The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Demographic Dialectal Variation in Social Media: A Case Study of African-American English
Open accessAbstract
Though dialectal language is increasingly abundant on social media, few resources exist for developing NLP tools to handle such language.We conduct a case study of dialectal language in online conversational text by investigating African-American English (AAE) on Twitter.We propose a distantly supervised model to identify AAE-like language from demographics associated with geo-located messages, and we verify that this language follows well-known AAE linguistic phenomena.In addition, we analyze the quality of existing language identification and dependency parsing tools on AAE-like text, demonstrating that they perform poorly on such text compared to text associated with white speakers.We also provide an ensemble classifier for language identification which eliminates this disparity and release a new corpus of tweets containing AAE-like language.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Such variations were also observed across racial or ethnic groups”
From Social Data: Biases, Methodological Pitfalls, and Ethical Boundaries (2019) · cites this paper as Blodgett et al., 2016
In the citing paper
“these biases raise additional concerns as they affect several popular tasks, such as user classification, trending topics detection, language identification, or content filtering”
From Social Data: Biases, Methodological Pitfalls, and Ethical Boundaries (2019) · cites this paper as Blodgett et al., 2016
In the citing paper
“by focusing on African-American English dialect, Blodgett et al. (2016) show racial disparity when the textual content produced by users vary from the mainstream or standard languages.”
From Social Data: Biases, Methodological Pitfalls, and Ethical Boundaries (2019) · cites this paper as Blodgett et al., 2016
In the citing paper
“Gaps between the purpose and the assumptions under which these datasets and models are built and those under which they are being used can lead to performance disparities, affecting research validity and producing misleading results (e.g., Blodgett et al., 2016; Buolamwini and Gebru, 2018).”
From Social Data: Biases, Methodological Pitfalls, and Ethical Boundaries (2019) · cites this paper as Blodgett et al., 2016
Citations
Cites
Griffiths, T. L., & Steyvers, M. (2004) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0307752101 · Cited by 6,049
Monroe, B. L., Colaresi, M. P., & Quinn, K. M. (2008) · Political Analysis · doi:10.1093/pan/mpn018 · Cited by 542 · cited 2×
“This model has broadly similar goals as nonlatent, log-linear generative models of text that condition on document-level covariates (Monroe et al., 2008; Eisenstein et al., 2011a; Taddy, 2013).”
MethodThe social impact of natural language processing
Hovy, D., & Spruit, S. L. (2016) · Proceedings of the 54th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 2: Short Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/p16-2096 · Cited by 329
Toward a Description of African American Vernacular English Dialect Regions Using “Black Twitter”
Jones, T. (2015) · American Speech · doi:10.1215/00031283-3442117 · Cited by 144 · cited 5×
“, 2016) and sociolinguistic (Stewart, 2014; Eisenstein, 2015; Jones, 2015) research.”
BackgroundMethodInfluential
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 201–300 of 378
Robust Concept Erasure via Kernelized Rate-Distortion Maximization
Chowdhury, S. B. R., Monath, N., Dubey, K. A., Ahmed, A., & Chaturvedi, S. (2023) · Neural Information Processing Systems · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2312.00194 · Cited by 13
“D IAL [12] is a Twitter-based sentiment classification dataset, where each tweet is associated with sentiment labels and “race” information (binary concept label) of the author.”
BackgroundTowards Bridging the Digital Language DividePreprint
Bella, G., Helm, P., Koch, G., & Giunchiglia, F. (2023) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2307.13405 · Cited by 15
Platform governance in the era of AI and the digital economy
Zheng, X.-L., Zhou, G., & Zeng, D. (2023) · Frontiers of Engineering Management · doi:10.1007/s42524-022-0241-1 · Cited by 13
“In recent years, algorithmic discrimination by algorithmic decision-making systems has been examined in content moderation (Blodgett et al., 2016).”
BackgroundBitrate-Constrained DRO: Beyond Worst Case Robustness To Unknown Group Shifts
Setlur, A. R., Dennis, D. K., Eysenbach, B., Raghunathan, A., Finn, C., Smith, V., & Levine, S. (2023) · International Conference on Learning Representations · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2302.02931 · Cited by 13
“This also complements the failure mode of neural networks trained with stochastic gradient descent (SGD) that rely on simple spurious features which correctly classify points in the majority group but may fail on minority groups [10].”
BackgroundAAEBERT: Debiasing BERT-based Hate Speech Detection Models via Adversarial Learning
Okpala, E., Cheng, L., Mbwambo, N. M. J., & Luo, F. (2022) · International Conference on Machine Learning and Applications · doi:10.1109/icmla55696.2022.00053 · Cited by 8
FairGrad: Fairness Aware Gradient Descent
Maheshwari, G., & Perrot, M. (2022) · Trans. Mach. Learn. Res. · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2206.10923 · Cited by 13
"Stop Asian Hate!" : Refining Detection of Anti-Asian Hate Speech During the COVID-19 Pandemic
Nghiem, H., & Morstatter, F. (2021) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2112.02265 · Cited by 13
Effective Controllable Bias Mitigation for Classification and Retrieval using Gate Adapters
Masoudian, S., Volaucnik, C., Schedl, M., & Rekabsaz, N. (2024) · Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2401.16457 · Cited by 12
“Following previous studies (Sap et al., 2019; Ravfogel et al., 2020), we assign race dialect labels of African American and White American to FDCL18 using the probabilistic model developed by Blodgett et al. (2016).”
