Cited by 18Topic ModelingDomain Adaptation and Few-Shot LearningNatural Language Processing Techniques

Forgetting before Learning: Utilizing Parametric Arithmetic for Knowledge Updating in Large Language Models

Open access
Ni, Shiwen, Chen, Dingwei, Li, Chengming, Hu, Xiping, Xu, Ruifeng, Yang, Min·2024·Proceedings of the 62nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers)

Abstract

Recent advancements in Large Language Models (LLMs) have showcased their remarkable capabilities in text understanding and generation.However, even stronger LLMs are susceptible to acquiring erroneous or obsolete information from the training corpus.Direct secondary fine-tuning with data containing new knowledge may be ineffective in updating knowledge due to the conflict between old and new knowledge.In this paper, we propose a new paradigm for fine-tuning called F-Learning (Forgetting before Learning), which employs parametric arithmetic to facilitate the forgetting of old knowledge and learning of new knowledge.Experimental results on two publicly available datasets demonstrate that our proposed F-Learning can obviously improve the knowledge updating performance of both full fine-tuning and LoRA fine-tuning, simultaneously outperforming the existing baselines in most cases.Moreover, we have also discovered that forgetting old knowledge by subtracting the parameters of LoRA can yield a similar effect to subtracting the parameters of full fine-tuning, and occasionally even surpass it significantly.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.18653/v1/2024.acl-long.310

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ni, S., Chen, D., Li, C., Hu, X., Xu, R., & Yang, M.
Affiliations
  • Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
  • Harbin Institute of Technology (CN)
Venue
Proceedings of the 62nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers)
Published
2024
Pages
5716-5731
ISSN
0736-587X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4402671654
Cited by
6
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 1
FWCI
1.77
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (62376262)
  • Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province
  • National Key Research and Development Program of China (2022YFF0902100)
  • Shenzhen Science and Technology Innovation Program (KQTD20190929172835662)
  • Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation of Guangdong Province
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Natural Language Processing Techniques
Keywords
knowledge updating, large language models, low-rank adaptation, full fine-tuning, knowledge conflicts

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review