Landscape fragmentation, severe drought, and the new Amazon forest fire regime
Abstract
Changes in weather and land use are transforming the spatial and temporal characteristics of fire regimes in Amazonia, with important effects on the functioning of dense (i.e., closed‐canopy), open‐canopy, and transitional forests across the Basin. To quantify, document, and describe the characteristics and recent changes in forest fire regimes, we sampled 6 million ha of these three representative forests of the eastern and southern edges of the Amazon using 24 years (1983–2007) of satellite‐derived annual forest fire scar maps and 16 years of monthly hot pixel information (1992–2007). Our results reveal that changes in forest fire regime properties differentially affected these three forest types in terms of area burned and fire scar size, frequency, and seasonality. During the study period, forest fires burned 15% (0.3 million ha), 44% (1 million ha), and 46% (0.6 million ha) of dense, open, and transitional forests, respectively. Total forest area burned and fire scar size tended to increase over time (even in years of average rainfall in open canopy and transitional forests). In dense forests, most of the temporal variability in fire regime properties was linked to El Nino Southern Oscillation (ENSO)‐related droughts. Compared with dense forests, transitional and open forests experienced fires twice as frequently, with at least 20% of these forests' areas burning two or more times during the 24‐year study period. Open and transitional forests also experienced higher deforestation rates than dense forests. During drier years, the end of the dry season was delayed by about a month, which resulted in larger burn scars and increases in overall area burned later in the season. These observations suggest that climate‐mediated forest flammability is enhanced by landscape fragmentation caused by deforestation, as observed for open and transitional forests in the Eastern portion of the Amazon Basin.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
New fire regimes are burning larger forest areas, emitting more carbon to the atmosphere and forcing IPLCs to readapt.
“As a result, new fire regimes are burning larger forest areas43, emitting more carbon to the atmosphere44 and forcing IPLCs to readapt45.”
From Critical transitions in the Amazon forest system (2024) · cites this paper as [43]
Cites
Estimated carbon dioxide emissions from tropical deforestation improved by carbon-density maps
Baccini, A., Goetz, S. J., Walker, W. S., Laporte, N. T., Sun, M., Sulla-Menashe, D., Hackler, J., Beck, P. S. A., Dubayah, R., Friedl, M. A., et al. (2012) · Nature Climate Change · doi:10.1038/nclimate1354 · Cited by 1,788 · see citing works
Broadbent, E. N., Asner, G. P., Keller, M., Knapp, D. E., Oliveira, P. J. C., & Silva, J. N. (2008) · Biological Conservation · doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2008.04.024 · Cited by 582 · see citing works
Self-citationBowman, M. S., Soares-Filho, B. S., Merry, F. D., Nepstad, D. C., Rodrigues, H., & Almeida, O. T. (2012) · Land Use Policy · doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2011.09.009 · Cited by 282 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Forest health and global change
Trumbore, S., Brando, P., & Hartmann, H. (2015) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aac6759 · Cited by 1,042 · see citing works
Self-citationCritical transitions in the Amazon forest system
Flores, B. M., Montoya, E., Sakschewski, B., Nascimento, N., Staal, A., Betts, R. A., Levis, C., Lapola, D. M., Esquível-Muelbert, A., Jakovac, C., et al. (2024) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-023-06970-0 · Cited by 607 · see citing works
Kirsch, G., Araujo, R. M. G., Melo, M. S., Nazari, E. M., & Figueiredo, B. R. S. (2025) · Chemosphere · doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2025.144756 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
- Authors
- Alencar, A. A., Brando, P. M., Asner, G. P., & Putz, F. E.
- Affiliations
- Instituto de Pesquisa Ambiental da Amazônia (BR)
- Carnegie Institution for Science (US)
- University of Florida (US)
- Corresponding author
- Alencar, Ane A.
- Venue
- Ecological Applications
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2015-09
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1493-1505
- ISSN
- 1051-0761 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-5582
- OpenAlex
- W2168411714
- Cited by
- 280
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 17 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 31 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 38 · 2021: 34 · 2020: 33 · 2019: 25 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 27 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 5
- FWCI
- 16.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Ecological Applications (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Fire effects on ecosystems
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics
- Keywords
- forest fire regimes, Amazon rainforest, landscape fragmentation, drought, ENSO, deforestation, fire seasonality, fire frequency, forest flammability, open-canopy forests, transitional forest, dense forest, fire scars
- MeSH terms
- Conservation of Natural Resources, Fires, Models, Theoretical, Time Factors, Droughts, Forests
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review