The DOI matches its Crossref record; 26 of the 26 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Evaluating the Underlying Gender Bias in Contextualized Word Embeddings
Open accessAbstract
Gender bias is highly impacting natural language processing applications.Word embeddings have clearly been proven both to keep and amplify gender biases that are present in current data sources.Recently, contextualized word embeddings have enhanced previous word embedding techniques by computing word vector representations dependent on the sentence they appear in.In this paper, we study the impact of this conceptual change in the word embedding computation in relation with gender bias.Our analysis includes different measures previously applied in the literature to standard word embeddings.Our findings suggest that contextualized word embeddings are less biased than standard ones even when the latter are debiased.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Text suggestions based on language models have been known to inherit biases and dominant 'views' from the text corpus used to train the language model [22,39,43,55].”
From Interacting with Next-Phrase Suggestions: How Suggestion Systems Aid and Influence the Cognitive Processes of Writing (2023) · cites this paper as [22]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Hochreiter, S., & Schmidhuber, J. (1997) · Neural Computation · doi:10.1162/neco.1997.9.8.1735 · Cited by 102,318
BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding
Devlin, J., Chang, M.-W., Lee, K., & Toutanova, K. (2018) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1810.04805 · Cited by 73,173
BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding
Devlin, J., Chang, M.-W., Lee, K., & Toutanova, K. (2019) · Proceedings of the 2019 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Volume 1 (Long and Short Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/n19-1423 · Cited by 54,325
Glove: Global Vectors for Word Representation
Pennington, J., Socher, R., & Manning, C. (2014) · Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.3115/v1/d14-1162 · Cited by 34,071
Distributed Representations of Words and Phrases and their Compositionality
Mikolov, T., Sutskever, I., Chen, K., Corrado, G., & Dean, J. (2013) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1310.4546 · Cited by 24,533
Deep Contextualized Word Representations
Peters, M., Neumann, M., Iyyer, M., Gardner, M., Clark, C., Lee, K., & Zettlemoyer, L. (2018) · Proceedings of the 2018 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Volume 1 (Long Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/n18-1202 · Cited by 11,983
UMAP: Uniform Manifold Approximation and Projection
McInnes, L., Healy, J., Saul, N., & Großberger, L. (2018) · Journal of Open Source Software · doi:10.21105/joss.00861 · Cited by 9,826 · cited 1×
“The clusters (for one particular experiment out of the 10 of them) are shown in Figure 2 after applying UMAP (McInnes et al., 2018; McInnes et al., 2018) to the contextualized embeddings.”
MethodUMAP: Uniform Manifold Approximation and Projection for Dimension Reduction
McInnes, L., Healy, J., & Melville, J. (2018) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1802.03426 · Cited by 7,101
Recurrent neural network based language model
Mikolov, T., Karafiát, M., Burget, L., Černocký, J., & Khudanpur, S. (2010) · Interspeech 2010 · doi:10.21437/interspeech.2010-343 · Cited by 5,390
Universal Language Model Fine-tuning for Text Classification
Howard, J., & Ruder, S. (2018) · Proceedings of the 56th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/p18-1031 · Cited by 4,100
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Tomas Mikolov, Ilya Sutskever, Kai Chen, Greg S Cor- rado, and Jeff Dean. 2013. Distributed representa- tions of words and phrases and their composition- ality. In C. J. C. Burges, L. Bottou, M. Welling, Z. Ghahramani, and K. Q. Weinberger, editors, Ad- vances in Neural Information Processing Systems 26, pages 3111-3119.
