Cited by 795Complex Network Analysis TechniquesMathematical and Theoretical Epidemiology and Ecology ModelsEcology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies

Compartments revealed in food-web structure.

Open access
Krause, Ann E., Frank, Kenneth A., Mason, Doran M., Ulanowicz, Robert E., Taylor, William W.·2003·Nature

Abstract

Compartments in food webs are subgroups of taxa in which many strong interactions occur within the subgroups and few weak interactions occur between the subgroups. Theoretically, compartments increase the stability in networks, such as food webs. Compartments have been difficult to detect in empirical food webs because of incompatible approaches or insufficient methodological rigour. Here we show that a method for detecting compartments from the social networking science identified significant compartments in three of five complex, empirical food webs. Detection of compartments was influenced by food web resolution, such as interactions with weights. Because the method identifies compartmental boundaries in which interactions are concentrated, it is compatible with the definition of compartments. The method is rigorous because it maximizes an explicit function, identifies the number of non-overlapping compartments, assigns membership to compartments, and tests the statistical significance of the results. A graphical presentation reveals systemic relationships and taxa-specific positions as structured by compartments. From this graphic, we explore two scenarios of disturbance to develop a hypothesis for testing how compartmentalized interactions increase stability in food webs.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nature02115

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Compartmentalisation is commonly observed in complex ecological networks and is thought to enhance their stability and persistence.

    “a feature commonly observed in complex ecological networks and thought to enhance their stability and persistence”

    From A Food Web Model of the Serengeti: Stability, Dynamics and Indirect Effects (2026) · cites this paper as Krause et al. 2003

    In “Compartments revealed in food-web structure” (page not provided), the authors report significant compartments in three of five complex empirical food webs and describe a theoretical stabilizing effect. This supports occurrence in some food webs and the proposed link to stability, but not the broader claim that compartmentalisation is commonly observed across complex ecological networks or that it enhances persistence. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Simon, H. A. in General Systems: Yearbook of the Society for General Systems (eds von Bertalanffy, L. & Rapaport, A.) Vol. 10 63-76 (Society for General Systems, Ann Arbor, Michigan, 1965).
  2. Wolff, K. H.) (Free Press, Glencoe, Illinois, 1950).
  3. Wolff, K. (Free Press, Glencoe, Illinois, 1955).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Krause, A. E., Frank, K. A., Mason, D. M., Ulanowicz, R. E., & Taylor, W. W.
Affiliations
  • Michigan State University (US)
  • NOAA Great Lakes Environmental Research Laboratory (US)
Corresponding author
Krause, Ann E.
Venue
Nature
Published
2003-11
Volume
426
Issue
6964
Pages
282-285
ISSN
  • 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4687
OpenAlex
W1985381446
Cited by
795
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 27 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 33 · 2023: 31 · 2022: 57 · 2021: 43 · 2020: 42 · 2019: 57 · 2018: 47 · 2017: 32 · 2016: 36 · 2015: 49 · 2014: 31 · 2013: 37 · 2012: 26
FWCI
13.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Deep Blue (University of Michigan) (submittedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation
  • Great Lakes Fishery Commission
  • Goddard Space Flight Center
  • National Institute of Child Health and Human Development
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Complex Network Analysis Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Mathematical and Theoretical Epidemiology and Ecology Models
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
Keywords
food web structure, network stability, social network analysis, disturbance scenarios
MeSH terms
Algorithms, Animals, Humans, Models, Biological, Social Behavior, United States, Food Chain

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review