The DOI matches its Crossref record; 30 of the 44 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
FinQA: A Dataset of Numerical Reasoning over Financial Data
Open accessAbstract
Zhiyu Chen, Wenhu Chen, Charese Smiley, Sameena Shah, Iana Borova, Dylan Langdon, Reema Moussa, Matt Beane, Ting-Hao Huang, Bryan Routledge, William Yang Wang. Proceedings of the 2021 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. 2021.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Most existing financial benchmarks focus on static question-answering, failing to capture the dynamics of real-market trading.”
From StockBench: Can LLM Agents Trade Stocks Profitably In Real-world Markets? (2025) · cites this paper as Chen et al., 2021
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“However, most existing benchmarks focus on static question-answering, such as FinQA, TAT-QA, and FinBench (Chen et al., 2021; Zhu et al., 2021; Yin et al., 2023).”
From StockBench: Can LLM Agents Trade Stocks Profitably In Real-world Markets? (2025) · cites this paper as Chen et al., 2021
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization
Kingma, D. P., & Ba, J. (2014) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1412.6980 · Cited by 98,946 · cited 1×
“For all models, we use the Adam optimizer (Kingma and Ba, 2015).”
MethodBERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding
Devlin, J., Chang, M.-W., Lee, K., & Toutanova, K. (2019) · Proceedings of the 2019 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Volume 1 (Long and Short Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/n19-1423 · Cited by 54,325 · cited 6×
“Retriever The full page of the financial report can go beyond 2,000 tokens, which cannot be coped with the current popular QA models (Devlin et al., 2019).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialRoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approach
Liu, Y., Ott, M., Goyal, N., Du, J., Joshi, M., Chen, D., Levy, O., Lewis, M., Zettlemoyer, L., & Stoyanov, V. (2019) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1907.11692 · Cited by 16,515 · cited 4×
“, 2019) and RoBERTa (Liu et al., 2019), our proposed approach outperforms all other baselines and achieves an execution accuracy of 65.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialLongformer: The Long-Document Transformer
Beltagy, I., Peters, M. E., & Cohan, A. (2020) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2004.05150 · Cited by 2,281 · cited 6×
“3703 scales linearly with sequence length, like the Longformer (Beltagy et al., 2020).”
BackgroundInfluentialKnow What You Don’t Know: Unanswerable Questions for SQuAD
Rajpurkar, P., Jia, R., & Liang, P. (2018) · Proceedings of the 56th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 2: Short Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/p18-2124 · Cited by 2,240 · cited 1×
“Financial QA is more challenging than classic QA (Rajpurkar et al., 2018; Yang et al., 2018) because it requires the system to spot relevant information across heterogeneous sources, such as tables and unstructured texts, and then create a numerical reasoning path to connect all the information.”
BackgroundHotpotQA: A Dataset for Diverse, Explainable Multi-hop Question Answering
Yang, Z., Qi, P., Zhang, S., Bengio, Y., Cohen, W., Salakhutdinov, R., & Manning, C. D. (2018) · Proceedings of the 2018 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.18653/v1/d18-1259 · Cited by 1,804 · cited 2×
“Financial QA is more challenging than classic QA (Rajpurkar et al., 2018; Yang et al., 2018) because it requires the system to spot relevant information across heterogeneous sources, such as tables and unstructured texts, and then create a numerical reasoning path to connect all the information.”
BackgroundYu, T., Zhang, R., Yang, K., Yasunaga, M., Wang, D., Li, Z., Ma, J., Li, I., Yao, Q., Roman, S., et al. (2018) · Proceedings of the 2018 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.18653/v1/d18-1425 · Cited by 1,034
MathQA: Towards Interpretable Math Word Problem Solving with Operation-Based Formalisms
Amini, A., Gabriel, S., Lin, S., Koncel-Kedziorski, R., Choi, Y., & Hajishirzi, H. (2019) · North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.18653/v1/n19-1245 · Cited by 956 · cited 6×
“This way the model is able to learn the program structures as patterns from very large-scale data (~40k for MathQA), but may fail on learning the reasoning paths.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialFinBERT: Financial Sentiment Analysis with Pre-trained Language Models
Araci, D. (2019) · arXiv · Cited by 602 · cited 5×
“The performance of using FinBert is no better than BERT-large, mostly because its pre-training corpus is limited (~30M words from news articles).”
BackgroundInfluentialMAWPS: A Math Word Problem Repository
Koncel-Kedziorski, R., Roy, S., Amini, A., Kushman, N., & Hajishirzi, H. (2016) · North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.18653/v1/n16-1136 · Cited by 551 · cited 2×
“Another kind of QA datasets related to ours is the math word problem datasets, like MaWPS (Koncel-Kedziorski et al., 2016), MathQA (Amini et al.”
Background
Research works printed but not linked: 7
- additionally , we have other committed and uncommitted credit lines of $ 746 million with major international banks and financial institutions to support our general global funding needs , including with respect to bank supported letters of credit, performance bonds and guarantees .
- Kezhen Chen, Qiuyuan Huang, Hamid Palangi, Paul Smolensky, Kenneth D. Forbus, and Jianfeng Gao. 2020a. Mapping natural-language problems to formal-language solutions using structured neural representations. In Proceedings of the 37th Inter- national Conference on Machine Learning, ICML 2020, 13-18 July 2020, Virtual Event, volume 119 of Proceedings of Machine Learning Research, pages 1566-1575. PMLR.
- Xinyun Chen, Chen Liang, Adams Wei Yu, Denny Zhou, Dawn Song, and Quoc V. Le. 2020d. Neu- ral symbolic reader: Scalable integration of dis- tributed and symbolic representations for reading comprehension. In 8th International Conference on Learning Representations, ICLR 2020, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, April 26-30, 2020. OpenReview.net.
- Zhuang Liu, Degen Huang, Kaiyu Huang, Zhuang Li, and Jun Zhao. 2020. Finbert: A pre-trained finan- cial language representation model for financial text mining. In Proceedings of the Twenty-Ninth Inter- national Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, IJCAI 2020, pages 4513-4519. ijcai.org. · DOI
- Donald MacKenzie. 2008. An engine, not a camera: How financial models shape markets. Mit Press.
