Applications of Invisible and Generative Artificial Intelligence in Developing and Assessing Visual Projects in Higher Education
Open accessAbstract
The present study examines how teachers in higher education can integrate invisible and generative artificial intelligence (AI) in visual communication classes, with focus on both its transformative potential and unavoidable pedagogical challenges. As AI tools such as Adobe Firefly, Midjourney, and DALL·E have been reshaping design processes, educators are put in the position to rethink the manner in which visual communication is taught, learned, and assessed. With this in mind, we propose a theoretical and pedagogical framework that addresses the complex nature of AI usage in visual communication education. By combining AI integration with educational theories, we believe that our analysis manages to offer an instrument for fostering critical reflection, aesthetic sensitivity, and conceptual clarity among students. The article analyses the importance of maintaining a balance between technological fluency and fundamental design principles. Educators in this field are recommended to nurture creativity, ethical awareness, and originality, while avoiding the over-usage of automated processes. In this regard, we propose an example of an evaluation grid that could be used in assessing AI-assisted design projects, considering factors such as conceptual depth, aesthetic quality, process transparency, and ethical sensitivity. Last, but not least, we suggest that process build on co-creation could enhance, rather than replace, human creativity. We believe this approach could offer future professional communicators the necessary tools to evolve in the intricate landscape of creative industries.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A theoretical framework proposes evaluation grids for conceptual depth, ethics, and process transparency, but lacks classroom trials and external validation.
“A theoretical framework analysing rubrics proposes evaluation grids for conceptual depth, ethics, and process transparency, but lacks classroom trials and external validation (Sirb and Petrovici 2025).”
From A Study on the Role of Midjourney, A Generative Artificial Intelligence Tool, in Enhancing Student Creativity in Illustration Design Classes (2026) · cites this paper as Sirb and Petrovici 2025
Cites
Still being checked.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
He, S. (2026) · Journal of Computer Assisted Learning · doi:10.1002/jcal.70305
Research on the Application of Generative Artificial Intelligence in Visual Image Design
Xing, Q., & Yuchi, X. (2025) · International Conference on Image Processing, Computer Vision and Machine Learning (ICICML) · doi:10.1109/icicml67980.2025.11333464
AI in the Classroom: Balancing Automation and Human Teaching in Pedagogical Approaches
Jamoldinova, O. R., Каримов, Х., Sharipova, M., Miralimova, S., Mamadodilovna, M. N., & Qizi, M. D. R. (2026) · International Conference on Sustainable Computing and Integrated Communication in Changing Landscape of AI (ICSCAI) · doi:10.1109/icscai68849.2026.11648582
Gülden, S. (2026) · Lecture notes of the Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-39734-8_25
- Authors
- Sirb, C., & Petrovici, I.
- Affiliations
- West University of Timişoara (RO)
- ORCID
- Petrovici, Iasmina
- Venue
- Revista Romaneasca pentru Educatie Multidimensionala
- Publisher
- InManifest Network
- Published
- 2025-09-19
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 532-550
- ISSN
- 2066-7329 (ISSN-L)
- 2067-9270
- OpenAlex
- W4414352665
- Cited by
- 4
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 1
- FWCI
- 4.19
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Revista Romaneasca pentru Educatie Multidimensionala (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Artificial Intelligence in Education
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design › Digital Media and Visual Art
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Visual Arts and Performing Arts › Art Education and Development
- Keywords
- generative AI, visual communication education, university teaching, evaluation grid, Adobe Firefly, Midjourney, DALL-E, design education, creativity, moral consciousness, co-creation, aesthetic sensibility, critical reflection
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review