- Matthew Peters, Mark Neumann, Mohit Iyyer, Matt Gardner, Christopher Clark, Kenton Lee, and Luke Zettlemoyer. 2018. Deep contextualized word rep- resentations. In Proceedings of the 2018 Confer- ence of the North American Chapter of the Associ- ation for Computational Linguistics: Human Lan- guage Technologies, Volume 1 (Long Papers), pages 2227-2237, New Orleans, Louisiana. Association for Computational Linguistics.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–190 of 190
Inherent Discriminability of BERT Towards Racial Minority Associated Data
Taeb, M., Chi, H., Jones, E. L., & Chi, Z. (2021) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-86970-0_19 · Cited by 7
An Investigation of Structures Responsible for Gender Bias in BERT and DistilBERT
Leteno, T., Gourru, A., Laclau, C., & Gravier, C. (2023) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-30047-9_20 · Cited by 9
Towards Debiasing Sentence RepresentationsPreprint
Liang, P. P., Li, I., Zheng, E., Lim, Y. C., Salakhutdinov, R., & Morency, L. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2007.08100 · Cited by 65
Gender Bias in Multilingual Neural Machine Translation: The Architecture MattersPreprint
Costa‐jussà, M. R., Escolano, C., Basta, C., Ferrando, J., Batlle, R., & Kharitonova, K. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2012.13176 · Cited by 7
Self-citationExperimental Standards for Deep Learning in Natural Language Processing Research
Ulmer, D., Bassignana, E., Müller-Eberstein, M., Varab, D., Zhang, M., van der Goot, R., Hardmeier, C., & Plank, B. (2022) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP (Findings of EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.findings-emnlp.196 · Cited by 9
Gender bias in natural language processing
Basta, C. (2022) · UPCommons institutional repository (Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya) · doi:10.5821/dissertation-2117-379361 · Cited by 6
Self-citationIdentifying and Mitigating Gender Bias in Language Models: A Fair Machine Learning Approach
Ajith, S., Rithani, M., & SyamDev, R. S. (2023) · International Conference on Image Information Processing (ICIIP) · doi:10.1109/iciip61524.2023.10537623 · Cited by 5
AI and Future-Making: Design, Biases, and Human-Plant Interactions
Ghajargar, M. (2024) · International Academic Mindtrek Conference (Mindtrek) · doi:10.1145/3681716.3681738 · Cited by 5
Stereotype and Categorical Bias Evaluation via Differential Cosine Bias Measure
Sayenju, S., Aygün, R. S., Franks, B., Johnston, S., Lee, G., & Modgil, G. (2022) · IEEE International Conference on Big Data (BigData) · doi:10.1109/bigdata55660.2022.10020924 · Cited by 5
Understanding and Mitigating Gender Bias in Information Retrieval Systems
Bigdeli, A., Arabzadeh, N., Seyedsalehi, S., Zihayat, M., & Ebrahim Bagheri, A. (2023) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-28241-6_32 · Cited by 5
Creating a Chinese gender lexicon for detecting gendered wording in job advertisements
Jiang, T., Li, Y., Fu, S., & Chen, Y. (2023) · Information Processing & Management · doi:10.1016/j.ipm.2023.103424 · Cited by 5
Detecting intersectionality in NER models: A data-driven approach
Lassen, I. M. S., Almasi, M., Enevoldsen, K., & Kristensen‐McLachlan, R. D. (2023) · Joint SIGHUM Workshop on Computational Linguistics for Cultural Heritage, Social Sciences, Humanities and Literature (LaTeCH-CLfL) · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.latechclfl-1.13 · Cited by 6
Genderly: a data-centric gender bias detection system
Khreich, W., & Doughman, J. (2025) · Complex & Intelligent Systems · doi:10.1007/s40747-025-01859-z · Cited by 5