MethodErasure of Unaligned Attributes from Neural Representations
Shao, S., Ziser, Y., & Cohen, S. B. (2023) · Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.1162/tacl_a_00558 · Cited by 5
“For example, Blodgett et al. (2016) ∗Equal contribution.”
MethodSocioProbe: What, When, and Where Language Models Learn about Sociodemographics
Lauscher, A., Bianchi, F., Bowman, S. R., & Hovy, D. (2022) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2211.04281 · Cited by 12
“Accordingly, researchers in NLP have explored these variations (Rosenthal and McKe-own, 2011; Blodgett et al., 2016) and showed that sociodemographic factors influence model performance (e.g., Volkova et al., 2013; Hovy, 2015).”
Backgroundfairlib: A Unified Framework for Assessing and Improving Classification Fairness
Han, X., Shen, A., Li, Y., Frermann, L., Baldwin, T., & Cohn, T. (2022) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2205.01876 · Cited by 12
“M OJI : This sentiment analysis dataset was collected by Blodgett et al. (2016), and contains tweets that are either African American English (AAE)- like or Standard American English (SAE)-like.”
MethodFrom theories on styles to their transfer in text: Bridging the gap with a hierarchical survey
Troiano, E., Velutharambath, A., & Klinger, R. (2022) · Natural Language Engineering · doi:10.1017/s1351324922000407 · Cited by 13
Who's in and who's out? A case study of multimodal CLIP-filtering in DataComp
Hong, R., Agnew, W., Kohno, T., & Morgenstern, J. (2024) · Proceedings of the 4th ACM Conference on Equity and Access in Algorithms, Mechanisms, and Optimization · doi:10.1145/3689904.3694702 · Cited by 11
“Figure 19 illustrates the frequency and pass rates by the dialect prediction model from Blodgett et al. [20] on a random subset of 100 , 000 samples detected as English by langdetect [116].”
Language Models Change Facts Based on the Way You Talk
Kearney, M., Binns, R., & Gal, Y. (2025) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2507.14238 · Cited by 11
“These studies find that model performance is significantly worse or consistently biased on tasks such as hate speech detection, part of speech tagging, dependency parsing, logical and mathematical reasoning, and dialect translation when the tasks involve AAVE compared with SAE [23, 14, 2, 18, 5].”
OLMo: Accelerating the Science of Language Models
Groeneveld, D., Beltagy, I., Walsh, P., Bhagia, A., Kinney, R., Tafjord, O., Jha, A. H., Ivison, H., Magnusson, I., Wang, Y., et al. (2024) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2402.00838 · Cited by 10
“The evaluation suite (Wang et al., 2023; Ivison et al., 2023) for adapted models.”
Minimax Regret Learning for Data with Heterogeneous Subgroups
Mo, W.-B., Tang, W., Xue, S., Liu, Y.-F., & Zhu, J. (2024) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2405.01709 · Cited by 10
“Weibin to substantial heterogeneity across sub-populations, predictive models that optimize average criteria over the pooled population may suffer from poor performance in certain sub-populations [3, 36, 38].”
BackgroundLinguistically Differentiating Acts and Recalls of Racial Microaggressions on Social Media
Gunturi, U. S., Kumar, A., Ding, X., & Rho, E. H. R. (2024) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3637366 · Cited by 12
Social Meme-ing: Measuring Linguistic Variation in Memes
Zhou, N., Jurgens, D., & Bamman, D. (2023) · North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2311.09130 · Cited by 10
“This work is important not only because language variation often exposes shortcomings in NLP tools, which are primarily developed for standard language varieties (Blodgett et al., 2016), but also because variation often embeds social meaning .”
BackgroundUsing Sociolinguistic Variables to Reveal Changing Attitudes Towards Sexuality and Gender
CH-Wang, S., & Jurgens, D. (2021) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.emnlp-main.782 · Cited by 9
“Prior work has shown that location data for tweets can be used to identify lexical variation associated with identity (Gonçalves and Sánchez, 2014; Blodgett et al., 2016; Abitbol et al., 2018).”
BackgroundBuilding a Japanese Typo Dataset from Wikipedia’s Revision History
Tanaka, Y., Murawaki, Y., Kawahara, D., & Kurohashi, S. (2020) · Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.acl-srw.31 · Cited by 10
“…by phenomena not found in standard texts, such as word lengthening (Brody and Diakopoulos, 2011), dialectal variations (Saito et al., 2017; Blodgett et al., 2016), unknown ono-matopoeias (Sasano et al., 2013), grammatical errors (Mizumoto et al., 2011; Lee et al., 2018), and mother tongue…”
BackgroundRelational Summarization for Corpus Analysis
Handler, A., & O'Connor, B. T. (2018) · North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.18653/v1/n18-1159 · Cited by 10
“Many existing methods specialize in detecting (Chaney et al., 2016), tracking (Allan et al., 1998) and summarizing evolving topics in timestamped documents.”
