The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Demographic Dialectal Variation in Social Media: A Case Study of African-American English
Open accessAbstract
Though dialectal language is increasingly abundant on social media, few resources exist for developing NLP tools to handle such language.We conduct a case study of dialectal language in online conversational text by investigating African-American English (AAE) on Twitter.We propose a distantly supervised model to identify AAE-like language from demographics associated with geo-located messages, and we verify that this language follows well-known AAE linguistic phenomena.In addition, we analyze the quality of existing language identification and dependency parsing tools on AAE-like text, demonstrating that they perform poorly on such text compared to text associated with white speakers.We also provide an ensemble classifier for language identification which eliminates this disparity and release a new corpus of tweets containing AAE-like language.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Such variations were also observed across racial or ethnic groups”
From Social Data: Biases, Methodological Pitfalls, and Ethical Boundaries (2019) · cites this paper as Blodgett et al., 2016
In the citing paper
“these biases raise additional concerns as they affect several popular tasks, such as user classification, trending topics detection, language identification, or content filtering”
From Social Data: Biases, Methodological Pitfalls, and Ethical Boundaries (2019) · cites this paper as Blodgett et al., 2016
In the citing paper
“by focusing on African-American English dialect, Blodgett et al. (2016) show racial disparity when the textual content produced by users vary from the mainstream or standard languages.”
From Social Data: Biases, Methodological Pitfalls, and Ethical Boundaries (2019) · cites this paper as Blodgett et al., 2016
In the citing paper
“Gaps between the purpose and the assumptions under which these datasets and models are built and those under which they are being used can lead to performance disparities, affecting research validity and producing misleading results (e.g., Blodgett et al., 2016; Buolamwini and Gebru, 2018).”
From Social Data: Biases, Methodological Pitfalls, and Ethical Boundaries (2019) · cites this paper as Blodgett et al., 2016
Citations
Cites
Griffiths, T. L., & Steyvers, M. (2004) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0307752101 · Cited by 6,049
Monroe, B. L., Colaresi, M. P., & Quinn, K. M. (2008) · Political Analysis · doi:10.1093/pan/mpn018 · Cited by 542 · cited 2×
“This model has broadly similar goals as nonlatent, log-linear generative models of text that condition on document-level covariates (Monroe et al., 2008; Eisenstein et al., 2011a; Taddy, 2013).”
MethodThe social impact of natural language processing
Hovy, D., & Spruit, S. L. (2016) · Proceedings of the 54th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 2: Short Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/p16-2096 · Cited by 329
Toward a Description of African American Vernacular English Dialect Regions Using “Black Twitter”
Jones, T. (2015) · American Speech · doi:10.1215/00031283-3442117 · Cited by 144 · cited 5×
“, 2016) and sociolinguistic (Stewart, 2014; Eisenstein, 2015; Jones, 2015) research.”
BackgroundMethodInfluential
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 301–378 of 378
Benchmarking Sociolinguistic Diversity in Swahili NLP: A Taxonomy-Guided Approach
Oketch, K., Lalor, J. P., & Abbasi, A. (2025) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2508.14051 · Cited by 2
“Studies on code-switching (Khanuja et al. 2020, Piergallini et al. 2016), dialectal NLP (Blodgett et al. 2016, Faisal et al. 2024), and low-resource benchmarks (Tan and Celis 2019), argue for treating variation as a meaningful signal.”
Singh, I. P., Srirag, D., & Joshi, A. (2025) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2505.15095 · Cited by 2
“Our findings corroborate past work that shows degradation in performance for language varieties other than standard American English for other tasks (Blodgett et al., 2016; Ziems et al., 2023; Joshi et al., 2025; Srirag et al., 2025b).”
Balancing the Scales: Reinforcement Learning for Fair Classification
Eshuijs, L., Wang, S.-H., & Fokkens, A. (2024) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2407.10629 · Cited by 2
“Following Ravfogel et al. (2020) and Han et al. (2022a) we also evaluate on the Emoji (Elazar and Goldberg, 2018) sentiment analysis task of Twitter data (Blodgett et al., 2016).”
