The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Demographic Dialectal Variation in Social Media: A Case Study of African-American English
Open accessAbstract
Though dialectal language is increasingly abundant on social media, few resources exist for developing NLP tools to handle such language.We conduct a case study of dialectal language in online conversational text by investigating African-American English (AAE) on Twitter.We propose a distantly supervised model to identify AAE-like language from demographics associated with geo-located messages, and we verify that this language follows well-known AAE linguistic phenomena.In addition, we analyze the quality of existing language identification and dependency parsing tools on AAE-like text, demonstrating that they perform poorly on such text compared to text associated with white speakers.We also provide an ensemble classifier for language identification which eliminates this disparity and release a new corpus of tweets containing AAE-like language.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Such variations were also observed across racial or ethnic groups”
From Social Data: Biases, Methodological Pitfalls, and Ethical Boundaries (2019) · cites this paper as Blodgett et al., 2016
In the citing paper
“these biases raise additional concerns as they affect several popular tasks, such as user classification, trending topics detection, language identification, or content filtering”
From Social Data: Biases, Methodological Pitfalls, and Ethical Boundaries (2019) · cites this paper as Blodgett et al., 2016
In the citing paper
“by focusing on African-American English dialect, Blodgett et al. (2016) show racial disparity when the textual content produced by users vary from the mainstream or standard languages.”
From Social Data: Biases, Methodological Pitfalls, and Ethical Boundaries (2019) · cites this paper as Blodgett et al., 2016
In the citing paper
“Gaps between the purpose and the assumptions under which these datasets and models are built and those under which they are being used can lead to performance disparities, affecting research validity and producing misleading results (e.g., Blodgett et al., 2016; Buolamwini and Gebru, 2018).”
From Social Data: Biases, Methodological Pitfalls, and Ethical Boundaries (2019) · cites this paper as Blodgett et al., 2016
Citations
Cites
Griffiths, T. L., & Steyvers, M. (2004) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0307752101 · Cited by 6,049
Monroe, B. L., Colaresi, M. P., & Quinn, K. M. (2008) · Political Analysis · doi:10.1093/pan/mpn018 · Cited by 542 · cited 2×
“This model has broadly similar goals as nonlatent, log-linear generative models of text that condition on document-level covariates (Monroe et al., 2008; Eisenstein et al., 2011a; Taddy, 2013).”
MethodThe social impact of natural language processing
Hovy, D., & Spruit, S. L. (2016) · Proceedings of the 54th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 2: Short Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/p16-2096 · Cited by 329
Toward a Description of African American Vernacular English Dialect Regions Using “Black Twitter”
Jones, T. (2015) · American Speech · doi:10.1215/00031283-3442117 · Cited by 144 · cited 5×
“, 2016) and sociolinguistic (Stewart, 2014; Eisenstein, 2015; Jones, 2015) research.”
BackgroundMethodInfluential
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–200 of 378
Ball-Burack, A., Lee, M. S. A., Cobbe, J., & Singh, J. P. (2021) · ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (FAccT) · doi:10.1145/3442188.3445875 · Cited by 38
“These alignments are calculated using a model [6] that was trained on a corpus of 60 million”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialDialectometric analysis of language variation in Twitter
Donoso, G., & Sánchez, D. (2017) · Workshop on NLP for Similar Languages, Varieties and Dialects · doi:10.18653/v1/w17-1202 · Cited by 51
Beyond Perplexity: Multi-dimensional Safety Evaluation of LLM Compression
Xu, Z., Gupta, A., Li, T., Bentham, O., & Srikumar, V. (2024) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2407.04965 · Cited by 51
“Different prior works have studied dialect biases for language models (Blodgett et al., 2016, 2020; Joshi et al., 2024; Lent et al., 2021, inter alia ).”
BackgroundNeural representations for modeling variation in speech
Bartelds, M., de Vries, W., Sanal, F., Richter, C., Liberman, M., & Wieling, M. B. (2022) · Journal of Phonetics · doi:10.1016/j.wocn.2022.101137 · Cited by 32
Alshaabi, T., Adams, J. L., Arnold, M., Minot, J. R., Dewhurst, D. R., Reagan, A. J., Danforth, C. M., & Dodds, P. S. (2021) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.abe6534 · Cited by 52
Scientism as illusio in HR algorithms: Towards a framework for algorithmic hygiene for bias proofing
Vassilopoulou, J., Kyriakidou, O., Özbilgin, M. F., & Groutsis, D. G. (2022) · Human Resource Management Journal · doi:10.1111/1748-8583.12430 · Cited by 81
“Limited training data may also provoke the unfair exclusion of minority applicants who have strong accents and are not native language speakers (Blodgett et al., 2016).”
BackgroundCombining Feature and Instance Attribution to Detect Artifacts
Pezeshkpour, P., Jain, S., Singh, S., & Wallace, B. (2022) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL (Findings of ACL) · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.findings-acl.153 · Cited by 41
“We use the topic model from (Blodgett et al., 2016) to classify tweets as exhibiting AAVE and WAE (keeping samples with dialect confidence of greater”
MethodXu, Q., Qu, L., Xu, C., & Cui, R. (2019) · International Conference on Natural Language Generation · doi:10.18653/v1/w19-8633 · Cited by 48
“Race (Blodgett et al., 2016) is a dataset based on the dialectal tweets corpus (DIAL), including 59.2 million tweets.”
