Cited by 63Green IT and SustainabilityEnergy Efficiency in ComputingParallel Computing and Optimization Techniques

Great Power, Great Responsibility: Recommendations for Reducing Energy for Training Language Models

Open access
McDonald, Joseph, Li, Baolin, Frey, Nathan, Tiwari, Devesh, Gadepally, Vijay, Samsi, Siddharth·2022·Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: NAACL 2022

Abstract

The energy requirements of current natural language processing models continue to grow at a rapid, unsustainable pace.Recent works highlighting this problem conclude there is an urgent need for methods that reduce the energy needs of NLP and machine learning more broadly.In this article, we investigate techniques that can be used to reduce the energy consumption of common NLP applications.In particular, we focus on techniques to measure energy usage and different hardware and datacenter-oriented settings that can be tuned to reduce energy consumption for training and inference for language models.We characterize the impact of these settings on metrics such as computational performance and energy consumption through experiments conducted on a high performance computing system as well as popular cloud computing platforms.These techniques can lead to significant reduction in energy consumption when training language models or their use for inference.For example, power-capping, which limits the maximum power a GPU can consume, can enable a 15% decrease in energy usage with marginal increase in overall computation time when training a transformer-based language model. 1

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.18653/v1/2022.findings-naacl.151

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Jonathan Frankle and Michael Carbin. 2019. The lot- tery ticket hypothesis: Finding sparse, trainable neu- ral networks. In International Conference on Learn- ing Representations.
  2. Stephen Merity, Caiming Xiong, James Bradbury, and Richard Socher. 2017. Pointer sentinel mixture mod- els. In Proceedings of the 5th International Confer- ence on Learning Representations (ICLR).
  3. Jiaqi Mu and Pramod Viswanath. 2018. All-but-the- top: Simple and effective postprocessing for word representations. In International Conference on Learning Representations.
  4. Roy Schwartz, Jesse Dodge, Noah Smith, and Oren Et- zioni. 2020. Green ai. Communications of the ACM, 63:54 -63.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
McDonald, J., Li, B., Frey, N., Tiwari, D., Gadepally, V., & Samsi, S.
Affiliations
  • MIT Lincoln Laboratory (US)
  • Northeastern University (US)
Venue
Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: NAACL 2022
Published
2022
Pages
1962-1970
OpenAlex
W4287889735
Cited by
62
References
18
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 1
FWCI
22.24
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: NAACL (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (1910601, 1920020, 2124897)
  • Leukemia and Lymphoma Society of Canada
  • Massachusetts Green High Performance Computing Center
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Green IT and Sustainability
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Hardware and Architecture › Energy Efficiency in Computing
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Hardware and Architecture › Parallel Computing and Optimization Techniques
Keywords
energy consumption, language model training, energy efficiency, power capping, cloud computing, transformer models

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review