MethodVernacular? I Barely Know Her: Challenges with Style Control and StereotypingPreprint
Aich, A., Liu, T., Giorgi, S., Isman, K., Ungar, L., & Curtis, B. L. (2024) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2406.12679 · Cited by 3
“For the AAE task, we use a lexicon-based scoring from a paper by Blodgett et al. (2016), which defines African-American English (AAE/AAVE) as a dialect of Standard American English with specific linguistic features and uses a distantly supervised model to identify AAE-like language on Twitter.”
MethodJohnson, A., Shetty, V. M., Mari Ostendorf, E., & Alwan, A. A. (2023) · IEEE International Conference on Acoustics Speech and Signal Processing · doi:10.1109/icassp49357.2023.10096614 · Cited by 3
“TwitterAAE [21] is a dataset of over one million tweets that were automatically found to have a high probability of being authored by a speaker of AAE.”
BackgroundMeasuring Dimensions of Self-Presentation in Twitter Bios and their Links to Misinformation Sharing
Madani, N., Bandyopadhyay, R., Yoder, M. M., McCabe, S. D., Swire‐Thompson, B., & Joseph, K. (2025) · Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media · doi:10.1609/icwsm.v19i1.35866 · Cited by 3
“It is possible that our use of (Blodgett, Green, and O’Connor 2016); as such, we manually evaluate it.”
Jones, T. (2023) · Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.3389/frai.2022.683104 · Cited by 2
“I manually checked these, as language detection is unreliable with AAE (Blodgett et al., 2016, 2020).”
MethodPEARC ’22: Practice and Experience in Advanced Research Computing Proceedings
Youn, J., & Bowen, A. (2022) · Practice and Experience in Advanced Research Computing · doi:10.1145/3491418.3535185 · Cited by 2
“[2] created a corpus of 60 million geolocated tweets with dialectal language based on the population of non-Hispanic whites, non-Hispanic blacks, Hispanics, and Asians.”
BackgroundDim Wihl Gat Tun: The Case for Linguistic Expertise in NLP for Under-Documented Languages
Forbes, C., Samir, F., Oliver, B., Yang, C., Coates, E., Nicolai, G., & Silfverberg, M. (2022) · Findings · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2203.09632 · Cited by 2
“Relevant to this decision are factors 5For an English analogue, consider splitting the lexicalized verb enforce into a prefix en- and root force.”
BackgroundInfluentialCO-STAR: Conceptualisation of Stereotypes for Analysis and ReasoningPreprint
Kwon, T., & Gopalan, A. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2112.00819 · Cited by 2
“In addition, unsupervised approaches could be explored, which would lessen the impact of any imbalances in the training data set, such as emoji analysis [84] or lexical dialect detection [85], especially for improving model performance on the in-group variable.”
BackgroundMethodInvestigating Online Community Engagement through Stancetaking
Aggarwal, J., Diep, B., Watson, J., & Stevenson, S. (2023) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP (Findings of EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.findings-emnlp.387 · Cited by 1
“…has begun to shift from relating language choices and macrosocial categories like age, gender, and race (Burger et al., 2011; Nguyen et al., 2013; Blodgett et al., 2016), to a more nuanced approach to identity, adopting the framework of communities of practice (Eckert and McConnell-Ginet, 1992;…”
BackgroundPaloma: A Benchmark for Evaluating Language Model Fit
Magnusson, I., Bhagia, A., Hofmann, V., Soldaini, L., Jha, A. H., Tafjord, O., Schwenk, D., Walsh, E. P., Elazar, Y., Lo, K., et al. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2312.10523 · Cited by 1
“As a starting point for measuring disparities between dialects, we include T WITTER AAE [Blodgett et al., 2016], two corpora representing African-American and White-aligned English, automatically classified via geolocation information and demographic census statistics.”
