The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The community effects of phenotypic and genetic variation within a predator population
Abstract
Natural populations are heterogeneous mixtures of individuals differing in physiology, morphology, and behavior. Despite the ubiquity of phenotypic variation within natural populations, its effects on the dynamics of ecological communities are not well understood. Here, we use a quantitative genetics framework to examine how phenotypic variation in a predator affects the outcome of apparent competition between its two prey species. Classical apparent competition theory predicts that prey have reciprocally negative effects on each other. The addition of phenotypic trait variation in predation can marginalize these negative effects, mediate coexistence, or generate positive indirect effects between the prey species. Long-term coexistence or facilitation, however, can be preceded by long transients of extinction risk whenever the heritability of phenotypic variation is low. Greater heritability can circumvent these ecological transients but also can generate oscillatory and chaotic dynamics. These dramatic changes in ecological outcomes, in the sign of indirect effects, and in stability suggest that studies which ignore intraspecific trait variation may reach fundamentally incorrect conclusions regarding ecological dynamics.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Ecological consequences of genetic diversity
Hughes, A. R., Inouye, B. D., Johnson, M. T. J., Underwood, N., & Vellend, M. (2008) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2008.01179.x · Cited by 1,834
Natural selection and random genetic drift in phenotypic evolution
Lande, R. (1976) · Evolution · doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.1976.tb00911.x · Cited by 1,828
Cited by
The return of the variance: intraspecific variability in community ecology
Violle, C., Enquist, B. J., McGill, B. J., Jiang, L., Albert, C. H., Hulshof, C., Jung, V., & Messier, J. (2012) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2011.11.014 · Cited by 1,768
Animal personalities: consequences for ecology and evolution
Wolf, M., & Weissing, F. J. (2012) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2012.05.001 · Cited by 1,293
The ecological causes of individual specialisation
Araújo, M. S., Bolnick, D. I., & Layman, C. A. (2011) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2011.01662.x · Cited by 1,074
Self-citationIntraspecific trait variation across scales: implications for understanding global change responses
Moran, E. V., Hartig, F., & Bell, D. M. (2016) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/gcb.13000 · Cited by 346
How variation between individuals affects species coexistence
Hart, S. P., Schreiber, S. J., & Levine, J. M. (2016) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1111/ele.12618 · Cited by 316
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Schreiber, S. J., Bürger, R., & Bolnick, D. I.
- Venue
- Ecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2011-08
- Volume
- 92
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1582-1593
- ISSN
- 0012-9658 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2107810237
- Cited by
- 175
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 7.35
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The community effects of phenotypic and genetic variation within a predator population. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1890/10-2071.1
- The paper
- Schreiber, S. J., Bürger, R., & Bolnick, D. I. (2011). The community effects of phenotypic and genetic variation within a predator population. Ecology. https://doi.org/10.1890/10-2071.1
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.