The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Anthropogenic resource subsidies decouple predator–prey relationships
Open accessAbstract
The extent to which resource subsidies affect food web dynamics is poorly understood in anthropogenic landscapes. To better understand how species interactions are influenced by subsidies, we studied breeding birds and nest predators along a rural-to-urban landscape gradient that varied in subsidies provided to generalist predators. We hypothesized that resource subsidies in urban landscapes would decouple predator-prey relationships, as predators switch from natural to anthropogenic foods. From 2004 to 2009, we surveyed nest predators and monitored 2942 nests of five songbird species breeding in 19 mature forest stands in Ohio, USA. Eighteen species were video-recorded depredating nests. Numbers of avian and mammalian nest predators were positively associated with the amount of urban development surrounding forests, with the exception of Brown-headed Cowbirds (Molothrus ater). Although nest survival strongly declined with detections of nest predators in rural landscapes, nest survival and predator numbers were unrelated in urban landscapes. Thus, the strength of interaction between breeding birds and nest predators diminished as landscapes surrounding forested parks became more urbanized. Our work suggests that decoupling of predator-prey relationships can arise when synanthropic predators are heavily subsidized by anthropogenic resources. In this way, human drivers can alter, and completely disarticulate, relationships among species that are well established in more natural systems.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Caution Regarding Rules of Thumb for Variance Inflation Factors
O’brien, R. M. (2007) · Quality & Quantity · doi:10.1007/s11135-006-9018-6 · Cited by 11,217
Mesopredator release and avifaunal extinctions in a fragmented system
Crooks, K. R., & Soulé, M. E. (1999) · Nature · doi:10.1038/23028 · Cited by 1,721
Ecological Meltdown in Predator-Free Forest Fragments
Terborgh, J., Lopez, L., Nuñez, P., Rao, M., Shahabuddin, G., Orihuela, G., Riveros, M., Ascanio, R., Adler, G. H., Lambert, T. D., et al. (2001) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1064397 · Cited by 1,656
Food Chain Dynamics: The Central Theory of Ecology?
Fretwell, S. D. (1987) · Oikos · doi:10.2307/3565489 · Cited by 402
Cited by
Behavioural adjustments for a life in the city
Sol, D., Lapiedra, O., & González-Lagos, C. (2013) · Animal Behaviour · doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2013.01.023 · Cited by 729
One strategy does not fit all: determinants of urban adaptation in mammals
Santini, L., González‐Suárez, M., Russo, D., Gonzalez‐Voyer, A., von Hardenberg, A., & Ancillotto, L. (2019) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1111/ele.13199 · Cited by 320
Fischer, J. D., Cleeton, S. H., Lyons, T. P., & Miller, J. R. (2012) · BioScience · doi:10.1525/bio.2012.62.9.6 · Cited by 286
Impact of Land Use Changes and Habitat Fragmentation on the Eco-epidemiology of Tick-Borne Diseases
Diuk-Wasser, M. A., VanAcker, M. C., & Fernandez, M. P. (2021) · Journal of Medical Entomology · doi:10.1093/jme/tjaa209 · Cited by 285
Baumann, C. (2023) · Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences · doi:10.1007/s12520-023-01764-x · Cited by 35
Metadata
- Authors
- Rodewald, A. D., Kearns, L. J., & Shustack, D. P.
- Venue
- Ecological Applications
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2011-04-28
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 936-943
- ISSN
- 1051-0761 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2116048203
- Cited by
- 266
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 6.44
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Anthropogenic resource subsidies decouple predator–prey relationships. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1890/10-0863.1
- The paper
- Rodewald, A. D., Kearns, L. J., & Shustack, D. P. (2011). Anthropogenic resource subsidies decouple predator–prey relationships. Ecological Applications. https://doi.org/10.1890/10-0863.1
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.