- Donald MacKenzie, Daniel Beunza, Yuval Millo, and Juan Pablo Pardo-Guerra. 2012. Drilling through the allegheny mountains: Liquidity, materiality and high-frequency trading. Journal of cultural econ- omy, 5(3):279-296.
- Chuan-Ju Wang, Ming-Feng Tsai, Tse Liu, and Chin- Ting Chang. 2013. Financial sentiment analysis for risk prediction. In Sixth International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing, IJC- NLP 2013, Nagoya, Japan, October 14-18, 2013, pages 802-808. Asian Federation of Natural Lan- guage Processing / ACL.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–200 of 888
FinDER: Financial Dataset for Question Answering and Evaluating Retrieval-Augmented Generation
Choi, C., Kwon, J., Ha, J., Choi, H., Kim, C., Lee, Y., Sohn, J.-Y., & Lopez-Lira, A. (2025) · ACM International Conference on AI in Finance (ICAIF) · doi:10.1145/3768292.3770361 · Cited by 52
“Unlike open-domain QA, financial QA demands a higher level of precision, disambiguation, and technical understanding, which makes it uniquely challenging and error-prone [6, 7, 41, 59, 62].”
InfluentialZhu, J., Li, J., Wen, Y., & Guo, L.-F. (2024) · Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2405.10542 · Cited by 33
“Question Type (Task) English FINQA (Chen et al., 2021) Question Answering TAT-QA (Zhu et al., 2021) Question Answering BizBench (Koncel-Kedziorski et al., 2023) Quantitative Reasoning FINANCEBENCH (Islam et al., 2023) Question Answering FLUE (Shah et al., 2022) Sentiment Classification (Malo et…”
Modern Question Answering Datasets and Benchmarks: A Survey
Wang, Z. (2022) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2206.15030 · Cited by 21
“Compare to previous multi-hop QA only focuses on textual data, FinQA (Chen et al., 2021), which extracted from financial reports, includes more kinds of information, such as table and number, and therefore some specific numerical operation is needed.”
InfluentialTable-R1: Inference-Time Scaling for Table ReasoningPreprint
Yang, Z., Chen, L., Cohan, A., & Zhao, Y. (2025) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2505.23621 · Cited by 26
“To assess generalization of To address RQ1, we conduct a comprehensive evaluation and summarize the key findings from the results presented in Table 2 as follows:”
FinMTEB: Finance Massive Text Embedding Benchmark
Tang, Y., & Yang, Y. (2025) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2502.10990 · Cited by 31
“FinQA (from DuEE-fin) (Lu et al., 2023) Chinese Financial news bulletin event quiz dataset.”
InfluentialAIRS-Bench: a Suite of Tasks for Frontier AI Research Science AgentsPreprint
Lupidi, A., Gauri, B., Foster, T. S., Omari, B. A., Magka, D., Pepe, A., Audran-Reiss, A., Aghamelu, M., Baldwin, N., Cipolina-Kun, L., et al. (2026) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2602.06855 · Cited by 52
“The task utilizes the FinQA dataset (Chen et al., 2021), which is designed to evaluate complex question answering and reasoning over both natural language and structured tables in the financial domain.”
Demystifying Domain-adaptive Post-training for Financial LLMs
Ke, Z.-X., Ming, Y., Nguyen, X.-P., Xiong, C., & Joty, S. (2025) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2501.04961 · Cited by 30
“We also include large open QA datasets like FinQA (Chen et al., 2021).”
XFinBench: Benchmarking LLMs in Complex Financial Problem Solving and Reasoning
Zhang, Z., Cao, Y., & Liao, L. (2025) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL (Findings of ACL) · doi:10.18653/v1/2025.findings-acl.457 · Cited by 13
“Existing finance datasets, including TAT-QA (Zhu et al., 2021), FinQA (Chen et al., 2021), Multi-Hiertt (Zhao et al., 2022), PACIFIC (Deng et al., 2022) and ConvFinQA (Chen et al., 2022), focus on quantity extraction and basic numerical reasoning tasks when provided with company’s financial reports.”
InfluentialEnhancing Financial Question Answering with a Multi-Agent Reflection Framework
Fatemi, S., & Hu, Y. (2024) · ACM International Conference on AI in Finance (ICAIF) · doi:10.1145/3677052.3698686 · Cited by 18
“Recent studies have explored the effectiveness of various models and approaches in comprehending financial documents through Question-Answering (QA) tasks [3, 4].”
SEC-QA: A Systematic Evaluation Corpus for Financial QA
Lai, V., Krumdick, M., Lovering, C., Reddy, V., Schmidt, C. W., & Tanner, C. (2024) · Proceedings of The 10th Workshop on Financial Technology and Natural Language Processing · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2406.14394 · Cited by 29
“These questions are much more challenging than existing financial QA tasks such as FinQA(Chen et al., 2021) or TAT-QA (Zhu et al., 2021).”
BackgroundMethodMathematical Language Models: A Survey
Liu, W., Hu, H., Zhou, J., Ding, Y., Li, J., Zeng, J., He, M., Chen, Q., Jiang, B., Zhou, A., et al. (2025) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3773985 · Cited by 47
“Correct Option : B Current research delves into exploring mathematical INT [190], Feit-Thompson [64], and IsarStep [92]) to develop novel machine theorem-proving strategies.”
InfluentialLi, X., Zhu, Y., Liu, S., Ju, J., Qu, Y., & Cheng, G. (2022) · AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2211.12668 · Cited by 29
“We used the results of Long-former and NeRd reported in Chen et al. (2021b).”
InfluentialGür, Y., Toğaçar, M., & Solak, B. (2025) · Computational Economics · doi:10.1007/s10614-025-10893-5 · Cited by 28
“Moreover, as emphasised by Chen et al. (2021), the complexity of financial data is further increased by its heterogeneous nature, including both structured and unstructured data sources.”
