The DOI matches its Crossref record; 55 of the 55 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Mapping the niche space of soil microorganisms using taxonomy and traits
Abstract
The biodiversity of microbial communities has important implications for the stability and functioning of ecosystem processes. Yet, very little is known about the environmental factors that define the microbial niche and how this influences the composition and activity of microbial communities. In this study, we derived niche parameters from physiological response curves that quantified microbial respiration for a diverse collection of soil bacteria and fungi along a soil moisture gradient. On average, soil microorganisms had relatively dry optima (0.3 MPa) and were capable of respiring under low water potentials (−2.0 MPa). Within their limits of activity, microorganisms exhibited a wide range of responses, suggesting that some taxa may be able to coexist by partitioning the moisture niche axis. For example, we identified dry‐adapted generalists that tolerated a broad range of water potentials, along with wet‐adapted specialists with metabolism restricted to less‐negative water potentials. These contrasting ecological strategies had a phylogenetic signal at a coarse taxonomic level (phylum), suggesting that the moisture niche of soil microorganisms is highly conserved. In addition, variation in microbial responses along the moisture gradient was linked to the distribution of several functional traits. In particular, strains that were capable of producing biofilms had drier moisture optima and wider niche breadths. However, biofilm production appeared to come at a cost that was reflected in a prolonged lag time prior to exponential growth, suggesting that there is a trade‐off associated with traits that allow microorganisms to contend with moisture stress. Together, we have identified functional groups of microorganisms that will help predict the structure and functioning of microbial communities under contrasting soil moisture regimes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Naïve Bayesian Classifier for Rapid Assignment of rRNA Sequences into the New Bacterial Taxonomy
Wang, Q., Garrity, G. M., Tiedje, J. M., & Cole, J. R. (2007) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.00062-07 · Cited by 19,885
Flemming, H.-C., & Wingender, J. (2010) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nrmicro2415 · Cited by 10,137
The diversity and biogeography of soil bacterial communities
Fierer, N., & Jackson, R. B. (2006) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0507535103 · Cited by 5,711
Plant Strategies and Vegetation Processes
Grime, J. P. (1979) · Andalas University Repository (Andalas University) · Cited by 5,371
Prokaryotes: The unseen majority
Whitman, W. B., Coleman, D. C., & Wiebe, W. J. (1998) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.95.12.6578 · Cited by 4,871 · cited 2×
“Although microorganisms are the most abundant and diverse taxa on Earth (cf. Whitman et al. 1998, Curtis et al. 2002) and play an important role in the stability and functioning of managed and natural ecosystems (Hashsham et al. 2000, Bell et al. 2005), ecologists are only beginning to understand…”
BackgroundPhylogenies and Community Ecology
Webb, C. O., Ackerly, D. D., McPeek, M. A., & Donoghue, M. J. (2002) · Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.33.010802.150448 · Cited by 4,609
Soil bacterial and fungal communities across a pH gradient in an arable soil
Rousk, J., Bååth, E., Brookes, P. C., Lauber, C. L., Lozupone, C., Caporaso, J. G., Knight, R., & Fierer, N. (2010) · The ISME Journal · doi:10.1038/ismej.2010.58 · Cited by 4,223
MICROBIAL STRESS-RESPONSE PHYSIOLOGY AND ITS IMPLICATIONS FOR ECOSYSTEM FUNCTION
Schimel, J., Balser, T. C., & Wallenstein, M. (2007) · Ecology · doi:10.1890/06-0219 · Cited by 3,045
Soil microbiology and biochemistry
(1989) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.26-6277 · Cited by 2,931
Niche Conservatism: Integrating Evolution, Ecology, and Conservation Biology
Wiens, J. J., & Graham, C. H. (2005) · Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.36.102803.095431 · Cited by 2,615
Cited by
Microbiomes in light of traits: a phylogenetic perspective
Martiny, J. B. H., Jones, S. E., Lennon, J. T., & Martiny, A. C. (2015) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aac9323 · Cited by 834
Self-citationFungal traits that drive ecosystem dynamics on land
Treseder, K. K., & Lennon, J. T. (2015) · Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews · doi:10.1128/mmbr.00001-15 · Cited by 625
Self-citationFuchslueger, L., Bahn, M., Fritz, K., Hasibeder, R., & Richter, A. (2014) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/nph.12569 · Cited by 369
Resilience vs. historical contingency in microbial responses to environmental change
Hawkes, C. V., & Keitt, T. H. (2015) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1111/ele.12451 · Cited by 289
Trait‐based approach to bacterial growth efficiency
Muscarella, M. E., Howey, X. M., & Lennon, J. T. (2020) · Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1111/1462-2920.15120 · Cited by 30
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Lennon, J. T., Aanderud, Z. T., Lehmkuhl, B. K., & Schoolmaster, D. R.
- Venue
- Ecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2012-08
- Volume
- 93
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1867-1879
- ISSN
- 0012-9658 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-9170
- OpenAlex
- W2164641345
- Cited by
- 435
- References
- 55
- FWCI
- 22.82
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Mapping the niche space of soil microorganisms using taxonomy and traits. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1890/11-1745.1
- The paper
- Lennon, J. T., Aanderud, Z. T., Lehmkuhl, B. K., & Schoolmaster, D. R. (2012). Mapping the niche space of soil microorganisms using taxonomy and traits. Ecology. https://doi.org/10.1890/11-1745.1
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.