MethodSelf-citationTowards Fairer NLP Models: Handling Gender Bias In Classification Tasks
Sobhani, N., & Delany, S. J. (2024) · GEBNLP · doi:10.18653/v1/2024.gebnlp-1.10 · Cited by 10
“Our key concern is the potential allocational harms arising from such systematic gender biases in NLP models, where the systems may disproportionately misclassify or make inaccu-167 rate predictions for text associated with a particular gender group (Blodgett et al., 2016; Barocas et al., 2017).”
BackgroundMethodThe Group Robustness is in the Details: Revisiting Finetuning under Spurious Correlations
LaBonte, T., Hill, J. C., Zhang, X., Muthukumar, V. K., & Kumar, A. (2024) · Neural Information Processing Systems · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2407.13957 · Cited by 9
“Rectifying this weakness is an important challenge for real-world deployment of machine learning algorithms, as spurious correlations can exacerbate unintended bias against demographic minorities [20, 2, 57, 17, 5] or cause failure in high-consequence applications [33, 8, 70, 42].”
BackgroundAccuracy on the Curve: On the Nonlinear Correlation of ML Performance Between Data Subpopulations
Liang, W., Mao, Y.-N., Kwon, Y., Yang, X., & Zou, J. Y. (2023) · International Conference on Machine Learning · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2305.02995 · Cited by 9
“This confirms that the nonlinear (“moon shape”) correlation phenomenon is indeed not captured by previous work. can still fail on particular groups of data points (Hashimoto et al., 2018; Buolamwini & Gebru, 2018; Blodgett et al., 2016).”
Corpus-Guided Contrast Sets for Morphosyntactic Feature Detection in Low-Resource English Varieties
Masis, T., Neal, A., Green, L., & O'Connor, B. T. (2022) · FIELDMATTERS · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2209.07611 · Cited by 9
“Rule-based approaches have used sequences of unigrams and POS tags to identify syntactic features (Blodgett et al., 2016), but many features cannot be defined by sequences and the tags may be unreliable.”
MethodSelf-citationDebiasing with Sufficient Projection: A General Theoretical Framework for Vector Representations
Shi, E., Ding, L., Kong, L., & Jiang, B. (2024) · Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies (NAACL-HLT) · doi:10.18653/v1/2024.naacl-long.332 · Cited by 5
“In the text classification task, De-Arteaga et al. (2019); Blodgett et al. (2016) proposed two benchmark datasets and used the equal opportunity measure from fairness literature.”
Identity-Aware Large Language Models require Cultural ReasoningPreprint
Plum, A., Lutgen, A.-M., Purschke, C., & Rettinger, A. (2025) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2510.18510 · Cited by 8
“Furthermore, by including only small proportions of non-western languages, context-specific varieties and variation is barely included in the training data [9, 33, 34].”
Analyzing Dialectical Biases in LLMs for Knowledge and Reasoning Benchmarks
Pan, E., Choi, A. S. G., ter Hoeve, M., Seto, S., & Koenecke, A. (2025) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2510.00962 · Cited by 8
EnDive: A Cross-Dialect Benchmark for Fairness and Performance in Large Language ModelsPreprint
Gupta, A., Cheung, J., Meng, P., Sayyed, S., Liao, A., Zhu, K., & O'Brien, S. (2025) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2504.07100 · Cited by 6
Mitigating Spurious Correlations via Disagreement Probability
Han, H.-G., Kim, S., Joo, H., Hong, S.-W., & Lee, J. (2024) · Neural Information Processing Systems · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2411.01757 · Cited by 8
“However, this approach has been found to underperform on certain groups of data [4, 15, 11] due to the prevalence of spurious correlations within training datasets [31, 38, 39].”
Variationist: Exploring Multifaceted Variation and Bias in Written Language Data
Ramponi, A., Casula, C., & Menini, S. (2024) · Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2406.17647 · Cited by 8
“For instance, it can be used for advancing research on sociolects such as African-American English (Blodgett et al., 2016), to study linguistic reclamation and more generally investigate semantic change over time, or to conduct qualitative error analyses for model predictions (i.e., to unveil which…”
BackgroundDisentangling Dialect from Social Bias via Multitask Learning to Improve Fairness
Spliethöver, M., Menon, S., & Wachsmuth, H. (2024) · Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2406.09977 · Cited by 8
“Dialects appear in regional and social communities and introduce syntactic and lexical variations (Blodgett et al., 2016).”
InfluentialTowards a Deep Multi-layered Dialectal Language Analysis: A Case Study of African-American English
Dacon, J. (2022) · HCINLP · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2206.08978 · Cited by 8
“We collect 3000 demographically-aligned African American (AA) tweets possessing an average of 7 words per tweet from the publicly available TwitterAAE corpus by Blodgett et al. (2016).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialPreventing Author Profiling through Zero-Shot Multilingual Back-Translation
Adelani, D. I., Zhang, M., Shen, X., Davody, A., Kleinbauer, T., & Klakow, D. (2021) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.emnlp-main.684 · Cited by 2
“In this paper, we conduct experiments on three datasets: DIAL (Blodgett et al., 2016), VerbMobil (Weilhammer et al., 2002) and Yelp (Reddy and Knight, 2016; Shen et al., 2017).”