Lei, F., He, S.-Z., Li, X. L., Zhao, J., & Liu, K. (2022) · International Conference on Computational Linguistics · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2209.07692 · Cited by 28
“The second is the numerical reasoning question, which usually aims to use the contents of tables and texts for numerical calculation (Zhu et al., 2021; Chen et al., 2021).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialFino1: On the Transferability of Reasoning-Enhanced LLMs and Reinforcement Learning to FinancePreprint
Qian, L., Zhou, W., Wang, Y., Peng, X., Yi, H., Zhao, Y., Huang, J., Xie, Q., & Nie, J. (2025) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2502.08127 · Cited by 65
FinDVer: Explainable Claim Verification over Long and Hybrid-content Financial Documents
Zhao, Y., Long, Y., Jiang, T., Wang, C., Chen, W., Liu, H., Tang, X., Zhang, Y., Zhao, C., & Cohan, A. (2024) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2024.emnlp-main.818 · Cited by 7
“…QA benchmarks have been proposed to evaluate models’ performance in answering questions based on financial documents, with a particular focus on numerical reasoning (Chen et al., 2021; Zhu et al., 2021; Zhao et al., 2022; Chen et al., 2022b; Koncel-Kedziorski et al., 2024; Zhao et al., 2024b,a).”
BackgroundSelf-citationS3HQA: A Three-Stage Approach for Multi-hop Text-Table Hybrid Question Answering
Lei, F., Li, X. L., Wei, Y., He, S.-Z., Huang, Y., Zhao, J., & Liu, K. (2023) · Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2305.11725 · Cited by 27
“Comparison A3: Rafer Johnson 2020b,a; Zhu et al., 2021; Chen et al., 2021; Zhao et al., 2022; Wang et al., 2022a).”
BackgroundA survey on complex factual question answering
Zhang, L., Zhang, J., Ke, X., Li, H., Huang, X., Shao, Z., Cao, S., & Lv, X. (2022) · AI Open · doi:10.1016/j.aiopen.2022.12.003 · Cited by 24
Zhou, Z., Feng, X., Zhu, Z., Yao, J., Koyejo, S., & Han, B. (2025) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2506.08295 · Cited by 13
“In code reasoning, benchmarks such as HumanEval (Chen et al., 2021a) and MBPP (Austin et al., 2021) challenge LLMs to generate correct and functional code by reasoning through programming tasks.”
MMTU: A Massive Multi-Task Table Understanding and Reasoning Benchmark
Xing, J., He, Y.-Y., Zhou, M., Dong, H.-Y., Han, S., Chen, L., Zhang, D.-M., Chaudhuri, S., & Jagadish, H. (2025) · Neural Information Processing Systems · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2506.05587 · Cited by 26
“• We recognize that providing effective safeguards is challenging, and many papers do not require this, but we encourage authors to take this into account and make a best faith effort.”
Qiu, Z.-P., Li, C.-Y., Peng, Y., He, G.-X., Yuan, B., & Wang, C. (2024) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2411.19504 · Cited by 26
“These tasks include performing arithmetic operations and understanding numerical relationships, which add a layer of complexity and sophistication to the benchmarks [36, 37].”
FAMMA: A Benchmark for Financial Domain Multilingual Multimodal Question AnsweringPreprint
Xue, S., Li, X., Zhou, F., Dai, Q., Chu, Z., & Mei, H. (2024) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2410.04526 · Cited by 38
“…understanding and knowledge acquisition (Wang et al., 2019; Hendrycks et al., 2021a; Zhou et al., 2023; Wang et al., 2024), code generation (Chen et al., 2021a; Liu et al., 2023; Jimenez et al., 2024), mathematical reasoning (Cobbe et al., 2021; Hendrycks et al., 2021b), tool use (Yan et…”
E2ETune: End-to-End Knob Tuning via Fine-tuned Generative Language Model
Huang, X., Li, H., Zhang, J., Zhao, X., Yao, Z., Li, Y., Yu, Z., Zhang, T., Chen, H., & Li, C.-P. (2024) · Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2404.11581 · Cited by 26
Surprising Efficacy of Fine-Tuned Transformers for Fact-Checking over Larger Language Models
Setty, V. (2024) · International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (SIGIR) · doi:10.1145/3626772.3661361 · Cited by 20
“For verifying numerical claims, we also use FinQA-RoBERTa-Large [20] fine-tuned using the financial QA dataset, FinQA [4].”
MethodTAT-LLM: A Specialized Language Model for Discrete Reasoning over Tabular and Textual Data
Zhu, F., Liu, Z.-Y., Feng, F.-L., Wang, C., Li, M.-X., & Chua, T.-S. (2024) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2401.13223 · Cited by 26
“We test our TAT-LLM on three popular tabular and textual QA benchmarks: FinQA [7], TAT-QA [54] and TAT-DQA [53].”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialELASTIC: Numerical Reasoning with Adaptive Symbolic Compiler
Zhang, J., & Moshfeghi, Y. (2022) · Neural Information Processing Systems · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2210.10105 · Cited by 26
“We conduct experiments on two challenging datasets: FinQA [15], and MathQA [19].”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialUniRPG: Unified Discrete Reasoning over Table and Text as Program Generation
Zhou, Y., Bao, J., Duan, C., Wu, Y.-Z., He, X.-D., & Zhao, T.-J. (2022) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2210.08249 · Cited by 26
“FinQA (Chen et al., 2021) is a recent work similar to ours, aiming to address the task of numerical reasoning over financial data.”
BackgroundPeng, X., Qian, L., Wang, Y., Xiang, R., He, Y., Ren, Y., Jiang, M., Zhang, V. J., Guo, Y., Zhao, J., et al. (2026) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.18653/v1/2026.acl-long.770 · Cited by 37
“Further evaluation results with complementary metrics, including BERTScore (Zhang et al., 2020) and numeric-consistency checks (Chen et al., 2021a), are provided in Table 9 (Appendix H.12).”
FinRAGBench-V: A Benchmark for Multimodal RAG with Visual Citation in the Financial Domain
Zhao, S.-F., Jin, Z.-R., Li, S.-J., & Gao, J. (2025) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2505.17471 · Cited by 25
When Agents Trade: Live Multi-Market Trading Benchmark for LLM Agents
Qian, L., Peng, X., Wang, Y., Zhang, V. J., He, H., Smith, H., Han, Y., He, Y., Li, H., Cao, Y., et al. (2025) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2510.11695 · Cited by 4
“Early financial NLP benchmarks [5, 6, 22, 33, 38, 42] such as Fin-Ben [41] expanded evaluation beyond sentiment and QA to include retrieval augmented tasks and multi-step decision-making problems, yet they remained largely static and English-centric.”