BackgroundInfluentialThe sociolinguistic foundations of language modeling
Grieve, J., Bartl, S., Fuoli, M., Grafmiller, J., Huang, W., Jawerbaum, A., Murakami, A., Perlman, M., Rœmling, D., & Winter, B. (2025) · Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.3389/frai.2024.1472411 · Cited by 56
Learning to Recognize Dialect Features
Demszky, D., Sharma, D., Clark, J. H., Prabhakaran, V., & Eisenstein, J. (2021) · Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies (NAACL-HLT) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.naacl-main.184 · Cited by 34
“This can help to test the performance of downstream models across dialects, assessing dialect transfer loss (e.g., Blodgett et al., 2016), as well as identifying cases of interest for manual dialectological analysis.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialOn learning and representing social meaning in NLP: a sociolinguistic perspective
Nguyen, D., Rosseel, L., & Grieve, J. (2021) · Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies (NAACL-HLT) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.naacl-main.50 · Cited by 28
“…usually developed for standard varieties of language, and therefore tend to under-perform on texts written in varieties that diverge from the ‘standard’, including language identification (Blodgett et al., 2016), dependency parsing (Blodgett et al., 2016), and POS tagging (Hovy and Søgaard, 2015).”
BackgroundGold Doesn’t Always Glitter: Spectral Removal of Linear and Nonlinear Guarded Attribute Information
Shao, S., Ziser, Y., & Cohen, S. B. (2022) · Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2203.07893 · Cited by 44
“In their influential work, Bolukbasi et al. (2016) revealed that word embeddings for many genderneutral terms show a gender bias. Zhao et al. (2018) presented a customized training scheme for word embeddings, which minimizes the negative distances between words in the two groups, e.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialMitigating Racial Biases in Toxic Language Detection with an Equity-Based Ensemble Framework
Halevy, M., Harris, C., Bruckman, A., Yang, D., & Howard, A. (2021) · ACM Conference on Equity and Access in Algorithms, Mechanisms, and Optimization (EAAMO) · doi:10.1145/3465416.3483299 · Cited by 36
“’s corpus of demographic based Twitter data that belongs to African American authors [4].”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialModeling the Second Player in Distributionally Robust OptimizationPreprint
Michel, P., Hashimoto, T., & Neubig, G. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2103.10282 · Cited by 16
“, 2020), sociolect (Blodgett et al., 2016), accent (Amodei et al.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialCorrecting Sociodemographic Selection Biases for Population Prediction from Social Media
Giorgi, S., Lynn, V., Gupta, K., Ahmed, F., Matz, S., Ungar, L., & Schwartz, H. A. (2022) · Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media · doi:10.1609/icwsm.v16i1.19287 · Cited by 33
“The geotagging process can select certain ages and genders [22], and races may be partially excluded due to language filters, prone to errors on region-or race-specific dialects such as African-American English [23].”
BackgroundSociodemographic Bias in Language Models: A Survey and Forward Path
Gupta, V., Venkit, P. N., Wilson, S., & Passonneau, R. (2023) · GEBNLP · doi:10.18653/v1/2024.gebnlp-1.19 · Cited by 43
FairOD: Fairness-aware Outlier Detection
Shekhar, S., Shah, N., & Akoglu, L. (2021) · Proceedings of the AAAI/ACM Conference on AI Ethics and Society · doi:10.1145/3461702.3462517 · Cited by 30
“• Abusive Tweets [10] (Tweets).”
MethodLalor, J. P., Abbasi, A., Oketch, K., Yang, Y., & Forsgren, N. (2024) · ACM Transactions on Information Systems · doi:10.1145/3641276 · Cited by 40
“Suppose that a young, African American man logs onto an online shopping platform and writes a positive but somewhat lukewarm review for a product using the African-American English sociolect [AAE, 20].”
BackgroundOptimising Equal Opportunity Fairness in Model Training
Shen, A., Han, X., Cohn, T., Baldwin, T., & Frermann, L. (2022) · North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2205.02393 · Cited by 41
“Following previous studies (Ravfogel et al., 2020; Han et al., 2021c; Shen et al., 2021), we adopt the dataset of Blodgett et al. (2016) (Moji hereafter), where the training dataset is balanced with respect to both sentiment and ethnicity but skewed in terms of sentiment–ethnicity combinations (40%…”
BackgroundMethodMeasuring the Prevalence of Anti-Social Behavior in Online Communities
Park, J.-S., Seering, J., & Bernstein, M. S. (2022) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3555552 · Cited by 31
“Additionally, some worry that these automated tools would exhibit discriminatory bias like other machine learning models, thereby making moderation decisions that unfairly treat people of a certain gender, race, ethnicity, or age and cause more harm than good [4, 9, 30, 96].”
BackgroundSachdeva, P., Barreto, R., von Vacano, C., & Kennedy, C. J. (2022) · ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (FAccT) · doi:10.1145/3531146.3533216 · Cited by 25
“Some past work has probabilistically inferred the racial identity of comment authors [9, 13], though there are both demonstrated biases [31] and ethical risks with race imputation [54].”