Reactive Writers: How Co-Writing with AI Changes How We Engage with Ideas
Bhat, A., Quéré, M. A. L., Naaman, M., & Naaman, M. (2026) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3772318.3791529 · Cited by 12
The effects of gender bias in word embeddings on patient phenotyping in the mental health domain
Soğancıoğlu, G., Kaya, H., & Salah, A. A. (2023) · International Conference on Affective Computing and Intelligent Interaction and workshops · doi:10.1109/acii59096.2023.10388203 · Cited by 5
Characterizing gender stereotypes in popular fiction: A machine learning approach
Zhang, C., & Wu, B. (2023) · Online Journal of Communication and Media Technologies · doi:10.30935/ojcmt/13644 · Cited by 4
Using Gender- and Polarity-Informed Models to Investigate Bias
Touileb, S., Øvrelid, L., & Velldal, E. (2021) · Workshop on Gender Bias in Natural Language Processing (GeBNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.gebnlp-1.8 · Cited by 5
A Study on Bias Detection and Classification in Natural Language ProcessingPreprint
Evans, A. S., Moniz, H., & Luisa, C. (2023) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-3351695/v1 · Cited by 4
Proceedings of The ACM Collective Intelligence Conference
(2023) · doi:10.1145/3582269 · Cited by 4
A Semantic Approach for Linked Model, Data, and Dataspace Cards
Donald, A., Galanopoulos, A., Curry, E., Muñoz, E., Ullah, I., Waskow, M. A., Kalra, M., Saxena, S., & Iqbal, T. (2025) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2025.3572211 · Cited by 3
“Since Lawyers are Males..”: Examining Implicit Gender Bias in Hindi Language Generation by LLMs
Gupta, I., Joshi, I., Dey, A., & Parikh, T. S. (2025) · ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (FAccT) · doi:10.1145/3715275.3732208 · Cited by 10
Identity Term Sampling for Measuring Gender Bias in Training Data
Sobhani, N. C., & Delany, S. J. (2023) · Communications in computer and information science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-26438-2_18 · Cited by 3
Salutari, F., Ramos, J., Rahmani, H. A., Linguaglossa, L., & Lipani, A. (2023) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-33374-3_42 · Cited by 3
Selitskiy, S., Inoue, C., Schetinin, V., & Jakaite, L. (2023) · International Conference on Social Networks Analysis, Management and Security (SNAMS) · doi:10.1109/snams60348.2023.10375471 · Cited by 4
A multifaceted approach to detect gender biases in Natural Language Generation
Consuegra‐Ayala, J. P., Martínez-Murillo, I., Lloret, E., Moreda, P., & Palomar, M. (2024) · Knowledge-Based Systems · doi:10.1016/j.knosys.2024.112367 · Cited by 3
Agmon, S., Singer, U., & Radinsky, K. (2024) · JMIR AI · doi:10.2196/49546 · Cited by 3
Gender disentangled representation learning in neural rankers
Seyedsalehi, S., Salamat, S., Arabzadeh, N., Ebrahimi, S., Zihayat, M., & Ebrahim Bagheri, A. (2025) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1007/s10994-024-06664-2 · Cited by 3
Analysis of Gender Bias in Social Perception and Judgement Using Chinese Word Embeddings
Li, J., Zhu, S., Liu, Y., & Liu, P. (2022) · Workshop on Gender Bias in Natural Language Processing (GeBNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.gebnlp-1.2 · Cited by 3
Injection of linguistic knowledge into neural text generation models
Manzanares, N. C. (2020) · UPCommons institutional repository (Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya) · doi:10.5821/dissertation-2117-341598 · Cited by 3
Experimental Standards for Deep Learning in Natural Language Processing ResearchPreprint
Ulmer, D., Bassignana, E., Müller-Eberstein, M., Varab, D., Zhang, M., van der Goot, R., Hardmeier, C., & Plank, B. (2022) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2204.06251 · Cited by 9
