Cited by 278Mental Health via WritingTopic ModelingMachine Learning in Healthcare

Mental-LLM: Leveraging Large Language Models for Mental Health Prediction via Online Text Data

Open access
Xu, Xuhai, Yao, Bingsheng, Dong, Yuanzhe, Gabriel, Saadia, Yu, Hong, Hendler, James, Ghassemi, Marzyeh, Dey, Anind K. +1 more·2024·Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies

Abstract

Advances in large language models (LLMs) have empowered a variety of applications. However, there is still a significant gap in research when it comes to understanding and enhancing the capabilities of LLMs in the field of mental health. In this work, we present a comprehensive evaluation of multiple LLMs on various mental health prediction tasks via online text data, including Alpaca, Alpaca-LoRA, FLAN-T5, GPT-3.5, and GPT-4. We conduct a broad range of experiments, covering zero-shot prompting, few-shot prompting, and instruction fine-tuning. The results indicate a promising yet limited performance of LLMs with zero-shot and few-shot prompt designs for mental health tasks. More importantly, our experiments show that instruction finetuning can significantly boost the performance of LLMs for all tasks simultaneously. Our best-finetuned models, Mental-Alpaca and Mental-FLAN-T5, outperform the best prompt design of GPT-3.5 (25 and 15 times bigger) by 10.9% on balanced accuracy and the best of GPT-4 (250 and 150 times bigger) by 4.8%. They further perform on par with the state-of-the-art task-specific language model. We also conduct an exploratory case study on LLMs' capability on mental health reasoning tasks, illustrating the promising capability of certain models such as GPT-4. We summarize our findings into a set of action guidelines for potential methods to enhance LLMs' capability for mental health tasks. Meanwhile, we also emphasize the important limitations before achieving deployability in real-world mental health settings, such as known racial and gender bias. We highlight the important ethical risks accompanying this line of research.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/3643540

