The DOI matches its Crossref record; 53 of the 54 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Origin of compartmentalization in food webs
Open accessAbstract
The response of an ecosystem to perturbations is mediated by both antagonistic and facilitative interactions between species. It is thought that a community's resilience depends crucially on the food web—the network of trophic interactions—and on the food web's degree of compartmentalization. Despite its ecological importance, compartmentalization and the mechanisms that give rise to it remain poorly understood. Here we investigate several definitions of compartments, propose ways to understand the ecological meaning of these definitions, and quantify the degree of compartmentalization of empirical food webs. We find that the compartmentalization observed in empirical food webs can be accounted for solely by the niche organization of species and their diets. By uncovering connections between compartmentalization and species' diet contiguity, our findings help us understand which perturbations can result in fragmentation of the food web and which can lead to catastrophic effects. Additionally, we show that the composition of compartments can be used to address the long‐standing question of what determines the ecological niche of a species.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“a feature commonly observed in complex ecological networks and thought to enhance their stability and persistence”
From A Food Web Model of the Serengeti: Stability, Dynamics and Indirect Effects (2026) · cites this paper as Guimerà et al. 2010
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Community structure in social and biological networks
Girvan, M., & Newman, M. E. J. (2002) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.122653799 · Cited by 15,502
Self-citationFinding and evaluating community structure in networks
Newman, M. E. J., & Girvan, M. (2004) · Physical Review E · doi:10.1103/physreve.69.026113 · Cited by 13,931
Self-citationHarary, F. (1969) · Cited by 10,739
Functional cartography of complex metabolic networks
Guimerà, R., & Nunes Amaral, L. A. (2005) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature03288 · Cited by 3,983
Self-citationResolution limit in community detection
Fortunato, S., & Barthélemy, M. (2007) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0605965104 · Cited by 3,024
Comparing community structure identification
Danon, L., Dı́az-Guilera, A., Duch, J., & Arenas, À. (2005) · Journal of Statistical Mechanics Theory and Experiment · doi:10.1088/1742-5468/2005/09/p09008 · Cited by 2,905
Will a Large Complex System be Stable?
MAY, R. M. (1972) · Nature · doi:10.1038/238413a0 · Cited by 2,869
Plant-Animal Mutualistic Networks: The Architecture of Biodiversity
Bascompte, J., & Jordano, P. (2007) · Annual Review of Ecology Evolution and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.38.091206.095818 · Cited by 1,733
Food-web structure and network theory: The role of connectance and size
Dunne, J. A., Williams, R. J., & Martinez, N. D. (2002) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.192407699 · Cited by 1,531
Simple rules yield complex food webs
Martinez, N. D., Williams, R. J., & Martinez, N. D. (2000) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35004572 · Cited by 1,453
Flagged first, then by citations
1 of the 54 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Pimm S. L., 2002, Food webs. First edition
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Compartmentalization increases food-web persistence
Stouffer, D. B., & Bascompte, J. (2011) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1014353108 · Cited by 751
Self-citationBeyond pairwise mechanisms of species coexistence in complex communities
Levine, J. M., Bascompte, J., Adler, P. B., & Allesina, S. (2017) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature22898 · Cited by 737
A method for detecting modules in quantitative bipartite networks
Dormann, C. F., & Strauss, R. (2013) · Methods in Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.1111/2041-210x.12139 · Cited by 639
Clustering and Community Detection in Directed Networks: A SurveyPreprint
Malliaros, F. D., & Vazirgiannis, M. (2016) · Cited by 637
Clustering and community detection in directed networks: A survey
Malliaros, F. D., & Vazirgiannis, M. (2013) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2013.08.002 · Cited by 594
“mmunities-clusters in food webs), where species within the same compartment interact frequently among each other, but show fewer interactions between species of dierent compartments (see e.g., Refs. [133,134,135]). The existence of community structure in food webs is an important property, due it its relationship to t…”
BackgroundInfluentialCommunity detection in networks: A multidisciplinary review
Javed, M. A., Younis, M. S., Latif, S., Qadir, J., & Baig, A. (2018) · Journal of Network and Computer Applications · doi:10.1016/j.jnca.2018.02.011 · Cited by 519
Kortsch, S., Primicerio, R., Fossheim, M., Викторович, Д. А., & Aschan, M. (2015) · Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.2015.1546 · Cited by 484
Kissling, W. D., Dormann, C. F., Groeneveld, J., Hickler, T., Kühn, I., McInerny, G., Montoya, J. M., Römermann, C., Schiffers, K. H., Schurr, F. M., et al. (2011) · Journal of Biogeography · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2699.2011.02663.x · Cited by 436
“…e.g. by ordering species by their topological importance within the network (e.g. important connectors or generalist consumers, e.g. Montoya et al., 2009; Guimerá et al., 2010), by interaction strengths, or by trait-related network parameters (e.g. degree of size matching; Stang et al., 2009).”