The Dialect Tax: Dialectal Biases Persist throughout the Language Modeling Pipeline
Yang, E. M., Chen, M., Tworek, J., Jun, H.-W., Yuan, Q.-I., Pondé, H., Pinto, O., Kaplan, J., Edwards, H., Burda, Y., et al. (2026) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2608.24952 · Cited by 1
“…historically marginalized communities that speak “non-standard” language varieties vulnerable to further discrimination by modern AI systems trained on historical data (Blodgett et al., 2016; Jurgens et al., 2017; Kantharuban et al., 2023; Dro˙zd˙zowicz and Peled, 2024; Nayeem and Rafiei, 2026).”
DiaLLM: An Investigation into the Robustness-Generation Gap in English Dialect Adaptation
Painter, J., Srirag, D., Kappiyath, A., Kanojia, D., Joshi, A., & Yin, L. (2026) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2607.07669 · Cited by 1
“…strong performance across a range of NLP tasks (Wang et al., 2024; Touvron et al., 2023), but often falter on dialectal and non-standard varieties—regional and social forms that diverge from standardised norms (Joshi et al., 2025; Blodgett et al., 2016; Hofmann et al., 2024; Mire et al., 2025).”
InfluentialPluRule: A Benchmark for Moderating Pluralistic Communities on Social Media
Kachwala, Z., Truong, B., Muralidharan, R., Kwak, H., An, J.-S., & Menczer, F. (2026) · Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.18653/v1/2026.acl-long.1590 · Cited by 1
“Finally, P LU R ULE is multilingual and multimodal, capturing the visual (Gomez et al., 2020) and linguistic (Blodgett et al., 2016) diversity of online communities often overlooked by text-only benchmarks.”
Cultural Benchmarking of LLMs in Standard and Dialectal Arabic Dialogues
Kautsar, M. D. A., Almheiri, S., Ahsan, M., Elbouardi, B., Samih, Y., Ahmad, S., Keleg, A., Herraoui, O. E., Elzeky, K., Freihat, A. A., et al. (2026) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.18653/v1/2026.acl-long.963 · Cited by 1
“Studies on English, Hindi, and Chinese di-alects show that dialect choice signals social identity, politeness, norms, power relations, and pragmatic conventions (Hovy, 2015; Blodgett et al., 2016; Jurgens et al., 2017; Hershcovich et al., 2022).”
Liang, S., & Wassink, A. (2026) · Conference on Fairness, Accountability and Transparency · doi:10.1145/3805689.3806448 · Cited by 1
“These communities represent systematically underrepresented varieties with well-documented linguistic structures distinct from Standard American English [5, 14, 17, 23, 25].”
Black LLMirror: User (Self) Perceptions in Black American English Interactions with LLMs
Campbell, M. M., Mire, J., Díaz, M., & Sap, M. (2026) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3772318.3791111
“…highlight key differences between BAE as spoken between native speakers and BAE found in the many corpora on which many popular LLMs are trained [3, 17], finding that the publicly accessible written BAE in popular media and on social media is insufficient to enable LLMs to acceptably imitate BAE.”
How Well Do Large Language Models Understand African American Language? Causes and Implications
McKeown, K. R., Grieser, J. A., Deas, N., Kleiner, S., Patton, D. U., Shepard, J., & Vente, B. (2026) · Annual Review of Linguistics · doi:10.1146/annurev-linguistics-041824-050629
Nozlan, N. N., & Rahmatullah, T. (2026) · Journal of Central Banking Law and Institutions · doi:10.21098/jcli.v5i1.445 · Cited by 1
Robust Persona-Aware Toxicity Detection with Prompt Optimization and Learned EnsemblingPreprint
Atil, B., Passonneau, R., & Mehrabi, N. (2026) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2601.02337 · Cited by 1
“Dialect variation further amplifies this issue: demographic-aligned language features (e.g., African-American English) differ from mainstream norms (Blodgett et al., 2016), and insensitivity to dialect has been shown to induce racial bias in hate-speech annotation and down-stream classifiers (Sap…”
Kharchenko, J., Roosta, T. G., Chadha, A. R., & Shah, C. (2025) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2508.04939 · Cited by 1
“Recent studies indicate that language models exhibit dialect prejudice, assigning lower employability scores to AAE speakers, which underscores the potential of AI systems to perpetuate linguistic biases (Hofmann et al., 2024; Blodgett et al., 2016; Davidson et al., 2019).”
