Cited by 184Multimodal Machine Learning ApplicationsArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare and EducationRadiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging

METransformer: Radiology Report Generation by Transformer with Multiple Learnable Expert Tokens

Open access
Wang, Zhanyu, Liu, Lingqiao, Wang, Lei, Zhou, Luping·2023·2023 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR)

Abstract

In clinical scenarios, multi-specialist consultation could significantly benefit the diagnosis, especially for intricate cases. This inspires us to explore a “multi-expert joint diagnosis” mechanism to upgrade the existing “single expert” framework commonly seen in the current literature. To this end, we propose METransformer, a method to realize this idea with a transformer-based backbone. The key design of our method is the introduction of multiple learnable “expert” tokens into both the transformer encoder and decoder. In the encoder, each expert token interacts with both vision tokens and other expert tokens to learn to attend different image regions for image representation. These expert tokens are encouraged to capture complementary information by an orthogonal loss that minimizes their over-lap. In the decoder, each attended expert token guides the cross-attention between input words and visual tokens, thus influencing the generated report. A metrics-based expert voting strategy is further developed to generate the final report. By the multi-experts concept, our model enjoys the merits of an ensemble-based approach but through a manner that is computationally more efficient and supports more sophisticated interactions among experts. Experimental results demonstrate the promising performance of our proposed model on two widely used benchmarks. Last but not least, the framework-level innovation makes our work ready to incorporate advances on existing “single-expert” models to further improve its performance.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/cvpr52729.2023.01112

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • References to prior studies can be removed to reduce hallucinations when prior studies are not available.

    “Such references can be removed to reduce hallucinations when prior studies are not available, 9,14,18 or used in conjunction with prior images to enable descriptions of change.17,19,20”

    From MAIRA-2: Grounded Radiology Report Generation (2024) · cites this paper as [14]

    The Ablation Study (§4.4; page unavailable) discusses expert tokens and report-generation performance, not removing references to prior studies. Searches for hallucinations, prior images, previous examinations, and removal of references found no passage addressing the claimed practice or its effect. (LLM, conf=0.72)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 51 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. su, 2019, Vl-bert: Pre-training of generic visuallinguistic representations, ArXiv Preprint

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wang, Z., Liu, L., Wang, L., & Zhou, L.
Affiliations
  • The University of Sydney (AU)
  • The University of Adelaide (AU)
  • University of Wollongong (AU)
Venue
2023 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2023-06
Pages
11558-11567
ISSN
1063-6919 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4386076536
Cited by
184
References
51
Citations by year
2026: 58 · 2025: 82 · 2024: 37 · 2023: 7
FWCI
19.62
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Research Online (University of Wollongong) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Multimodal Machine Learning Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
Keywords
radiology report generation, vision-language transformers, cross-attention

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review