The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
More than the sum of the parts: forest climate response from joint species distribution models
Abstract
The perceived threat of climate change is often evaluated from species distribution models that are fitted to many species independently and then added together. This approach ignores the fact that species are jointly distributed and limit one another. Species respond to the same underlying climatic variables, and the abundance of any one species can be constrained by competition; a large increase in one is inevitably linked to declines of others. Omitting this basic relationship explains why responses modeled independently do not agree with the species richness or basal areas of actual forests. We introduce a joint species distribution modeling approach (JSDM), which is unique in three ways, and apply it to forests of eastern North America. First, it accommodates the joint distribution of species. Second, this joint distribution includes both abundance and presence–absence data. We solve the common issue of large numbers of zeros in abundance data by accommodating zeros in both stem counts and basal area data, i.e., a new approach to zero inflation. Finally, inverse prediction can be applied to the joint distribution of predictions to integrate the role of climate risks across all species and identify geographic areas where communities will change most (in terms of changes in abundance) with climate change. Application to forests in the eastern United States shows that climate can have greatest impact in the Northeast, due to temperature, and in the Upper Midwest, due to temperature and precipitation. Thus, these are the regions experiencing the fastest warming and are also identified as most responsive at this scale.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Pearson, R. G., & Dawson, T. P. (2003) · Global Ecology and Biogeography · doi:10.1046/j.1466-822x.2003.00042.x · Cited by 4,252
Cited by
So Many Variables: Joint Modeling in Community Ecology
Warton, D. I., Blanchet, F. G., O’Hara, R. B., Ovaskainen, O., Taskinen, S., Walker, S. C., & Hui, F. K. C. (2015) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2015.09.007 · Cited by 854
Clark, J. S., Iverson, L., Woodall, C. W., Allen, C. D., Bell, D. M., Bragg, D. C., D'Amato, A. W., Davis, F. W., Hersh, M. H., Ibanez, I., et al. (2016) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/gcb.13160 · Cited by 606
Self-citationJoint Species Distribution Modelling: With Applications in R
Ovaskainen, O., & Abrego, N. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108591720 · Cited by 394
Intraspecific trait variation across scales: implications for understanding global change responses
Moran, E. V., Hartig, F., & Bell, D. M. (2016) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/gcb.13000 · Cited by 346
Clark, J. S., Nemergut, D., Seyednasrollah, B., Turner, P. J., & Zhang, S. (2017) · Ecological Monographs · doi:10.1002/ecm.1241 · Cited by 283
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Clark, J. S., Gelfand, A. E., Woodall, C. W., & Zhu, K.
- Venue
- Ecological Applications
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2014-07
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 990-999
- ISSN
- 1051-0761 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-5582
- OpenAlex
- W2123127253
- Cited by
- 247
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 10.90
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: More than the sum of the parts: forest climate response from joint species distribution models. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1890/13-1015.1
- The paper
- Clark, J. S., Gelfand, A. E., Woodall, C. W., & Zhu, K. (2014). More than the sum of the parts: forest climate response from joint species distribution models. Ecological Applications. https://doi.org/10.1890/13-1015.1
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.