Class-Conditional Distribution Balancing for Group Robust Classification
Zhao, M.-Y., Zhang, Q., & Li, C. (2025) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2504.17314 · Cited by 1
Kato, T., & Miyao, Y. (2024) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2409.09260 · Cited by 1
“To choose white and African-American target words, we ran the mixed-membership demographic-language model developed by Blodgett et al. (2016).”
MethodInfluentialInference-Time Selective Debiasing to Enhance Fairness in Text Classification Models
Kuzmin, G., Yadav, N., Smirnov, I., Baldwin, T., & Shelmanov, A. (2024) · North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.18653/v1/2025.naacl-short.9 · Cited by 1
Leveraging Syntactic Dependencies in Disambiguation: The Case of African American English
Previlon, W., Rozet, A., Gowda, J., Dyer, B., Tang, K., & Moeller, S. (2024) · Language Resources and Evaluation Conference (LREC) · doi:10.63317/4w6faq8ec8tz · Cited by 1
“MAE : ‘I am usually in my office by 7:30’ Although relatively infrequent, habitual be is employed regularly by AAE speakers (Blodgett et al., 2016) as well as speakers of 90 other Englishes (Kortmann, 2020).”
BackgroundSuum Cuique: Studying Bias in Taboo Detection with a Community Perspective
Khalid, O., Rusert, J., & Srinivasan, P. (2022) · Findings · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2203.11401 · Cited by 1
“While not strictly comparable, our 0.85 threshold is more conservative than the 0.80 used in Blodgett et al. (2016).”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialNetworks and Identity Drive Geographic Properties of the Diffusion of Linguistic Innovation
Ananthasubramaniam, A., Jurgens, D., & Romero, D. M. (2022) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2202.04842 · Cited by 1
6 Questions for Socially Aware Language Technologies
Yang, D. (2021) · Northern European Journal of Language Technology · doi:10.3384/nejlt.2000-1533.2021.3874
“For instance, Blodgett et al. (2016) found that existing language identification and dependency parsing tools on African-American Vernacular English text demonstrated very poor performances compared to on Standard English text.”
Background3D4ALL: Toward an Inclusive Pipeline to Classify 3D Contents
Kwon, N., Chen, L., & Kim, J. (2021) · IUI Workshops · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2102.12606 · Cited by 1
“Subsequently, many studies (e.g., [41, 42]) have explored potential risks of algorithmic decision-making that are potentially biased and discriminatory to a certain group of people such as underrepresented groups of gender, race, disability.”
BackgroundDiscovering and analysing lexical variation in social media text
Shoemark, P. (2020) · doi:10.7488/era/417 · Cited by 1
“, 2015), African American English (Jones, 2015), and global Spanish (Gonçalves and Sánchez, 2014), and to study variation associated with factors such as race/ethnicity (Jones, 2015; Blodgett et al., 2016; Jørgensen et al., 2015) and gender (Bamman et al.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialModeling Cultural and Subcultural Variation in Code-Switched Discourse with Topic Annotation
Tyagi, N., Licona-Guevara, N., & Kellert, O. (2026) · Proceedings of the 4th Workshop on Cross-Cultural Considerations in NLP (C3NLP 2026) · doi:10.18653/v1/2026.c3nlp-1.3 · Cited by 1
“Research in computational sociolinguistics emphasizes that such variation reflects underlying social structures and subcultures (Nguyen et al. 2016; Blodgett et al. 2016; Kellert and Matlis 2022).”
