Cited by 21Speech and dialogue systemsArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare and EducationMachine Learning in Healthcare

Overview of the MEDIQA-Chat 2023 Shared Tasks on the Summarization & Generation of Doctor-Patient Conversations

Open access
Ben Abacha, Asma, Yim, Wen-wai, Adams, Griffin, Snider, Neal, Yetisgen, Meliha·2023·Proceedings of the 5th Clinical Natural Language Processing Workshop

Abstract

Automatic generation of clinical notes from doctor-patient conversations can play a key role in reducing daily doctors' workload and improving their interactions with the patients.MEDIQA-Chat 2023 aims to advance and promote research on effective solutions through shared tasks on the automatic summarization of doctor-patient conversations and on the generation of synthetic dialogues from clinical notes for data augmentation.Seventeen teams participated in the challenge and experimented with a broad range of approaches and models.In this paper, we describe the three MEDIQA-Chat 2023 tasks, the datasets, and the participants' results and methods.We hope that these shared tasks will lead to additional research efforts and insights on the automatic generation and evaluation of clinical notes.Section Header Conversation Summary MEDICATIONS Doctor: Are you still taking the Trizivir?Patient: Yes.Doctor: How much are you taking?Patient: I take one pill two times a day.Doctor: Are you taking any other medications?Patient: I take Ibuprofen for body aches from time to time but that's it.1.She is on Trizivir 1 tablet p.o. b.i.d. 2. Ibuprofen over-the-counter p.r.n.ROS Doctor: Have you had any anxiety attacks lately?Patient: No. Doctor: Have you felt depressed or had any mood swing problems?Patient: No. Doctor: Any phobias?Patient: No, not really.Doctor: Okay.PSYCHIATRIC: Normal; Negative for anxiety, depression, or phobias.FAM/SOCHX Doctor: Are you still working?Patient: No, I am retired

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.18653/v1/2023.clinicalnlp-1.52

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Colin Grambow, Longxiang Zhang, and Thomas Schaaf. 2022. In-domain pre-training improves clinical note generation from doctor-patient conversations. In Pro- ceedings of the First Workshop on Natural Language Generation in Healthcare, pages 9-22, Waterville, Maine, USA and virtual meeting. Association for Computational Linguistics.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ben Abacha, A., Yim, W.-W., Adams, G., Snider, N., & Yetisgen, M.
Affiliations
  • Microsoft (United States) (US)
  • Columbia University (US)
Venue
Proceedings of the 5th Clinical Natural Language Processing Workshop
Published
2023
Pages
503-513
OpenAlex
W4385571763
Cited by
20
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 3
FWCI
3.53
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
Clinical Natural Language Processing Workshop (ClinicalNLP) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Strong
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Speech and dialogue systems
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning in Healthcare
Keywords
shared task, automatic summarization, doctor-patient conversation, clinical note generation, synthetic dialogue generation, data augmentation, clinical notes

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review