Cited by 40Topic ModelingSpeech and dialogue systemsNatural Language Processing Techniques

Reinforced Dynamic Reasoning for Conversational Question Generation

Open access
Pan, Boyuan, Li, Hao, Yao, Ziyu, Cai, Deng, Sun, Huan·2019·Proceedings of the 57th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics

Abstract

This paper investigates a new task named Conversational Question Generation (CQG) which is to generate a question based on a passage and a conversation history (i.e., previous turns of question-answer pairs).CQG is a crucial task for developing intelligent agents that can drive question-answering style conversations or test user understanding of a given passage.Towards that end, we propose a new approach named Reinforced Dynamic Reasoning (ReDR) network, which is based on the general encoder-decoder framework but incorporates a reasoning procedure in a dynamic manner to better understand what has been asked and what to ask next about the passage.To encourage producing meaningful questions, we leverage a popular question answering (QA) model to provide feedback and fine-tune the question generator using a reinforcement learning mechanism.Empirical results on the recently released CoQA dataset demonstrate the effectiveness of our method in comparison with various baselines and model variants.Moreover, to show the applicability of our method, we also apply it to create multiturn question-answering conversations for passages in SQuAD. * Work done while visiting the Ohio State University.Shelly is in second grade.She is a new student at her school.Shelly's family has lived in many different places.Shelly was born in Florida.Her family moved to Tennessee when she was two years old.When she was four years old, they moved to Texas.They moved from there to Arizona, where they now live.Q1: What grade is Shelly in ?A1: second R1: Shelly is in second grade.Q2: Was she a

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.18653/v1/p19-1203

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Yizhe Zhang, Michel Galley, Jianfeng Gao, Zhe Gan, Xiujun Li, Chris Brockett, and Bill Dolan. 2018. Generating informative and diverse conversational responses via adversarial information maximization. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Sys- tems, pages 1815-1825.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pan, B., Li, H., Yao, Z., Cai, D., & Sun, H.
Affiliations
  • Zhejiang University (CN)
  • The Ohio State University (US)
  • Alibaba Group (China) (CN)
Corresponding author
Cai, Deng
Venue
Proceedings of the 57th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics
Published
2019
Pages
2114-2124
ISSN
0736-587X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2952939310
Cited by
40
References
45
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 2
FWCI
2.58
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (1815674)
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (61751307)
  • Army Research Office (W911NF-17, W911NF-17-1-0412, W911NF)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Speech and dialogue systems
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Natural Language Processing Techniques
Keywords
reinforcement learning, question answering systems, conversation history, SQuAD, intelligent agents

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review