FinChain: A Symbolic Benchmark for Verifiable Chain-of-Thought Financial Reasoning
Xie, Z.-H., Orel, D., Thareja, R., Sahnan, D., Madmoun, H., Zhang, F., Banerjee, D., Georgiev, G., Peng, X.-Q., Qian, L.-F., et al. (2025) · Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2506.02515 · Cited by 24
“- investor_name = sample(investors) - project_name = sample(projects) - principal = range(1000, 5000) - rate = uniform(2, 10) - time = range(1, 5)”
Song, T., Gan, G., Shang, M., & Zhao, Y. (2025) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2503.04644 · Cited by 5
“…growing emphasis on developing IR benchmarks in specialized domains, such as law (Xiao et al., 2019; Li et al., 2023), finance (Jangid et al., 2018; Chen et al., 2021; Zhao et al., 2024b), scientific literature (Wu et al., 2024; Ajith et al., 2024), and healthcare (Roberts et al., 2020; Tamine and…”
Do We Need Domain-Specific Embedding Models? An Empirical InvestigationPreprint
Tang, Y., & Yang, Y. (2024) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2409.18511 · Cited by 41
“Reranking includes a set of financial datasets that have the ranking of retrieved documents to user queries such as FinQA2018-Rerank (Chen et al., 2021).”
BackgroundCFGPT: Chinese Financial Assistant with Large Language ModelPreprint
Li, J., Bian, Y., Wang, G., Yang, L., Cheng, D., Ding, Z., & Jiang, C. (2023) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2309.10654 · Cited by 45
“ConvFinQA builds upon FinQA by introducing multi-turn conversations for question-answering tasks using earnings reports.”
MethodFinMath: Injecting a Tree-structured Solver for Question Answering over Financial Reports
Li, C., Ye, W.-B., & Zhao, Y. (2022) · International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation · doi:10.63317/3sn46fpg5rrp · Cited by 23
“…in areas like question answering (Dua et al., 2019; Andor et al., 2019; Ran et al., 2019; Herzig et al., 2020; Chen et al., 2020a; Yin et al., 2020; Chen et al., 2021) and math word problems (MWPs) solving (Xie and Sun, 2019b; Amini et al., 2019; Koncel-Kedziorski et al., 2016; Hendrycks et al.,…”
BackgroundTableMind: An Autonomous Programmatic Agent for Tool-Augmented Table Reasoning
Jiang, C., Cheng, M.-Y., Tao, X.-Y., Mao, Q.-Y., Ouyang, J., & Liu, Q. (2025) · Web Search and Data Mining · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2509.06278 · Cited by 22
“To further evaluate the robustness and transferability of TableMind, we extend our experiments to two out-of-domain datasets: HiTab [7] and FinQA [2].”
A Survey on Mathematical Reasoning and Optimization with Large Language Models
Forootani, A. (2025) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2503.17726 · Cited by 22
Fine-tuning Smaller Language Models for Question Answering over Financial Documents
Phogat, K. S., Puranam, S. A., Dasaratha, S., Harsha, C., & Ramakrishna, S. (2024) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2408.12337 · Cited by 22
“In contrast, we focus on fine-tuning small language models for financial question answering problems (Chen et al., 2021b, 2022; Zhu et al., 2021).”
Towards Fine-grained Causal Reasoning and QAPreprint
Yang, L., Wang, Z., Wu, Y., Yang, J., & Zhang, Y. (2022) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2204.07408 · Cited by 13
FinCARDS: Card-Based Analyst Reranking for Financial Document Question Answering
Zhou, Y.-X., Zhang, F., Chen, Y., Zhang, H., Nakov, P., & Xie, Z.-H. (2026) · Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2601.06992 · Cited by 21
“This isolates the core retrieval bottleneck in financial QA: locating grounded evidence within long documents before generation (Zhu et al., 2021; Chen et al., 2021).”
Zhu, J., Wang, J.-Y., Yu, B.-H., Wu, X.-Y., Li, J.-B., Wang, L., & Xu, N. (2025) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2506.03949 · Cited by 21
“Existing methods often use exact match (Zhu et al., 2021), F1-score (Chen et al., 2021b), or n-gram-matching (Parikh et al., 2020; Nan et al., 2022) metrics.”
ControlNET: A Firewall for RAG-based LLM SystemPreprint
Yao, H., Shi, H., Chen, Y., Jiang, Y., Wang, C., & Qin, Z. (2025) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2504.09593 · Cited by 21
Pr????mpt: Sanitizing Sensitive Prompts for LLMs
Chowdhury, A. R., Glukhov, D., Anshumaan, D., Chalasani, P., Papernot, N., Jha, S., & Mihir Bellare, Y. (2026) · Network and Distributed System Security Symposium · doi:10.14722/ndss.2026.231277 · Cited by 12
“Homomor-phic encryption similarly faces high inference, memory, and communication costs.”
TableMaster: A Recipe to Advance Table Understanding with Language Models
Cao, L., & Liu, H. (2025) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2501.19378 · Cited by 21
“FinQA [61] requires multi-step numerical reasoning over financial reports—e.g., computing growth rates or combining multiple cells with arithmetic operators.”
Opportunities and Challenges of Generative-AI in Finance
Desai, A. P., Ravi, T., Luqman, M., Mallya, G., Kota, N., & Yadav, P. (2024) · IEEE International Conference on Big Data (BigData) · doi:10.1109/bigdata62323.2024.10825658 · Cited by 34
FinQAPT: Empowering Financial Decisions with End-to-End LLM-driven Question Answering Pipeline
Singh, K., Kaur, S., & Smiley, C. (2024) · ACM International Conference on AI in Finance (ICAIF) · doi:10.1145/3677052.3698682 · Cited by 15
“To test the individual modules and end-to-end pipeline, we conducted experiments using two datasets: the S&P 500 companies’ earnings reports [32] and the FinQA dataset [7].”
Self-citationChaining Simultaneous Thoughts for Numerical Reasoning
Shao, Z., Huang, F., & Huang, M. (2022) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2211.16482 · Cited by 21
“Numerical reasoning over text is an essential skill for a neural model to help analyze rich numerical information from large-scale textual data (Chen et al., 2021).”
