Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 382

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 37 of the 37 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Environmental flows for natural, hybrid, and novel riverine ecosystems in a changing world

Open access
Acreman, Mike, Arthington, Angela H, Colloff, Matthew J, Couch, Carol, Crossman, Neville D, Dyer, Fiona, Overton, Ian, Pollino, Carmel A, Stewardson, Michael J, Young, William·2014·Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment

Abstract

The term “environmental flows” describes the quantities, quality, and patterns of water flows required to sustain freshwater and estuarine ecosystems and the ecosystem services they provide. Environmental flows may be achieved in a number of different ways, most of which are based on either (1) limiting alterations from the natural flow baseline to maintain biodiversity and ecological integrity or (2) designing flow regimes to achieve specific ecological and ecosystem service outcomes. We argue that the former practice is more applicable to natural and semi‐natural rivers where the primary objective and opportunity is ecological conservation. The latter “designer” approach is better suited to modified and managed rivers where return to natural conditions is no longer feasible and the objective is to maximize natural capital as well as support economic growth, recreation, or cultural history. This permits elements of ecosystem design and adaptation to environmental change. In a future characterized by altered climates and intensive regulation, where hybrid and novel aquatic ecosystems predominate, the designer approach may be the only feasible option. This conclusion stems from a lack of natural ecosystems from which to draw analogs and the need to support broader socioeconomic benefits and valuable configurations of natural and social capital.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1890/130134

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 37 references

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. Booker DJ, 2004, Habitat assessment at the catchment scale: application to the River Itchen, UK, Hydrology: science and practice for the 21st century, vol II, Proceedings of the British Hydrological Society International Conference; 12–16 Jul 2004; London, UK
  2. Davies PE, 2012, Sustainable rivers audit 2: the ecological health of rivers in the Murray–Darling Basin at the end of the Millennium Drought (2008–2010). Vol 1
  3. 10.1002/hyp.5665 · doi:10.1002/hyp.5665
  4. Kendy E, 2012, A practical guide to environmental flows for policy and planning, with nine case studies from the United States
  5. King JM, 2000, Environmental flow assessments for rivers: manual for the Building Block Methodology
  6. 10.1002/aqc.2281 · doi:10.1002/aqc.2281
  7. 10.1080/02626667.2013.843777 · doi:10.1080/02626667.2013.843777

Cited by

See all 382

Metadata

Authors
Acreman, M., Arthington, A. H., Colloff, M. J., Couch, C., Crossman, N. D., Dyer, F., Overton, I., Pollino, C. A., Stewardson, M. J., & Young, W.
Venue
Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2014-08-26
Volume
12
Issue
8
Pages
466-473
ISSN
  • 1540-9295 (ISSN-L)
  • 1540-9309
OpenAlex
W2156113027
Cited by
382
References
37
FWCI
27.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Environmental flows for natural, hybrid, and novel riverine ecosystems in a changing world. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1890/130134
The paper
Acreman, M., Arthington, A. H., Colloff, M. J., Couch, C., Crossman, N. D., Dyer, F., Overton, I., Pollino, C. A., Stewardson, M. J., & Young, W. (2014). Environmental flows for natural, hybrid, and novel riverine ecosystems in a changing world. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment. https://doi.org/10.1890/130134

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.