Cites

109 of 109 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 16

  1. [10]Amin Mostafa M., Cambria Erik, and Schuller Björn W.. 2023. Will Affective Computing Emerge from Foundation Models and General AI? A First Evaluation on ChatGPT. http://arxiv.org/abs/2303.03186 · arXiv
  2. [29]Coppersmith Glen, Leary Ryan, Crutchley Patrick, and Fine Alex. 2018. Natural Language Processing of Social Media as Screening for Suicide Risk. Biomedical Informatics Insights 10 (Jan. 2018), 117822261879286. 10.1177/1178222618792860 PMC6111391 30158822 · DOI · Paper page
  3. [31]Dang Hai, Mecke Lukas, Lehmann Florian, Goller Sven, and Buschek Daniel. 2022. How to prompt? Opportunities and challenges of zero-and few-shot learning for human-AI interaction in creative applications of generative models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2209.01390 (2022). · arXiv
  4. [46]Guntuku Sharath Chandra, Buffone Anneke, Jaidka Kokil, Eichstaedt Johannes C, and Ungar Lyle H. 2019. Understanding and measuring psychological stress using social media. In Proceedings of the international AAAI conference on web and social media, Vol. 13. 214– 225.
  5. [58]Ji Shaoxiong, Zhang Tianlin, Ansari Luna, Fu Jie, Tiwari Prayag, and Cambria Erik. 2021. MentalBERT: Publicly Available Pretrained Language Models for Mental Healthcare. http://arxiv.org/abs/2110.15621 · arXiv
  6. [65]Kojima Takeshi, Gu Shixiang Shane, Reid Machel, Matsuo Yutaka, and Iwasawa Yusuke. 2022. Large Language Models are Zero-Shot Reasoners. In 36th Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems.
  7. [71]Liu Xin, McDuff Daniel, Kovacs Geza, Galatzer-Levy Isaac, Sunshine Jacob, Zhan Jiening, Poh Ming-Zher, Liao Shun, Achille Paolo Di, and Patel Shwetak. 2023. Large Language Models are Few-Shot Health Learners. In arXiv.
  8. [81]Nepal Subigya, Martinez Gonzalo J., Mirjafari Shayan, Saha Koustuv, Swain Vedant Das, Xu Xuhai, Audia Pino G., Choudhury Munmun De, Dey Anind K., Striegel Aaron, and Campbell Andrew T.. 2022. A Survey of Passive Sensing in the Workplace. arXiv:2201.03074 [ cs.HC] · arXiv
  9. [93]Posner K, Brent D, Lucas C, Gould M, Stanley B, Brown G, Fisher P, Zelazny J, Burke A, Oquendo MJNY, 2008. Columbia-suicide severity rating scale (C-SSRS). New York, NY: Columbia University Medical Center 10 (2008), 2008.
  10. [97]Raffel Colin, Shazeer Noam, Roberts Adam, Lee Katherine, Narang Sharan, Matena Michael, Zhou Yanqi, Li Wei, and Liu Peter J. 2020. Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformer. Journal of Machine Learning Research (2020).
  11. [98]Regier Darrel A, Kuhl Emily A, and Kupfer David J. 2013. The DSM-5: Classification and criteria changes. World psychiatry 12, 2 (2013), 92– 98. 23737408 PMC3683251
  12. [100]Robinson Joshua and Wingate David. 2023. Leveraging Large Language Models for Multiple Choice Question Answering. In The Eleventh International Conference on Learning Representations. https://openreview.net/forum?id=yKbprarjc5B
  13. [104]Saifullah Shoffan, Fauziah Yuli, and Aribowo Agus Sasmito. 2021. Comparison of machine learning for sentiment analysis in detecting anxiety based on social media data. arXiv preprint arXiv:2101.06353 (2021). · arXiv
  14. [123]Wei Jason, Bosma Maarten, Zhao Vincent Y., Guu Kelvin, Yu Adams Wei, Lester Brian, Du Nan, Dai Andrew M., and Le Quoc V.. 2022. Finetuned Language Models Are Zero-Shot Learners. http://arxiv.org/abs/2109.01652 arXiv:2109.01652 [cs]. · arXiv
  15. [131]Xu Xuhai, Zhang Han, Sefidgar Yasaman, Ren Yiyi, Liu Xin, Seo Woosuk, Brown Jennifer, Kuehn Kevin, Merrill Mike, Nurius Paula, Patel Shwetak, Althoff Tim, Margaret E Morris Eve Riskin, Mankoff Jennifer, and Dey Anind K. 2022. GLOBEM Dataset: Multi-Year Datasets for Longitudinal Human Behavior Modeling Generalization. In Thirty-sixth Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems Datasets and Benchmarks Track. 18.
  16. [132]Yang Kailai, Ji Shaoxiong, Zhang Tianlin, Xie Qianqian, and Ananiadou Sophia. 2023. On the Evaluations of ChatGPT and Emotion-enhanced Prompting for Mental Health Analysis. http://arxiv.org/abs/2304.03347 · arXiv

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Xu, X., Yao, B., Dong, Y., Gabriel, S., Yu, H., Hendler, J., Ghassemi, M., Dey, A. K., & Wang, D.
Affiliations
  • University of Washington (US)
  • Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute (US)
  • Stanford University (US)
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
  • University of Massachusetts Lowell (US)
  • Northeastern University (US)
Venue
Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies
Published
2024-03-06
Volume
8
Issue
1
Pages
1-32
ISSN
2474-9567 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4392503764
Cited by
278
References
109
Citations by year
2026: 86 · 2025: 121 · 2024: 69 · 2023: 2
FWCI
130.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive Mobile Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DSpace@MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
Funders
  • VW Foundation
  • Quanta Computing
  • NIH (1R01MD018424-01)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health via Writing
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning in Healthcare
Keywords
large language models, mental health prediction, instruction tuning, zero-shot prompting, few-shot prompting, GPT-4, GPT-3.5, alpaca, Flan-T5, racial and gender bias, ethical risks

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review