BackgroundImbalanced Gradients in RL Post-Training of Multi-Task LLMs
Wu, R., Samanta, A., Jain, A., Fujimoto, S., Kwon, J., Kretzu, B., Yu, Y., Hassani, K., Vidolov, B., & Efroni, Y. (2025) · Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2510.19178 · Cited by 20
“…(2) Countdown , where the model needs to construct a target number from given inputs using basic arithmetic operators (Pan et al., 2025); (3) MATH , focused on mathematical problem solving (Hendrycks et al., 2021); and (4) FinQA , financial reasoning over tabular data and text (Chen et al., 2021).”
FinAuditing: A Financial Taxonomy-Structured Multi-Document Benchmark for Evaluating LLMs
Wang, Y., Wang, K., Yang, S., Patel, J., Zhao, J., Mo, F., Peng, X., Qian, L., Chen, Y., Gutiérrez-Basulto, V., et al. (2026) · International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (SIGIR) · doi:10.1145/3805712.3808578 · Cited by 22
“Detecting errors across the hierarchical and structured financial documents requires understanding semantics, hierarchical relations, and numerical logic.”
InfluentialReasoning-Table: Exploring Reinforcement Learning for Table ReasoningPreprint
Lei, F., Meng, J., Huang, Y., Chen, T., Zhang, Y., He, S., Zhao, J., & Liu, K. (2025) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2506.01710 · Cited by 22
“…Answer EM,F1 MultiHiertt (Zhao et al., 2022) Spreadsheet Table Answer EM,F1 OTT-QA (Chen et al., 2021a) Semi-Structured Table Answer EM,F1 FinQA (Chen et al., 2021b) Spreadsheet Table Answer Acc FeTaQA (Nan et al., 2022) Spreadsheet Table Sentence Answer BLEU TAT-QA (Nan et al., 2022)…”
Yang, B., Zhang, Y., Liu, D., Freitas, A., & Lin, C. (2025) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2501.13042 · Cited by 20
“HybridQA (Chen et al., 2020b) derived from Wikipedia emphasises span lookup, while TAT-QA (Zhu et al., 2021), FinQA (Chen et al., 2021), and DocMath-Eval (Zhao et al., 2024) address numerical reasoning in the financial domain.”
TART: An Open-Source Tool-Augmented Framework for Explainable Table-based Reasoning
Lu, X., Pan, L., Ma, Y.-B., Nakov, P., & Kan, M.-Y. (2024) · North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2409.11724 · Cited by 20
“HiTab (HIT) (Cheng et al., 2022), TabMWP (TMP) (Lu et al., 2023b) and FinQA (FQA) (Chen et al., 2021) datasets focus on numerical reasoning reasoning.”
MuGER2: Multi-Granularity Evidence Retrieval and Reasoning for Hybrid Question Answering
Wang, Y., Bao, J., Duan, C., Wu, Y.-Z., He, X.-D., & Zhao, T.-J. (2022) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2210.10350 · Cited by 20
“Based on the HybridQA, Chen et al. (2021a) further pro-pose the OTT-QA dataset, which requires the sys-tem to retrieve relevant tables and text for the given questions.”
BackgroundZhao, Y., Long, Y.-T., Liu, H.-J., Nan, L., Chen, L., Kamoi, R., Liu, Y., Tang, X., Zhang, R., & Cohan, A. (2023) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2311.09805 · Cited by 19
“Applying these models in the finance domain (Xie et al., 2023; Wu et al., 2023a; Yang et al., 2023) presents additional challenges in terms of interpreting hybrid data (Zhu et al., 2021) and utilizing domain-specific expertise (Chen et al., 2021; Zhao et al., 2024).”
InfluentialRealFin: How Well Do LLMs Reason About Finance When Users Leave Things Unsaid?Preprint
Dai, Y., Lin, Y., Xie, Z., & Wang, Y. (2026) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2602.07096 · Cited by 6
“More recent work extends financial QA toward numerical and long-form reasoning over reports, as in FinQA (Chen et al., 2021) and TAT-QA (Zhu et al., 2021), and toward multi-task settings that integrate retrieval and multi-step reasoning, including PIXIU (Xie et al., 2023), FinBen (Xie et al., 2024), EMS (Hu et al., 20…”
It’s High Time: A Survey of Temporal Question Answering
Piryani, B., Abdallah, A., Mozafari, J., Anand, A., & Jatowt, A. (2026) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.18653/v1/2026.acl-long.1332 · Cited by 34
“Notable examples include FinQA (Chen et al., 2021b), FinTextQA (Chen et al., 2024), and FinDER (Choi et al., 2025).”
DianJin-R1: Evaluating and Enhancing Financial Reasoning in Large Language Models
Zhu, J., Chen, Q., Dou, H.-X., Li, J., Guo, L.-F., Chen, F., & Zhang, C. (2025) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2504.15716 · Cited by 19
“We begin by constructing a high-quality reasoning dataset, DianJin-R1-Data, using three major sources: CFLUE (Zhu et al., 2024), FinQA (Chen et al., 2021), and our proprietary compliance dataset for the task of Chinese Compliance Check (CCC).”
EconNLI: Evaluating Large Language Models on Economics Reasoning
Guo, Y., & Yang, Y. (2024) · Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2407.01212 · Cited by 19
“Besides, several datasets are developed to evaluate LLMs in various financial NLP tasks, such as sentiment analysis (Malo et al., 2014; FiQA), text classification (Sinha and Khandait, 2020; Shah et al., 2023) or question answering (Chen et al., 2021, 2022).”