BackgroundPosition: Model Collapse Does Not Mean What You Think
Schaeffer, R., Kazdan, J., Arulandu, A., & Koyejo, O. (2025) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2503.03150 · Cited by 39
Choi, M., Pei, J., Kumar, S., Shu, C., & Jurgens, D. (2023) · Proceedings of the 2023 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.emnlp-main.699 · Cited by 38
“…exemplified by studies showing that, when measuring the same concept, the performance of a model can vary greatly when tested on a different dataset due to factors such as changes in dialect, speaker demographics, and dataset domain (Miller et al., 2020; Blodgett et al., 2016; Wang et al., 2022a).”
BackgroundParameter-efficient Modularised Bias Mitigation via AdapterFusion
Kumar, D., Lesota, O., Zerveas, G., Cohen, D., Eickhoff, C., Schedl, M., & Rekabsaz, N. (2023) · Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2302.06321 · Cited by 38
“A.1 Datasets In FDCL18 dataset, we use the TwitterAAE model (Blodgett et al., 2016) to assign racial dialect classes.”
MethodTwitter-based measures of neighborhood sentiment as predictors of residential population health
Gibbons, J., Malouf, R., Spitzberg, B. H., Martinez, L. S., Appleyard, B. S., Thompson, C. A., Nara, A., & Tsou, M. (2019) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0219550 · Cited by 38
The Authors Matter: Understanding and Mitigating Implicit Bias in Deep Text Classification
Liu, H., Jin, W., Karimi, H., Liu, Z., & Tang, J. (2021) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL (Findings of ACL) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.findings-acl.7 · Cited by 33
A Review of the Role of Causality in Developing Trustworthy AI SystemsPreprint
Ganguly, N., Fazlija, D., Badar, M., Fisichella, M., Sikdar, S., Schrader, J., Wallat, J., Rudra, K., Koubarakis, M., Patro, G. K., et al. (2023) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2302.06975 · Cited by 34
Understanding Why Generalized Reweighting Does Not Improve Over ERM
Zhai, R., Dan, C., Kolter, J., & Ravikumar, P. (2022) · International Conference on Learning Representations · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2201.12293 · Cited by 35
“This strong performance of ERM however has been shown to degrade under distributional shift , where the training and test distributions are different (Hovy & Søgaard, 2015; Blodgett et al., 2016; Tatman, 2017).”
BackgroundASTRAEA: Grammar-based Fairness Testing
Soremekun, E., Udeshi, S., & Chattopadhyay, S. (2022) · IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering · doi:10.1109/tse.2022.3141758 · Cited by 41
“Terminal nodes that portray societal biases such as gender-biased occupations are collected from established databases that classify the relevant data [2], [15], [45], [53], [79].”
BackgroundAssessing Dialect Fairness and Robustness of Large Language Models in Reasoning Tasks
Lin, F., Mao, S., Malfa, E. L., Hofmann, V., de Wynter, A., Wang, X., Chen, S., Wooldridge, M., Pierrehumbert, J. B., & Wei, F. (2025) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.18653/v1/2025.acl-long.317 · Cited by 31
“…work on AAVE studies in natural language processing mostly focuses on non-reasoning-heavy tasks such as POS tagging (Jørgensen et al., 2015, 2016), language identification and dependency parsing (Blodgett et al., 2016), automatic captioning (Tatman, 2017), and language modeling (Deas et al., 2023).”
Evaluating Synthetic Data Generation from User Generated Text
Chim, J., Ive, J., & Liakata, M. (2024) · Computational Linguistics · doi:10.1162/coli_a_00540 · Cited by 12
“Such tasks include preserving linguistic diversity within datasets (Blodgett, Green, and O’Connor 2016), generation from transcribed speech while preserving linguistic markers of mental health status or psychiatric conditions (e.g., disfluencies; Howes et al. 2017), and generation from interaction…”
Group Robust Classification Without Any Group Information
Tsirigotis, C., Monteiro, J., Rodríguez, P., Vázquez, D., & Courville, A. (2023) · Neural Information Processing Systems · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2310.18555 · Cited by 34
“Consequently, models that achieve low expected loss can still be unfair when the model is tasked to predict outcomes for underrepresented groups [38, 10, 66], and prone to rely on spurious correlations between target annotations and generative attributes of the training data [32, 62] that do not…”
BackgroundAnalyzing Hate Speech Data along Racial, Gender and Intersectional Axes
Maronikolakis, A., Baader, P., & Schütze, H. (2022) · GEBNLP · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2205.06621 · Cited by 34
“The AAE tweets come from (Blodgett et al., 2016) and the SAE are direct translations of those tweets provided by annotators.”
BackgroundAdaptive Sampling Strategies to Construct Equitable Training Datasets
Cai, W., Encarnación, R., Chern, B., Corbett‐Davies, S., Bogen, M., Bergman, S., & Goel, S. (2022) · ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (FAccT) · doi:10.1145/3531146.3533203 · Cited by 21
“Machine learning models like this—as well as related models in natural language processing, healthcare, criminal justice, and beyond—have been shown to exhibit sharp disparities, often performing worse on subgroups of the population defined by race, ethnicity, gender, language, and nationality [9, 11, 15, 18, 20, 22,…”
BackgroundConstance: modeling annotation contexts to improve stance classification
Joseph, K., Friedland, L., Hobbs, W., Lazer, D., & Tsur, O. (2017) · Proceedings of the 2017 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.18653/v1/d17-1116 · Cited by 33
“Recent work has shown that cognitive biases such as stereotypes (Carpenter et al., 2016) and anchoring (Berzak et al., 2016) can negatively impact text annotation and resulting models, even for ob-jective tasks like POS tagging (Blodgett et al., 2016).”