Hamel, E., & Kani, N. (2023) · IEEE/ACM Transactions on Audio Speech and Language Processing · doi:10.1109/taslp.2023.3331139 · Cited by 5
“African American Vernacular English is often the vehicle chosen to explore the topic of racial bias in NLP due to its prevalence on social media, its linguistic diversity, and its ties to a historically marginalized community [1], [27].”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialOLEA: Tool and Infrastructure for Offensive Language Error Analysis in English
Grace, M., Seabrum, J., Srinivas, D., & Palmer, A. (2023) · Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.eacl-demo.24 · Cited by 1
“Detecting explicit offensive language often relies on key-word detection (Wiegand et al., 2019), but keyword-driven systems can lead to messages being falsely flagged, causing unchecked or unnoticed racial biases to propagate in the system’s decisions (Sap et al., 2021; Blodgett et al., 2016).”
BackgroundMethodTowards Open-Domain Twitter User Profile Inference
Wen, H., Xiao, Z., Hovy, E., & Hauptmann, A. (2023) · Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.findings-acl.198 · Cited by 1
“Computational efforts to discover these relationships include demographic dialectal variation (Blodgett et al., 2016), geographical variation (Eisenstein et al., 2010; Nguyen and Eisenstein, 2017), syntactic or stylistic variation over age and gender (Johannsen et al., 2015), socio-economic status…”
BackgroundGeneralizing Fairness using Multi-Task Learning without Demographic Information
Aguirre, C., & Dredze, M. (2023) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2305.12671 · Cited by 1
“The demographic variables are based on the dialectal corpus from Blodgett et al. (2016), where race was assigned based on geolocation and words used in the tweet, obtaining a binary AAE (African-American English) and SAE (Standard American English) which we use as proxies for non-Hispanic…”
MethodExposing Racial Dialect Bias in Abusive Language Detection: Can Explainability Play a Role?
Manerba, M. M., & Morini, V. (2023) · Communications in computer and information science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-23618-1_32 · Cited by 3
“We, therefore, isolated from the test set the comments highly characterized by this slang, using a classifier 5 specifically trained to recognize texts belonging to the African-American English dialect [10].”
MethodDeep Fair Learning: Task-Aware Fair Representations via Joint Distance-Covariance Regularization
Shi, E., Xiao, Y.-Q., Kong, L.-L., & Jiang, B. (2025) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2504.06470
“MOJI is a tweet-sentiment task with happy/sad labels from emoji annotations and African-American English (AAE) versus Standard American English (SAE) group annotations (Blodgett et al., 2016).”
Principled Nonlinear Concept Erasure and Steering
Simai, I., Ravfogel, S., & Shaham, U. (2026) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2610.32516
Operational Abstractions of Neural Network Concepts via Topological Representations
Pont, M., & Garth, C. (2026) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2610.05017
“The effect of increasing label imbalance is illustrated on Dial Mention (Fig.”
InfluentialRetrieval Sensitivity to Identity Signals in Queries
Tang, A., Deas, N., McKeown, K., & Misra, V. (2026) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2609.36534
“…rich, multidimensional identities to binary contrasts (left vs. right political lean and AAL vs. WME) and rely on imperfect proxies for each: AllSides’ editorial lean labels, an LLM classifier for Reddit nat ideology, and the demographic-alignment classifier of Blodgett et al. (2016) for dialect.”
Empath: Tracing Multi-Level Emotion Dynamics in Crisis Counseling DialoguesPreprint
Gong, Z., Huang, Y., Liang, W., Deas, N., Subbiah, M., McKeown, K. R., & Hirschberg, J. (2026) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2609.29056
“…of the model against expert annotations (§B) and that dense AAL features are not common in the corpus: the demographic alignment classifier introduced in Blodgett et al. (2016) predicts AAL as the most likely label for ∼ 6% of texts, and a probability exceeding .8 for less than 1% of texts.”
