed benchmarks cover a diverse set of domains, including Wikipedia tables (Parikh et al., 2020), financial tables (Chen et al., 2021b), scientific tables (Moosavi et al., 2021), which serve as invaluable sources for developing and testing general table understanding models.”
MATATA: Weakly Supervised End-to-End MAthematical Tool-Augmented Reasoning for Tabular Applications
Vinayagame, V., Senay, G., & Martí, L. (2025) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-04614-7_24 · Cited by 1
“Method step GPT-4 experts Datasets used PoT [6] PE FinQA, TAT-QA, TabMWP EEDP [26] PE FinQA, TAT-QA, TabMWP Chameleon [19] PE TabMWP ToRA [11] FT TabMWP Husky [17] FT FinQA, TabMWP TAT-LLM [37] FT FinQA, TAT-QA FinQANet [7] FT FinQA TagOP [36] FT TAT-QA”
InfluentialTowards Efficient Dataset Development: A Case Study of M2Q2+ in Movie QA Systems
Aggoune, A., & Mihoubi, Z. (2024) · International Conference on Advanced Aspects of Software Engineering · doi:10.1109/icaase64542.2024.10850962 · Cited by 2
“For the creation of the FinQA dataset [14] in the finance domain, the process starts by filtering the FinTab-Net dataset of earnings reports to remove complex nested structures.”
CAP: Data Contamination Detection via Consistency AmplificationPreprint
Zhao, Y., Li, J., & Yang, L. (2024) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2410.15005 · Cited by 2
“This observation is consistent with the FinMA paper (Xie et al., 2023), which notes that these models were trained on a combination of instruction datasets, including FinQA.”
BackgroundInfluentialExploring the Effectiveness of Large Language Models in Financial Question Answering
Provakar, M. M., & Hashi, E. K. (2024) · International Conference on Computing Advancements (ICCA) · doi:10.1145/3723178.3723244 · Cited by 1
“The FinQA dataset (Chen et al., 2021) [3] has emerged as a top-tier publicly accessible dataset featuring more than 8,000 question-answer pairs carefully assembled by finance experts, broadening the range of assessments in financial question-answering.”
Co-Trained Retriever-Generator Framework for Question Generation in Earnings Calls
Juan, Y., Chen, C.-C., Huang, H., & Chen, H. (2025) · International World Wide Web Conference (WWW) · doi:10.1145/3701716.3715524 · Cited by 3
“While beneficial in education, these methods may not translate well to professional contexts where questions are complex and require domain expertise.”
Metadata
- Authors
- Chen, Z., Chen, W., Smiley, C., Shah, S., Borova, I., Langdon, D., Moussa, R., Beane, M., Huang, T.-H., Routledge, B., & Wang, W. Y.
- Affiliations
- University of California, Santa Barbara (US)
- Thomson Reuters (United States) (US)
- Pennsylvania State University (US)
- Carnegie Mellon University (US)
- Stanford University (US)
- ORCID
- Venue
- Proceedings of the 2021 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing
- Published
- 2021
- Pages
- 3697-3711
- OpenAlex
- W3198243861
- Cited by
- 258
- References
- 44
- Citations by year
- 2026: 79 · 2025: 74 · 2024: 42 · 2023: 35 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 1
- FWCI
- 12.13
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Natural Language Processing Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Multimodal Machine Learning Applications
- Keywords
- numerical reasoning, financial data, question answering, financial question answering
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review