BackgroundModularity and stability in ecological communities
Grilli, J., Rogers, T., & Allesina, S. (2016) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms12031 · Cited by 398
Effects of network modularity on the spread of perturbation impact in experimental metapopulations
Gilarranz, L. J., Rayfield, B., Liñán, G., Bascompte, J., & Gonzalez, A. (2017) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aal4122 · Cited by 275
The Structure of Ecological Networks Across Levels of Organization
Guimarães, P. R. (2020) · Annual Review of Ecology Evolution and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-012220-120819 · Cited by 288
“High trait variation across species may lead to the formation of modules due to specialization (Poisot et al. 2013), intervality (Guimerà et al. 2010, Stouffer et al. 2006), interspecific competition (Dalerum et al. 2016, Valverde et al. 2020), trade-offs in resource use (Pinheiro et al. 2019), and…”
BackgroundEvolutionary Conservation of Species’ Roles in Food Webs
Stouffer, D. B., Sales‐Pardo, M., Sirer, M. I., & Bascompte, J. (2012) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1216556 · Cited by 186
Self-citationTrophic coherence determines food-web stability
Johnson, S., Domínguez‐García, V., Donetti, L., & Muñoz, M. A. (2014) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1409077111 · Cited by 166
“hat the leading eigenvalues of matrices related to food webs (networks in which the species are nodes and the links represent predation) do not exhibit the expected dependence on size or link density [10]. Food webs must, therefore, have some unknown structural feature which accounts for this deviation from randomness…”
BackgroundResultInfluentialMittelbach, G. G., & McGill, B. J. (2019) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198835851.001.0001 · Cited by 178
Krasnov, B. R., Fortuna, M. A., Mouillot, D., Khokhlova, I. S., Shenbrot, G. I., & Poulin, R. (2012) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/664612 · Cited by 157
“In addition, many ecological networks appear to be modular (or compartmen- talized; Olesen et al. 2007; Dupont and Olesen 2009; Guimerà et al. 2010; Stouffer and Bascompte 2011).”
BackgroundInvaders of pollination networks in the Galápagos Islands: emergence of novel communities
Traveset, A., Heleno, R., Chamorro, S., Vargas, P., McMullen, C. K., Castro‐Urgal, R., Nogales, M., Herrera, H. W., & Olesen, J. M. (2013) · Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.2012.3040 · Cited by 160
Habitat loss alters the architecture of plant–pollinator interaction networks
Spiesman, B. J., & Inouye, B. D. (2013) · Ecology · doi:10.1890/13-0977.1 · Cited by 146
“Modules are thought to form in ecological networks as a result of niche organization and resource contiguity (Guimera et al. 2010).”
