Cited by 14Topic ModelingNatural Language Processing TechniquesMultimodal Machine Learning Applications

BizBench: A Quantitative Reasoning Benchmark for Business and Finance

Open access
Krumdick, Michael, Koncel-Kedziorski, Rik, Lai, Viet Dac, Reddy, Varshini, Lovering, Charles, Tanner, Chris·2024·Proceedings of the 62nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers)

Abstract

Michael Krumdick, Rik Koncel-Kedziorski, Viet Dac Lai, Varshini Reddy, Charles Lovering, Chris Tanner. Proceedings of the 62nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2024.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.18653/v1/2024.acl-long.452

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In high-stakes domains such as business and finance, correctness outweighs other attributes.

    “In some high-stakes domains such as business and finance, however, correctness outweighs other attributes (Bommasani et al., 2022;Feuer et al., 2025;Krumdick et al., 2024).”

    From No Free Labels: Limitations of LLM-as-a-Judge Without Human Grounding (2025) · cites this paper as Krumdick et al., 2024

    The Conclusion says numerical reasoning is critically important in business and finance because small errors can incur large costs. That supports the importance of correctness in these high-stakes domains, but the paper does not say correctness outweighs other attributes. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

The publisher hasn’t deposited this paper’s reference list.

Research works printed but not linked: 21

  1. Aida Amini, Saadia Gabriel, Shanchuan Lin, Rik Koncel-Kedziorski, Yejin Choi, and Hannaneh Ha- jishirzi. 2019. MathQA: Towards interpretable math word problem solving with operation-based for- malisms. In Proceedings of the 2019 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Volume 1 (Long and Short Papers), pages 2357-2367, Minneapolis, Minnesota. Asso- ciation for Computational Linguistics. · DOI
  2. Willy Au, Abderrahim Ait-Azzi, and Juyeon Kang. 2021. Finsbd-2021: the 3rd shared task on struc- ture boundary detection in unstructured text in the financial domain. In Companion Proceedings of the Web Conference 2021, pages 276-279.
  3. Tom Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah, Jared D Kaplan, Prafulla Dhariwal, Arvind Neelakantan, Pranav Shyam, Girish Sastry, Amanda Askell, et al. 2020. Language models are few- shot learners. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 33:1877-1901.
  4. Wenhu Chen, Xueguang Ma, Xinyi Wang, and William W. Cohen. 2023. Program of thoughts prompting: Disentangling computation from reason- ing for numerical reasoning tasks. Transactions on Machine Learning Research.
  5. Wenhu Chen, Hanwen Zha, Zhiyu Chen, Wenhan Xiong, Hong Wang, and William Yang Wang. 2020. Hy- bridQA: A dataset of multi-hop question answering over tabular and textual data. In Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2020, pages 1026-1036, Online. Association for Computational Linguistics. · DOI
  6. Zhiyu Chen, Wenhu Chen, Charese Smiley, Sameena Shah, Iana Borova, Dylan Langdon, Reema Moussa, Matt Beane, Ting-Hao Huang, Bryan Routledge, and William Yang Wang. 2021b. FinQA: A dataset of nu- merical reasoning over financial data. In Proceedings of the 2021 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pages 3697-3711, On- line and Punta Cana, Dominican Republic. Associa- tion for Computational Linguistics. · DOI · Paper page
  7. Zhiyu Chen, Shiyang Li, Charese Smiley, Zhiqiang Ma, Sameena Shah, and William Yang Wang. 2022. ConvFinQA: Exploring the chain of numerical rea- soning in conversational finance question answer- ing. In Proceedings of the 2022 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pages 6279-6292, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates. Association for Computational Linguistics. · DOI
  8. Yanai Elazar, Abhijit Mahabal, Deepak Ramachandran, Tania Bedrax-Weiss, and Dan Roth. 2019. How large are lions? inducing distributions over quantitative at- tributes. In Proceedings of the 57th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 3973-3983, Florence, Italy. Association for Computational Linguistics. · DOI
  9. Weiguang Han, Boyi Zhang, Qianqian Xie, Min Peng, Yanzhao Lai, and Jimin Huang. 2023. Select and trade: Towards unified pair trading with hierar- chical reinforcement learning. In Proceedings of the 29th ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, KDD '23, page 4123-4134, New York, NY, USA. Association for Computing Machinery. · DOI
  10. Corey Harper, Jessica Cox, Curt Kohler, Antony Scerri, Ron Daniel Jr., and Paul Groth. 2021. SemEval-2021 task 8: MeasEval -extracting counts and measure- ments and their related contexts. In Proceedings of the 15th International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation (SemEval-2021), pages 306-316, Online. Association for Computational Linguistics. · DOI
