Cited by 899Topic ModelingMachine Learning in HealthcareBiomedical Text Mining and Ontologies

Transfer Learning in Biomedical Natural Language Processing: An Evaluation of BERT and ELMo on Ten Benchmarking Datasets

Open access
Peng, Yifan, Yan, Shankai, Lu, Zhiyong·2019·Proceedings of the 18th BioNLP Workshop and Shared Task

Abstract

Inspired by the success of the General Language Understanding Evaluation benchmark, we introduce the Biomedical Language Understanding Evaluation (BLUE) benchmark to facilitate research in the development of pre-training language representations in the biomedicine domain.The benchmark consists of five tasks with ten datasets that cover both biomedical and clinical texts with different dataset sizes and difficulties.We also evaluate several baselines based on BERT and ELMo and find that the BERT model pre-trained on PubMed abstracts and MIMIC-III clinical notes achieves the best results.We make the datasets, pre-trained models, and codes publicly available at https://github.com/ ncbi-nlp/BLUE_Benchmark.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.18653/v1/w19-5006

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Qingyu Chen, Yifan Peng, and Zhiyong Lu. 2019. BioSentVec: creating sentence embeddings for biomedical texts. In Proceedings of the 7th IEEE In- ternational Conference on Healthcare Informatics.
  2. Martin Krallinger, Obdulia Rabal, Saber A. Akhondi, Martín Pérez Pérez, Jesús Santamaría, Gael Pérez Rodríguez, Georgios Tsatsaronis, Ander Intxau- rrondo, José Antonio López1 Umesh Nandal, Erin Van Buel, Akileshwari Chandrasekhar, Mar- leen Rodenburg, Astrid Laegreid, Marius Doornen- bal, Julen Oyarzabal, Analia Lourenc ¸o, and Alfonso Valencia. 2017. Overview of the BioCreative VI chemical-protein interaction track. In Proceedings of BioCreative, pages 141-146.
  3. Yuqi Si, Jingqi Wang, Hua Xu, and Kirk Roberts. 2019. Enhancing clinical concept extraction with contex- tual embedding. arXiv preprint arXiv:1902.08691. · arXiv
  4. Wonjin Yoon, Chan Ho So, Jinhyuk Lee, and Jaewoo Kang. 2018. CollaboNet: collaboration of deep neu- ral networks for biomedical named entity recogni- tion. arXiv preprint arXiv:1809.07950. · arXiv

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Peng, Y., Yan, S., & Lu, Z.
Affiliations
National Institutes of Health (US)
Venue
Proceedings of the 18th BioNLP Workshop and Shared Task
Published
2019
Pages
58-65
OpenAlex
W2971258845
Cited by
899
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 66 · 2025: 136 · 2024: 142 · 2023: 164 · 2022: 147 · 2021: 150 · 2020: 83 · 2019: 11
FWCI
37.41
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • BioNLP Workshop and Shared Task (BioNLP) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • U.S. National Library of Medicine (R00LM013001, K99LM013001)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning in Healthcare
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies
Keywords
transfer learning, biomedical natural language processing, BERT, ELMo, biomedical text understanding, clinical text understanding, PubMed abstracts, benchmark dataset

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review