BackgroundAlbrecht, M., Padrón, B., Bartomeus, Í., & Traveset, A. (2014) · Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.2014.0773 · Cited by 141
Potapov, A., Brose, U., Scheu, S., & Tiunov, A. V. (2019) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/705811 · Cited by 137
Significant Scales in Community Structure
Traag, V., Krings, G., & Dooren, P. M. V. (2013) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep02930 · Cited by 140
Faster unfolding of communities: Speeding up the Louvain algorithm
Traag, V. (2015) · Physical Review E · doi:10.1103/physreve.92.032801 · Cited by 132
Functional group diversity increases with modularity in complex food webs
Montoya, D., Yallop, M. L., & Memmott, J. (2015) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms8379 · Cited by 125
The spatial scaling of species interaction networks
Galiana, N., Lurgi, M., López, B. C., Fortin, M., Leroux, S., Cazelles, K., Gravel, D., & Montoya, J. M. (2018) · Nature Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1038/s41559-018-0517-3 · Cited by 108
Spatial Guilds in the Serengeti Food Web Revealed by a Bayesian Group Model
Baskerville, E. B., Dobson, A. P., Bedford, T., Allesina, S., Anderson, T. M., & Pascual, M. (2011) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002321 · Cited by 113
Thébault, É. (2012) · Journal of Biogeography · doi:10.1111/jbi.12015 · Cited by 107
“…relevant in ecology for the study of interaction webs (Olesen et al., 2007; Vacher et al., 2008; Dupont & Olesen, 2009; Rezende et al., 2009; Guimerà et al., 2010; Thébault & Fontaine, 2010; Stouffer & Bascompte, 2011), and its use has recently begun to extend into biogeography…”
BackgroundExploring community structure in biological networks with random graphs
Sah, P., Singh, L., Clauset, A. J., & Bansal, S. (2014) · BMC Bioinformatics · doi:10.1186/1471-2105-15-220 · Cited by 95
“Although community structure has been found to be a central topological feature of biological networks such as metabolic [5], protein [6, 7], genetic [8], food-web [9, 10] and pollination networks [11], a detailed understanding of its relationship with other network topological properties is still limited.”
Emergence of Structural Patterns in Neutral Trophic Networks
Canard, E., Mouquet, N., Marescot, L., Gaston, K. J., Gravel, D., & Mouillot, D. (2012) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0038295 · Cited by 88
Griffiths, E. C., Pedersen, A. B., Fenton, A., & Petchey, O. L. (2014) · Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.2013.2286 · Cited by 93
Properties of networks with partially structured and partially random connectivity
Ahmadian, Y., Fumarola, F., & Miller, K. D. (2015) · Physical Review E · doi:10.1103/physreve.91.012820 · Cited by 83
Sensitivity analysis of coexistence in ecological communities: theory and application
Barabás, G., Pásztor, L., Meszéna, G., & Ostling, A. (2014) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1111/ele.12350 · Cited by 84
The role of body mass in diet contiguity and food-web structure
Stouffer, D. B., Rezende, E. L., & Amaral, L. A. N. (2011) · Journal of Animal Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2656.2011.01812.x · Cited by 77
Self-citationA new model explaining the origin of different topologies in interaction networks
Pinheiro, R. B. P., Felix, G. M., Dormann, C. F., & Mello, M. A. R. (2019) · Ecology · doi:10.1002/ecy.2796 · Cited by 67
Food webs reveal coexistence mechanisms and community organization in carnivores
Lu, Q., Cheng, C., Xiao, L., Li, J., Li, X., Zhao, X. H., Lu, Z. J., Zhao, J., & Yao, M. (2023) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2022.12.049 · Cited by 63
The impact of climate change on the structure of Pleistocene food webs across the mammoth steppe
Yeakel, J. D., Guimarães, P. R., Bocherens, H., & Koch, P. L. (2013) · Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.2013.0239 · Cited by 61
“appendix III), is often observed in extant trophic systems [27, 59, 7, 66], and is thought to promote stability [37, 59] by isolating extinction cascades [58].”
BackgroundTrophic groups and modules: two levels of group detection in food webs
Gauzens, B., Thébault, É., Lacroix, G., & Stéphane Legendre, C. (2015) · Journal of The Royal Society Interface · doi:10.1098/rsif.2014.1176 · Cited by 60
“The opposite result is found when groups are determined only accordingly to prey or predator similarity [12].”