  11. Raymond Li, Loubna Ben Allal, Yangtian Zi, Niklas Muennighoff, Denis Kocetkov, Chenghao Mou, Marc Marone, Christopher Akiki, Jia Li, Jenny Chim, et al. 2023. StarCoder: may the source be with you! Transactions on Machine Learning Research.
  12. Lefteris Loukas, Manos Fergadiotis, Ilias Chalkidis, Eirini Spyropoulou, Prodromos Malakasiotis, Ion Androutsopoulos, and Georgios Paliouras. 2022. FiNER: Financial numeric entity recognition for XBRL tagging. In Proceedings of the 60th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers), pages 4419- 4431, Dublin, Ireland. Association for Computational Linguistics. · DOI
  13. Dakuan Lu, Jiaqing Liang, Yipei Xu, Qianyu He, Yipeng Geng, Mengkun Han, Yingsi Xin, Hengkui Wu, and Yanghua Xiao. 2023b. Bbt-fin: Compre- hensive construction of chinese financial domain pre- trained language model, corpus and benchmark. · DOI
  14. Aman Madaan, Shuyan Zhou, Uri Alon, Yiming Yang, and Graham Neubig. 2022. Language models of code are few-shot commonsense learners. In Proceedings of the 2022 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pages 1384-1403, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates. Association for Computational Linguistics. · DOI
  15. Julio Cesar Salinas Alvarado, Karin Verspoor, and Tim- othy Baldwin. 2015. Domain adaption of named entity recognition to support credit risk assess- ment. In Proceedings of the Australasian Language Technology Association Workshop 2015, pages 84- 90, Parramatta, Australia.
  16. Raj Shah, Kunal Chawla, Dheeraj Eidnani, Agam Shah, Wendi Du, Sudheer Chava, Natraj Raman, Charese Smiley, Jiaao Chen, and Diyi Yang. 2022. When FLUE meets FLANG: Benchmarks and large pre- trained language model for financial domain. In Proceedings of the 2022 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pages 2322-2335, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates. As- sociation for Computational Linguistics. · DOI · Paper page
  17. Mirac Suzgun, Nathan Scales, Nathanael Schärli, Se- bastian Gehrmann, Yi Tay, Hyung Won Chung, Aakanksha Chowdhery, Quoc Le, Ed Chi, Denny Zhou, and Jason Wei. 2023. Challenging BIG- bench tasks and whether chain-of-thought can solve them. In Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL 2023, pages 13003- 13051, Toronto, Canada. Association for Computa- tional Linguistics. · DOI · Paper page
  18. Boshi Wang, Sewon Min, Xiang Deng, Jiaming Shen, You Wu, Luke Zettlemoyer, and Huan Sun. 2023. Towards understanding chain-of-thought prompting: An empirical study of what matters. In Proceedings of the 61st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers), pages 2717-2739, Toronto, Canada. Associ- ation for Computational Linguistics. · DOI · Paper page
  19. Xuanyu Zhang and Qing Yang. 2023. Xuanyuan 2.0: A large chinese financial chat model with hun- dreds of billions parameters. In Proceedings of the 32nd ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, CIKM '23, page 4435-4439, New York, NY, USA. Association for Computing Machinery. · DOI
  20. Yilun Zhao, Yunxiang Li, Chenying Li, and Rui Zhang. 2022. MultiHiertt: Numerical reasoning over multi hierarchical tabular and textual data. In Proceedings of the 60th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers), pages 6588-6600, Dublin, Ireland. Asso- ciation for Computational Linguistics. · DOI
  21. Fengbin Zhu, Wenqiang Lei, Youcheng Huang, Chao Wang, Shuo Zhang, Jiancheng Lv, Fuli Feng, and Tat-Seng Chua. 2021. TAT-QA: A question answering benchmark on a hybrid of tabular and textual content in finance. In Proceedings of the 59th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and the 11th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (Volume 1: Long Papers), pages 3277-3287, Online. Association for Computa- tional Linguistics. · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Krumdick, M., Koncel-Kedziorski, R., Lai, V. D., Reddy, V., Lovering, C., & Tanner, C.
Venue
Proceedings of the 62nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers)
Published
2024
Pages
8309-8332
ISSN
0736-587X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4402671590
Cited by
13
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 6 · 2023: 1
FWCI
3.54
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Natural Language Processing Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Multimodal Machine Learning Applications
Keywords
quantitative reasoning, financial reasoning, benchmark, reasoning datasets, natural language question answering

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review