CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 12

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Spatial variation in life‐history trade‐offs results in an ideal free distribution in Black Brant Geese

Nicolai, Christopher A., Sedinger, James S., Ward, David H., Boyd, W. Sean·2014·Ecology
DOI 10.1890/13-0860.1
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Ideal free distribution theory predicts that individuals distribute themselves so fitness is equal among patches. In this paper we evaluate all components of adult fitness to assess the hypothesis that individuals distribute themselves among seven brood‐rearing areas so that trade‐offs among different life history traits result in equal mean fitness among individuals using different areas. We used estimates of vital rates (clutch size, nest survival, pre‐fledging survival, post‐fledging survival, juvenile survival, and breeding probability) to estimate brood‐rearing‐area‐specific per capita recruitment rates and survival for adult females. We summed brood‐rearing‐area‐specific per capita recruitment and adult survival to calculate brood‐rearing‐area‐specific estimates of λ. We found little variation in λ among brood‐rearing areas and lifetime fitness implications of changing brood‐rearing area were negligible (<1% brood‐rearing area mean fitness). We conclude that adult female Black Brant distribute themselves in an ideal free manner, resulting in equal fitness among females using these areas.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1890/13-0860.1

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • These three versions of IDMs have been applied to many different species and circumstances to develop predictions for how non-human and human organisms should distribute themselves across a landscape.

    “These three versions of ideal distribution models (IDMs) have been applied to many different species and circumstances to develop predictions for how non-human (Hendrickx, Palmer, and Travis 2013;McNickle and Brown 2014;Nicolai et al. 2014) and human (Disma, Sokolowski, and Tonneau 2011;Moritz et al. 2014aMoritz et al. , 2015Moritz et al. , 2014b;;Morris and Kingston 2002) organisms should”

    From The Ideal Distribution Model and Archaeological Settlement Patterning (2022) · cites this paper as Nicolai et al. 2014

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 48

  1. 10.2307/3808363 · DOI
  2. Barker R. J, 2001, Wildlife, land, and people: priorities for the 21st century. Proceedings of the Second International Wildlife Management Congress, 361
  3. 10.1086/382547 · DOI
  4. Burnham K. P, 2002, Model selection and multimodel inference: a practical information-theoretic approach. Second edition
  5. 10.1046/j.1365-2656.2002.00619.x · DOI
  6. 10.1890/04-1551 · DOI
  7. 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2007.01352.x · DOI
  8. 10.1007/s004420050851 · DOI
  9. 10.1007/BF00321202 · DOI
  10. 10.1098/rspb.2005.3357 · DOI
  11. 10.1086/506970 · DOI
  12. 10.1111/j.1600-0706.2010.17845.x · DOI
  13. Flint P. L, 1993, Prefledging survival and reproductive strategies in Black Brant
  14. 10.1007/BF01601953 · DOI · Paper page
  15. 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.31.1.367 · DOI · Paper page
  16. 10.1006/anbe.1994.1064 · DOI
  17. 10.1098/rspb.2006.3659 · DOI
  18. 10.1111/j.2006.0908-8857.03712.x · DOI
  19. 10.1023/A:1006527305773 · DOI
  20. 10.1098/rspb.1999.0828 · DOI
  21. 10.2307/2937171 · DOI
  22. 10.1111/j.1600-048X.2012.05715.x · DOI
  23. 10.2307/4089202 · DOI
  24. 10.1046/j.1365-2656.1999.00325.x · DOI
  25. 10.1086/422660 · DOI
  26. 10.1111/j.1365-2656.2012.01953.x · DOI
  27. 10.1111/j.1365-2656.2012.01952.x · DOI
  28. 10.1007/s00442-003-1197-4 · DOI
  29. 10.1016/j.anbehav.2005.09.014 · DOI
  30. 10.1650/0010-5422(2007)109[949:AVODPU]2.0.CO;2 · DOI
  31. 10.2307/2532908 · DOI
  32. 10.1086/409852 · DOI
  33. 10.1098/rspb.2011.0026 · DOI
  34. Reed A, 1998, The birds of North America
  35. 10.1177/0013164498058002005 · DOI
  36. SAS Institute, 2004, Version 9. SAS Institute
  37. 10.1111/j.1365-2656.2008.01403.x · DOI
  38. 10.2307/2265816 · DOI
  39. 10.1642/0004-8038(2001)118[1088:LSVIGO]2.0.CO;2 · DOI
  40. 10.1642/0004-8038(2004)121[0068:EEAROB]2.0.CO;2 · DOI
  41. Sedinger J. S, 1993, Current status and recent dynamics of the Black Brant breeding population, Wildfowl, 44, 49
  42. 10.2307/4089076 · DOI
  43. 10.2307/4089410 · DOI
  44. 10.2193/2005-768 · DOI
  45. 10.1086/284547 · DOI
  46. 10.1650/7387 · DOI
  47. Wilson H. M, 2012, Aerial photographic survey of brant colonies on the Yukon-Kuskokwim Delta, Alaska, 2012
  48. 10.1093/beheco/14.3.433 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Nicolai, C. A., Sedinger, J. S., Ward, D. H., & Boyd, W. S.
Venue
Ecology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2014-05
Volume
95
Issue
5
Pages
1323-1331
ISSN
  • 0012-9658
  • 1939-9170
DOI
10.1890/13-0860.1
Cited by
12
References
0
Language
en
Licence
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor (vor)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review