BackgroundA Differential Entropy Estimator for Training Neural Networks
Pichler, G., Colombo, P., Boudiaf, M., Koliander, G., & Piantanida, P. (2022) · International Conference on Machine Learning · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2202.06618 · Cited by 33
“We follow the experimental setting from (Elazar & Goldberg, 2018; Barrett et al., 2019) and use two datasets from the DIAL corpus (Blodgett et al., 2016) (over 50 million tweets) where the protected attribute S is the race and the main labels are sentiment or mention labels.”
MethodFairness-aware Class Imbalanced Learning
Subramanian, S., Rahimi, A., Baldwin, T., Cohn, T., & Frermann, L. (2021) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.emnlp-main.155 · Cited by 33
“Emoji prediction: We use the Twitter dataset of Blodgett et al. (2016), where tweets are associated with the private attribute race (black/white), and sentiment labels are derived from emoji usage (happy/sad) (Elazar and Goldberg, 2018).”
MethodA Dataset and Classifier for Recognizing Social Media English
Blodgett, S. L., Wei, J. T.-Z., & O'Connor, B. (2017) · Workshop on Noisy User-generated Text (W-NUT) · doi:10.18653/v1/w17-4408 · Cited by 26
“This is potentially especially problematic for language by minority dialect speakers— for example, Blodgett et al. (2016) found that current language identification models had lower re-call for tweets written in African-American English (AAE) than those in standard English.”
BackgroundSelf-citationIskander, S., Radinsky, K., & Belinkov, Y. (2023) · Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2305.10204 · Cited by 32
“…word embeddings exhibit gender bias in their associations of professions (Bolukbasi et al., 2016; Caliskan et al., 2017) and that learned representations of language models capture demographic data about the writer of the text, such as race or age (Blodgett et al., 2016; Elazar and Goldberg, 2018).”
Stewart, I., & Eisenstein, J. (2018) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.18653/v1/d18-1467 · Cited by 32
“social media data (Eisenstein, 2013; Blodgett et al., 2016) and the limits of manual annotation may render this typical analysis difficult or impossible.”
BackgroundDialect-robust Evaluation of Generated Text
Sun, J., Sellam, T., Clark, E., Vu, T., Dozat, T., Garrette, D., Siddhant, A., Eisenstein, J., & Gehrmann, S. (2022) · Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2211.00922 · Cited by 31
“There is some work on getting dialectal data without country codes: Blodgett et al. (2016) build a dataset of tweets that are likely to include a high density of African-American English by linking geolocated Twitter data with demographic data from the U.S. census.”
BackgroundMethodControlled Analyses of Social Biases in Wikipedia Bios
Field, A., Park, C. Y., Lin, K., & Tsvetkov, Y. (2022) · International World Wide Web Conference (WWW) · doi:10.1145/3485447.3512134 · Cited by 22
“11 Thus, we follow prior work in sociolingustics in considering Hispanic/Latinx a (nonexclusive) racial category [1, 6], e.”
BackgroundYe, H., Zou, J. Y., & Zhang, L.-J. (2022) · International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2210.11075 · Cited by 30
“These features are referred to as spurious features (Hovy and Søgaard, 2015; Blodgett et al., 2016; Hashimoto et al., 2018), being predictive for most of the training examples, but are not truly correlated with the intrinsic labeling function.”
BackgroundModel-Based Approach for Measuring the Fairness in ASR
Liu, Z., Veliche, I.-E., & Peng, F.-C. (2021) · IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing · doi:10.1109/icassp43922.2022.9747654 · Cited by 30
“The concern of fairness, is not limited to speech recognition tasks, but also comes to light in other machine learning applications, including facial recognition [6, 7], natural language processing [8, 9], and healthcare [10].”
BackgroundA Computational Framework for Slang Generation
Sun, Z., Zemel, R., & Xu, Y. (2021) · Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.1162/tacl_a_00378 · Cited by 20
“Slang has been extensively studied as a social phenomenon (Mattiello, 2005), where social variables such as gender (Blodgett et al., 2016), ethnicity (Bamman et al., 2014), and social-economic status (Labov, 1972, 2006) have been shown to play important roles in slang construction.”
BackgroundFuzzE: Fuzzy Fairness Evaluation of Offensive Language Classifiers on African-American English
Rios, A. (2020) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v34i01.5434 · Cited by 23
“For example, attribute words such as “sholl”, “iont”, and “sumn” (i.e., words common in AAVE (Blodgett, Green, and O’Connor 2016)) are not indexed.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialRejected Dialects: Biases Against African American Language in Reward Models
Mire, J., Aysola, Z., Chechelnitsky, D., Deas, N., Zerva, C., & Sap, M. (2025) · North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2502.12858 · Cited by 28
“To estimate this, we again leverage the Blodgett et al. (2016) method for predicting the degree to which a text is AAL-like (see Appendix 4 for additional details on the technique).”