Metric-Construction Coupling Inflates Measured Synthetic Dialect Recovery
Han, H. (2026) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2610.00164
“Dialect NLP has long modelled variation directly, from demographic dialect variation in social media [3] to dialect behaviour in generation [12] and the dialect discrimination reproduced by current LLMs [10].”
MUtE: A Dual Framework for Concept Erasure and Counterfactual InterventionsPreprint
Saillenfest, A. (2026) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2609.11253
Recent Advances in Text Anonymization: A Systematic Review
Litvak, M., & Jorge, A. (2026) · WIREs Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery · doi:10.1002/widm.70127
Κουτσουπιάς, Ν., & Nosios, M. (2026) · Peace Studies · doi:10.3390/peacestud1030008
“Research on dialectal variation, including African American English and other sociolects, reveals that models often misclas-sify identity-linked linguistic features as toxicity indicators due to spurious correlations embedded within training data (Sap et al., 2019; Blodgett et al., 2016).”
Wu, H., Emami, A., Hassan, M. F., Igbinoba, O., Idusuyi, O., Igbinoba, O., Khattak, F. K., & Seyyed-Kalantari, L. (2026) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2607.06845
“Second, real-AAE stud-a”
InfluentialRacial Biases in Social Media Discussions About Soccer Players
Schumacher, T., Sen, I., Doda, E., & Wagner, C. (2026) · Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media · doi:10.1609/icwsm.v20i1.42736
“Many of these methods attempt to detect overt racial bias, e.g., the use of racial slurs and stereotypes, while others assess differential behavior of NLP tools based on racialized dialects such as African-American English (Sap et al. 2019; Blodgett, Green, and O’Connor 2016).”
Zaghouani, W. (2026) · Proceedings of the Language Resources and Evaluation Conference · doi:10.63317/3kcvyhsgnv3u
“Part-of-speech taggers trained on standard varieties degrade when applied to dialect text [Hovy and Søgaard, 2015, Blodgett et al., 2016].”
A Security Analysis of Tf-Idf and Deep Learning Model for Hate Speech Detection in YouTube
Khan, S., Kumar, S., Faisal, S., & Sharma, A. (2026) · World Conference on Computational Science and Technology (WcCST) · doi:10.1109/wccst67302.2026.11496093
“Su Lin Blodgett (2016) [6] studied how Twitter users speak African-American English and Standard American English by analyzing dialectal variations between these two languages.”
Evaluating the Usage of African-American Vernacular English in Large Language Models
Dunlap, D., & McCoy, R. T. (2026) · HCII · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2602.21485
Multi-objective joint optimization method for text classification
Ye, Z., Dai, M., Guan, Z., Ma, C., & Huang, H. (2026) · Journal of King Saud University: Computer and Information Sciences · doi:10.1007/s44443-026-00512-0
“For each training sample, the sensitive attribute label a (e.g., gender in Bias in Bios or race/dialect group in Twitter Sentiment) is provided by the dataset annotations and is only used to supervise the sensitive-attribute discriminator D .”
InfluentialBAID: A Benchmark for Bias Assessment of AI DetectorsPreprint
Basu, P., Zhang, Y., & Raheja, V. (2025) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2512.11505
“For example, AAVE samples emphasize authentic syntactic and lexical constructions, while Singlish prompts incorporate pragmatic particles and col-loquial phrasing.”
Technical Report on Text Dataset Distillation
Ogawa, K., Yamamoto, B., de Alcantara, L. L., Zacarias, V., Bollis, E., Pellicer, L. F. A. O., Costa, R. P., Costa, A. H. R., & Jordão, A. (2025) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2512.03967
“As this work takes place in the early stage of text dataset distillation, its studies cover the use of a multi-layer perceptron on binary sentiment analysis and occupation classification tasks over datasets with bias (Blodgett et al., 2016; De-Arteaga et al., 2019).”