Stars, Stripes, and Silicon: Unravelling the ChatGPT’s All-American, Monochrome, Cis-centric Bias
Torrielli, F. (2025) · Communications in computer and information science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-74630-7_19 · Cited by 3
Collectivism and individualism political bias in large language models: A two-step approach
Xiao-bo, S. H. A. N., Teng, Y., Wang, Y., Zhao, H., & Wang, Y. (2025) · Big Data & Society · doi:10.1177/20539517251343861 · Cited by 3
Evaluating Fairness and Bias in Large Language Models for Tabular Data
Tayebi, A., & Garibay, Ö. Ö. (2025) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-93415-5_7 · Cited by 2
ImageBiTe: A Framework for Evaluating Representational Harms in Text-to-Image Models
Morales, S., Clarisó, R., & Cabot, J. (2025) · IEEE/ACM International Conference on AI Engineering – Software Engineering for AI (CAIN) · doi:10.1109/cain66642.2025.00019 · Cited by 2
Gasparotto, M. (2026) · Big Data & Society · doi:10.1177/20539517251406184 · Cited by 3
Analysis of Bias in NLP Models With Regression and Effect Sizes
Dayanık, E., Vu, N. T., & Padó, S. (2022) · Northern European Journal of Language Technology · doi:10.3384/nejlt.2000-1533.2022.3505 · Cited by 3
Unmasking the Stereotypes: Evaluating Social Biases in Chinese BERT
Zhang, S., & Li, P. (2022) · 2022 4th International Conference on Natural Language Processing (ICNLP) · doi:10.1109/icnlp55136.2022.00059 · Cited by 2
A Word Sense Distribution-based approach for Semantic Change Prediction
Tang, X., Zhou, Y., Aida, T., Sen, P., & Bollegala, D. (2023) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP (Findings of EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.findings-emnlp.231 · Cited by 4
Machine Learning and the Analysis of Culture
Mützel, S., & Ollion, É. (2024) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780197653609.013.39 · Cited by 3
Understanding and Mitigating Gender Bias in Information Retrieval Systems
Seyedsalehi, S., Bigdeli, A., Arabzadeh, N., AlMousawi, B., Marshall, Z., Zihayat, M., & Bagheri, E. (2025) · Foundations and Trends® in Information Retrieval · doi:10.1561/1500000103 · Cited by 3
The Effects of Demographic Instructions on LLM Personas
de Paula, A. F. M., Culpepper, J. S., Moffat, A., Cherumanal, S. P., Scholer, F., & Trippas, J. R. (2025) · International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (SIGIR) · doi:10.1145/3726302.3730255 · Cited by 4
Does ChatGPT Add Value to University Students’ Academic Performance?
Kaur, P., Jawaid, A., Qi, R. O. J., Rokman, R. D. B. C. M., Awai, S. S. A., Liew, S. S., & Yunus, S. N. B. M. (2023) · International Journal of Membrane Science and Technology · doi:10.15379/ijmst.v10i3.2583 · Cited by 2
Swap and Predict – Predicting the Semantic Changes in Words across Corpora by Context Swapping
Aida, T., & Bollegala, D. (2023) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP (Findings of EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.findings-emnlp.520 · Cited by 3
Dewitte, P. (2024) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4773907 · Cited by 2
Apports de la sémantique distributionnelle pour la morphologie dérivationnelle
Wauquier, M. (2022) · Corpus · doi:10.4000/corpus.6303 · Cited by 1
Puente, C., Sanchez-Perez, I., Kolomiyets-Ludwig, E., Palacios-Castrillo, C., Wang, P. S. P., & Palacios, R. (2025) · International Journal of Pattern Recognition and Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1142/s021800142551005x · Cited by 1
Shafqat, Z., Jilani, A. A. A., Butt, N. A., Rehman, S. U., Khalid, M. U., & Gruhn, V. (2025) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2025.3618868 · Cited by 1