InfluentialDialect Diversity in Text Summarization on Twitter
Keswani, V., & Celis, L. E. (2021) · International World Wide Web Conference (WWW) · doi:10.1145/3442381.3450108 · Cited by 13
“[5] used the census data to learn demographic language models for the following population categories: non-Hispanic Whites, non-Hispanic Blacks, Hispanics, and Asians; using the learned models, they report the probability of each post being written by a user of a given population category.”
MethodUncovering memorization effect in the presence of spurious correlations
You, C., Dai, H., Min, Y., Sekhon, J. S., Joshi, S. C., & Duncan, J. S. (2025) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-025-61531-5 · Cited by 13
“Thus, understanding the underlying causes of this unbalanced performance between the majority and minority groups is crucial to their reliable and safe deployment in various real-world scenarios Blodgett et al. [2016], Buolamwini and Gebru [2018], Hashimoto et al. [2018].”
BLIND: Bias Removal With No Demographics
Orgad, H., & Belinkov, Y. (2023) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.acl-long.490 · Cited by 24
“We follow the setting of Elazar and Goldberg (2018), who used a twitter dataset collected by Blodgett et al. (2016) to study dialectal variation in social media.”
MethodArthur, R., & Williams, H. T. P. (2018) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0214466 · Cited by 27
"Play PRBLMS": Identifying and Correcting Less Accessible Content in Voice Interfaces
Springer, A., & Cramer, H. (2018) · Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3173574.3173870 · Cited by 27
Understanding the Detrimental Class-level Effects of Data Augmentation
Kirichenko, P., Ibrahim, M., Balestriero, R., Bouchacourt, D., Vedantam, R., Firooz, H., & Wilson, A. G. (2023) · Neural Information Processing Systems · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2401.01764 · Cited by 25
“…result in poor generalization on downstream tasks related to the affected classes (Salman et al., 2022), while in other applications it would be unethical to sacrifice accuracy on some classes for improvements in average accuracy (Blodgett et al., 2016; Tatman, 2017; Buolamwini & Gebru, 2018).”
Modular and On-demand Bias Mitigation with Attribute-Removal Subnetworks
Hauzenberger, L., Masoudian, S., Kumar, D., Schedl, M., & Rekabsaz, N. (2023) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL (Findings of ACL) · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.findings-acl.386 · Cited by 16
“In FDCL18 dataset, we use the TwitterAAE model (Blodgett et al., 2016) to assign racial dialect classes.”
MethodGeographic Adaptation of Pretrained Language Models
Hofmann, V., Glavaš, G., Ljubešić, N., Pierrehumbert, J. B., & Schütze, H. (2024) · Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.1162/tacl_a_00652 · Cited by 22
“…Doyle, 2014; Eisenstein et al., 2014; Huang et al., 2016; Hovy and Purschke, 2018; Hovy et al., 2020), although phonological (Hulden et al., 2011; Blodgett et al., 2016), syntactic (Dunn, 2019; Demszky et al., 2021), and semantic properties (Bamman et al., 2014; Kulkarni et al., 2016) have been…”
BackgroundMethodAgarwal, O., Yang, Y., Wallace, B., & Nenkova, A. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2004.04123 · Cited by 24
Does Representational Fairness Imply Empirical Fairness?
Shen, A., Han, X., Cohn, T., Baldwin, T., & Frermann, L. (2022) · AACL/IJCNLP · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.findings-aacl.8 · Cited by 7
“has attracted substantial research interest across tasks including Twitter sentiment analysis (Blodgett et al., 2016; Han et al., 2021b), part-of-speech tagging (Hovy and Søgaard, 2015; Li et al.”
BackgroundDecoupling Adversarial Training for Fair NLP
Han, X., Baldwin, T., & Cohn, T. (2021) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL (Findings of ACL) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.findings-acl.41 · Cited by 21
“Data We experiment with the dataset of Blodgett et al. (2016), which contains tweets that are either African American English (AAE)-like or Standard American English (SAE)-like (following Han et al. (2021)).”
MethodFederated learning-based natural language processing: a systematic literature review
Khan, Y., Sánchez, D., & Domingo‐Ferrer, J. (2024) · Artificial Intelligence Review · doi:10.1007/s10462-024-10970-5 · Cited by 35
“They proposed FEDERATE, a technique that used a DP encoder and adversarial learning to acquire fair, accurate models with representations for identification on four different datasets, including the Twitter Sentiment dataset by Blodgett et al. (2016).”
Fairness Definitions in Language Models Explained
Yin, Z., Wang, Z., Palikhe, A., & Zhang, W. (2026) · Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery · doi:10.1002/widm.70063 · Cited by 21
“Numerous studies investigate the disparities in text generation accuracy between different racial or gender groups in text classifiers [18, 23, 68, 73].”
Sociotechnical Implications of Generative Artificial Intelligence for Information Access
Mitra, B., Cramer, H., & Gurevich, O. (2024) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2405.11612 · Cited by 24
“Examples may include the handling of certain languages as one homogeneous entity without regards for sociolects or dialects [28] or holding different perspectives as equally valid without considerations for historical context or structural dynamics of power.”