MethodComparing MT Approaches for Text Normalization
Veliz, C. M., Clercq, O. D., & Hoste, V. (2019) · International conference Recent advances in natural language processing · doi:10.26615/978-954-452-056-4_086 · Cited by 9
“(Vandekerckhove and Nobels, 2010; Blodgett et al., 2016).”
BackgroundPerceptions of Language Technology Failures from South Asian English Speakers
Holt, F., Held, W. B., & Yang, D. (2024) · Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.18653/v1/2024.findings-acl.241 · Cited by 8
“Previous studies in Natural Language Processing have identified performance disparities between Standard American English (SAmE) and other English dialects (Blevins et al., 2016; Jørgensen et al., 2016a; Blodgett et al., 2016; Jurgens et al., 2017; Ziems et al., 2022a, 2023; Shan et al., 2023).”
BackgroundDetecting Contact-Induced Semantic Shifts: What Can Embedding-Based Methods Do in Practice?
Miletić, F., Przewozny-Desriaux, A., & Tanguy, L. (2021) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.emnlp-main.847 · Cited by 7
“, 2018) or to examine the impact of sociodemographic factors (Bamman et al., 2014; Blodgett et al., 2016; Nguyen et al., 2013).”
BackgroundMy LLM might Mimic AAE - But When Should it?
Sandoval, S., Acquaye, C., Cobbina, K. A., Teli, M. N., & Daumé, H. (2025) · North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2502.04564 · Cited by 7
“AAE, while predominantly a spoken language variety, is seeing increased representation in speech-like media such as texting and social media (Blodgett et al., 2016).”
BESSTIE: A Benchmark for Sentiment and Sarcasm Classification for Varieties of English
Srirag, D., Joshi, A., Painter, J., & Kanojia, D. (2024) · Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2412.04726 · Cited by 7
“While previous studies utilise location-based filtering (Blodgett et al., 2016; Sun et al., 2023), we examine if the collected text from the two methods is indeed from these language varieties.”
DRPruning: Efficient Large Language Model Pruning through Distributionally Robust Optimization
Deng, H., Jiao, W., Liu, X.-B., Li, J., Zhang, M., & Tu, Z. (2024) · Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2411.14055 · Cited by 7
“Overparameterized neural networks excel on i.i.d. test sets but struggle with underrepresented data groups (Hovy and Søgaard, 2015; Blodgett et al., 2016; Tatman, 2017).”
Systematic Evaluation of Predictive Fairness
Han, X., Shen, A., Cohn, T., Baldwin, T., & Frermann, L. (2022) · AACL · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2210.08758 · Cited by 7
“We use the widely-used Twitter emoji dataset (Blodgett et al., 2016; Ravfogel et al., 2020; Shen et al., 2022), denoted as Moji .”
Uncertainty Estimation for Debiased Models: Does Fairness Hurt Reliability?
Kuzmin, G., Vazhentsev, A., Shelmanov, A., Han, X., Šuster, S., Panov, M., Panchenko, A., & Baldwin, T. (2023) · International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing and Conference of the Asia-Pacific Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics (IJCNLP-AACL) · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.ijcnlp-main.48 · Cited by 3
“We experiment with two text classification datasets widely used for the evaluation of debiasing techniques in previous work: Moji (Blodgett et al., 2016) and Bios (De-Arteaga et al., 2019).”
MethodCausal Effect Regularization: Automated Detection and Removal of Spurious Correlations
Kumar, A., Deshpande, A., & Sharma, A. (2023) · Neural Information Processing Systems · doi:10.52202/075280-0916 · Cited by 7
“For example in a sentiment classification dataset that we evaluate (Twitter-AAE [4]), a demographic attribute like race could be spuriously correlated with the sentiment of a sentence [9].”
BackgroundDialect Variation on Social Media
Nguyen, D. (2021) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108565080.014 · Cited by 7
“For example, in a study on African-American English in Twitter, Blodgett et al. (2016) analyzed habitual be by tagging tweets with the ARK Twitter POS tagger (Owoputi et al., 2013) and searching for O-be-V and O-b-V sequences.”
BackgroundInfluentialWhen Large Language Models Meet Law: Dual-Lens Taxonomy, Technical Advances, and Ethical GovernancePreprint
Shao, P., Xu, L., Wang, J., Zhou, W., & Wu, X. (2025) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2507.07748 · Cited by 11
“Blodgett et al. found that NLP tools are less accurate in identifying African American English (AAE) compared to standard English [23, 25].”
Data Caricatures: On the Representation of African American Language in Pretraining CorporaPreprint
Deas, N., Vente, B., Ananthram, A., Grieser, J. A., Patton, D. U., Kleiner, S., Shepard, J., & McKeown, K. R. (2025) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2503.10789 · Cited by 1
“Because much of recent work relies on a threshold of 0.8 to identify AAL documents (e.g., David-son et al. (2019)) using the demographic alignment classifier (Blodgett et al., 2016), we prioritize texts with a higher probability of including AAL in human judgments.”