MethodDólares or Dollars? Unraveling the Bilingual Prowess of Financial LLMs Between Spanish and English
Zhang, X., Xiang, R., Yuan, C., Feng, D., Han, W., Lopez-Lira, A., Liu, X.-Y., Qiu, M., Ananiadou, S., Peng, M., et al. (2024) · ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD) · doi:10.1145/3637528.3671554 · Cited by 23
L-Eval: Instituting Standardized Evaluation for Long Context Language Models
An, C., Gong, S., Zhong, M., Zhao, X., Li, M., Zhang, J., Kong, L., & Qiu, X. (2024) · Proceedings of the 62nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/2024.acl-long.776 · Cited by 18
Can AI Agents Answer Your Data Questions? A Benchmark for Data Agents
Ma, R., Shankar, S., Chen, R., Lin, Y.-M., Zeighami, S., Ghosh, R., Gupta, A., Gupta, A., Gopal, T., & Parameswaran, A. G. (2026) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2603.20576 · Cited by 18
“…, github_repos ) [4, 14], local business and reviews ( googlelocal , yelp ) [18, 27, 46], music ( music_brainz_20k ) [38, 39], financial markets ( stockindex , stockmarket ) [32], medical research pancancer_atlas patents The crmarenapro dataset and its queries are drawn from the CR-MArena”
Kim, S., Song, H., Seo, H., & Kim, H. (2025) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2503.15191 · Cited by 26
“…2024), selected to cover (Islam et al., 2023) Real-world questions written by non-experts TATQA(Zhu et al., 2021) Basic arithmetic questions FinQA(Chen et al., 2021) Complex arithmetic questions ConvFinQA(Chen et al., 2022) Questions asking for specific value from table values MultiHiertt(Zhao…”
DAgent: A Relational Database-Driven Data Analysis Report Generation AgentPreprint
Xu, W., Mao, Y., Zhang, X., Zhang, C., Dong, X., Zhang, M., & Gao, Y. (2025) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2503.13269 · Cited by 23
“…and limited table contexts; Open-Domain DatasetssuchasOTTQA[3]andNQ-tables[15],designedfor broader generalization across various tables; and Hybrid Datasets like TAT-QA[46] and FinQA[4], which combine tables with surrounding text and require models to handle both structured and unstructured data.”
FinLLMs: A Framework for Financial Reasoning Dataset Generation With Large Language Models
Yuan, Z., Wang, K., Zhu, S., Yuan, Y., Zhou, J., Zhu, Y., & Wei, W. (2024) · IEEE Transactions on Big Data · doi:10.1109/tbdata.2024.3524083 · Cited by 22
“In this domain, widely recognized datasets include FinQA [4] and TAT-QA [5].”
InfluentialCompMix: A Benchmark for Heterogeneous Question Answering
Christmann, P., Roy, R. S., & Weikum, G. (2024) · International World Wide Web Conference (WWW) · doi:10.1145/3589335.3651444 · Cited by 9
“like Wikidata or DBpedia [25, 47]; (iii) they span only two sources, like tables and text [10, 12, 50], or text and knowledge bases [25, 38, 47]; (iv) they explore only one domain like finance [12, 50], geography [24], or e-commerce [34]; and (v) their questions are only in conversational form with implicit intent, un…”
BackgroundIs GPT-OSS Good? A Comprehensive Evaluation of OpenAI's Latest Open Source ModelsPreprint
Bi, Z., Chen, K., Tseng, C.-Y., Zhang, D. H., Wang, T., Luo, H., Lu, C., Huang, J., Guan, J., Hao, J., et al. (2025) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2508.12461 · Cited by 21
“Domain-specific evaluation includes FinQA [52] for financial reasoning, MedQA [53] for medical knowledge assessment, LegalQA [54] for legal understanding, and SciQ [55] for scientific reasoning.”
Benchmarking Multimodal LLMs on Recognition and Understanding over Chemical Tables
Zhou, Y., Cheng, M., Mao, Q., Luo, Y., Liu, Q., Li, Y., Zhang, X., Liu, D., Li, X., & Chen, E. (2026) · ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD) · doi:10.1145/3770855.3818823 · Cited by 16
“Benchmarks like ChartQA [24] and ChartX [38] have begun exploring visual reasoning over scientific figures.”
Weaver: Interweaving SQL and LLM for Table Reasoning
Khoja, R., Gupta, D., Fu, Y.-J., Roth, D., & Gupta, V. (2025) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2505.18961 · Cited by 17
“…lookups or aggregations; fact-checking queries (TabFact (Chen et al., 2019)) that require claim verification; numerical reasoning queries (FinQA (Chen et al., 2021b)) necessitating multi-step calculations; and multi-modal queries (FinQA and OTT-QA (Chen et al., 2021a)) that demand reasoning…”
Responsible Innovation: A Strategic Framework for Financial LLM Integration
Tavasoli, A., Sharbaf, M., & Madani, S. M. (2025) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2504.02165 · Cited by 17
“…significantly curtails misclassification and enhances factual grounding, but key challenges persist: numeric reasoning remains difficult, factual “hallucinations” can occur in extended text generation, and certain real-time analyses require continuous updates (Chen et al., 2022; Ji et al., 2023).”
Brief, M., Ovadia, O., Shenderovitz, G., Yoash, N. B., Lemberg, R., & Sheetrit, E. (2024) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2410.01109 · Cited by 15
“• ConvFinQA : The ConvFinQA dataset (Chen et al., 2022) extends FinQA by including conversational aspects, making the question-answering process more complex.”
InfluentialcPAPERS: A Dataset of Situated and Multimodal Interactive Conversations in Scientific Papers
Sundar, A. S., Xu, J., Avsian, A., Richardson, C., & Heck, L. (2024) · Neural Information Processing Systems · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2406.08398 · Cited by 17
“Other tabular datasets are constructed from financial reports including TAT-QA [60], F IN QA [8], M ULTI H IERTT [59], or arXiv iTBLS [46].”
MethodFinanceBench: A New Benchmark for Financial Question Answering
Islam, P., Kannappan, A., Kiela, D., Qian, R., Scherrer, N., & Vidgen, B. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2311.11944 · Cited by 16
SpreadsheetBench 2: Evaluating Agents on End-to-End Business Spreadsheet WorkflowsPreprint
Zhu, J., Zhang, Y., Ma, Z., Zhang, B.-H., Schoepf, A., Woloch, D., Wang, P. Y., Yang, G. R., Jacob, S., Nagisetty, S., et al. (2026) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2606.29955 · Cited by 16
“A substantial body of work has developed benchmarks for table understanding, spanning question answering over structured tables, fact verification against tabular evidence, and numerical reasoning over hybrid tabular-textual data [31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 20].”
Can GRPO Boost Complex Multimodal Table Understanding?