BackgroundResultInfluentialHost Centrality in Food Web Networks Determines Parasite Diversity
Anderson, T. K., & Sukhdeo, M. V. K. (2011) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0026798 · Cited by 61
Pásztor, L., Botta‐Dukát, Z., Magyar, G., Czárán, T., & Meszéna, G. (2016) · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199577859.001.0001 · Cited by 86
Increasing modularity when downscaling networks from species to individuals
Tur, C., Olesen, J. M., & Traveset, A. (2014) · Oikos · doi:10.1111/oik.01668 · Cited by 56
“Resource partitioning and niche organization have been suggested as drivers of network modularity in previous studies at the species level (Prado and Lewinsohn 2004, Guimerà et al. 2010).”
BackgroundDrivers of compartmentalization in a Mediterranean pollination network
González, A. M. M., Allesina, S., Rodrigo, A., & Bosch, J. (2012) · Oikos · doi:10.1111/j.1600-0706.2012.20279.x · Cited by 60
Roopnarine, P. D., Angielczyk, K. D., Weik, A. S., & Dineen, A. A. (2018) · Earth-Science Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.earscirev.2018.10.014 · Cited by 56
Quinto, J., Marcos-García, M. Á., Díaz‐Castelazo, C., Rico‐Gray, V., Brustel, H., Galante, E., & Micó, E. (2012) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0045062 · Cited by 55
Plant community stability is associated with a decoupling of prokaryote and fungal soil networks
Zandt, D. I. ‘., Kolaříková, Z., Cajthaml, T., & Münzbergová, Z. (2023) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-023-39464-8 · Cited by 55
“This division likely created separate soil niches for each group 22,23 , leading to enhancedresilienceagainstdisturbancesinthesystem.”
Structure of trophic and mutualistic networks across broad environmental gradients
Welti, E. A. R., & Joern, A. (2014) · Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.1002/ece3.1371 · Cited by 50
“Modularity has been hypothesized to be linked to network size (Olesen et al. 2007), habitat structure (Pimm and Lawton 1980), niche space (Guimer a et al. 2010), trait matching (Joppa and Williams 2013), phylogeny (Rezende et al. 2007), and rate of temperature change (Dalsgaard et al. 2013).”
BackgroundInfluentialAnthropogenic effects are associated with a lower persistence of marine food webs
Gilarranz, L. J., Mora, C., & Bascompte, J. (2016) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms10737 · Cited by 49
Robustness to extinction and plasticity derived from mutualistic bipartite ecological networks
Sheykhali, S., Fernández-Gracia, J., Traveset, A., Ziegler, M., Voolstra, C. R., Duarte, C. M., & Eguı́luz, V. M. (2020) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-020-66131-5 · Cited by 52
Flexible foraging shapes the topology of plant–pollinator interaction networks
Spiesman, B. J., & Gratton, C. (2016) · Ecology · doi:10.1890/15-1735.1 · Cited by 49
“Modularity is thought to result from niche organization and similarity of resource use (Guimerà et al. 2010), which may promote biodiversity through niche partitioning and complementary specialization (Blüthgen and Klein 2011).”
BackgroundEcological network assembly: How the regional metaweb influences local food webs
Saravia, L. A., Marina, T. I., Kristensen, N. P., Troch, M. D., & Momo, F. (2021) · Journal of Animal Ecology · doi:10.1111/1365-2656.13652 · Cited by 46
Kharrazi, A., Fath, B. D., & Katzmair, H. (2016) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su8090935 · Cited by 40
“Recent empirical work conducted on food-webs has confirmed that food webs are more compartmentalized than a null model where species interact with equal probability with other species [76,77,85].”
BackgroundIsland Biogeography of Food Webs
Massol, F., Dubart, M., Calcagno, V., Cazelles, K., Jacquet, C., Kéfi, S., & Gravel, D. (2016) · Advances in ecological research/Advances in Ecological Research · doi:10.1016/bs.aecr.2016.10.004 · Cited by 45
“Thus, the origin of compartmentalization in food webs could be unrelated to a stability/robustness issue, but rather to the niche-based organization of food webs (Guimera et al., 2010).”