Jeon, K. (2026) · Journal of Korean Medical Association · doi:10.5124/jkma.25.0163 · Cited by 2
Fair In-Context Learning via Latent Concept Variables
Bhaila, K., Van, M.-H., Edemacu, K., Zhao, C., Chen, F., & Wu, X.-T. (2024) · BigData Congress [Services Society] · doi:10.1109/bigdata66926.2025.11402286 · Cited by 7
EquiSent: A Scalable Solution for Bias-Aware Gender-Fair Sentiment Modeling
Kundu, P., & Senthilselvi, A. (2025) · International Conference on Advances in Computation, Communication and Information Technology (ICAICCIT) · doi:10.1109/icaiccit68829.2025.11434462 · Cited by 1
A Cloud Cluster Test Framework for English Machine Translation based on Prior Information
Wang, Y. (2023) · International Conference on Inventive Computation Technologies (ICICT) · doi:10.1109/icict57646.2023.10134230 · Cited by 1
Bravo-Villasante, M. Á. (2023) · Cuestiones de género/Cuestiones de género · doi:10.18002/cg.i18.7573 · Cited by 1
An Invariant Learning Characterization of Controlled Text Generation
Zheng, C., Shi, C., Vafa, K., Feder, A., & Blei, D. M. (2023) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.acl-long.179 · Cited by 3
Chintam, A., Beloch, R., Zuidema, W. H., Hanna, M., & van der Wal, O. (2023) · BlackboxNLP Workshop on Analyzing and Interpreting Neural Networks for NLP (BlackboxNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.blackboxnlp-1.29 · Cited by 10
ChatGPT and the Moralities of Large Language Modelling in Research Publications
Sethi, S. S., Sharma, P., & Kumar, A. V. S. (2024) · Advances in business information systems and analytics book series · doi:10.4018/979-8-3693-0815-8.ch014 · Cited by 2
Nakanishi, T. (2024) · IEEE International Conference on Semantic Computing (ICSC) · doi:10.1109/icsc59802.2024.00036 · Cited by 1
Beyond the Bar: Generative AI as a Transformative Component in Legal Document Review
Yang, E., Omrani, R., Curtin, E., Emory, T. S., Gray, L., Pickens, J., Reff, N., Traylor, C., Underwood, S., Lewis, D. D., et al. (2024) · IEEE International Conference on Big Data (BigData) · doi:10.1109/bigdata62323.2024.10826089 · Cited by 3
Schneeberger, D., & Traavik, L. E. M. (2025) · International perspectives on equality, diversity and inclusion · doi:10.1108/s2051-233320250000012025 · Cited by 1
MDD @ AMI: Vanilla Classifiers for Misogyny Identification
Abassi, S. E., & Nisioi, S. (2020) · Accademia University Press eBooks · doi:10.4000/books.aaccademia.6819 · Cited by 1
Overview of NLPCC 2022 Shared Task 7: Fine-Grained Dialogue Social Bias Measurement
Zhou, J., Mi, F., Meng, H. M. L., & Deng, J. (2022) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-17189-5_31 · Cited by 1
Using Cross-Loss Influence Functions to Explain Deep Network Representations.Preprint
Silva, A., Chopra, R., & Gombolay, M. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · Cited by 1
A Primer on ChatGPT: Coherence Does Not Imply CorrectnessPreprint
Ubani, S. (2023) · EdArXiv (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.35542/osf.io/8fmrn · Cited by 1
Hallucinating Machines: Exploring the ethical implications of generative language models
Hill, M. (2023) · Open Access Victoria University of Wellington | Te Herenga Waka (Figshare) · doi:10.26686/wgtn.24180456 · Cited by 1
Dewitte, P. (2024) · doi:10.31219/osf.io/gdt3z · Cited by 1
Opening the algorithm’s black box and understand its ouputs
Saboni, A., & Blangero, A. (2020) · International Conference on Electrical and Information Technologies · doi:10.1109/iceit48248.2020.9113174
MDD @ AMI: Vanilla Classifiers for Misogyny Identification (short paper).
