Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 180

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Low‐severity fire increases tree defense against bark beetle attacks

Hood, Sharon, Sala, Anna, Heyerdahl, Emily K., Boutin, Marion·2015·Ecology

Abstract

Induced defense is a common plant strategy in response to herbivory. Although abiotic damage, such as physical wounding, pruning, and heating, can induce plant defense, the effect of such damage by large‐scale abiotic disturbances on induced defenses has not been explored and could have important consequences for plant survival facing future biotic disturbances. Historically, low‐severity wildfire was a widespread, frequent abiotic disturbance in many temperate coniferous forests. Native Dendroctonus and Ips bark beetles are also a common biotic disturbance agent in these forest types and can influence tree mortality patterns after wildfire. Therefore, species living in these disturbance‐prone environments with strategies to survive both frequent fire and bark beetle attack should be favored. One such example is Pinus ponderosa forests of western North America. These forests are susceptible to bark beetle attack and frequent, low‐severity fire was common prior to European settlement. However, since the late 1800s, frequent, low‐severity fires have greatly decreased in these forests. We hypothesized that non‐lethal, low‐severity, wildfire induces resin duct defense in P. ponderosa and that lack of low‐severity fire relaxes resin duct defense in forests dependent on frequent, low‐severity fire. We first compared axial resin duct traits between trees that either survived or died from bark beetle attacks. Next, we studied axial ducts using tree cores with crossdated chronologies in several natural P. ponderosa stands before and after an individual wildfire and, also, before and after an abrupt change in fire frequency in the 20th century. We show that trees killed by bark beetles invested less in resin ducts relative to trees that survived attack, suggesting that resin duct‐related traits provide resistance against bark beetles. We then show low‐severity fire induces resin duct production, and finally, that resin duct production declines when fire ceases. Our results demonstrate that low‐severity fire can trigger a long‐lasting induced defense that may increase tree survival from subsequent herbivory.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1890/14-0487.1

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 180

Metadata

Authors
Hood, S., Sala, A., Heyerdahl, E. K., & Boutin, M.
Venue
Ecology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2015-07
Volume
96
Issue
7
Pages
1846-1855
ISSN
  • 0012-9658 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-9170
OpenAlex
W2102783198
Cited by
180
References
2
FWCI
11.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Low‐severity fire increases tree defense against bark beetle attacks. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1890/14-0487.1
The paper
Hood, S., Sala, A., Heyerdahl, E. K., & Boutin, M. (2015). Low‐severity fire increases tree defense against bark beetle attacks. Ecology. https://doi.org/10.1890/14-0487.1

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.