BackgroundFood webs: ordering species according to body size yields high degree of intervality.
Zook, A., Eklof, A., Jacob, U., & Allesina, S. (2011) · Journal of Theoretical Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jtbi.2010.11.045 · Cited by 40
Hui, C., Richardson, D. M., Pyšek, P., Roux, J. J. L., Kučera, T., & Jaros̆ı́k, V. (2013) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms3454 · Cited by 40
Emergence of consensus as a modular-to-nested transition in communication dynamics
Borge‐Holthoefer, J., Baños, R. A., Gracia-Lázaro, C., & Moreno, Y. (2017) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep41673 · Cited by 37
“Moreover, the level of turnover in the sequence of data is very informative, as it characterizes how the system renews its structure over time (see the main text).”
BackgroundPredation risk influences food‐web structure by constraining species diet choice
Ho, H., Tylianakis, J. M., Zheng, J. X., & Pawar, S. S. (2019) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1111/ele.13334 · Cited by 35
Assessing the robustness of networks of spatial genetic variation
Albert, E. M., Fortuna, M. A., Godoy, J. A., & Bascompte, J. (2013) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1111/ele.12061 · Cited by 34
“On one hand, ecologists have tried to find evidence for modularity in real ecological networks (Pimm & Lawton 1980; Raffaelli & Hall 1992; Meli an & Bascompte 2004; Olesen et al. 2007; Guimer a et al. 2010).”
BackgroundNuwagaba, S., Zhang, F., & Hui, C. (2015) · Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.2015.0320 · Cited by 34
Trophic Interactions of Turtles in a North Florida Lake Food Web: Prevalence of Omnivory
Aresco, M. J., Travis, J., & MacRae, P. S. D. (2015) · Copeia · doi:10.1643/ce-13-130 · Cited by 33
“…these species can reduce the level of compartmentalization, but there is no loss of stability in the overall food web of the lake because diet switching and the high number of weak trophic interactions dilute the effects of lesser compartmentalization (Motta and Uieda, 2005; Guimera et al., 2010).”
BackgroundRobustness of rigid and adaptive networks to species loss
Nuwagaba, S., Zhang, F., & Hui, C. (2017) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0189086 · Cited by 32
Interactions among anthropogenic effects on aquatic food webs
Kovalenko, K. E. (2019) · Hydrobiologia · doi:10.1007/s10750-019-04018-x · Cited by 32
Food web modularity and biodiversity promote species persistence in polluted environments
Garay‐Narváez, L., Flores, J. D., Arim, M., & Ramos‐Jiliberto, R. (2013) · Oikos · doi:10.1111/j.1600-0706.2013.00764.x · Cited by 32
Ferreira, F. S., Brito, S. V., Almeida, W. D. O., & Alves, R. R. N. (2015) · Regional Environmental Change · doi:10.1007/s10113-015-0767-4 · Cited by 29
“The analysis of interaction networks is a method that has been used to describe patterns in ecological communities through interactions among species (Guimera et al. 2010; Lewinsohn et al. 2006).”
MethodThe heterogeneity–diversity–system performance nexus
Eisenhauer, N., Angst, G., Asato, A. E. B., Beugnon, R., Bönisch, E., Cesarz, S., Dietrich, P., Jurburg, S. D., Madaj, A., Reuben, R. C., et al. (2023) · National Science Review · doi:10.1093/nsr/nwad109 · Cited by 33
“That is, when patterns of species interactions are organized according to spatial heterogeneity in landscapes, disturbances propagate within subsystems of species that interact closely with each other within a patch, but resistance is conveyed to the landscape or system as a whole [63,64].”
