Cited by 55Adversarial Robustness in Machine LearningHate Speech and Cyberbullying DetectionSentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining

Grey-box Adversarial Attack And Defence For Sentiment Classification

Open access
Xu, Ying, Zhong, Xu, Jimeno Yepes, Antonio, Lau, Jey Han·2021·Proceedings of the 2021 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies

Abstract

Ying Xu, Xu Zhong, Antonio Jimeno Yepes, Jey Han Lau. Proceedings of the 2021 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies. 2021.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.18653/v1/2021.naacl-main.321

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Pin-Yu Chen, Huan Zhang, Yash Sharma, Jinfeng Yi, and Cho-Jui Hsieh. 2017. Zoo: Zeroth order opti- mization based black-box attacks to deep neural net- works without training substitute models. In Pro- ceedings of the 10th ACM Workshop on AI and Secu- rity, pages 15-26. ACM.
  2. Xu, Y., Zhong, X., Yepes, A. J. & Lau, J. H. (2021). Grey-box Adversarial Attack And Defence For Sentiment Classification. 2021 CONFERENCE OF THE NORTH AMERICAN CHAPTER OF THE ASSOCIATION FOR COMPUTATIONAL LINGUISTICS: HUMAN LANGUAGE TECHNOLOGIES (NAACL-HLT 2021), pp.4078-4087. ASSOC COMPUTATIONAL LINGUISTICS-ACL. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2021.naacl-main.321. Persistent Link: http://hdl.handle.net/11343/281203 License: CC BY

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Xu, Y., Zhong, X., Jimeno Yepes, A., & Lau, J. H.
Affiliations
The University of Melbourne (AU)
Venue
Proceedings of the 2021 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies
Published
2021
Pages
4078-4087
OpenAlex
W3169965252
Cited by
54
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 1
FWCI
4.50
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies (NAACL-HLT) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Minerva Access (University of Melbourne) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining
Keywords
adversarial attacks, adversarial defense, sentiment classification

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review