InfluentialSrivastava, A., & Chiang, D. (2024) · Proceedings of the Tenth Workshop on Noisy and User-generated Text · doi:10.18653/v1/2025.wnut-1.6 · Cited by 6
“Whether a user adopts a regional dialect, follows different spelling conventions, or uses culturally-specific vocabulary, encountering text variation in most day-to-day NLP use cases is inevitable (Blodgett et al., 2016; Huang et al., 2020).”
Leveraging Prototypical Representations for Mitigating Social Bias without Demographic Information
Iskander, S., Radinsky, K., & Belinkov, Y. (2024) · North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2403.09516 · Cited by 6
“We use the DIAL Dataset (Blodgett et al., 2016), which contains 100K Twitter messages labeled with positive or negative sentiment.”
MethodBreak it, Imitate it, Fix it: Robustness by Generating Human-Like AttacksPreprint
Sinha, A., Balashankar, A., Beirami, A., Avrahami, T., Chen, J., & Beutel, A. (2023) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2310.16955 · Cited by 1
“Prior work that does not assume a standardized single language, include studies on dialectal language like Ebonics on Twitter (Blodgett et al., 2016), multilingual text on Reddit (Michel & Neubig, 2018), Hinglish (Biradar et al., 2021)), emoji-based hatespeech (Kirk et al., 2022); and methods that…”
BackgroundWriting Assistants Should Model Social Factors of LanguagePreprint
Kulkarni, V., & Raheja, V. (2023) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2303.16275 · Cited by 6
Measuring Geographic Performance Disparities of Offensive Language Classifiers
Lwowski, B., Rad, P., & Rios, A. (2022) · International Conference on Computational Linguistics · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2209.07353 · Cited by 6
“Moreover, the di- 434 alect features are the probabilities returned from the 435 dialect inference tool from Blodgett et al. (2016).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialSustaining Fairness via Incremental Learning
Chowdhury, S. B. R., & Chaturvedi, S. (2022) · AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2208.12212 · Cited by 6
“Numerous works try to achieve fairness through unawareness (Apfelbaum et al. 2010) by debiasing model representations from protected attributes (Blodgett, Green, and O’Connor 2016; Elazar and Goldberg 2018; Elazar et al. 2021; Chowd-hury and Chaturvedi 2022).”
BackgroundUndersampling is a Minimax Optimal Robustness Intervention in Nonparametric Classification
Chatterji, N. S., Haque, S., & Hashimoto, T. B. (2022) · Trans. Mach. Learn. Res. · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2205.13094 · Cited by 6
“When there is a mismatch between the train and test distributions, current models are often brittle and perform poorly on rare examples (Hovy & Søgaard, 2015; Blodgett et al., 2016; Tatman, 2017; Hashimoto et al., 2018; Alcorn et al., 2019).”
MethodBokányi, E., Kondor, D., & Vattay, G. (2019) · Royal Society Open Science · doi:10.1098/rsos.190027 · Cited by 5
“The amount of these texts enables the analysis of language on a previously unprecedented scale [2–4], including the dynamics, geography and time scale of language change [5,6], social media cursing habits [7–9] or dialectal variations [10].”
BackgroundDebiasing NLP Models Without Demographic Information
Orgad, H., & Belinkov, Y. (2022) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2212.10563 · Cited by 6
“We follow the setting of Elazar and Goldberg (2018), who used a twitter dataset collected by Blodgett et al. (2016) to study dialectal variation in social media.”
MethodText Characterization Toolkit (TCT)
Simig, D., Wang, T., Dankers, V., Henderson, P., Batsuren, K., Hupkes, D., & Diab, M. T. (2022) · AACL · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.aacl-demo.9 · Cited by 6
“More worrying, however, is that training or finetuning on datasets that contain biases and artefacts may result in models implementing undesired, biased behaviour (e.g. Rudinger et al., 2018; Blodgett et al., 2016).”
BackgroundBias Mitigation for Toxicity Detection via Sequential Decisions
Cheng, L., Mosallanezhad, A., Silva, Y. N., Hall, D. L., & Liu, H. (2022) · Proceedings of the 45th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval · doi:10.1145/3477495.3531945 · Cited by 8
Kleiner, S., Grieser, J. A., Miller, S., Shepard, J., García-Pérez, J., Deas, N., Patton, D. U., Turcan, E., & McKeown, K. (2024) · AI and Ethics · doi:10.1007/s43681-024-00623-2 · Cited by 5
Understanding Position Bias Effects on Fairness in Social Multi-Document Summarization
Olabisi, O., & Agrawal, A. (2024) · Workshop on NLP for Similar Languages, Varieties and Dialects · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2405.01790 · Cited by 5
“…the DivSumm dataset 1 , an MDS dataset consisting of English tweets of three diverse dialects ( African-American English, Hispanic-aligned Language, and White-aligned Language) (Olabisi et al., 2022), which was developed using a large corpus of tweets originally collected by Blodgett et al. (2016).”
BackgroundFair Text Classification with Wasserstein Independence
Leteno, T., Gourru, A., Laclau, C., Emonet, R., & Gravier, C. (2023) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2311.12689 · Cited by 5
“Moji (Blodgett et al., 2016).”