BackgroundThe importance of being modular
Sales‐Pardo, M. (2017) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aan8075 · Cited by 29
Self-citationNetwork modularity influences plant reproduction in a mosaic tropical agroecosystem
Saunders, M. E., & Rader, R. (2019) · Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.2019.0296 · Cited by 27
Stable diverse food webs become more common when interactions are more biologically constrained
Gellner, G., McCann, K. S., & Hastings, A. (2023) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2212061120 · Cited by 25
“This model has been found to recreate common empirical findings for network structure across diverse ecosystems but does not introduce compartmentation like the more popular Niche model (41, 42) which we wanted to control for to make the results more comparable to classical random matrix approaches, while still being…”
ResultTrophic structuring of modularity alters energy flow through marine food webs
Eskuche‐Keith, P., Hill, S. L., Hollyman, P. R., Taylor, M. L., & O’Gorman, E. J. (2023) · Frontiers in Marine Science · doi:10.3389/fmars.2022.1046150 · Cited by 24
“Previous research has suggested that the level of diet contiguity in the food web may determine modularity, with modules in some networks displaying trophic clustering such that they encompass a relatively limited range of trophic levels and have low overlap of trophic levels between modules (Guimera et al., 2010; Kor…”
BackgroundQuinto, J., Marcos-García, M. Á., Díaz‐Castelazo, C., Rico‐Gray, V., Galante, E., & Micó, E. (2015) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0122141 · Cited by 25
Detection of structurally homogeneous subsets in graphs
Léger, J.-B., Vacher, C., & Daudin, J. (2013) · Statistics and Computing · doi:10.1007/s11222-013-9395-3 · Cited by 21
Structure, dynamics and stability of a Mediterranean river food web
Peralta‐Maraver, I., López‐Rodríguez, M. J., & de Figueroa, J. M. T. (2016) · Marine and Freshwater Research · doi:10.1071/mf15154 · Cited by 21
Food web aggregation: effects on key positions
Giacomuzzo, E., & Jordán, F. (2021) · Oikos · doi:10.1111/oik.08541 · Cited by 21
DNA metabarcoding reveals broadly overlapping diets in three sympatric North American hummingbirds
Spence, A. R., Rankin, E. W. W., & Tingley, M. (2021) · Ornithology · doi:10.1093/ornithology/ukab074 · Cited by 19
Howe, E. R., Simenstad, C. A., & Ogston, A. S. (2017) · Ecological Applications · doi:10.1002/eap.1600 · Cited by 20
Zetina-Rejón, M. J., Neri, E. C., López‐Ibarra, G. A., Arcos-Huitrón, N. E., & Villy Christensen, A. (2015) · Ecological Modelling · doi:10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2015.07.001 · Cited by 18
“It has been suggested that rophic interaction data may be all that is needed to study compart- entalization processes and reveal food web fragmentation effects Guimerà et al., 2010).”
BackgroundKempf, H. L., Castro, I. O., Dineen, A. A., Tyler, C. L., & Roopnarine, P. D. (2020) · Paleobiology · doi:10.1017/pab.2020.26 · Cited by 18
“…https://doi.org/10.1017/pab.2020.26 Published online by Cambridge University Press accurate, can never be precisely speci fi ed by a single topology (Roopnarine 2006, 2010, 2018; Roopnarine and Dineen 2018), because no food web reconstruction (modern or fossil) can capture all species interactions.”
InfluentialLourenço, P. M., Catry, T., Lopes, R. J., Piersma, T., & Granadeiro, J. P. (2016) · Marine Ecology Progress Series · doi:10.3354/meps11979 · Cited by 16
“Therefore, the resilience of a community will depend on the network of trophic interactions (Guimerà et al. 2010).”
