Cited by 124Topic ModelingBiomedical Text Mining and OntologiesMachine Learning in Healthcare

MedSTS: a resource for clinical semantic textual similarity

Open access
Wang, Yanshan, Afzal, Naveed, Fu, Sunyang, Wang, Liwei, Shen, Feichen, Rastegar-Mojarad, Majid, Liu, Hongfang·2020·Language Resources and Evaluation

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10579-018-9431-1

Cites

65 of 65 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Atkinson, J., A. Ferreira and E. Aravena (2009). "Discovering implicit intention-level knowledge from naturallanguage texts." Knowledge-Based Systems 22 (7): 502-508.
  2. 1495-1500). IEEE. Pivovarov, R., & Elhadad, N. (2015). Automated methods for the summarization of electronic health records. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 22(5), 938-947.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wang, Y., Afzal, N., Fu, S., Wang, L., Shen, F., Rastegar-Mojarad, M., & Liu, H.
Affiliations
Mayo Clinic (US)
Corresponding author
Liu, Hongfang
Venue
Language Resources and Evaluation
Published
2018-10-24
Volume
54
Issue
1
Pages
57-72
ISSN
  • 1574-020X (ISSN-L)
  • 1574-0218
OpenAlex
W2889272240
Cited by
124
References
65
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 9
FWCI
8.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Language Resources and Evaluation (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R01GM102282)
  • U.S. National Library of Medicine (R01LM11934)
  • National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering (R01EB19403)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning in Healthcare
Keywords
semantic textual similarity, clinical text, shared task, electronic health records, clinical information extraction, redundancy reduction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review