Abassi, S. E., & Nisioi, S. (2020)
Gender Bias in Occupation Classification from the New York Times Obituaries
Atik, C., & Tekır, S. (2022) · Deu Muhendislik Fakultesi Fen ve Muhendislik · doi:10.21205/deufmd.2022247109
Foundations of Language Modeling
Beinborn, L., & Hollenstein, N. (2023) · Synthesis lectures on human language technologies · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-43260-6_2
Is “Chat GPT” Going to Replace Academia? A Critical Review from the Sociological Perspective
Singh, R., & Pandey, A. (2023) · Contemporary Studies in Social Sciences · doi:10.31559/csss2023.1.2.6
Student-Teacher Prompting for Red Teaming to Improve Guardrails
Llaca, R. R., Leskoschek, V., Paiva, V. C., Lupău, C., Lippmann, P., & Yang, J. (2023) · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.artofsafety-1.2
LangBiTe: An open-source platform to automate bias testing of large language models
Morales, S., Clarisó, R., & Cabot, J. (2025) · SoftwareX · doi:10.1016/j.softx.2025.102248
Who is Legion?: Surfacing Demographic Voices in Large Language ModelsPreprint
Koehl, D. (2024) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4856328
Evaluating Language Model Vulnerability to Poisoning Attacks in Low-Resource Settings
Plant, R., Giuffrida, M. V., Pitropakis, N., & Gkatzia, D. (2024) · IEEE Transactions on Audio Speech and Language Processing · doi:10.1109/taslp.2024.3507565 · Cited by 1
Vuković-Stamatović, M., & Čarapić, D. (2025) · Zeitschrift für Slawistik · doi:10.1515/slaw-2025-0036
Towards Responsible Multimodal Modeling for Mental Healthcare
Kaya, H., & Soğancıoğlu, G. (2025) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-07956-5_1
Urquijo, B. S., Belloso, M. L., Gutiérrez, L. R., & Cabrera, M. S. (2025) · Investigaciones Feministas · doi:10.5209/infe.100601
Bias Mitigation in Large Language Models for Tabular Data Classification
Lu, H., Shao, Z., Gao, J., & Uddin, S. (2026) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1007/s10994-026-07030-0 · Cited by 1
Neural Transfer Learning for Domain Adaptation in Natural Language Processing
Meftah, S. (2021) · theses.fr (ABES) · doi:10.70675/9111562bzfa37z4fd8zae6bz2e8ae8d5d403
Longitudinal, large-scale and unbiased Internet measurements
Salutari, F. (2021) · theses.fr (ABES) · doi:10.70675/fdae004bz8be1z472bz820azb61283724f00
Peuplement semi-automatisé de bases de connaissances à partir de documents non structurés.
Prieur, M. (2025) · theses.fr (ABES) · doi:10.70675/6c995326zb3b9z422dz9e5azbbabf8c75862
A Regularization Framework for Gender Bias Mitigation in Dense Neural Rankers
Seyedsalehi, S., Zihayat, M., & Ebrahim Bagheri, A. (2026) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1007/s10994-025-06964-1
Murdaugh, K. M., & Kwok, I. B. (2026) · Journal of Palliative Medicine · doi:10.1177/10966218261452780
Gengler, E. J. (2026) · Lecture notes in information systems and organisation · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-08486-6_9
Ferrari, M. (2026) · IGI Global eBooks · doi:10.4018/979-8-2600-3043-1.ch011
Rethinking Software Ethics in the Age of Artificial Intelligence
Nigsch, K. (2026) · Studies in applied philosophy, epistemology and rational ethics · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-31732-2_7
Matysik, S., Wiśniewska, J., & Frankowski, P. K. (2026) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2026.3733019
LangBiTe: model-driven bias testing of text-to-text large language models
Morales, S., Clarisó, R., & Cabot, J. (2026) · Software & Systems Modeling · doi:10.1007/s10270-026-01425-2
Metadata
- Authors
- Basta, C., Costa-jussà, M. R., & Casas, N.
- Affiliations
- Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya (ES)
- ORCID
- Basta, Christine
- Venue
- Proceedings of the First Workshop on Gender Bias in Natural Language Processing
- Published
- 2019
- Pages
- 33-39
- OpenAlex
- W2972668795
- Cited by
- 189
- References
- 25
- Citations by year
- 2026: 12 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 41 · 2022: 32 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 26 · 2019: 10
- FWCI
- 23.69
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- Workshop on Gender Bias in Natural Language Processing (GeBNLP) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- UPCommons institutional repository (Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya) (submittedVersion, public-domain)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR-17-CHR2-0004)
- Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad (TEC2015-69266-P)
- Agència de Gestió d'Ajuts Universitaris i de Recerca
- European Regional Development Fund (TEC2015-69266-P)
- Agencia Estatal de Investigación
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender Studies in Language
- Keywords
- gender bias, contextual word embeddings, word embeddings
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review