BackgroundKharrazi, A. (2018) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-409548-9.10751-1 · Cited by 16
Trophic hierarchy in a marine community revealed by network analysis on co-occurrence data
Russo, L., Casella, V., Marabotti, A., Jordán, F., Congestri, R., & D’Alelio, D. (2022) · Food Webs · doi:10.1016/j.fooweb.2022.e00246 · Cited by 17
How production networks amplify economic growth
McNerney, J., Savoie, C., Caravelli, F., Carvalho, V. M., & Farmer, J. D. (2021) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2106031118 · Cited by 89
“ure of inter-industry ows. Physica A 392 , 6427{ 6441 (2013). [8] Carvalho, V. M. Aggregate Fluctuations and the Network Structure of Intersectoral Trade . Ph.D. thesis, University of Chicago (2008). [9] Antras, P., Chor, D., Fally, T. & Hillberry, R. Measuring the upstreamness of production and trade ows. America…”
BackgroundA network-based measure of functional diversity in food webs
Lin, W.-H., Lai, S.-M., Davis, A., Liu, W., & Jordán, F. (2022) · Biology Letters · doi:10.1098/rsbl.2022.0183 · Cited by 14
Using network analysis to study and manage human-mediated dispersal of exotic species
Runghen, R., Llopis‐Belenguer, C., McNeill, M. R., Riva, G. V. D., & Stouffer, D. B. (2023) · Biological Invasions · doi:10.1007/s10530-023-03122-3 · Cited by 16
“…measuring the connectance (Olesen and Jordano 2002), nested-ness (Pires et al. 2014) and compartmentalisation or modularity (Bascompte et al. 2003; Guimerà et al. 2010; Newman 2010; Stouffer and Bascompte 2011) of a dispersal vector–site network, we can quantify the likelihood of a site to be…”
BackgroundSelf-citationSpatial compartmentation and food web stability
Mougi, A. (2018) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-018-34716-w · Cited by 14
From robustness to resilience: A network Price identity approach
Dragicevic, A. Z. (2016) · Ecological Complexity · doi:10.1016/j.ecocom.2016.10.002 · Cited by 14
McGarvey, D. J., & Veech, J. A. (2018) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0208720 · Cited by 14
Degree of intervality of food webs: from body-size data to models.
Capitán, J. A., Arenas, A., & Guimerà, R. (2013) · Journal of Theoretical Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jtbi.2013.06.004 · Cited by 12
Self-citationSelecting food web models using normalized maximum likelihood
Staniczenko, P. P. A., Smith, M. J., & Allesina, S. (2014) · Methods in Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.1111/2041-210x.12192 · Cited by 13
“The modular model family is based on the presence of compartments or modules in ecology (Krause et al. 2003; Allesina & Pascual 2009; Rezende et al. 2009; Guimera et al. 2010; Stouffer &Bascompte 2011).”
Li, Y., Chen, Z., Peng, C., Huang, G., Niu, H.-Y., & Zhang, H.-M. (2021) · BMC Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.1186/s12862-021-01865-y · Cited by 11
“(1) Richness, the number of bird species; (2) Shannon–Wiener diversity index and Pielou uniformity index, parameters to measure abundance and heterogeneity, were mainly used in the diversity characteristics of birds [32], (3) Connectance (C), the proportion of realized interactions out of those possible in the network…”
Russo, L., Bellardini, D., Zampicinini, G., Jordán, F., Congestri, R., & D'Alelio, D. (2023) · Marine Ecology · doi:10.1111/maec.12733 · Cited by 11
Interaction patterns within a multi-herbivore assemblage derived from stable isotopes
Miranda, M., Dalerum, F., & Parrini, F. (2014) · Ecological Complexity · doi:10.1016/j.ecocom.2014.08.002 · Cited by 13
Identifying compartments in ecological networks based on energy channels
Zhao, L., Zhang, H., Tian, W., & Xu, X. (2017) · Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.1002/ece3.3648 · Cited by 11
“Most food webs in our study were found to be strongly compartmentalized, in agreement with previous research (Guimera et al., 2010; Krause et al., 2003; Rezende et al., 2009).”
ResultCore–periphery organization of the cryptocurrency market inferred by the modularity operator
Polovnikov, K., Kazakov, V., & Syntulsky, S. (2019) · Physica A Statistical Mechanics and its Applications · doi:10.1016/j.physa.2019.123075 · Cited by 12
Bellisario, B., Cerfolli, F., & Nascetti, G. (2012) · Aquatic Ecology · doi:10.1007/s10452-012-9412-1 · Cited by 12
“Among many, modularity is considered one of the main topological structures often found in many ecological networks (Krause et al. 2003; Olesen et al. 2007; Fortuna et al. 2009; Guimerà et al. 2010).”
