The DOI matches its Crossref record; 79 of the 80 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Towards Interpretable Mental Health Analysis with Large Language Models
Open accessAbstract
The latest large language models (LLMs) such as ChatGPT, exhibit strong capabilities in automated mental health analysis.However, existing relevant studies bear several limitations, including inadequate evaluations, lack of prompting strategies, and ignorance of exploring LLMs for explainability.To bridge these gaps, we comprehensively evaluate the mental health analysis and emotional reasoning ability of LLMs on 11 datasets across 5 tasks.We explore the effects of different prompting strategies with unsupervised and distantly supervised emotional information.Based on these prompts, we explore LLMs for interpretable mental health analysis by instructing them to generate explanations for each of their decisions.We convey strict human evaluations to assess the quality of the generated explanations, leading to a novel dataset with 163 humanassessed explanations 1 .We benchmark existing automatic evaluation metrics on this dataset to guide future related works.According to the results, ChatGPT shows strong in-context learning ability but still has a significant gap with advanced task-specific methods.Careful prompt engineering with emotional cues and expertwritten few-shot examples can also effectively improve performance on mental health analysis.In addition, ChatGPT generates explanations that approach human performance, showing its great potential in explainable mental health analysis.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Prompting to concentrate on the emotional clues in text was also shown to improve ChatGPT performance on a variety of mental health-related tasks [71].”
From The Opportunities and Risks of Large Language Models in Mental Health (2024) · cites this paper as [71]
In the citing paper
“ChatGPT has been shown to be able to explain why an individual was classified as experiencing stress or depressive symptoms [71]”
From The Opportunities and Risks of Large Language Models in Mental Health (2024) · cites this paper as [71]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding
Devlin, J., Chang, M.-W., Lee, K., & Toutanova, K. (2019) · Proceedings of the 2019 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Volume 1 (Long and Short Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/n19-1423 · Cited by 54,325
Learning Phrase Representations using RNN Encoder–Decoder for Statistical Machine Translation
Cho, K., van Merrienboer, B., Gulcehre, C., Bahdanau, D., Bougares, F., Schwenk, H., & Bengio, Y. (2014) · Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.3115/v1/d14-1179 · Cited by 25,545
Language Models are Few-Shot Learners
Brown, T. B., Mann, B., Ryder, N., Subbiah, M., Kaplan, J., Dhariwal, P., Neelakantan, A., Shyam, P., Sastry, G., Askell, A., et al. (2020) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2005.14165 · Cited by 23,372
RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approach
Liu, Y., Ott, M., Goyal, N., Du, J., Joshi, M., Chen, D., Levy, O., Lewis, M., Zettlemoyer, L., & Stoyanov, V. (2019) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1907.11692 · Cited by 16,515
Convolutional Neural Networks for Sentence Classification
Kim, Y. (2014) · Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.3115/v1/d14-1181 · Cited by 14,831
(2004) · Cited by 9,718
XLNet: Generalized Autoregressive Pretraining for Language Understanding
Yang, Z., Dai, Z., Yang, Y., Carbonell, J., Salakhutdinov, R., & Le, Q. V. (2019) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1906.08237 · Cited by 6,687
VADER: a parsimonious rule-based model for sentiment analysis of social media text
Hutto, C., & Gilbert, E. (2014) · Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media · doi:10.1609/icwsm.v8i1.14550 · Cited by 6,087
LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Models
Touvron, H., Lavril, T., Izacard, G., Martinet, X., Lachaux, M.-A., Lacroix, T., Rozière, B., Goyal, N., Hambro, E., Azhar, F., et al. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2302.13971 · Cited by 4,602
Bag of Tricks for Efficient Text Classification
Joulin, A., Grave, E., Bojanowski, P., & Mikolov, T. (2017) · Proceedings of the 15th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Volume 2, Short Papers · doi:10.18653/v1/e17-2068 · Cited by 4,545
Research works printed but not linked: 5
- Shaoxiong Ji, Tianlin Zhang, Luna Ansari, Jie Fu, Prayag Tiwari, and Erik Cambria. 2022b. Mental- bert: Publicly available pretrained language mod- els for mental healthcare. In Proceedings of the Thirteenth Language Resources and Evaluation Con- ference, pages 7184-7190. European Language Re- sources Association (ELRA).
- Kishore Papineni, Salim Roukos, Todd Ward, and Wei- Jing Zhu. 2002. Bleu: a method for automatic evalu- ation of machine translation. In Proceedings of the 40th annual meeting of the Association for Computa- tional Linguistics, pages 311-318.
- Nisan Stiennon, Long Ouyang, Jeffrey Wu, Daniel Ziegler, Ryan Lowe, Chelsea Voss, Alec Radford, Dario Amodei, and Paul F Christiano. 2020. Learn- ing to summarize with human feedback. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 33:3008- 3021.
- Ermal Toto, ML Tlachac, and Elke A Rundensteiner. 2021. Audibert: A deep transfer learning multimodal classification framework for depression screening. In Proceedings of the 30th ACM international con- ference on information & knowledge management, pages 4145-4154.
- Peng Zhou, Wei Shi, Jun Tian, Zhenyu Qi, Bingchen Li, Hongwei Hao, and Bo Xu. 2016. Attention-based bidirectional long short-term memory networks for relation classification. In Proceedings of the 54th annual meeting of the association for computational linguistics (volume 2: Short papers), pages 207-212.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Large language models in healthcare and medical domain: A review
Nazi, Z. A., & Peng, W. (2024) · Informatics · doi:10.3390/informatics11030057 · Cited by 415
Large Language Models for Mental Health Applications: Systematic Review
Guo, Z., Lai, A., Thygesen, J. H., Farrington, J., Keen, T., & Li, K. (2024) · JMIR Mental Health · doi:10.2196/57400 · Cited by 269
The Opportunities and Risks of Large Language Models in Mental Health
Lawrence, H. R., Schneider, R. A., Rubin, S. B., Matarić, M. J., McDuff, D. J., & Jones Bell, M. (2024) · JMIR Mental Health · doi:10.2196/59479 · Cited by 235
Nasarian, E., Alizadehsani, R., Acharya, U. R., & Tsui, K.-L. (2024) · Information Fusion · doi:10.1016/j.inffus.2024.102412 · Cited by 207
MentaLLaMA: Interpretable Mental Health Analysis on Social Media with Large Language Models
Yang, K., Zhang, T., Kuang, Z., Xie, Q., Huang, J., & Ananiadou, S. (2024) · International World Wide Web Conference (WWW) · doi:10.1145/3589334.3648137 · Cited by 275
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Yang, K., Ji, S., Zhang, T., Xie, Q., Kuang, Z., & Ananiadou, S.
- Affiliations
- University of Manchester (GB)
- University of Helsinki (FI)
- Yale University (US)
- Venue
- Proceedings of the 2023 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing
- Published
- 2023
- Pages
- 6056-6077
- OpenAlex
- W4389523980
- Cited by
- 155
- References
- 71
- Citations by year
- 2026: 32 · 2025: 58 · 2024: 56 · 2023: 9
- FWCI
- 77.54
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Työväentutkimus Vuosikirja (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
- Funders
- Government of the United Kingdom
- UK Research and Innovation
- European Commission (HORIZON2020, 771113, 101070350)
- China Scholarship Council
- HORIZON EUROPE Framework Programme
- Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BB/P025684/1)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health via Writing
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Emotion and Mood Recognition
- Keywords
- large language models, explainable AI, prompt engineering, emotional reasoning, explanation generation, ChatGPT, human evaluation of explanations, emotional cues, in-context learning
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
