Cited by 15Advanced Neural Network ApplicationsTopic ModelingNatural Language Processing Techniques

TextPruner: A Model Pruning Toolkit for Pre-Trained Language Models

Open access
Yang, Ziqing, Cui, Yiming, Chen, Zhigang·2022·Proceedings of the 60th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics: System Demonstrations

Abstract

Pre-trained language models have been prevailed in natural language processing and become the backbones of many NLP tasks, but the demands for computational resources have limited their applications.In this paper, we introduce TextPruner, an open-source model pruning toolkit designed for pre-trained language models, targeting fast and easy model compression.TextPruner offers structured posttraining pruning methods, including vocabulary pruning and transformer pruning, and can be applied to various models and tasks.We also propose a self-supervised pruning method that can be applied without the labeled data.Our experiments with several NLP tasks demonstrate the ability of TextPruner to reduce the model size without re-training the model. 1

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.18653/v1/2022.acl-demo.4

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The order of examples presented to the annotator may bias the results.

    “Further, the order of examples presented to the annotator may bias the results [207].”

    From RLHF Deciphered: A Critical Analysis of Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback for LLMs (2026) · cites this paper as [207]

    Section 3.1, “Pruning Mode,” discusses examples used to compute model-pruning scores, and Section 4 describes NLP experiments; neither addresses examples presented to human annotators. Searches for example order, annotators, and presentation-order bias found no relevant passage in our copy. Page numbers were not available. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Paul Michel, Omer Levy, and Graham Neubig. 2019. Are sixteen heads really better than one? In Ad- vances in Neural Information Processing Systems 32: Annual Conference on Neural Information Process- ing Systems 2019, NeurIPS 2019, December 8-14, 2019, Vancouver, BC, Canada, pages 14014-14024.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yang, Z., Cui, Y., & Chen, Z.
Affiliations
  • IFlyTek (China) (CN)
  • Harbin Institute of Technology (CN)
Venue
Proceedings of the 60th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics: System Demonstrations
Published
2022
Pages
35-43
OpenAlex
W4221164185
Cited by
14
References
19
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2
FWCI
1.09
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics: System Demonstrations (ACL Demo) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
National Key Research and Development Program of China (2018YFB1005100)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Natural Language Processing Techniques
Keywords
model pruning, pre-trained language models, model compression, post-training pruning, open-source software toolkit

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review