Kang, X.-Q., Wu, S., Wang, Z., Liu, Y., Jin, X.-B., Huang, K.-Z., Wang, W., Yue, Y., Huang, X.-W., & Wang, Q.-F. (2025) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2509.16889 · Cited by 16
“…in NLP and multimodal research, as structured data in the form of tables is pervasive across diverse domains such as scientific research (Van Breugel and Van Der Schaar, 2024; Li et al., 2024a), finance (Chen et al., 2021; Katsis et al., 2022), and education (Lu et al., 2023; Kang et al., 2025).”
Self-citationKnowledge-Aware Reasoning over Multimodal Semi-structured TablesPreprint
Mathur, S. V., Bafna, J. S., Kartik, K., Khandelwal, H., Shrivastava, M., Gupta, V., Bansal, M., & Roth, D. (2024) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2408.13860 · Cited by 3
“Works such as (Chen et al., 2020; Zhu et al., 2021; Chen et al., 2021; Zhao et al., 2022) integrate paragraph context alongside tables for enhanced tabular question answering.”
BackgroundTheoremExplainAgent: Towards Multimodal Explanations for LLM Theorem Understanding
Ku, M. W. F., Chong, T., Leung, J., Shah, K., Yu, A., & Chen, W.-H. (2025) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2502.19400 · Cited by 16
“As LLM capabilities advanced, more domain-specific benchmarks emerged, extending evaluation to fields like science reasoning (ScienceQA) (Lu et al., 2022), financial reasoning (FinQA) (Chen et al., 2022b), and theorem comprehension (The-oremQA) (Chen et al., 2023b).”
Self-citationFUSION: Fully Integration of Vision-Language Representations for Deep Cross-Modal UnderstandingPreprint
Liu, Z., Liu, M., Chen, J.-Z., Xu, J.-W., Cui, B., He, C.-H., & Zhang, W.-T. (2026) · International Conference on Learning Representations · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2504.09925 · Cited by 16
MultiFinBen: A Multilingual, Multimodal, and Difficulty-Aware Benchmark for Financial LLM Evaluation
Peng, X.-Q., Qian, L.-F., Wang, Y., Xiang, R.-Y., He, Y.-R., Ren, Y., Jiang, M.-Y., Zhao, J., He, H., Han, Y., et al. (2025) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2506.14028 · Cited by 16
“Further evaluation results with complementary metrics, including BERTScore (Zhang et al., 2020) and numeric-consistency checks (Chen et al., 2021a), are provided in Table 9 (Appendix H.12).”
DocMath-Eval: Evaluating Math Reasoning Capabilities of LLMs in Understanding Financial Documents
Zhao, Y., Long, Y.-T., Liu, H.-J., Kamoi, R., Nan, L., Chen, L., Liu, Y., Tang, X., Zhang, R., & Cohan, A. (2024) · Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.18653/v1/2024.acl-long.852 · Cited by 16
“Applying these models in the finance domain (Xie et al., 2023; Wu et al., 2023a; Yang et al., 2023b) presents additional challenges in terms of interpreting hybrid data (Zhu et al., 2021) and utilizing domain-specific expertise (Chen et al., 2021; Zhao et al., 2023a).”
InfluentialDIVE: Scaling Diversity in Agentic Task Synthesis for Generalizable Tool UsePreprint
Chen, A., Zhang, C., Liu, J., Chen, J., Du, C., Li, Y., Zhong, M., Wang, Q., Zhu, Z., Song, J., et al. (2026) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2603.11076 · Cited by 15
FinTrust: A Comprehensive Benchmark of Trustworthiness Evaluation in Finance Domain
Hu, T., Hu, T.-Y., Bai, L.-Y., Zhao, Y., Cohan, A., & Zhao, C. (2025) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.18653/v1/2025.emnlp-main.512 · Cited by 15
“The development of Large Language Models (LLMs) has brought significant benefits to the financial domain across a range of applications (Chen et al., 2021; Zhu et al., 2021; Zhao et al., 2022; Yang et al., 2023; Xie et al., 2023; Gruver et al., 2023; Nie et al., 2024; Zhao et al., 2024b; Peng et…”
InfluentialSECQUE: A Benchmark for Evaluating Real-World Financial Analysis CapabilitiesPreprint
Yoash, N. B., Brief, M., Ovadia, O., Shenderovitz, G., Mishaeli, M., Lemberg, R., & Sheetrit, E. (2025) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2504.04596 · Cited by 11
“Early efforts include FiQA (Maia et al., 2018) for sentiment analysis and opinionated QA, while FinQA (Chen et al., 2021) and its conversational extension ConvFinQA (Chen et al., 2022) offer more realistic, multi-turn interactions.”
Open FinLLM Leaderboard: Towards Financial AI Readiness
Lin, S., Tian, F., Wang, K., Zhao, X.-J., Huang, J.-M., Xie, Q.-Q., Borella, L., White, M., Wang, C., Xiao, K., et al. (2025) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2501.10963 · Cited by 15
SensorQA: A Question Answering Benchmark for Daily-Life Monitoring
Reichman, B. Z., Yu, X.-F., Hu, L., Truxal, J., Jain, A., Chandrupatla, R., Rosing, T., & Heck, L. (2025) · ACM International Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2501.04974 · Cited by 15
“Question Answering using sensor data Question Answering has attracted extensive interests in the field of Natural Language Processing (NLP), with a wide range of datasets designed to address various language tasks [6, 9, 11, 20, 21, 23, 27, 40, 55, 58].”
SusGen-GPT: A Data-Centric LLM for Financial NLP and Sustainability Report GenerationPreprint
Wu, Q., Xiang, X., Huang, H., Wang, X., Jie, Y. W., Satapathy, R., Filho, R. S., & Veeravalli, B. (2024) · RePEc: Research Papers in Economics · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2412.10906 · Cited by 10
“For finanical Q&A task, the FinQA (Chen et al., 2021) dataset focuses on multi-step numerical reasoning through financial reports.”
InfluentialHusky: A Unified, Open-Source Language Agent for Multi-Step ReasoningPreprint
Kim, J., Paranjape, B., Khot, T., & Hajishirzi, H. (2024) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2406.06469 · Cited by 15
“• FinQA [5]: We use the publicly available train split as part of the training set or generating tool-integrated solution trajectories, and the test split as part of the evaluation set.”