BERnaT: Basque Encoders for Representing Natural Textual Diversity
Azurmendi, E., de Landa, J. F., Bengoetxea, J., Heredia, M., Etxaniz, J., Zubillaga, M., Soraluze, A., & Soroa, A. (2025) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2512.03903
“In practice, it has been proven that models trained with less diverse data suffer from representation biases and problems in performance (Blod-gett et al., 2016).”
Black drama: between hate speech and algorithmic racism
Rosa, C. C. S., Ishii, R. P., & Martinez, F. V. (2025) · International Conference on Machine Learning and Applications · doi:10.1109/icmla66185.2025.00219
Huang, X., & Xie, F. (2025) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2507.06619
“Similar disparities were observed in sentiment analysis of African-American English tweets [16] and species classification on the iNaturalist dataset [17].”
Stronger Together: Unleashing the Social Impact of Hate Speech Research
Wong, S. (2025) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2505.13251
Limits to Predicting Online Speech Using Large Language Models
Remeli, M., Hardt, M., & Williamson, R. (2024) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2407.12850
“More details on the pre-finetuning and loss curves can be found in Appendix C. 1 .”
Efficient DNN-Powered Software with Fair Sparse Models
Gao, X., Jiang, W., Zhai, J., Ma, S., Zhang, X., & Shen, C. Q. (2024) · ACM SIGSOFT International Symposium on Software Testing and Analysis (ISSTA) · doi:10.1145/3650212.3680336
“In the experiment, we fixed the training settings and dataset of the model and ran the training 10 times to ensure the reliability of the results and reduce the randomness.”
DispaRisk: Assessing Fairness Through Usable Information
Vasquez, J., Domeniconi, C., & Rangwala, H. (2025) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-05962-8_18
Interactive Analysis and Visualisation of Annotated Collocations in Spanish (AVAnCES)
Gonzalez, S. (2023) · NLP4DH · doi:10.46298/jdmdh.11383
“, 2021; Eisenstein, 2013), stylistic and lexical variation on writing (Blodgett et al., 2016; Nguyen, 2017; Shoemark, 2020; Wurschinger, 2021; Pavalanathan and Eisenstein, 2015), dialectal studies (Eisenstein, 2017; Jorgensen et al.”
BackgroundSentiment Prediction by a Classifier
Ren, Y. (2023) · Applied and Computational Engineering · doi:10.54254/2755-2721/8/20230060
“Dataset There are several datasets provided already, such as the Twitter dataset [4], preprocessed data [5], and blend datasets [6-8].”
BackgroundTransferring Fairness using Multi-Task Learning with Limited Demographic Information
Aguirre, C. A., & Dredze, M. (2023) · NLP4PI · doi:10.18653/v1/2024.nlp4pi-1.3
“The demographic variables are based on the dialectal corpus from Blodgett et al. (2016), where race was assigned based on geolocation and words used in the tweet, obtaining a binary AAE (African-American English) and SAE (Standard American English) which we use as proxies for non-Hispanic…”
MethodRanking & Reweighting Improves Group Distributional Robustness
Liu, Y.-C., Zhang, B.-H., Mei, Q.-Z., & Dhillon, P. S. (2023) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2305.05759
“λ is selected from the list [2, 3, 5] for all methods that performed constant upweighting.”
BackgroundMethodUnderstanding Lexical Biases when Identifying Gang-related Social Media CommunicationsPreprint
Murthy, D., Caramanis, C., & Rudra, K. (2023) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2304.11485
“To compare the performance of our classifier with different forms of English, we used an additional corpus of tweets from [23] that have been machine labeled with a probability of being written by an African American, Hispanic, or White person, or none of the listed 3.”
MethodSystem Demo: Tool and Infrastructure for Offensive Language Error Analysis (OLEA) in English
Grace, M., Seabrum, X. J., Srinivas, D., & Palmer, A. (2022) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2210.16398
Simig, D., Wang, T.-L., Dankers, V., Henderson, P., Batsuren, K., Hupkes, D., & Diab, M. T. (2022) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2210.01734
“More worrying, however, is that training or finetuning on datasets that contain biases and artefacts may result in models implementing undesired, biased behavior (e.g. Rudinger et al., 2018; Blodgett et al., 2016).”
