The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Latent resilience in ponderosa pine forest: effects of resumed frequent fire
Open accessAbstract
Ecological systems often exhibit resilient states that are maintained through negative feedbacks. In ponderosa pine forests, fire historically represented the negative feedback mechanism that maintained ecosystem resilience; fire exclusion reduced that resilience, predisposing the transition to an alternative ecosystem state upon reintroduction of fire. We evaluated the effects of reintroduced frequent wildfire in unlogged, fire‐excluded, ponderosa pine forest in the Bob Marshall Wilderness, Montana, USA. Initial reintroduction of fire in 2003 reduced tree density and consumed surface fuels, but also stimulated establishment of a dense cohort of lodgepole pine, maintaining a trajectory toward an alternative state. Resumption of a frequent fire regime by a second fire in 2011 restored a low‐density forest dominated by large‐diameter ponderosa pine by eliminating many regenerating lodgepole pines and by continuing to remove surface fuels and small‐diameter lodgepole pine and Douglas‐fir that established during the fire suppression era. Our data demonstrate that some unlogged, fire‐excluded, ponderosa pine forests possess latent resilience to reintroduced fire. A passive model of simply allowing lightning‐ignited fires to burn appears to be a viable approach to restoration of such forests.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Using Fire to Increase the Scale, Benefits, and Future Maintenance of Fuels Treatments
North, M., Collins, B. M., & Stephens, S. (2012) · Journal of Forestry · doi:10.5849/jof.12-021 · Cited by 317
Cited by
Halofsky, J. E., Peterson, D. L., & Harvey, B. J. (2020) · Fire Ecology · doi:10.1186/s42408-019-0062-8 · Cited by 640
Adapting western North American forests to climate change and wildfires: 10 common questions
Prichard, S. J., Hessburg, P. F., Hagmann, R. K., Povak, N. A., Dobrowski, S. Z., Hurteau, M. D., Kane, V. R., Keane, R. E., Kobziar, L. N., Kolden, C. A., et al. (2021) · Ecological Applications · doi:10.1002/eap.2433 · Cited by 336
Self-citationClimate, Environment, and Disturbance History Govern Resilience of Western North American Forests
Hessburg, P. F., Miller, C. L., Parks, S. A., Povak, N. A., Taylor, A. H., Higuera, P. E., Prichard, S. J., North, M. P., Collins, B. M., Hurteau, M. D., et al. (2019) · Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.3389/fevo.2019.00239 · Cited by 308
Self-citationPost-fire vegetation and fuel development influences fire severity patterns in reburns
Coppoletta, M., Merriam, K. E., & Collins, B. M. (2016) · Ecological Applications · doi:10.1890/15-0225 · Cited by 295
Tree regeneration following wildfires in the western US: a review
Stevens-Rumann, C. S., & Morgan, P. (2019) · Fire Ecology · doi:10.1186/s42408-019-0032-1 · Cited by 278
Metadata
- Authors
- Larson, A. J., Belote, R. T., Cansler, C. A., Parks, S. A., & Dietz, M. S.
- Venue
- Ecological Applications
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2013-09
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1243-1249
- ISSN
- 1051-0761 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-5582
- OpenAlex
- W1999751747
- Cited by
- 159
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 11.84
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Latent resilience in ponderosa pine forest: effects of resumed frequent fire. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1890/13-0066.1
- The paper
- Larson, A. J., Belote, R. T., Cansler, C. A., Parks, S. A., & Dietz, M. S. (2013). Latent resilience in ponderosa pine forest: effects of resumed frequent fire. Ecological Applications. https://doi.org/10.1890/13-0066.1
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.