Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 286

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 24 of the 24 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

LANDSCAPE AND REGIONAL IMPACTS OF HURRICANES IN PUERTO RICO

Open access
Boose, Emery R., Serrano, Mayra I., Foster, David R.·2004·Ecological Monographs

Abstract

Puerto Rico is subject to frequent and severe impacts from hurricanes, whose long‐term ecological role must be assessed on a scale of centuries. In this study we applied a method for reconstructing hurricane disturbance regimes developed in an earlier study of hurricanes in New England. Patterns of actual wind damage from historical records were analyzed for 85 hurricanes since European settlement in 1508. A simple meteorological model (HURRECON) was used to reconstruct the impacts of 43 hurricanes since 1851. Long‐term effects of topography on a landscape scale in the Luquillo Experimental Forest (LEF) were simulated with a simple topographic exposure model (EXPOS). Average return intervals across Puerto Rico for F0 damage (loss of leaves and branches) and F1 damage (scattered blowdowns, small gaps) on the Fujita scale were 4 and 6 years, respectively. At higher damage levels, a gradient was created by the direction of the storm tracks and the weakening of hurricanes over the interior mountains. Average return intervals for F2 damage (extensive blowdowns) and F3 damage (forests leveled) ranged from 15 to 33 years and 50 to 150 years, respectively, from east to west. In the LEF, the combination of steep topography and constrained peak wind directions created a complex mosaic of topographic exposure and protection, with average return intervals for F3 damage ranging from 50 years to >150 years. Actual forest damage was strongly dependent on land‐use history and the effects of recent hurricanes. Annual and decadal timing of hurricanes varied widely. There was no clear centennial‐scale trend in the number of major hurricanes over the historical period.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1890/02-4057

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 24 references

Cited by

See all 286

Metadata

Authors
Boose, E. R., Serrano, M. I., & Foster, D. R.
Venue
Ecological Monographs
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2004-02
Volume
74
Issue
2
Pages
335-352
ISSN
  • 0012-9615 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-7015
OpenAlex
W2159081305
Cited by
286
References
24
FWCI
1.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: LANDSCAPE AND REGIONAL IMPACTS OF HURRICANES IN PUERTO RICO. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1890/02-4057
The paper
Boose, E. R., Serrano, M. I., & Foster, D. R. (2004). LANDSCAPE AND REGIONAL IMPACTS OF HURRICANES IN PUERTO RICO. Ecological Monographs. https://doi.org/10.1890/02-4057

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.