InfluentialA Comprehensive Survey of Contamination Detection Methods in Large Language ModelsPreprint
Ravaut, M., Ding, B., Jiao, F., Chen, H., Li, X., Zhao, R., Qin, C., Xiong, C., & Joty, S. (2024) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2404.00699 · Cited by 59
“Authors also show that the n-gram contamination detection method from Llama-2 Touvron et al. (2023b) is not effective at detecting contaminated data points, calling for more robust methods.”
FinToolBench: Evaluating LLM Agents for Real-World Financial Tool UsePreprint
Lu, J., Wang, K., Wang, Y., Tang, Q., Zeng, H., Chen, X., Pi, J., Deng, S., Chen, L., Fu, Y., et al. (2026) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2603.08262 · Cited by 15
“Examples include FinanceBench [12], OpenFinData [19], and report-focused datasets such as FinQA [4] and TAT-QA [33].”
LiveTradeBench: Seeking Real-World Alpha with Large Language ModelsPreprint
Yu, H., Li, F., & You, J. (2025) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2511.03628 · Cited by 30
“FinQA (Chen et al., 2021) ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ConvFinQA (Chen et al., 2022) ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ FLUE (Shah et al., 2022) ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ FinEval (Zhang et al., 2023) ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ BizFinBench (Bigeard et al., 2025) ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ FinAgentBench (Bigeard et al., 2025) ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ FinSearchComp (Hu et al., 2025) ✓ ✗ ✗ ✗ INVESTORBENCH (Li et al.,…”
Watermarking Diffusion Language Models
Gloaguen, T., Staab, R., Jovanovi'c, N., & Vechev, M. T. (2025) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2509.24368 · Cited by 14
“We use as prompts the long-answer sub-tasks of W ATER B ENCH : 200 questions from the ELI-5 dataset (Fan et al., 2019), 200 questions from the F INANCE -QA dataset (Chen et al., 2021), and 200 questions from the A LPACA -”
FAITH: A Framework for Assessing Intrinsic Tabular Hallucinations in Finance
Zhang, M., Fu, J., Warrier, T., Wang, Y., Tan, T., & Huang, K. (2025) · ACM International Conference on AI in Finance (ICAIF) · doi:10.1145/3768292.3770433 · Cited by 7
“Datasets like FinQA [5] and TAT-QA [30] test joint reasoning over tables and text, while others focus on navigating complex hierarchical structures [9, 23, 27].”
NeuSym-RAG: Hybrid Neural Symbolic Retrieval with Multiview Structuring for PDF Question Answering
Cao, R., Zhang, H., Huang, T., Kang, Z., Zhang, Y., Sun, L., Li, H., Miao, Y., Fan, S., Chen, L., et al. (2025) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.18653/v1/2025.acl-long.311 · Cited by 10
Self-citationChoe, J., Kim, J., & Jung, W. (2025) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL 2025 · doi:10.18653/v1/2025.findings-acl.855 · Cited by 7
“In this section, we detail our process for constructing open-domain QA pairs by leveraging three established financial QA benchmarks: FinQA (Chen et al., 2021), Financebench (Islam et al., 2023), and SEC-QA (Lai et al., 2024).”
Ranking Free RAG: Replacing Re-ranking with Selection in RAG for Sensitive Domains
Saxena, Y., Padia, A., Chaudhary, M. S., Gunaratna, K., Parthasarathy, S., & Gaur, M. (2025) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2505.16014 · Cited by 14
“FinQA provides numerical reasoning challenges over financial reports with hybrid text-table evidence (Chen et al., 2021).”
Liu, S., Li, X.-Z., Liu, Z.-H., Yan, Y.-K., Yang, C., Zeng, Z.-N., Liu, Z.-Y., Sun, M.-S., & Yu, G. (2025) · Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2502.18817 · Cited by 14
Zhang, X.-L., Wang, D., Wang, B., Dou, L.-X., Lu, X., Xu, K., Wu, D.-Y., Zhu, Q.-F., & Che, W.-X. (2024) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2412.11757 · Cited by 14
“TAT-QA (Zhu et al., 2021), FinQA (Chen et al., 2021), and DocMath-Eval (Zhao et al., 2024b) primarily address the numerical reasoning task in the financial domain.”
Hu, G., Qin, K., Yuan, C., Peng, M., Lopez-Lira, A., Wang, B., Ananiadou, S., Huang, J., & Xie, Q. (2024) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2403.06249 · Cited by 17
“We fully translated datasets for text-centric tasks like FinSA and FinHC, while translating only the validation sets for the more intricate FinSP and FinQA tasks.”
MethodInfluentialZero-Shot Question Answering over Financial Documents using Large Language Models
Phogat, K. S., Harsha, C., Dasaratha, S., Ramakrishna, S., & Puranam, S. A. (2023) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2311.14722 · Cited by 14
“We use a DSL similar to (Chen et al., 2021b) with two differences: we don’t have table operators and instead we have a max and min operator.”
MethodRetrieval-Augmented Chain-of-Thought in Semi-structured Domains
Mavi, V., Saparov, A., & Zhao, C. (2023) · NLLP · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2310.14435 · Cited by 14
“For FinQA, Chen et al. (2021) propose program accuracy where the model is expected to generate a ‘program’ along with the answer.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialBC4LLM: Trusted Artificial Intelligence When Blockchain Meets Large Language Models
Luo, H., Luo, J., & Vasilakos, A. V. (2023) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2310.06278 · Cited by 14
“Nowadays, there are relevant research efforts to apply LLMs to fintech, such as sentiment analysis [134], news classification [135], and question answering [136].”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Chen, Z., Chen, W., Smiley, C., Shah, S., Borova, I., Langdon, D., Moussa, R., Beane, M., Huang, T.-H., Routledge, B., & Wang, W. Y.
- Affiliations
- University of California, Santa Barbara (US)
- Thomson Reuters (United States) (US)
- Pennsylvania State University (US)
- Carnegie Mellon University (US)
- Stanford University (US)
- ORCID
- Venue
- Proceedings of the 2021 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing
- Published
- 2021
- Pages
- 3697-3711
- OpenAlex
- W3198243861
- Cited by
- 258
- References
- 44
- Citations by year
- 2026: 79 · 2025: 74 · 2024: 42 · 2023: 35 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 1
- FWCI
- 12.13
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Natural Language Processing Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Multimodal Machine Learning Applications
- Keywords
- numerical reasoning, financial data, question answering, financial question answering
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review