BackgroundA Survey of Corpora for Germanic Low-Resource Languages and Dialects
Blaschke, V., Schütze, H., & Plank, B. (2023) · Nordic Conference of Computational Linguistics · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2304.09805 · Cited by 24
“TwitterAAE-UD (Blodgett et al., 2016) ENG (AAVE) Dep (UD) 250 tweets Ò”
Geolocating Tweets in any Language at any Location
Izbicki, M., Papalexakis, V., & Tsotras, V. J. (2019) · ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management (CIKM) · doi:10.1145/3357384.3357926 · Cited by 21
“…spread of political opinions [2, 11], for comparing dietary habits in different locations [60], for measuring neighborhood happiness levels [40], for measuring unemployment rates [1, 35], and for understanding differences between African American English and Standard American English [4, 16, 27].”
BackgroundAye or naw, whit dae ye hink? Scottish independence and linguistic identity on social media
Shoemark, P., Sur, D., Shrimpton, L., Murray, I., & Goldwater, S. (2017) · Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.18653/v1/e17-1116 · Cited by 24
“…English (Doyle, 2014; Huang et al., 2015), African American English (Jones, 2015), and global Spanish (Gonçalves and Sánchez, 2014), and to study variation associated with factors such as race/ethnicity (Jones, 2015; Blodgett et al., 2016; Jørgensen et al., 2015) and gender (Bamman et al., 2014).”
BackgroundOrwat, C. (2020) · Repository KITopen (Karlsruhe Institute of Technology) · doi:10.5445/ir/1000123477 · Cited by 24
Shode, I., Adelani, D. I., Peng, J., & Feldman, A. (2023) · Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2305.10971 · Cited by 23
“The imdb model (i.e imdb (eng) ) was probably worse despite the large training size due to a slight domain difference between Hol-lywood reviews and Nollywood reviews — may be due to writing style and slight vocabulary difference among English dialects (Blodgett et al., 2016).”
BackgroundLearning Disentangled Textual Representations via Statistical Measures of Similarity
Colombo, P., Staerman, G., Noiry, N., & Piantanida, P. (2022) · Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2205.03589 · Cited by 23
“To allow a fair comparison with previous works, we start by testing our framework with RNN encoders on the DIAL dataset.”
MethodInfluentialDistributionally Robust Models with Parametric Likelihood Ratios
Michel, P., Hashimoto, T. B., & Neubig, G. (2022) · International Conference on Learning Representations · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2204.06340 · Cited by 23
“The group-DRO problem is formulated by partitioning the evaluation data along labels as dialectal annotation obtained automatically with an off-the shelf classifier (Blodgett et al., 2016; Sap et al., 2019).”
BackgroundMethodAhmed, Z., Vidgen, B., & Hale, S. A. (2022) · EPJ Data Science · doi:10.1140/epjds/s13688-022-00319-9 · Cited by 22
“In others, however, they may be used to describe one’s own identity, i.e. self-referentially, or serve as an innocuous part of a group’s dialect [3].”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialTranslational NLP: A New Paradigm and General Principles for Natural Language Processing Research
Newman-Griffis, D. R., Lehman, J. F., Rosé, C. P., & Hochheiser, H. (2021) · Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies (NAACL-HLT) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.naacl-main.325 · Cited by 18
“Corporate disclosures, fi-nancial news reports, and tweets all require different processing strategies (Xing et al., 2018), as do tweets written by different communities (Blodgett et al., 2016; Groenwold et al., 2020).”
BackgroundDynamically Disentangling Social Bias from Task-Oriented Representations with Adversarial Attack
Wang, L., Yan, Y., He, K., Wu, Y., & Xu, W. (2021) · Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies (NAACL-HLT) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.naacl-main.293 · Cited by 19
“method on the dialectal tweets (DIAL) corpus collected by Blodgett et al. (2016) in a controlled setup, and the biography corpus (De-Arteaga et al.”
MethodUsing Noisy Self-Reports to Predict Twitter User Demographics
Wood-Doughty, Z., Xu, P., Liu, X., & Dredze, M. (2021) · International Workshop on Natural Language Processing for Social Media (SocialNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.socialnlp-1.11 · Cited by 19
“Lexical features are widely used for classifying users on Twitter [9, 54, 60].”
BackgroundHyperlocal Home Location Identification of Twitter Profiles
Poulston, A., Stevenson, M., & Bontcheva, K. (2017) · ACM Conference on Hypertext & Social Media · doi:10.1145/3078714.3078719 · Cited by 22
“such as hyperlocal content recommendation [18], inference of user characteristics based on neighborhood demography [3, 29, 35] or extraction and mapping of information to aid disaster response [27].”
BackgroundImproving Group Robustness on Spurious Correlation Requires Preciser Group Inference
Han, Y.-J., & Zou, D.-F. (2024) · International Conference on Machine Learning · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2404.13815 · Cited by 21
“Some methods attempt to infer group labels by training a simple ERM [7, 46, 19, 3, 40], maximizing the GroupDRO loss [12], or even introducing human knowledge [30, 48] when group information is unkonwn.”
