Cited by 60EFL/ESL Teaching and LearningSubtitles and Audiovisual MediaSecond Language Learning and Teaching

Same Task, Different Activities: Issues of Investment Identity, and Use of Strategy

Open access
Parks, Susan·2000·TESL Canada Journal

Abstract

Drawing on activity theory and the construct of investment, this article explores how three francophone CEGEP students variously invested in a task that involved producing short documentary-style videos in English. Case study data included interviews with the students and teacher and student work portfolios. The analysis suggests that the appropriation of, or resistance to, particular strategies was related to the construct of motive and issues of identity. Although all three participants had a positive orientation to L2 language learning, differences surfaced about the value attached to classroom language learning, task preference, and attitude to group work. The author argues for task-based research that takes into account the sociocultural dimension of task performance and learner's perspective, as well as studies that involve a broader range of tasks than is currently the case in traditional SLA task-based research. Implications of the study for ESL teaching are discussed.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.18806/tesl.v17i2.890

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 32 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 13

  1. Bakhtin, M.M. (1981). The dialogic imagination (M. Holquist, Ed., C. Emerson & M. Holquist, Trans.). Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
  2. Cole, M., & Engestrom, Y. (1993). A cultural-historical approach to distrbuted cognition. In G. Salomon (Ed.), Distributed cognitions: Psychological and educational considerations (pp. 1-46). New York: Cambridge University Press.
  3. Coughlin, P., & Duff, P. (1994). Same task, different activities: Analysis of SLA task from an activity theory perspective. In P. Lantolf & G. Appel (Eds.), Vygotskian approaches to second language research (pp.173-191). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
  4. Gillette, B. (1994). The role of learner goals in L2 success. In P. Lantolf & G. Appel (Eds.), Vygotskian approaches to second language research (pp. 195-213). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
  5. Kasper, L.F. (Ed.). (1999). Content-based col/ege ESL instruction. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  6. Lantolf, J., & Pavlenko, A. (1998, March). Second language activity theory: Constructing whole learners. Paper presented at American Association of Applied Linguistics Conference, Seattle.
  7. Maguire, M. (1994). Getting beyond programmes and instructional time in second-language teaching and learning: Who is mediating what? For whom? In what context? Journal of the CAAL, 16(/), 105-123.
  8. Mohan, B., & Smith, S.M. (1992). Context and cooperation in academic tasks. In D. Nunan (Ed.), Collaborative language learning and teaching (pp. 81-89). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
  9. Morrissette, E. (1997). Croyances et prejuges sur l'apprentissage d'une langue seconde. SPEAQ Out, 25(1),25.
  10. Newman, D., Griffin, P., & Cole, M. (1989). The construction zone: Workingfor cognitive change in schoof. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  11. A.A. Leontiev, Russian psycholinguistics, SLA classroom. Paper presented at American Association of Applied Linguistics Conference, Seattle.
  12. Wertsch, J.V. (1985). Vygotsky and the social formation ofmind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  13. In B. Rogoff & J. Lave (Eds.), Everyday cognition: Its development in social context (pp. 151-171). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Parks, S.
Corresponding author
Parks, Susan
Venue
TESL Canada Journal
Published
2000-06-30
Volume
17
Issue
2
Pages
21
ISSN
  • 0826-435X (ISSN-L)
  • 1925-8917
OpenAlex
W1480180372
Cited by
60
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 1
FWCI
12.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
TESL Canada Journal (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Subtitles and Audiovisual Media
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Second Language Learning and Teaching
Keywords
task-based language learning, student motivation, learner identity, strategy use, activity theory, CEGEP students, French-speaking learners, English as a second language, documentary filmmaking, group work, student attitudes, task preference, ESL teaching

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review