Cited by 31Privacy-Preserving Technologies in DataAdversarial Robustness in Machine LearningTopic Modeling

Preventing generation of verbatim memorization in language models gives a false sense of privacy

Open access
Ippolito, Daphne, Tramer, Florian, Nasr, Milad, Zhang, Chiyuan, Jagielski, Matthew, Lee, Katherine, Choquette Choo, Christopher, Carlini, Nicholas·2023·Proceedings of the 16th International Natural Language Generation Conference

Abstract

Daphne Ippolito, Florian Tramer, Milad Nasr, Chiyuan Zhang, Matthew Jagielski, Katherine Lee, Christopher Choquette Choo, Nicholas Carlini. Proceedings of the 16th International Natural Language Generation Conference. 2023.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.18653/v1/2023.inlg-main.3

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • There are limitations with the memorization analysis, e.g., recent work advocates for metrics beyond exact match and alternative prompt search strategies.

    “Note there are limitations with our analysis - for example, recent work advocates for metrics beyond exact match (Ippolito et al., 2023) and alternative prompt search strategies (Kassem et al., 2024).”

    From The Llama 3 Herd of Models (2024) · cites this paper as Ippolito et al., 2023

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Steven Bird, Ewan Klein, and Edward Loper. 2009. Natural language processing with Python: analyz- ing text with the natural language toolkit. " O'Reilly Media, Inc.".
  2. Jehoshua Bruck, Jie Gao, and Anxiao Jiang. 2006. Weighted Bloom filter. In 2006 IEEE International Symposium on Information Theory, pages 2304- 2308. IEEE.
  3. Ondrej Dušek and Filip Jurcıcek. 2016. A context- aware natural language generation dataset for dia- logue systems. In Workshop on collecting and gen- erating resources for chatbots and conversational agents-development and evaluation, pages 6-9.
  4. Ankur Parikh, Xuezhi Wang, Sebastian Gehrmann, Manaal Faruqui, Bhuwan Dhingra, Diyi Yang, and Dipanjan Das. 2020. Totto: A controlled table-to- text generation dataset. In Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Lan- guage Processing (EMNLP), pages 1173-1186.
  5. Thomas Scialom, Paul-Alexis Dray, Sylvain Lamprier, Benjamin Piwowarski, and Jacopo Staiano. 2020. Mlsum: The multilingual summarization corpus. In 2020 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP), pages 8051-8067. Association for Computational Linguistics.
  6. Om Dipakbhai Thakkar, Swaroop Ramaswamy, Rajiv Mathews, and Francoise Beaufays. 2021. Under- standing unintended memorization in language mod- els under federated learning. In Proceedings of the Third Workshop on Privacy in Natural Language Processing, pages 1-10.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ippolito, D., Tramer, F., Nasr, M., Zhang, C., Jagielski, M., Lee, K., Choquette Choo, C., & Carlini, N.
Affiliations
Google (United States) (US)
Venue
Proceedings of the 16th International Natural Language Generation Conference
Published
2023
Pages
28-53
OpenAlex
W4389009541
Cited by
28
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 1
FWCI
4.96
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • International Conference on Natural Language Generation (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Repository for Publications and Research Data (ETH Zurich) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • ETH Zürich Research Collection
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
Keywords
language models, privacy, adversarial attacks

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review