BackgroundMethodExamining Bias in Opinion Summarisation through the Perspective of Opinion Diversity
Huang, N., Tian, L., Fayek, H. M., & Zhang, X. (2023) · Workshop on Computational Approaches to Subjectivity, Sentiment and Social Media Analysis · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2306.04424 · Cited by 21
“Other studies focused on the perspective of dialect used in text and whether the generated summaries cover such dialects (Blodgett et al., 2016; Keswani and Celis, 2021; Olabisi et al., 2022).”
BackgroundA Call for Standardization and Validation of Text Style Transfer Evaluation
Ostheimer, P., Nagda, M., Kloft, M., & Fellenz, S. (2023) · Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2306.00539 · Cited by 21
“, 2018) – DIAL (Blodgett et al., 2016) – Europarl (Koehn, 2005) – FlickrStyle10K (Gan et al.”
Learning Fair Representations via Rate-Distortion Maximization
Chowdhury, S. B. R., & Chaturvedi, S. (2022) · Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.1162/tacl_a_00512 · Cited by 11
Mitigating Biases in Toxic Language Detection through Invariant Rationalization
Chuang, Y.-S., Gao, M., Luo, H., Glass, J. R., Lee, H.-Y., Chen, Y.-N., & Li, S.-W. D. (2021) · Workshop on Online Abuse and Harms (WOAH) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.woah-1.12 · Cited by 24
“We match X with TOXTRIG, a handcrafted word bank collected for NOI, OI, and ONI; for dialectal biases, we use the topic model from Blodgett et al. (2016) to classify X into four dialects: AAE, white-aligned English (WAE), Hispanic, and other.”
MethodDetecting Gang-Involved Escalation on Social Media Using Context
Chang, S., Zhong, R., Adams, E., Lee, F.-T., Varia, S., Patton, D., Frey, W. R., Kedzie, C., & McKeown, K. (2018) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.18653/v1/d18-1005 · Cited by 21
“Other research investigating the development of tools for understanding AAE in social media (Blodgett et al., 2016) shows that existing tools (e.g., dependency parsers) perform poorly on this language.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialFair NLP Models with Differentially Private Text Encoders
Maheshwari, G., Denis, P., Keller, M., & Bellet, A. (2022) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2205.06135 · Cited by 20
“Interestingly, unlike Twitter Sentiment and Bias in Bios, all approaches have comparable accuracy, including Noise and INLP .”
InfluentialStyle Pooling: Automatic Text Style Obfuscation for Improved Classification Fairness
Mireshghallah, F., & Berg-Kirkpatrick, T. (2021) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.emnlp-main.152 · Cited by 15
“DIAL dataset (Blodgett et al., 2016).”
A Multidimensional Lexicon for Interpersonal Stancetaking
Pavalanathan, U., Fitzpatrick, J., Kiesling, S. F., & Eisenstein, J. (2017) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.18653/v1/p17-1082 · Cited by 23
“…language variation has been studied primarily in connection with macro-scale social variables, such as age (Argamon et al., 2007; Nguyen et al., 2013), gender (Burger et al., 2011; Bam-man et al., 2014), race (Eisenstein et al., 2011; Blodgett et al., 2016), and geography (Eisenstein et al., 2010).”
BackgroundFairLib: A Unified Framework for Assessing and Improving Fairness
Han, X., Shen, A., Li, Y., Frermann, L., Baldwin, T., & Cohn, T. (2022) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing: System Demonstrations (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.emnlp-demos.7 · Cited by 7
“A.1 Datasets M OJI : This sentiment analysis dataset was collected by Blodgett et al. (2016), and contains tweets that are either African American English (AAE)- like or Standard American English (SAE)-like.”
MethodAdversarial Scrubbing of Demographic Information for Text Classification
Chowdhury, S. B. R., Ghosh, S., Li, Y., Oliva, J. B., Srivastava, S., & Chaturvedi, S. (2021) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.emnlp-main.43 · Cited by 13
“Prior works have shown that intermediate representations in a deep learning model encode demographic associations of the author or person being spoken about (Blodgett et al., 2016; Elazar and Goldberg, 2018; Elazar et al., 2021).”
BackgroundMethodA Framework for Auditing Chatbots for Dialect-Based Quality-of-Service Harms
Harvey, E., Kizilcec, R. F., & Koenecke, A. (2025) · ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (FAccT) · doi:10.1145/3715275.3732137 · Cited by 11
“(2) Punctuation: translated phrases should have proper punctuation.”
Evaluating Dialect Robustness of Language Models via Conversation Understanding
Srirag, D., Sahoo, N., & Joshi, A. (2024) · COLING Workshops · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2405.05688 · Cited by 17
“A ‘bad’ example deviates largely from the expected output, and such examples are excluded from the final set of conversations used in our evaluation.”
BackgroundWang, L., & Zhu, H. (2022) · ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (FAccT) · doi:10.1145/3531146.3533147 · Cited by 13
“Prior research has offered disparate predictions about the impact of algorithms on fairness [5, 6, 17, 28, 39, 42].”
BackgroundAnoop, K. R., Gangan, M. P., Deepak, P., & Lajish, V. L. (2022) · Lecture notes in electrical engineering · doi:10.1007/978-981-19-4453-6_2 · Cited by 17
“Stylistic biases originate due to stylistic differences in texts with same content but generated by different socio-economic groups [100], e.g. unfair treatment to African American English while using language identification tools and dependency parsers [15].”
