The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
INTERPOLATING, EXTRAPOLATING, AND COMPARING INCIDENCE-BASED SPECIES ACCUMULATION CURVES
Abstract
A general binomial mixture model is proposed for the species accumulation function based on presence–absence (incidence) of species in a sample of quadrats or other sampling units. The model covers interpolation between zero and the observed number of samples, as well as extrapolation beyond the observed sample set. For interpolation (sample-based rarefaction), easily calculated, closed-form expressions for both expected richness and its confidence limits are developed (using the method of moments) that completely eliminate the need for resampling methods and permit direct statistical comparison of richness between sample sets. An incidence-based form of the Coleman (random-placement) model is developed and compared with the moment-based interpolation method. For extrapolation beyond the empirical sample set (and simultaneously, as an alternative method of interpolation), a likelihood-based estimator with a bootstrap confidence interval is described that relies on a sequential, AIC-guided algorithm to fit the mixture model parameters. Both the moment-based and likelihood-based estimators are illustrated with data sets for temperate birds and tropical seeds, ants, and trees. The moment-based estimator is confidently recommended for interpolation (sample-based rarefaction). For extrapolation, the likelihood-based estimator performs well for doubling or tripling the number of empirical samples, but it is not reliable for estimating the richness asymptote. The sensitivity of individual-based and sample-based rarefaction to spatial (or temporal) patchiness is discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Maximum Likelihood from Incomplete Data Via the EM Algorithm
Dempster, A. P., Laird, N. M., & Rubin, D. B. (1977) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1977.tb01600.x · Cited by 50,444
A new relationship for rarefaction
Brewer, A., & Williamson, M. (1994) · Biodiversity and Conservation · doi:10.1007/bf00056509 · Cited by 57
Cited by
Colwell, R. K., Chao, A., Gotelli, N. J., Lin, S.-Y., Mao, C. X., Chazdon, R. L., & Longino, J. T. (2012) · Journal of Plant Ecology · doi:10.1093/jpe/rtr044 · Cited by 1,921
Self-citationPesticides reduce regional biodiversity of stream invertebrates
Beketov, M. A., Kefford, B. J., Schäfer, R. B., & Liess, M. (2013) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1305618110 · Cited by 874
Biological responses to disturbance from simulated deep-sea polymetallic nodule mining
Jones, D. O. B., Kaiser, S., Sweetman, A. K., Smith, C. R., Menot, L., Vink, A., Trueblood, D., Greinert, J., Billett, D. S. M., Arbizu, P. M., et al. (2017) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0171750 · Cited by 336
Estimating T-cell repertoire diversity: limitations of classical estimators and a new approach
Laydon, D. J., Bangham, C. R. M., & Asquith, B. (2015) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2014.0291 · Cited by 215
Cusack, J. J., Dickman, A. J., Rowcliffe, J. M., Carbone, C., Macdonald, D. W., & Coulson, T. (2015) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0126373 · Cited by 192
Metadata
- Authors
- Colwell, R. K., Mao, C. X., & Chang, J.
- Venue
- Ecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2004-10
- Volume
- 85
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 2717-2727
- ISSN
- 0012-9658 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2132853588
- Cited by
- 1,788
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 45.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: INTERPOLATING, EXTRAPOLATING, AND COMPARING INCIDENCE-BASED SPECIES ACCUMULATION CURVES. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1890/03-0557
- The paper
- Colwell, R. K., Mao, C. X., & Chang, J. (2004). INTERPOLATING, EXTRAPOLATING, AND COMPARING INCIDENCE-BASED SPECIES ACCUMULATION CURVES. Ecology. https://doi.org/10.1890/03-0557
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.