BackgroundDer „Algorithmic turn“ in der Plattform-Governance.
Katzenbach, C. (2022) · KZfSS Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie · doi:10.1007/s11577-022-00837-4 · Cited by 4
Diffusion Model-Driven Text Representation Sanitization for Strong Privacy and High Utility
Meng, Q., Meng, Z.-P., Dong, Y., Chen, Q., & Ai, X.-H. (2026) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2026.3685226
“(1) Twitter [24] (2016): A binary-label text corpus released by Twitter, Inc. containing 2 sentiment labels (positive vs. negative) and 2 race labels (African-American English vs. Standard American English).”
InfluentialEmpathetic Agents in Generative AI Applications
Chong, S. Y., Gupta, A., & Madisetti, V. K. (2026) · Journal of Software Engineering and Applications · doi:10.4236/jsea.2026.193003
The Silent Majority: Demystifying Memorization Effect in the Presence of Spurious Correlations
You, C., Dai, H., Min, Y.-F., Sekhon, J., Joshi, S. C., & Duncan, J. S. (2025) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2501.00961
“Thus, understanding the underlying causes of this unbalanced performance between the majority and minority groups is crucial to their reliable and safe deployment in various real-world scenarios Blodgett et al. [2016], Buolamwini and Gebru [2018], Hashimoto et al. [2018].”
Sampling Strategies for Creation of a Benchmark for Dialectal Sentiment Classification
Srirag, D., Painter, J., Joshi, A., & Kanojia, D. (2024) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2410.11216
LEXPLAIN: Improving Model Explanations via Lexicon Supervision
Ahia, O., Gonen, H., Balachandran, V., Tsvetkov, Y., & Smith, N. A. (2023) · STARSEM · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.starsem-1.19
“Finally, we show that by promoting task related lexicon entries, we are able to demote spurious correlations with AAE annotations on toxicity datasets.”
MethodInfluentialToward Analyzing the Diversity of Extractive Summaries
Hudson, A. D. (2022) · doi:10.15760/etd.7950
“In selecting tweets from Twitter AAE Corpus to use in DivSumm, there were some requirements created to ensure their quality.”
MethodInfluentialWhat is on Social Media that is not in WordNet? A Preliminary Analysis on the TwitterAAE Corpus
Domingo, C., Gonzalez-Ferrero, T., & Gonzalez-Dios, I. (2021) · Global WordNet Conference · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.gwc-1.27
“In this preliminary analysis we use the TwitterAAE corpus (Blodgett et al., 2016), which contains geographic and census information.”
MethodInfluentialDisembodied Machine Learning: On the Illusion of Objectivity in NLP
Waseem, Z., Lulz, S., Bingel, J., & Augenstein, I. (2021) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2101.11974 · Cited by 34
“…should a dataset embody the language production in multiple sociolects, a pre-trained language model (Devlin et al. 2019) 6 or mixed-member language models (Blodgett, Green, and O’Connor 2016) may provide deeper information about the sociolects in question by examining the sentential context.”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Blodgett, S. L., Green, L., & O'Connor, B.
- Affiliations
- University of Massachusetts Amherst (US)
- Venue
- Proceedings of the 2016 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing
- Published
- 2016
- Pages
- 1119-1130
- OpenAlex
- W2508354372
- Cited by
- 291
- References
- 41
- Citations by year
- 2026: 18 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 39 · 2022: 52 · 2021: 61 · 2020: 35 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 15
- FWCI
- 8.62
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Natural Language Processing Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Authorship Attribution and Profiling
- Social Sciences › Linguistics and Language › Linguistic Variation and Morphology
- Keywords
- African American English, dialect variation, social media language, Twitter, language identification, dependency parsing, ensemble classifiers
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review