BackgroundExamining Racial Bias in an Online Abuse Corpus with Structural Topic ModelingPreprint
Davidson, T., & Bhattacharya, D. (2020) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2005.13041 · Cited by 17
“2Replication materials are available on Github: https://github. com/db758/icwsm data challenge 3The Asian and Hispanic models are also not as reliable and the authors of the original paper recommend that they not be used (Blodgett, Green, and O’Connor 2016). ar X iv :2 00 5.”
MethodTuringBox: An Experimental Platform for the Evaluation of AI Systems
Epstein, Z., Payne, B. H., Shen, J. H., Hong, C., Felbo, B., Dubey, A., Groh, M., Obradovich, N., Cebrian, M., & Rahwan, I. (2018) · International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.24963/ijcai.2018/851 · Cited by 17
Fairness and Bias in Algorithmic Hiring
Fabris, A., Baranowska, N., Dennis, M., Hacker, P., Saldivar, J., Borgesius, F. Z., & Biega, A. J. (2023) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2309.13933 · Cited by 16
Tackling Language Modelling Bias in Support of Linguistic Diversity
Bella, G., Helm, P., Koch, G., & Giunchiglia, F. (2024) · The 2024 ACM Conference on Fairness Accountability and Transparency · doi:10.1145/3630106.3658925 · Cited by 15
Bias in Opinion Summarisation from Pre-training to Adaptation: A Case Study in Political Bias
Huang, N., Fayek, H. M., & Zhang, X. (2024) · Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2402.00322 · Cited by 15
“…in opinion summarisation using extractive models by comparing how contents are extracted and if they are representing opinions from different social groups in the source documents equally or proportionally (Dash et al., 2019; Blodgett et al., 2016; Keswani and Celis, 2021; Olabisi et al., 2022).”
BackgroundMethodGausen, A., Mitra, B., & Lindley, S. E. (2024) · ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (FAccT) · doi:10.1145/3630106.3658900 · Cited by 18
“For example, ignoring linguistic differences when such differences exist may further intensify disparities in system outcomes for different language variants, such as sociolects or dialects [24], while making it difficult to acknowledge the resulting gaps.”
BackgroundDistributionally Robust Machine Learning with Multi-source Data
Wang, Z.-Y., Bühlmann, P., & Guo, Z.-J. (2023) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2309.02211 · Cited by 15
“In various real-world applications such as face recognition [Grother and Phillips, 2011], language identification [Blodgett et al., 2016], and electronic health record (EHR) data analysis [Singh et al., 2022, Rasmy et al., 2018], the training data is often collected from multiple sources, with…”
MiMiC: Minimally Modified Counterfactuals in the Representation Space
Singh, S., Ravfogel, S., Herzig, J., Aharoni, R., Cotterell, R., & Kumaraguru, P. (2024) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2402.09631 · Cited by 14
“Specifically, we consider Blodgett et al.’s (2016) dataset on various dialects of American English.”
Resende, G., Nery, L., Benevenuto, F., Zannettou, S., & Figueiredo, F. (2024) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2401.12720 · Cited by 14
“To create the dataset, the authors [9, 10] developed a Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA) based topic model that took into account both the frequency of common terms used in AAE as well as Census data.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialTowards Equal Opportunity Fairness through Adversarial LearningPreprint
Han, X., Baldwin, T., & Cohn, T. (2022) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2203.06317 · Cited by 14
“…sentiment analysis and biography classification —145 using the same dataset splits as prior work.146 MOJI This sentiment analysis dataset was col-147 lected by Blodgett et al. (2016), and contains tweets148 that are either African American English (AAE)-149 like or Standard American English…”
MethodLu, C., & Jurgens, D. (2022) · Workshop on Online Abuse and Harms (WOAH) · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.woah-1.8 · Cited by 53
“…Twitter API, we collect all recent (2019 onward) tweets from each user in the TERF (13,508,673 tweets), trans-friendly (1,291,908 tweets), and control (33,573,308 tweets) groups and discard non-English tweets using the language classifier of Blodgett et al. (2016) for labeling social media English.”
MethodAligning to What? Limits to RLHF Based Alignment
Barnhart, L. D. W., Bafghi, R. A., Becker, S. P., & Raissi, M. (2025) · North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2503.09025 · Cited by 13
“The other two datasets again contain tweets in AAE or SAE, but these do not match semantically (Blodgett et al., 2016) (See E).”
Metadata
- Authors
- Blodgett, S. L., Green, L., & O'Connor, B.
- Affiliations
- University of Massachusetts Amherst (US)
- Venue
- Proceedings of the 2016 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing
- Published
- 2016
- Pages
- 1119-1130
- OpenAlex
- W2508354372
- Cited by
- 291
- References
- 41
- Citations by year
- 2026: 18 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 39 · 2022: 52 · 2021: 61 · 2020: 35 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 15
- FWCI
- 8.62
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Natural Language Processing Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Authorship Attribution and Profiling
- Social Sciences › Linguistics and Language › Linguistic Variation and Morphology
- Keywords
- African American English, dialect variation, social media language, Twitter, language identification, dependency parsing, ensemble classifiers
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review