Mixed-effects transformers for hierarchical adaptation
White, J., Goodman, N. D., & Hawkins, R. D. (2022) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2205.01749 · Cited by 5
“Contextual variation is ubiquitous in language, where predictions may differ as a function of speaker identity (Blodgett et al., 2016; Yang and Eisenstein, 2017; Ostapenko et al., 2022), location (Hofmann et al., 2022), time (Lazaridou et al., 2021; Sawhney et al., 2020; Schlechtweg et al., 2019;…”
BackgroundAuditing for Diversity Using Representative Examples
Keswani, V., & Celis, L. E. (2021) · ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD) · doi:10.1145/3447548.3467433 · Cited by 3
Efficiently Mitigating Classification Bias via Transfer LearningPreprint
Jin, X., Barbieri, F., Davani, A. M., Kennedy, B., Neves, L., & Ren, X. (2020) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2010.12864 · Cited by 5
“We use an off-the-shelf AAE dialect predictor (Blodgett et al., 2016) to identify examples written in AAE for the bias mitigation stage.”
MethodFoundation Metrics: Quantifying Effectiveness of Healthcare Conversations powered by Generative AI
Abbasian, M., Khatibi, E., Azimi, I., Oniani, D., Abad, Z. S. H., Thieme, A., Yang, Z., Wang, Y., Lin, B., Gevaert, O., et al. (2023) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2309.12444 · Cited by 5
Towards Fair Dataset Distillation for Text Classification
Han, X., Shen, A., Li, Y., Frermann, L., Baldwin, T., & Cohn, T. (2022) · Workshop on Simple and Efficient Natural Language Processing (SustaiNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.sustainlp-1.13
“Dataset: We consider two tasks: (1) binary sentiment analysis over the M OJI dataset (Blodgett et al., 2016), with protected “race” attributes (African American English vs. Standard American English); and (2) 28-way occupation classification with protected attribute gender (Male vs. Female) for…”
MethodObliviator Reveals the Cost of Nonlinear Guardedness in Concept Erasure
Akbari, R., Afshari, M., & Boddeti, V. N. (2026) · Neural Information Processing Systems · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2603.07529 · Cited by 4
“S ENTIMENT [4] (Y: Sentiment, S: Race), and Utility-Erasure Trade-off: While concept erasure methods are typically evaluated on their final-stage, such evaluations overlook how competing objectives interact throughout the erasure process.”
Zhou, K., Gligoric, K., Cheng, M., Lam, M. S., Raman, V., Aminu, B., Woo, C., Brockman, M. J., Cha, H., & Jurafsky, D. (2025) · Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2510.15951 · Cited by 4
“…technology users (Bolukbasi et al., 2016; Schiebinger, 2014; Caliskan et al., 2017; Sheng et al., 2019; Sap et al., 2019; Blodgett and O’Connor, 2017; Zhou et al., 2022b; Santurkar et al., 2023; Blodgett et al., 2016; Jurgens et al., 2017; Koenecke et al., 2020; Ògúnrè.mí et al., 2023).”
Nonlinear Concept Erasure: a Density Matching Approach
Saillenfest, A., & Lemberger, P. (2025) · European Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2507.12341 · Cited by 4
“This dataset, used in [4] DIAL is a Twitter-based sentiment classification dataset constructed from the DeepMoji corpus [6].”
Large Language Model Annotation Bias in Hate Speech Detection
Okpala, E., & Cheng, L. (2025) · Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media · doi:10.1609/icwsm.v19i1.35879 · Cited by 4
“Also, not all African Americans use AAE, and not all AAE users are African-American, although its use suggests closeness to the African-American community (Blodgett, Green, and O’Connor 2016).”
InfluentialStability Evaluation via Distributional Perturbation Analysis
Blanchet, J. H., Cui, P., Li, J.-J., & Liu, J.-S. (2024) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2405.03198 · Cited by 4
“For example, model performances substantially degrade under demographic shifts in recommender systems (Blodgett et al., 2016; Sapiezynski et al., 2017); under temporal shifts in medical diagnosis (Pasterkamp et al., 2017); and under spatial shifts in wildlife conservation (Beery et al., 2021).”
BackgroundHate Speech Detection for Transliterated English and Sinhala Code-Mixed Data
Muthuthanthri, M., & Smith, R. (2024) · International Conference on Advanced Research in Computing (ICARC) · doi:10.1109/icarc61713.2024.10499768 · Cited by 5
“Additionally, [26] highlighted the challenge of dialectal variations, particularly in African-American English, and the resultant biases in social media content analysis.”
Backgroundvan Boven, G., Hirmer, S., & Conforti, C. (2022) · International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation · doi:10.63317/4ifcfc833ze2 · Cited by 4
“Moreover, almost all research in this area has focused on High-Income Countries, with a particular strong focus on the US (Blodgett et al., 2016).”