BackgroundInfluentialStatistical mechanics of the directed 2-distance minimal dominating set problem
Habibulla, Y. (2020) · Communications in Theoretical Physics · doi:10.1088/1572-9494/aba249 · Cited by 10
Paula, D. P., & Andow, D. A. (2022) · Neotropical Entomology · doi:10.1007/s13744-022-01011-3 · Cited by 10
Ecological network assembly: how the regional metaweb influences local food websPreprint
Saravia, L., Marina, T. I., Kristensen, N., Troch, M. D., & Momo, F. (2018) · bioRxiv · doi:10.1101/340430 · Cited by 47
“Theoretical and empirical results suggest these roles are related to species traits, such as wide niche breadth, environmental tolerance, apex position in local communities and high motility (Rezende et al. 2009, Guimerà et al. 2010, Borthagaray et al. 2014, Kortsch et al. 2015).”
BackgroundMale Visitors May Decrease Modularity in Flower–Visitor Networks
Kishi, S., & Kakutani, T. (2020) · Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.3389/fevo.2020.00124 · Cited by 9
The Use of Ecological Networks as Tools for Understanding and Conserving Marine Biodiversity
Velásquez, V. M., Raimundo, R. L. G., Rosa, R. D. S., & Navia, A. F. (2020) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-58211-1_9 · Cited by 9
Ecological Multilayer Networks: A New Frontier for Network EcologyPreprint
Pilosof, S., Porter, M. A., & Kéfi, S. (2015) · arXiv (Cornell University) · Cited by 9
Unraveling emergent network indeterminacy in complex ecosystems: A random matrix approach
Kawatsu, K. (2024) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2322939121 · Cited by 9
“This should be unsuitable for natural settings, and nonrandom network configurations, such as nest-edness of generalist/specialist species and compartmentalization of interaction webs, are frequently observed in natural ecological communities (51, 52).”
Species coexistence and niche theory
Mittelbach, G. G., & McGill, B. J. (2019) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198835851.003.0008 · Cited by 8
Comparing forest governance models against invasive biological threats
Dragicevic, A. Z. (2018) · Journal of Theoretical Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jtbi.2018.11.014 · Cited by 8
SiMoCo: the viability of a prototype platform for a coastal monitoring system: a case study
Pereira, G. C., de Oliveira, M. M. F., de Andrade, L. P., Espíndola, R. P., van Hecke, K. G., & Ebecken, N. F. F. (2016) · Journal of Marine Science and Technology · doi:10.1007/s00773-016-0380-3 · Cited by 8
Metadata
- Authors
- Guimerà, R., Stouffer, D. B., Sales-Pardo, M., Leicht, E. A., Newman, M. E. J., & Amaral, L. A. N.
- Affiliations
- Northwestern University (US)
- Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (ES)
- University of California, Davis (US)
- University of Michigan (US)
- Corresponding author
- Guimerà, R.
- Venue
- Ecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2010-10
- Volume
- 91
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 2941-2951
- ISSN
- 0012-9658 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-9170
- OpenAlex
- W2133439349
- Cited by
- 201
- References
- 54
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 27 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 33 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 9
- FWCI
- 7.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- hdl.handle.net
- Locations
- Ecology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Oxford University Research Archive (ORA) (University of Oxford) (acceptedVersion)
- Deep Blue (University of Michigan) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation (0804778, 0624318)
- W. M. Keck Foundation
- James S. McDonnell Foundation
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Applied Mathematics › Mathematical and Theoretical Epidemiology and Ecology Models
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Sustainability and Ecological Systems Analysis
- Keywords
- trophic interactions, ecological niche, ecosystem resilience, perturbation response
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Feeding Behavior, Models, Biological, Food Chain
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