BackgroundDetection and Analysis of Online Extremist Communities
Benigni, M. (2017) · doi:10.1184/r1/6715841.v1 · Cited by 4
Task-Agnostic Privacy-Preserving Representation Learning via Federated Learning
Li, A., Yang, H., & Chen, Y. (2020) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-63076-8_4 · Cited by 3
Side-by-side Comparison Amplifies Dialect Bias in Language Models
Kondapally, K., Smerdon, C. J., Patel, P. C., Akoni, O., Torres, J., Ranjit, J., Finlayson, M., & Swayamdipta, S. (2026) · ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (FAccT) · doi:10.1145/3805689.3812217 · Cited by 1
“Blodgett et al. [8] introduced a dataset with AAVE tweets by leveraging demographic modeling to identify tweets written in AAVE.”
DIA-HARM: Dialectal Disparities in Harmful Content Detection Across 50 English Dialects
Lucas, J. S., Murtagh, M., Al-Lawati, A., Uchendu, U. S., Uchendu, A., & Lee, D. (2026) · Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2604.05318 · Cited by 3
“…remains the most studied variety (Joshi et al., 2025), with documented disparities in toxicity detection (Okpala et al., 2022), language identification (Blodgett and Eisenstein, 2016), and recent work showing lower LLM accuracy on AAE prompts compared to SAE (Zhou et al., 2025; Mire et al., 2025).”
Nayeem, M. T., & Rafiei, D. (2026) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2604.04204 · Cited by 3
“…other English varieties has shown systematic disparities in tagging, classification, sentiment analysis, robustness, and model behavior (Jørgensen et al., 2016; Blodgett et al., 2016; Kiritchenko & Mohammad, 2018; Ziems et al., 2023; Hofmann et al., 2024; Fleisig et al., 2024; Holt et al., 2024).”
Are Stereotypes Leading LLMs' Zero-Shot Stance Detection ?
Dubreuil, A., Gourru, A., Largeron, C., & Trabelsi, A. (2025) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.18653/v1/2025.emnlp-main.1605 · Cited by 3
“To infer the nature of the language, we propose to leverage the model 3 proposed by Blodgett et al. (2016) as was done to build the MOJI dataset.”
InfluentialLess Is More? Examining Fairness in Pruned Large Language Models for Summarising OpinionsPreprint
Huang, N., Fayek, H. M., & Zhang, X. (2025) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2508.17610
“Prior research has examined fairness across demographic attributes such as gender, race, political orientation (Dash et al., 2019), dialect (Blodgett et al., 2016), and opinion diversity (Huang et al., 2023).”
EmoDialect: Leveraging Fuzzy Matching and Dialect-Emotion Mapping for Sentiment Analysis
Madhu, C., & S., S. (2025) · IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing · doi:10.1109/taffc.2024.3514862 · Cited by 3
“Various regional and social dialects are developed within languages across the globe as a result of linguistic diversity within a standard language [60].”
InfluentialWei, D., Chau, M., & Li, Z. (2025) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.25300/misq/2025/18416 · Cited by 4
Fair Text Classification via Transferable RepresentationsPreprint
Leteno, T., Perrot, M., Laclau, C., Gourru, A., & Gravier, C. (2025) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2503.07691 · Cited by 1
“Moji (Blodgett et al., 2016).”
Analysis of LLM as a grammatical feature tagger for African American English
Porwal, R., Rozet, A., Houck, P., Gowda, J., Moeller, S., & Tang, K. (2025) · North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.18653/v1/2025.findings-naacl.431 · Cited by 3
“…et al., 2016), hate speech classification (Harris et al., 2022; Sap et al., 2019), ASR (Koenecke et al., 2020; Martin and Tang, 2020), di-alectal analysis (Blodgett et al., 2016; Dacon, 2022; Stewart, 2014) and feature detection (Masis et al., 2022; Santiago et al., 2022; Previlon et al., 2024).”
DrawL: Understanding the Effects of Non-Mainstream Dialects in Prompted Image GenerationPreprint
Williams, J. N., FitzMorris, M., Aka, O., & Laszlo, S. (2024) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2405.05382 · Cited by 3
“In the context of hate-speech detection, Blodgett et al. [6] have found that examples with a high likelihood of belonging to a dialect primarily spoken by Black Americans are classified as hate-speech with a higher likelihood than Mainstream American English.”
BackgroundTerry, J., & Green, L. J. (2023) · Publication of the American Dialect Society · doi:10.1215/00031283-11036836 · Cited by 3
Self-citationSelecting Shots for Demographic Fairness in Few-Shot Learning with Large Language Models
Aguirre, C., Sasse, K., Cachola, I., & Dredze, M. (2023) · NLP4PI · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2311.08472 · Cited by 3
“Twitter Sentiment : Similar to Bias in Bios, we modified the prompt from Min et al. (2022) to include information about the labels.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialA Novel Information-Theoretic Objective to Disentangle Representations for Fair ClassificationPreprint
Colombo, P., Noiry, N., Staerman, G., & Piantanida, P. (2023) · International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2310.13990 · Cited by 3
“We use the DIAL dataset (Blodgett et al., 2016) to ensure backward comparison with previous works (Colombo et al., 2021c; Xie et al., 2017; Barrett et al., 2019).”
MethodBoosting Fair Classifier Generalization through Adaptive Priority Reweighing
Hu, Z., Xu, Y., Du, M., Gu, J., Tian, X., & He, F. (2024) · ACM Transactions on Knowledge Discovery from Data · doi:10.1145/3665895 · Cited by 3
“12: return ℎ ( 𝑇 )”
Causal Effect Regularization: Automated Detection and Removal of Spurious Attributes
Kumar, A., Deshpande, A., & Sharma, A. (2023) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2306.11072 · Cited by 3
“For example in a sentiment classification dataset that we evaluate (Twitter-AAE [4]), a demographic attribute like race could be spuriously correlated with the sentiment of a sentence [9].”
BackgroundRant or rave: variation over time in the language of online reviews
Ziser, Y., Webber, B., & Cohen, S. B. (2023) · Language Resources and Evaluation · doi:10.1007/s10579-023-09652-5 · Cited by 7
“In addition to time, language variation in social media has been studied across other dimensions, such as the author’s location and demographics (Blodgett et al., 2016; Jurgens et al., 2017; Pavalanathan & Eisenstein, 2015).”
BackgroundAhmed, Z., Vidgen, B., & Hale, S. A. (2021) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2103.11806 · Cited by 3
“[2] themselves acknowledge, individuals”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialStewart, I., & Eisenstein, J. (2017) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1709.00345 · Cited by 3
“However, the poor performance of automatic parsers on social media data (Eisenstein, 2013; Blodgett et al., 2016) and the limits of manual annotation may render this typical analysis difficult or impossible.”
BackgroundOpen-Set Language Identification
Malmasi, S. (2017) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1707.04817 · Cited by 3
The SlangTrack Dataset: Supporting the Detection of Words Used in Slang Senses
Aloraini, A., Batista-Navarro, R., Nenadic, G., & Schlegel, V. (2026) · LChange@EACL · doi:10.18653/v1/2026.lchange-1.1 · Cited by 3
“Although linguists and computer scientists have developed many meth-ods for semantic analysis, slang remains a persistent challenge for natural language processing (NLP) systems (Eisenstein, 2013; Blodgett et al., 2016; Wuraola et al., 2024).”
Relationality and Offensive Speech: A Research Agenda
Amironesei, R., & Díaz, M. (2023) · WOAH · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.woah-1.8 · Cited by 1
“…in NLP have high error rates for African American English (AAE) in part-of-speech tagging and language identification (Jørgensen et al., 2015; Blodgett et al., 2016), and disproportionately toxic ratings of speech containing features of AAE compared with speech that does not (Sap et al.,…”
BackgroundBuilding a Japanese Typo Dataset and Typo Correction System Based on Wikipedia’s Revision History
Tanaka, Y., Murawaki, Y., Kawahara, D., & Kurohashi, S. (2021) · Journal of Natural Language Processing · doi:10.5715/jnlp.28.995 · Cited by 3
“Key Words: Typographical Error, Misspelling, Grammatical Error, Wikipedia 1 はじめに 近年,SNS等で一般ユーザーが作成したテキスト (UGC; User Generated Contents) が自然言 語処理の重要な研究対象となっている.UGCには,書籍などの文章にはあまり見られない表現 (Brody and Diakopoulos 2011; Saito et al. 2017; Blodgett et al. 2016; Sasano et al. 2013)が含ま れ,誤字などの入力誤りも頻繁に発生している. 入力誤りは,人がスムーズにテキストを…”
InfluentialHuang, N., Maab, I., & Yamagishi, J. (2026) · Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2604.21309 · Cited by 2
“Systems consistently underrep-resent minority groups (Shandilya et al., 2018; Dash et al., 2019; Blodgett et al., 2016; Huang et al., 2023, 2024b; Zhang et al., 2024b; Huang et al., 2025a) and exhibit framing biases when summarising sources with varying political perspectives, potentially…”
Huang, X., & Xie, F. (2026) · Entropy · doi:10.3390/e28040409
“Similar performance degradation for underrepresented groups has been observed in facial recognition [16,17], sentiment analysis [18], and species classification [19].”
NLP Privacy Risk Identification in Social Media (NLP-PRISM): A Survey
Goswami, D., Kumar, J., & Das, S. (2026) · Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.2139/ssrn.6129646 · Cited by 2
Deas, N., & McKeown, K. (2025) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.18653/v1/2025.emnlp-main.981 · Cited by 2
“1 (8B) on randomly sampled AAL and WME tweets from the TwitterAAE corpus (Blodgett et al., 2016) plotted on warmth and competence axes.”
Influential
Metadata
- Authors
- Blodgett, S. L., Green, L., & O'Connor, B.
- Affiliations
- University of Massachusetts Amherst (US)
- Venue
- Proceedings of the 2016 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing
- Published
- 2016
- Pages
- 1119-1130
- OpenAlex
- W2508354372
- Cited by
- 291
- References
- 41
- Citations by year
- 2026: 18 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 39 · 2022: 52 · 2021: 61 · 2020: 35 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 15
- FWCI
- 8.62
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Natural Language Processing Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Authorship Attribution and Profiling
- Social Sciences › Linguistics and Language › Linguistic Variation and Morphology
- Keywords
- African American English, dialect variation, social media language, Twitter, language identification, dependency parsing, ensemble classifiers
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review